Modern world today There are a lot of internal and international conflicts all over the world. Force methods are often used and have high effectiveness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promoting Cooperative Solutions for Space Security 1 Is Current International Humanitarian Law Sufficient to Regulate a Potential.
Advertisements

The Future of Nuclear Weapons More proliferation or further reductions? Keith Hansen February 19, 2015.
Chapter 9: Canada’s International Roles. Foreign Policy Tools – Non Military Diplomacy Canada uses its diplomatic contacts with other nation-states and/or.
On the creation of a nuclear crisis in the ME. Luc Reychler On the creation of a nuclear crisis in the ME KU Leuven
Challenge of Nuclear Weapons
Bulletin of atomic scientists
The Nuclear Club Who’s in? Who’s out? And where do we go from here?
US and Asia Today 4 developments with Asian countries over the past ten years.
INT 3131 Lecture Summary ( ) 1. The Organization of the UN (cont’d) Trusteeship Council Secretariat International Court of Justice.
Analyzing National Security Policy Strategic Policy-Making.
Citizenship Issues C.I.4 U.S. Domestic and Foreign Policy Students are able to: 4.2 Describe U.S. foreign policy. Students may indicate this by: – Defining.
The Presidency and Foreign Policy 9 December 2010.
Dealing with North Korea America’s Options. Threats from North Korea Direct nuclear attack on US forces or allies Sale of nuclear and missile technologies.
Economic security of enterprise.. By economic security of the enterprise (ESE) we mean the state of protection of it’s vital interests from internal and.
Confidence Building Measures Anatoly A.Streltsov D.Tech., D.J., prof. deputy director of the IPII MSU named by M.V.Lomonosov.
Olga Korolkova, AmSU.  territory;  rapid population growth;  great potential of natural resources;  remoteness from the basic events of the world.
International Security Changes in the United States and the world.
Foreign & Defense Policies. Discussion Questions:  Why do you think the Founders intentionally divided responsibility for foreign affairs between president.
International law and IR theories The invasion of Iraq, 2003.
First Nuclear Age, s Bipolarity – balance Deterrence – vulnerability Arms Control – Managing rivalry Rationality Second.
IDL – 104 Kholmogorov, Vyacheslav Yakutsk SU The use of armed forces in the resolution of political conflicts.
Foreign Policy: Asia By Brandi, Sarah, and Mike. Foreign Policy  Highly influential on the world stage as it is a superpower  Throughout U.S. History,
Lesson 1– The NPT.  Students will differentiate between nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.  Students will explain the history and purpose of.
GLOBAL SECURITY AND HUMAN SECURITY PRESENTATION TO THE ECONOMISTS FOR PEACE AND SECURITY (EPS) CONFERENCE ON THE ECONOMICS OF PEACE AND SECURITY: WAR AND.
Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning FOREIGN POLICY AND NATIONAL SECURITY Chapter Seventeen.
Nuclear Proliferation Theo Farrell, CSI Lecture 4, 2011.
The International System after 9/11  The American strategic thinking post- 9/11  Re-evaluation of the UN international system  Transatlantic tensions.
Use of Force and International Law General Treaty for the Renunciation of War, 1928/ Briand Kellog Pact ‘solemnly declare in the names of their respective.
The UK’s National Defence Needs and International Nuclear Disarmament Responsibilities Final report and recommendations #NET.
International Law and the Use of Force (LG566) Topic 1: Introduction.
Article 2(4) of the UN Charter A textual analysis.
Export licensing of dual-use and military goods in the Russian Federation.
A project implemented by BAFA This project is funded by the EU This project is funded by the German Federal Foreign Office Legal and Regulatory Bases for.
Human security from a legal point of view
EOC REVIEW standard 4 As you move through the series of questions, at the end of section keep notes on what topics or vocabulary you are missing. On your.
Nuclear Weapons Part I.
Bipolarity Deterrence Arms Control Rationality Multipolarity
GOVT Module 16 Defense Policy.
International Security and Peace
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
Contemporary Global Issues
North Korean Nuclear Proliferation Challenges
WEEK 4 September 11th, Global Terrorism and War on Terrorism
International Law.
Threats to World Security Chapter 33 Section 3.
The Climate conditions from a European perspective is the blue Arctic or High North with increased access and opportunities for social and economic development,
International security
The Concept of a Legal Norm
The Climate conditions from a European perspective is the blue Arctic or High North with increased access and opportunities for social and economic development,
Russell Alan Williams Department of Political Science
Assessing Deterrence Options for Cyberweapons
The Unsettling View from Moscow
Commander in chief and Chief Diplomat
War and Violence Can war be just?.
President of the Russian Association of International Law
Government Final Exam Review
Foreign and Defense Policymaking
Impact of Hypersonic Glide Technologies on Nuclear Deterrence
American Politics: Presidency
Military Influence of the USA
US Interests and Regional Issues in the Middle East.
International Law.
Foreign Policy and National Defense
PONI 2016 Winter Conference
Chapter VII Article 2.4 All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or.
Foreign and Defense Policymaking
What is the United Nations?
4.9 United Nations.
Unit 4 - Lesson 14: Third Party Involvement in Conflict
Foreign Policy and National Defense
Presentation transcript:

Modern world today There are a lot of internal and international conflicts all over the world. Force methods are often used and have high effectiveness. Possibility of nuclear proliferation is high (Iran, North Korea). Possibility of use nuclear weapons in war conflicts is also high (war in Iraq 2003)

Questions to answer Does nuclear deterrence mechanism works effectively today? What role does nuclear deterrence play in policy of the Russian Federation?

Nuclear weapons in the modern world S.D.Sagan: States want to have nuclear weapons on the following reasons: To provide security (The security model). To use it as a tool of domestic policy (The domestic politics model). To symbolize the level of state’s development (The normative model).

Legal status of nuclear weapons National and international law is applicable to nuclear weapons. In 1996 the UN International Court could not find whether it is lawful to use nuclear weapons in extreme situations or not (UN Doc. А/51/218).

Legal status of nuclear weapons UN International Court Advisory Opinion made in1996 (UN Doc. А/51/218): Jus bello is applicable to nuclear weapons. There is the UN Model Convention concerning nuclear weapons today (UN Doc. А/С.1/52/7).

Summary There is no strict prohibition of nuclear arms. There is no solid international regulation of nuclear conflict. Legal ground for nuclear attacks is a deal of domestic policy today. Problem: if common nuclear legislation is made nuclear weapons will be more legal than ever.

Nuclear deterrence today Classical nuclear deterrence definition: state will not use nuclear weapons against another one if there is a real threat of the second strike. Questions to answer: What prevent nuclear states from using nuclear weapons against non-nuclear ones? How to deter nuclear terrorism?

Nuclear deterrence today The answer for the 1st question is: No state is ready to take responsibility for escalation of nuclear threat. The answer for the 2nd question is: States may: Deter states sponsoring terrorism; Improve security of nuclear arsenals; Pay more attention on social and psychological state of employees.

Nuclear deterrence in Russian policy

Legal basis Russia is a member of international multilateral and bilateral nuclear agreements. Nuclear weapons’ status is also regulated by national legislation.

Russian nuclear policy Russia prefers to use diplomatic, political and economic methods of maintaining peace. Force may be used in extreme cases. Russia needs nuclear weapons to prevent aggression (Concept of national security)

Russian nuclear policy Concept of national security and Military doctrine allow using nuclear weapons against conventional arms (“flexible response” doctrine). Russia may use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states members of the NPT in certain cases.

Nuclear collaboration Russia considers collaboration with the USA to be the decisive issue in the deal of reduction nuclear threat.

Conclusions Nuclear weapons plays a great role in international relations today. States believe that nuclear deterrence still prevents nuclear war. Nuclear terrorism is a real problem. There may be no agreements with terrorists and nuclear deterrence does not work here.

Conclusions Possible nuclear states want to provide security and become the members of the deterrence mechanism. Not all states may be the members of the nuclear deterrence mechanism In general nuclear proliferation increases the risk of nuclear conflict today.

Conclusions Collaboration and maintenances of nonproliferation regime will improve nuclear deterrence mechanism.