Development Test Overview Test Stage Dates Major Test Events Decision Supported Planned Completed Analysis Test & Analysis Test Proven DT-1A MS B DT-1B DT-IIA Total Test Point Burn Down Program Plan MS C Current Test Results and Bottom-Line on Progress to Plan “System capabilities demonstrated as marginal, DT assessment to meet COIs assessed as moderate risk” Release / Classification Statement

Progress on CTPs and TPMs CTPs Threshold Status Path Forward Decision Supported CTP1 XXXXX ISE prior to IOT&E IOT&E cert CTP2 XXXXX Tested CDR CTP3 XXXXX Spiral upgrade (Block 5) N/A CTP4 XXXXX ISE prior to IOT&E IOT&E cert CTP5 XXXXX Post IOT&E upgrade FRP before IOC, SW drop 1.1 “Based on the DT accomplished to date, the RTO has identified no critical deficiencies impacting Warfighter needs”

DT Assessment of KPPs DT Assessment CDD/CPD KPPs KPP #1: Range KPP #2: Payload KPP #3: etc KPP #4: etc DT Assessment Y G COI 1 – MFHBCF requirements not met, will increase mx activity and reduce aircraft availability. COI 2 – Mission Planning hampered by insufficient processing capability. COI 3 – Infil / Exfil capability degraded by limitations in RF threat detection and jamming. COI 4 – Terminal / Objective area operations degraded by flight director coupled mode limitations.

DT Assessment of COIs TEMP COIs DT Assessment COI 1: Can the XXX effectively execute offensive air support missions in the intended environment? COI 2: Can XX mission preparation and preflight operations enable operational missions? COI 3: Etc COI 4: Etc DT Assessment Y Y COI 1 – MFHBCF requirements not met, will increase mx activity and reduce aircraft availability. COI 2 – Mission Planning hampered by insufficient processing capability. COI 3 – Infil / Exfil capability degraded by limitations in RF threat detection and jamming. COI 4 – Terminal / Objective area operations degraded by flight director coupled mode limitations. Y G

Top-Level Risks for Test Risk: FoS / SoS Drivers: Mitigation: Date: Risk: Performance Drivers: Mitigation: Date: 5 4 Risk: Test Resources Drivers: Mitigation: Date: Risk: Concurrency Drivers: Mitigation: Date: Likelihood (y) 3 2 1 Risk: KPP Drivers: Mitigation: Date: Risk: Schedule Drivers: Mitigation: Date: 1 2 3 4 5 Consequence (x) High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk

DT Test Summary Responsible Test Organization Conclusions, Observations, Strengths, Weaknesses, Recommendations Program on track to resolve issues prior that would prevent successful entry into low-rate production CTPs have been met DRs are being addressed/resolved KPP # 4 currently not met, but impact to mission is low Recommend program enter Low-rate Initial Production PM Assessment “System Currently Provides Marginal Utility, Program on Path to Achieve Military Needs” “Recommend Program Continue to Next Test Phase”

BACKUPS

COI 1: Can the XXX effectively execute offensive air support missions in the intended environment DT&E Assessment – High Risk Part 1 Deficiency Reports not resolved prior to IOT&E Report # XXX – Report # YYY – Critical weapons characterization testing not performed during DT&E Lack of data to make an assessment prior to IOT&E COI 1 – MFHBCF requirements not met, will increase mx activity and reduce aircraft availability. COI 2 – Mission Planning hampered by insufficient processing capability. COI 3 – Infil / Exfil capability degraded by limitations in RF threat detection and jamming. COI 4 – Terminal / Objective area operations degraded by flight director coupled mode limitations.

COI 2: Will the XXX training support system operation and maintenance by typical users? DT&E Assessment – Low Risk Training Systems Plan has been approved Initial cadre crew training is complete COI 1 – MFHBCF requirements not met, will increase mx activity and reduce aircraft availability. COI 2 – Mission Planning hampered by insufficient processing capability. COI 3 – Infil / Exfil capability degraded by limitations in RF threat detection and jamming. COI 4 – Terminal / Objective area operations degraded by flight director coupled mode limitations.

COI 3: Etc DT&E Assessment – COI 1 – MFHBCF requirements not met, will increase mx activity and reduce aircraft availability. COI 2 – Mission Planning hampered by insufficient processing capability. COI 3 – Infil / Exfil capability degraded by limitations in RF threat detection and jamming. COI 4 – Terminal / Objective area operations degraded by flight director coupled mode limitations.

DT Assessment of Requirement Shortfalls Rating Explanation KPP 1 - Environmental Protection Describe test phase CTP accomplished such as M&S, Measurement Lab, SIL, HWIL, OAR. Impacts to design and / or system maturity KPP 2 - CNS / ATM xxxx KSA 1 CTP 1 XXXX TPMs, Etc. Y Y Y Y R Highlight RED items in main part of brief or in risk cube Assessment relative to existing capabilities (example, C-130 AMP compared to C-130J, C-130E/H, etc.) “5 of 8 KPPs rated Green, 2 Yellow, 1 Red 8 of 12 KSAs rated Green, 3 Yellow, 1 Red 27 of 35 CTPs and TPMs rated Green, 3 Yellow 5 Red”

50 Open Medium and Low Priority” Deficiency Reporting OPEN, ONPC and CPRT yellow sheets Part *I Part I Part II Part III Approved previously 4 23 70 48 Approved since DT event 3 10 Draft 1 Total 8 34 4 significant deficiencies which are documented in other formats than a Yellow Sheet The impact to COI resolution is understood The safety concerns and technical risk caused by all open deficiencies is mitigated through Flight envelope Documentation or training Workaround procedure Inspection Burn-down plan Items highlighted in blue will be covered on subsequent slides “10 Open Hi-priority, 50 Open Medium and Low Priority”

Limitations to Scope of DT Impacts To COI Resolution Due To Incomplete Testing Concerns And Mitigation LPIA Radar Altimeter TCAS/SFI Design problems have yet to be fixed – systems removed from IOT&E configuration Flight Director – Coupled ILS / Approach System performance inadequate – modes will have restricted use in IOT&E Flight Director – Coupled Go-Around Non-functional in current software – prohibited for IOT&E Flight Director deficiencies will impact IOT&E assessment, but work-arounds will allow mission accomplishment