Social psychology – Lesson 3

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G544 DEBATES: Determinism vs Freewill
Advertisements

Unit 3: Obedience and Conformity
Persuading a Jury: Optional H/W from last lesson: What effect does the order in which testimony is presented have on persuading a jury? (10) JUN 11.
Clinical Psychology Leaflet Task
ETHNOCENTRISM DEBATES SEC B G544. WHAT IS ETHNOCENTRISM? The original meaning of ethnocentrism is a belief in the superiority of one’s own group (ethnic.
Evaluating cultural variations in attachment
Structures, Strategies and Compositions Lesson 9 Speed – Width – Variation - Creativity.
What makes a strong central claim? Choose any topic, and write out a claim that you believe is strong and arguable. Entry Task Today you’ll need: Spring.
1. Individual research into a chosen issue from the Modern Studies course. 2. Presentation of your findings in an appropriate way.
Would People Still Obey Today?
Obedience.
Structures, Strategies and Compositions Lesson 10 Evaluating for improvement Future development needs.
Topic 2 – Cognitive Psychology
Recap Acoustically similar? Example? Semantically similar? Example? Brief outline of Baddeley’s procedure What was found? What does this tell us about.
Welcome. Recap! What did we discuss last session? - An organisations main goals - Private sector - Government sector - Charitable trusts - Functions within.
Lesson Objective: To be able to evaluate the costs and benefits of developing Brownfield sites.
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Social Psychology – Lesson 4
Social Psychology – Lesson 4
Topic 2 – Cognitive Psychology
Topic 2 – Cognitive Psychology
Social psychology – Lesson 3
Internal exam paper 1 Feedback.
Contemporary study for schizophrenia
Sampling Techniques.
November test feedback
Social Psychology – Key Question
Would People Still Obey Today?
Milgram Experiment.
Social Psychology – Key Question
Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker
Methods – use of case studies
Methods – use of case studies
Social Psychology Classic Study
Lesson Two – Evaluation of the Four Ds of diagnosis
Topic 2 – Cognitive Psychology
G544 DEBATES: Determinism vs Freewill
RECAP Whiteboard relay… Outline and evaluate Milgram’s original obedience study (12)
Ethical issues in Research
Ethical costs of conducting research in Psychology
How far can social-psychological factors of obedience explain why an normal person could push someone to their death today?
Social Influence Asch (1951).
Social influence Asch(1951).
Social Influence Explanations of resistance to social influence, including social support and locus of control.
Obedience Today.
UNIT 3 Crime and Punishment.
Ethical costs of conducting research in Psychology
In your packs.... Two pieces of Learner work. Note: based on live examples Unit Specification Marking Sheet (blank) Standardisation Activity Unit.
Methodology of the Behaviourist Approach
Social Influence Types of conformity.
Social Influence Mini Mock
Title: Anderson and Dill (2000): Video games and aggression.
Wallboards What were the results of Asch’s Original study?
Obedience: Milgram’s Research
Andrade Quick Notes.
IS THE RESEARCH MEASURING WHAT IT AIMED TO MEASURE?
Conformity Lesson 2.
Title: Charlton et al (2000): St Helena study. Date: 28th June 2017

ETHICS in Psychological Experiments
Key Study: Yuki’s Emoticon Study (2007)
Bee Study: von Frisch.
Aim: Students will be able to better their understanding of research methods Do Now: Take out your worksheet from yesterday and answer the remaining questions.
Unit 7: The Great Depression
1. Write your current claim on a notecard.
Learning Objective: to evaluate the Humanistic Approach
Evaluate Question: Introduction: Yes! This was successful/important! .
CCJ10 Introduction to Forensic Psychology
AS Psychology Research Methods
Clinical Psychology Leaflet Task
Presentation transcript:

Social psychology – Lesson 3 Mini Debate (Milgram) and Milgram’s three variations

Milgram quiz Where did the study take place? How many participants took part? How were the participants recruited? How much were they paid? Participants were misled by Milgram – what were they told the study was about? What was the task the participant took part in? What signs of distress did the participants show? How many went up to 300V? How many went up to 450V? Why could this result be seen as useful to society?

Ethics mini debate – The trial! Group one Milgram and his confederates (Defence) You believe you can justify your decisions. Why did Milgram deceive his participants? Did he provide the right to withdraw? Did he harm the participant? What did he do to ensure there were no lasting problems? Group two Ethical board (Prosecution) You believe what took place in Yale was unacceptable What did Milgram do that was unethical? Why is this a problem?

Milgram’s variations After the original study Milgram conducted various variations of basic study. For this course we are going to be focussing on three of his variations. You will need to have to be able to describe each variation and provide evaluation points for each variation. Quick variations puzzle! Once you have matched up the pieces – discuss the differences between the variations and the original study Take a photo! Why did Milgram change his basic study?

Milgram on his variations (different conditions) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HcMWlnTtFQ 38 minutes until 44 minutes

Milgram’s variations – H/W 1. Use the worksheet to write up your APRC on each variation Evaluation A03 – Using the documents on the learning space provide evaluation points on each variation. Provide strengths and weaknesses.

Variation – Evaluation (resources on learning space) Strengths Weaknesses Rundown office variation Telephonic Instructions variation Ordinary man variation

Evaluate Milgram’s original study (8)

How to write out evaluation: In an evaluation essay: A03- Evaluation A01 - Description Point – which evaluation point are you going to use? Evidence – examples from study (this is description and is A01) Comment – so what?

How to write out evaluation: In an evaluation essay: A03- Evaluation A01 - Description Point – which evaluation point are you going to use? Evidence – examples from study (this is description and is A01) Comment – so what?

Evaluation Question (8 marks) Balanced argument coming to a judgement Therefore Weakness Strength Conclusion Always using PEC

Evaluate Milgram’s original study (8) Please complete Take a few minutes to plan Time – 10 minutes (or extra if ET)