Modeling drivers visual attention

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Driving Task The driving task is everything it takes to operate a motor vehicle. The three skills of the driving task are: A. Physical-coordination.
Advertisements

Predictive Data Modeling A CASE STUDY FOR DATA MODELING.
Assessment/Enhancement of Cognitive Ability in Older Adults Karlene Ball Center for Research on Applied Gerontology University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Mobile Phone Use in a Driving Simulation Task: Differences in Eye Movements Stacy Balk, Kristin Moore, Will Spearman, & Jay Steele.
Managing Risk with the IPDE Process
The Effects of Text Messaging On the Driving Performance of Young Novice Drivers MUARC: Kristie Young, Simon Hosking & Michael Regan NRMA Motoring & Services:
ETSC Best in Europe Conference 2006 Changing Human Machine Interfaces Towards the development of a testing regime Samantha Jamson University of Leeds.
Driver Distraction: Results from Naturalistic Teenage Driving Studies Charlie Klauer, Ph. D. Research Scientist Group Lead: Teen Risk and Injury Prevention.
Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving Author: David Shinar, Noam Tractinsky, Richard Compton Accident.
Alexandru Dancu 1 1 t2i lab, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden Designing seamless displays for interaction in motion Joe Marshall 2 2 University.
Cognitive demands of hands-free- phone conversation while driving Professor : Liu Student: Ruby.
Managing Risk with the IPDE Process
Driver sleepiness accounts for a substantial proportion of fatal and severe crashes A critical component to mitigate sleep-related crashes is the driver’s.
LOGO A review of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in auto safety Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Effects on driving behavior of congestion information and of scale of in-vehicle navigation systems Author: Shiaw-Tsyr Uang, Sheue-Ling Hwang Transportation.
Chapter 4 IPDE Objectives: 4.1
1 IE 486 Work Analysis & Design II Lecture 16 – Transportation Human Factors Dr. Vincent G. Duffy Thursday March 23, 2007.
Decide and Execute Jones College Prep Driver Education.
Chapter 4. IPDE PROCESS Identify Predict Decide Execute.
Development of Standardized Descriptions of Driving Simulator Scenarios: The Older Driver 2005 TRB Human Factors Workshop Karlene Ball University of Alabama.
Jeopardy The Basics Vehicle Control Traffic Laws Sharing the Road Focused And Sober Driving Crash Stats
Company Logo Professor: Liu student: Ruby The role of working memory, field dependence, visual search, and reaction time in the left turn performance of.
Managing Risk With the IPDE Process
Thursday, October 27, 2011  May 2012  Background  Problem Statement  Design Specification  Goals  Implementation  Budget  Timeline.
Transportation.  A chance to look at combining several ideas in a larger problem  What are the HF issues in driving?
Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception Boris M. Velichkovsky et al. Transportation Research Part F 5 (2002)
Project and Project Formulation and Management
In-Vehicle Driver Distractions & Eye Movements
Distracted Driving Provided by:
Virtual University of Pakistan
Jeopardy The Basics Vehicle Control Traffic Laws
Applying the IPDE Process
SEEV Model of Visual Attention Allocation
The Simulation of Traffic Patterns and Optimizing Traffic Lights
Slide show made and presented by: Gina Gillespie
Transportation Safety & Distracted Driving
Chapter The SIPDE Process.
The Importance of ADAS Technology
Managing Risk with the IPDE Process
Project Edward….
Managing Distractions
Impacts of workload on trust in imperfect automated systems
Virginia Department of Education
Managing Risk with the IPDE Process
Texting While Driving -- Another Kind of Impairment
lesson 10.1 SEARCHING INTERSECTIONS
THREE MAJOR FACTORS IN HIGH RISK
Nazli E. Kaya Suzan Ayas Canmanie T. Ponnambalam Birsen Donmez
Interior Camera - A solution to Driver Monitoring Status
Physics-based simulation for visual computing applications
Attention as a Limited Capacity Resource
Issues in measuring sensory-motor control performance of human drivers: The case of cognitive load and steering control Johan Engström, Volvo Technology.
Sample slides from the Drivers Edge USA curriculum
Phd Candidate Computational Physiology Lab University of Houston
An Introduction to VEX IQ Programming with Modkit
Vehicle Characteristics and Car Following
Project Risk Analysis and Management: L3
DRIVING HAZARD PERCEPTION TEST
Investigation Of Time And Speed Perception Using A Driving Simulator
ཡུལ་རྟོགས་ཀྱི་དཔེ་གཟུགས་ངོ་སྤྲོད།
Experimental Evaluation
Building Risk Agility Improving organizational risk agility requires
What Is Distracted Driving?
Basics of Experimentation
Welcome to the Flight Olympics!
lesson 14.1 ADJUSTING TO CITY TRAFFIC
IPDE PROCESS.
lesson 8.2 DISTRACTIONS INSIDE THE VEHICLE
DRIVE FOCUSED. DRIVE SMART. GET HOME SAFELY.
Jeopardy The Basics Vehicle Control Traffic Laws
Presentation transcript:

Modeling drivers visual attention

Visual attention We know that the vast majority of crashes are caused by human error Let’s boil that down a bit though shall we? Human error can be comprised of many different aspects Experience, attention, physiology Lets “focus” on attention for now Visual attention being a construct, is comprised of numerous aspects that when combined, account for a humans level of visual attention

seev Thankfully for us, a model for visual attention has already been established SEEV (Salience, Effort, Expectancy, Value) Salience: Attention grabbing properties(ie, bright lights, flashes etc) Effort: How much effort is required to attend (head and or neck movement) Expectancy: The likelihood of seeing an event in a particular location (notifications on a mobile phone) Value: How importance of the task (keeping a safe and regular speed limit is more important than AC settings of car

SEEV Seev Together: how people do allocate attention How people should optimally focus their attention

Seev By quantifying these variables we can actually sue SEEV into a computational model: P(A) = S – Ef + Ex + V

Implications of seev The SEEV model will predict Glance time and average duration in AOI(Area of Interest) Time gaze spent away from forward view (likelihood of missing hazards) The response time of events due to salience and where gaze was focused when event occurs The model actually accounts for about 90% of variance

Studies in seev Horrey, Wickens, Consalus, 2006 applied the SEEV model to the task of driving Wanted to see how well a computational model (SEEV) could be applied to predict visual scanning of the driver Focused on the impact of IVT’s (in vehicle technologies) on detection of road hazards Participants drove in a fixed base driving simulator while having their eye and head movements tracked

Studies in seev

Studies in seev

Studies in seev While driving, participants were to keep their vehicle in the center of their lane as closely as possible They also had a secondary task where they would need to periodically decide if a string of numbers displayed on the IVT added to an even or odd sum This IV was manipulated in two ways, complexity of the string and frequency

Studies in seev SEEV was able to significantly predict the amount of scanning by the drivers Why is this important?? By incorporating SEEV, designers will be able to more accurately predict visual scanning patterns of drivers This will obviously be an important piece of information to have as IVT’s become more common not only in cars but also in planes and trains

Questions?