Beaver River Watershed PCB Investigation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRESENTED MARCH 17 TH 2009 BY FRIENDS OF THE CHEAT Water Quality Monitoring & Mapping Assessment for Watershed Scale Restoration Planning in the Cheat.
Advertisements

TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
CWA §319 Grants General Conditions Grant Types Grant Format Timelines The Awards Reporting Note: § 319 monies are reimbursable grants.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Nutrient Monitoring on the Ohio River: Balancing Information Needs.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August xx, 2012.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Time of Travel. American Water Charleston intake on the Elk River Charleston 1,000, ,984 = 1880 seconds or 31 minutes.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Spills/Incident Management Monitoring, Mapping and Contingency Planning Jerry Schulte, Manager Source Water Protection and Emergency Response for ORSANCO.
SRRTTF Technical Activities Where We’ve Been, Where We’re Going Dave Dilks Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force Workshop January 13,
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
Working with Stakeholders in Developing Watershed and Water Quality Models: The Dos and Don’ts Well, at least some of them! Presented by: Brian J. Watson,
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
San Francisco Estuary Institute Annual Meeting October 7, 2008 Water Quality Science and Management in the Delaware Estuary Thomas J. Fikslin, Ph.D.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Overview of Statutes CERCLA - Federal law –Provides EPA with authority for clean up –Provides for liability, compensation,
La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August 22, 2012.
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Item 3b Guadalupe River Monitoring WY 2010 Jen Hunt, Ben Greenfield, Sarah Lowe, Lester McKee Sources, Pathway, and Loading Work Group May 6th, 2010.
WATER RESOURCES ORSANCO Technical Committee October 9-10, 2012.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in L’Anguille River Watershed and Deep Bayou Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium
Project Update: Hudson River PCBs Superfund Site October 24, 2012 Mr. David King, PE – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Gary Klawinski – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Mark Surette.
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
Biological & Research Programs. Overview Status Future Direction.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell August 8,
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Storm Water Permit Program Authority to regulate storm water discharges derives from 40 CFR Illinois EPA is delegated authority to administer this.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
WVDEP TMDL Development Nutrient Management Training December 16, 2009 Dave Montali, WVDEP.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
Watersheds in Pennsylvania
1 AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITY Financed by USAID APRA ROMANIA PROJECT Project implemented by: Assistance project for MAFWE International Resources.
Comparability of “Phase 2 Technical Activities Report” to Ecology’s “PCB Source Assessment” Dave Dilks SRRTTF June 24,
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Mulberry River Watershed
City of Black Hawk & Black Hawk / Central City Sanitation District
MS4 and Trading Considerations
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Elm Creek Watershed TMDL E. coli TMDL – Review of Preliminary Findings
Bacteria SW-WLA Implementation Plans
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Local Planning Process…
Desirable Results Since 1998
Drww general membership meeting
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Local Government Engagement Initiative January 16, 2018
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
PCB Concentrations in the Ambient Waters of the Delaware Estuary and Coastal Waters: Implications for TMDLs for PCBs Thomas J. Fikslin and Gregory Cavallo.
TOWARDS THE GOAL OF SETTING NUTRIENT CRITERIA FOR THE DELAWARE ESTUARY
Mercury TMDL Review & Permitting Strategy Update
Leon River Watershed Protection Plan: Addressing EPA Comments
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
SMR Nutrient Initiative Group SAG Meeting
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
SMR Nutrient Initiative Group Background Information Review
Presentation transcript:

Beaver River Watershed PCB Investigation Technical Committee Meeting October 20-21, 2009

PCB TMDL Background Completed Ohio River PCB TMDL in 2002 Entire WV border (277 river miles) Mainstem TMDL only Basin is too large and data is too limited to address issue with a single TMDL for entire watershed Assigned allowable loadings to major tributaries Follow-up tributary TMDLs/source reductions necessary to meet WQS in the Ohio River

Current Challenge The contamination is wide-spread TMDL required for the entire Ohio River Identifying specific sources has been difficult Sampling indicates POTWs and numerous types of industrial facilities may discharge PCBs Thousands of potential sources spread over basin Need to focus on a smaller scale Select tributary sub-basin to focus efforts

Tributaries of Concern Identified tributaries of concern based on high-volume sample results Ranked according to yield and load Allegheny Monongahela Beaver Muskingum Kanawha Guyandotte Scioto Great Miami Green Wabash

Why the Beaver River Watershed? Needed smaller area to focus source identification effort 3,130 square miles (Ranks 14th of Ohio R. tribs) Beaver River has elevated PCB levels Highest single sample concentration (19,300 pg/L) Highest average concentration (11,700 pg/L) Fourth highest load Highest PCB yield Interstate tributary

Beaver Basin Impairments Beaver River (Main stem) Entire 21.49 miles listed as impaired by PCBs TMDL completed 2001 for lower 3.8 miles Mahoning Lower 82 miles listed as impaired by PCBs Shenango Lower 33.1 miles listed as impaired by PCBs TMDL completed in 2001 Connoquenessing Not listed as impaired by PCBs

Inventory of Potential Sources National Priority List (Superfund) 6 NPL sites Toxics Release Inventory 2 facilities 267 potential sources based on SIC These are facility types which were found by DRBC to discharge significant levels of PCBs Met with Ohio EPA and PA DEP personnel to discuss sources and sampling approach

Proposed Sampling Approach Phased sampling approach Conduct initial round of sampling Subsequent rounds based on previous results Focus in on hot-spots First round of sampling Sample each tributary near mouth Beaver, Mahoning, Shenango, Connoquenessing Add additional sites based on sources and impaired segments Following rounds would allow for bracketing of potential sources

Sampling (continued) Use high-volume water sampling Sampling Schedule May only need to filter 250 to 500 liters Would allow for 2 samples to be collected each day Sampling Schedule Begin sampling in November 2009 Takes 4 weeks for preliminary results Select round 2 sites based on results Round 2 in early 2010 Repeat as budget allows Must be completed by June 30, 2010

Questions or Comments?