eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hughes/Winer Page 1 Ohio State Univ. RunIIb Review XFTIIB: Online Track Processor for CDF RunIIB Brian Winer/Richard Hughes Ohio State University CDF Collaboration.
Advertisements

Test beam 2001 Results M.C. Fouz Muon Week, CERN Nov 01.
Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.

8th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiment, Colmar, France, 10 Sep R.Ichimiya, ATLAS Japan 1 Sector Logic Implementation for the ATLAS Endcap.
Ben Kilminster 11 Feb 2005; p.1 Cornell JC : CDF XFT Upgrade 3-D Upgrading the CDF Track Trigger to 3-D for High Instantaneous Luminosity Ben Kilminster.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
DCZ status & results B A B AR Trigger Workshop, December 2004 Jamie Boyd University of Bristol for the Trigger Upgrade Group.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
BTeV Trigger Architecture Vertex 2002, Nov. 4-8 Michael Wang, Fermilab (for the BTeV collaboration)
FTK poster F. Crescioli Alberto Annovi
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
The Track-Finding Processor for the Level-1 Trigger of the CMS Endcap Muon System D.Acosta, A.Madorsky, B.Scurlock, S.M.Wang University of Florida A.Atamanchuk,
Some mediation on fast track reconstruction of BESIII Wang Dayong Mar 10,2004.
Ivan Vitev & E906 Muon Identifier Status Patrick McGaughey and the muon radiography team E866 Meeting at FNAL June 20-21, 2007 Large Muon Tracker at LANSCE.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
Richard E. Hughes 20 July 2004; p.1 XFT 2B; Director’s Review Upgrade of the CDF Track Trigger for High Luminosity Running.
SBS meeting VETROC application for Cerenkov triggering Alexandre Camsonne March 18 th 2015.
Levan Babukhadia IEEE NSS/MIC 2002, Norfolk, Virginia, 10 – 16 November, 2002 CHEP02 – 31 st International Conference on High Energy Physics, Amsterdam,
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
14/6/2000 End Cap Muon Trigger Review at CERN 1 Muon Track Trigger Processing on Slave and Hi-pT Boards C.Fukunaga/Tokyo Metropolitan University TGC electronics.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
LHC Upgrade: Evaluation of monitored drift tubes inclusion into the ATLAS level 1 muon end cap trigger ICEPP, KEK A Katarina Bendtz, Takayuki Kamiya, Tatsuo.
XFT Upgrade for Run II Mike Kasten, Suzanne Levine, Kevin Pitts, Greg Veramendi University of Illinois Richard Hughes, Kevin Lannon Ben Kilminster, Brian.
CLAS12 Trigger System part1: Level1 EC Revision 1, Feb 7, 2007.
SVT Nov 7, 2002Luciano Ristori - Vertex2002_7Nov02.ppt1 SVT The CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger Vertex 2002 Luciano Ristori Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
Richard E. Hughes 21 September 2003; p.1 IEEE/NSS 2003 Portland, OR eXtremely Fast Tracker; The Sequel Richard Hughes, Kevin Lannon Ben Kilminster, Brian.
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
The trigger-less TBit/s readout for the Mu3e experiment Dirk Wiedner On behalf of the Mu3e collaboration 24 Sep 20131Dirk Wiedner TWEPP2013.
NewCHOD Firmware Chris Parkinson, University of Birmingham 16 th December
November 15, 2005M Jones1 Track Lists in Level 2 Outputs from SLAM provide lists of tracks faster than the current path to SVT and Level 2 via XTRP Sparsify.
The Collider Detector at Fermilab (aka CDF) Jennifer Pursley Intermediate Seminar Oct. 28, 2003.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
M. Selen, 7/24/03 LEPP Lunch: Pg 1 The CLEO-c Trigger System: More Than Just Blinking Lights ! The CLEO-c Trigger System:
Off-Detector Processing for Phase II Track Trigger Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen,
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Results with the RPC system of OPERA and perspectives
CLAS12 Forward Tracking: Status and Challenges
The Totem trigger architecture The LONEG firmware archtecture
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
MDT and analog FEE mass production:
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Overview of the ATLAS Fast Tracker (FTK) (daughter of the very successful CDF SVT) July 24, 2008 M. Shochet.
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
Some basic ideas (not a solution)
DC trigger test Present layout Trigger electronics
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
Pixel-strip-EMC tracker and DC option
CLEO-III Trigger Systematic Studies Progress Report – M. Selen
Regional Cal. Trigger Milestone: Production & Testing Complete
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Changes in Level 1 CSC Trigger in ORCA by Jason Mumford and Slava Valuev University of California Los Angeles June 11,
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
The LHCb L0 Calorimeter Trigger
PHENIX forward trigger review
The Road Warrior: first use of the Pulsar for SVT
CSC Muon Sorter Status Tests Plans M.Matveev August 21, 2003.
XFT2B: Plans and Tasks XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.1.
Presentation transcript:

eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.1

XFT = eXtremely Fast Tracker Role of tracking Top, W/Z, Exotic Physics triggers require High momentum electron and muon Level 1 trigger candidates Bottom Physics require low momentum tracking at the Level 1 trigger electrons muons hadronic tracks L1 Trigger Primitives Electrons: XFT track + EM cluster Muons: XFT track + muon stub L2 Trigger Tracks XFT Track + Silicon Hits . XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.2

Central Outer Tracker (COT) 8 “superlayers” 4 with axial wires r - f measurement 4 with stereo wires z measurement Small Cells 0.88 cm drift (avg.) Max drift time ~220 ns 12 sense wires/cell: 96 possible measurements 2540 cells, 30240 channels total 1344 cells, 16128 channels axial only XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.3

Charged Track Finding Hit Finding: Mezzanine Card Hits are classified as prompt or delayed Segment Finding In the axial layers, search for patterns of prompt/delayed hits consistent with High Pt tracks Each segment found is assigned a pixel (phi, all layers) and possibly a slope (outer 2 axial layers only) Track Finding Looking across 3 or 4 axial layers, search for patterns of segments consistent with Pt>1.5 GeV/c Resultant Pt and Phi of all 1.5 GeV/c tracks sent on to XTRP Maximum of 288 tracks reported New Tracks reported every 132nsec! Good hit patterns are identified as segment, then segments are linked as tracks XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.4

XFT Tracking Trigger ~2 m of Cable Data @33MHz ~10 m of cable Ansley trigger cable (220 ft) Data @45MHz LVDS 48 XFT Finder 24 XFT Linker 168 TDC from COT axial layers ~10 m of cable 3 crates 3 crates The Finder and Linker are implemented on 9U VME cards and use commercial Programmable Logic Devices (PLD) 24 crates mezzanine card 24 XTRP Inside Collision Hall XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.5

XFT System Mezzanine Cards 168 cards Classifies hits as prompt/delayed Final Finder system 24 SL1-3 boards 24 SL2-4 boards Heavy reliance on PLDs Allows for some redesign: new patterns for number of misses, wire sag, faster gas, etc Final Linker System 24 Linker boards Allows for new road set based on new beam positions Have already developed 5(?) new roads sets due to accelerator changes. XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.6

TDC Mezzanine Card Developed at University of Michigan Resides on axial TDC’s Classifies all hits as prompt and/or delayed XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.7

TDC Mezzanine Card (XTC) As tracks pass through each layer of the COT, they generate “hits” at each of the 12 wire-layers within a superlayer. The mezzanine card is responsible for classifying each hit on a wire as either Prompt: Drift time from 0-66 nsec Delayed: Drift time from 66-210 nsec “Delayed” hit “Prompt” hit Single COT Superlayer XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.8

Finder Board Developed at FNAL. Each Finder PLD contains all the masks needed to find segments with Pt > 1.5 GeV/c. For SL 1, 2, 3, 4: Masks: 170, 230, 270, 310 Pixels: 12, 12, 6 & slope, 6 & slope Each chip processes 4 adjacent COT cells, and outputs pixel and slope information to the Linker. 48 Finder Boards (2 Flavors) 24 SL1-3 Boards 24 SL2-4 Boards 336 total Finder chips Board programs are stored in EEPROM and Flash Ram Finder SL2-4 XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.9

The Finder Track segments are found by comparing hit patterns in a given layer to a list of valid patterns or “masks”. “Prompt” “Delayed” Up to 3 missed hits are allowed. The number of misses is programmable depending on the COT efficiency. Mask : A specific pattern of prompt and delayed hits on the 12 wires of an axial COT layer XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.10

Finder Output In the inner two axial superlayers, each mask is assigned to 1 of 12 pixel positions in the middle of the layer. The pixel represents the phi position of a valid segment at that superlayer. In the outer 2 axial superlayers, each mask corresponds to 1 of 6 phi pixel positions and 1 of 3 slopes: (low pt +, low pt -, high pt). When a mask is found, the corresponding pixel is “turned on”. More than one mask (& pixel) may be found within a COT cell. XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.11

Example Finder Masks Track with PT = 1.0 GeV/c (not a valid mask) XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.12

Example Finder Masks Track with PT = -1.0 GeV/c (not a valid mask) XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.13

Linker Board Developed at OSU. Each linker chip contains all the roads needed to find tracks with transverse momentum > 1.5 GeV/c Each chip processes 1.25o of the chamber, and outputs the best found track in that phi-slice to the next stage in the trigger. There are twenty-four identical Linker Boards required for the full system. Each covers 15 deg. of the COT. 288 total Linker chips, 504 total PLDS Board programs are stored in EEPROM and Flash Ram XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.14

The Linker Tracks are found by comparing fired pixels in all 4 axial superlayers to a list of valid pixel patterns or “roads”. Slopes must match Pixels must The Linker system divides the COT into 288 slices. Track linking is performed simultaneously in these slices. XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.15

The Linker Each Linker Chip reports the best track that passes through a 1.25o phi-slice located at the 3rd axial layer. Since tracks can curve in the magnetic field, this means that pixels outside of the 1. 25o phi-slice are needed The total number of roads needed to find all tracks with PT > 1.5 GeV/c in a linker is 2400. The number of roads grows as 1/Pt(min) XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.16

Example Linker Roads Track with PT = +1.5 GeV/c (a valid road) XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.17

Some Numbers How fast? Data at each stage Capable of producing new track list every 132nsec Time to produce a track from collision = 1.9sec (~15 x 132nsec clock ticks) XTC + Ansely Cable time(315nsec) + Finder(560nsec) + Linker(730nsec) + XTRP CableTime(90nsec) Time for L1 decision: 5.5sec Data at each stage Input to Mezzanine: 16138 axial wires Input to Finder: 32256 bits (prompt/delayed at each axial wire) Input to Linker: (1344 cells)x(12pixels/cell)=16128 bits Input to XTRP: (288 Linkers)x(12 bits)=3456 bits XFT Workshop FNAL 19 December 2003; p.18