IFR detector mechanics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CALICE Dave Bailey. Aims and Objectives Develop the technology to build a high- resolution tracking calorimeter for ILC experiments Main thrusts: –Testbeam.
Advertisements

The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
V. Carassiti - Princeton (USA) 9-13/01/ BABAR IFR UPGRADE DETECTOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING.
LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics Lorenzo Bonechi on behalf of the LHCf Collaboration * University.
Mechanical Status of ECAL Marc Anduze – 30/10/06.
3/1/05 Status of the SHBD for the NUMI OPERA exposure D. Autiero IPN Lyon  Reminder about the proposed setup for the SHBD  Status of the sub-detectors.
G.Barber Tracker Update, Berkeley 10 Feb Tracker Progress Contents:- Station Space Frame Patch Panel / Vacuum Seal Light Guide Map Position of Degrader/Support.
The AMS-02 detector is based on a large acceptance (~0.5 m²sr) and high sensitivity spectrometer composed by a super-conducting magnet (0.8 T), cooled.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
T1008 status W.Baldini for the Ferrara and Padova SuperB-IFR Group.
1 Coordinate Detector: prototype design The Coordinate Detector (CDET): Three independent vertical planes with 15 cm plastic shield in front, all planes.
1 E906 Pre-Amplifier Card 2009/10/07. 2 E906 Wire Chambers Station1 MWPC: –build a new E906 MWPC. –4500 channels in total. Station2 DC: –recycle old E866.
Status report on MURAY telescope R&D
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
1 CLAS12/Central Tracker review. Saclay 12/09 Stéphan AUNE Central Tracker review Micromegas central & forward tracker  R&D and prototypes  CAD implantation.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
Mechanical Status of EUDET Module Marc Anduze – 05/04/07.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the CLAS12 Forward Detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Collaborating institutions: Yerevan Physics Institute (Armenia) James Madison.
Linear collider muon detector: Marcello Piccolo Amsterdam, April 2003.
Scintillating Tiles for the Muon Inner regions LHCb Muon Upgrade meeting, CERN May Wander Baldini for the Ferrara LHCb group.
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
VVS Prototype Construction at Fermilab Erik Ramberg 26 February,2002 Design issues for VVS Details of VVS prototype design Schedule and Budget Testing.
An Idea of Next Sci-ECAL Prototype for FNAL Beamtest Feb Sci-ECAL meeting S. Uozumi (Kobe)
E.Guschin (INR) 21 November 2003Integration EDR PRS/SPD static envelop, assembly and installation Detector layout Static envelop along the beam Detector.
Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002.
V. Korbel, DESY1 Progress Report on the TESLA Tile HCAL Option To be filled soon.
Coordinate Detector: prototype design General idea about the Coordinate Detector (CDET) so far: Three independent vertical planes with 15 cm plastic shield.
Marc Anduze – CALICE Meeting – KOBE 10/05/07 Mechanical R&D for Technological EUDET ECAL Prototype.
SiD Muon Detector Progress. Overall concept 2 There are slots in the iron. We will insert modules of orthogonal strips of appropriate size into the slots.
Zaragoza, 5 Julyl Construction of and experience with a 2.4 x 1 m² micromegas chambers Givi Sekhniaidze On behalf of the Micromegas community.
SiD Hcal structure & 1m² Micromegas chamber prototype CALICE 2009 – LYON – 2009, septembre 17 th.
Strip-scintillator/Si avalanche photo-diode Muon System Fermilab Test beam + Inst INFN Udine APDs Notre Dame Scint /WLS Baseline: Resistive Plate Chambers.
Vessel dimensions GTK assembly carrier Electrical connections Cooling pipes integration Vessel alignment with the beam Next steps Conclusion 3/23/20102electro-mechanical.
LSTs in the IFR gaps Workshop on IFR replacement SLAC November 14, 2002 L. Piemontese INFN Ferrara.
Paul Rubinov on behalf of Gene Fisk, Kurt Krempetz 22 Aug 2012.
MINER A at the Triple Point: Three Phases at once Deborah Harris AEM August 31, 2009.
Super-IFR Detector R&D summary Wander Baldini Ferrara, Padova, Roma1 INFN and University on behalf of the superB-IFR group: Ferrara, Padova, Roma1 INFN.
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Baby MIND, Large Area Trigger Counters E. Noah WA105 General Meeting 21 January 2015.
IFR Status Report W. Baldini, on behalf of the Ferrara SuperB-Group XIV SuperB General Meeting, Frascati Sept.27 – Oct
Status of Prototype Preparation (I) Wander Baldini On behalf of the Ferrara SuperB group SuperB Workshop, LNF Dic. 2-nd 2009.
HCAL Modules -First Ideas Mathias ReineckeHCAL – MPI meetingJan Motivation 2.Mechanical Constraints 3.HCAL Base Unit (HBU) 4.Light Calibration.
Baby MIND Scintillator modules 11 November 2015 Revision E. Noah.
SuperB – IFR status of the detector & tooling development 1V. Carassiti - INFN FEINP PAN 07-09/09/2012.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
Marc Anduze – EUDET Meeting – PARIS 08/10/07 Mechanical R&D for EUDET module.
Kitakami Side AHCAL Assembly or anywhere in any detector.
Prototype Assemblying, SiPM Characterization and QC
IFR Detector R&D status
IFR Detector R&D status
CEPC ScECAL Optimization for the 3th CEPC Physics Software Meeting
Wander baldini on behalf of the SHIP Muon Group
Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University and INFN
Baby-MIND Modules & Services
An active target for MEG2, a status report
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector
Felix Sefkow DESY LDC at Vienna November 17, 2005
New idea for the target detector: SuperFGD
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
Status of Prototype Preparation and SiPM Characterization
Backward Calorimetry For SuperB
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Prototype activities update
Plans from last meeting
HCAL Modules -First Ideas
BaBar IFR Upgrade Mark Convery SLAC 7 Jun 06.
Study of a Scintillating Digital Hadron Calorimeter Prototype
Limited Streamer Tube Project Summary
General Introduction to IFR
Presentation transcript:

IFR detector mechanics W. Baldini on behalf of the Ferrara IFR Group XXVII SuperB Workshop and Kick off Meeting Isola d’Elba May 28 - June 02 2011

IFR Baseline Detection Technique Plan to re-use BaBar IFR structure, adding iron to improve μ-ID Extruded Scintillator as active material to cope with higher flux of particles Minos-like scintillator bars readout through 3 WLS fibers and Silicon Photo-Multipliers (SiPM) 82 or 92cm of Iron interleaved by 8-9 active layers (under study with simulations and testbeam) Two readout options under study: Time readout (TDC-RO) barrel Binary readout (BI-RO) endcaps Minos like scintillator bar + WLS fibers SiPM

Readout Options Time readout Option (TDC-RO): the hit bar gives the first coordinate while the signal arrival time provides the second measure the 2 coordinate at the same time 1ns time resolution  ~ 20cm need TDC readout for each channel relatively simple to be constructed res~20cm Binary readout Option: (BI-RO): the two coordinates are given by two planes of orthogonal scintillator bars: high combinatorial simpler (and cheaper) electronics more complex construction Both option are being tested on beam thanks to a full depth prototype

Mechanics for the TDC Readout option The baseline option for the Barrel is the TDC readout: Outermost layer ≈ 400cm x 400cm Innermost layer ≈ 200cm x 200cm Scintillator bars 2x4x400 cm3 3 fibers each scint. bar SiPM on both sides The active material has to be protected and light shielded, keeping a max thickness of ≈ 23mm For the innermost layers, due to the very high neutron flux, the SiPM will not be inside the module Weight of a module 4m long and 10 scint. bars: ~ 40Kg, but not self sustaining Proper moving/installing tools have to be built

Mechanics for the TDC Readout option The basic idea is to prepare an aluminum box (0.5mm aluminum foil) fix on it the scintillator bars (fibers already glued and polished) Couple the fibers ( 5 cm longer than the scintillator) with the SiPM

Mechanics for the TDC Readout option The PCBs supporting the SiPMs would be fixed on the bottom side of the box on a kind of “rail” This to avoid too many holes in the box (to improve the light tightening) The signal cables will be connected to the PCBs through 90° connectors All the signal cables will be bundled and routed through a single hole (~ 10 cables) rail

Mechanics for the BI-RO Readout option The mechanics for the BIRO option is more complex since the SiPMs cannot be simply put on scintillator’s ends (no space) Two layers of orthogonal 1x4(?)x400 cm3 scintillators: For the longitudinal scint. bars we can basically use the same technique as for the TDC option For the orthogonal scint. Bars a special routing for the fibers has to be investigated A first idea is to bring out the fibers orthogonally, in a large grove (≈2mm deep) which would house the fibers for the whole plane The outermost layers could be made of 4 separated modules (to reduce fibers length) The X and Y planes could be in separated modules (but the total thickness has to be < 23mm) Barrel

Mechanics of the Endcaps For the endcaps the baseline option is the BIRO readout mechanics is easier since there are less constraints Here the modules are not rectangular so the aluminum boxes have to be properly shaped Also here the issue willl be the shielding of the SiPM Module 1 Module 1

Detector related Mechanical Activities Aside to the active layer mechanics there are many other mechanical activities to be carried out Tooling for the scintillator-fibers gluing (embedded holes or surface groves) Given the non self sustaining structure of the active layers (aluminum foils very thin) a set of toolings have to be designed and built: Supports to move the modules during the assembling and QC Toolings for the movements and insertion of the modules in the flux return during the installation phase Other tooling… QC related toolings

Conclusions and next steps The mechanics of the active layers is under definition A present these are “conceptual” designs, we are now going through the details toward a “technical” design Due to the high neutron flux an open issue is where to put the SiPMs of the innermost layers of the barrel It would be desirable to put the SiPMs in accessible points, but this implies to use longer fibers… We could consider the use of a few meters of clear fibers, in this case a proper coupling has to be done Aside to the mechanics of the active layers there are all the tools for the moving, QC, and installation