The School Turnaround Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Quality teaching requires strong professional learning communities. Collegial interchange, not isolation, must become the norm for teachers. Communities.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Providing Effective Feedback
June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate Workshop
What should be the basis of
Learning Centered Conferencing Using the Marzano Framework Beth McGibbon and Brent Perdue Part 1: The Preconference.
Mentoring and Coaching September, What is mentoring? Mentoring is a professional development strategy designed to improve teaching and learning.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 7.
Colorado’s Student Perception Survey. Agenda Why use a Student Perception Survey? What the Research Says Survey Overview Survey Administration Use of.
Goals for Learning: I can describe what rigor looks like in my classroom. I can examine student work products for rigor. I can incorporate rigor into my.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
21 st Century Assessment Examples of Practice Clinic Session 9:45 – 11:15.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Warilla Public School Journey of Literacy Development with Primary Students.
Depth of Knowledge. Let’s review... 1.Students perform simple procedures like copying, calculating, and remembering. They either know an answer or they.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Leadership Meeting April 23, Clear Learning Goals: Use The Framework of Teaching in Domain 1 (Planning & Preparation) & Domain 4 (Professional Responsibilities),
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Peer Consultancy: Observation, Debrief, Analysis.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Greenbush Teacher/ School Specialist Mentoring Model
Lesson Plan Construction (K-12)
Big Ideas, Learning Goals & Success Criteria
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
LEARNING FOCUSED RELATIONSHIPS
Staff meeting Monday 20th February 2017
Reading Procedures: MODELLED READING
Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate Workshop
Engaging Families in the Assessment Process
School Leadership Team Conference: HQS 3
- Student & School Success - K-12 English Language Arts
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Spotlight on our VOCABULARY
Implementing Race to the Top
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Assessments: Beyond the Claims
“Laying Foundations for the Future!”
INTASC Standards By: Michelle Dea.
Cooperating Teacher Training
Using data for instructional decision-making
Assessment The purpose of this workshop / discussion is to extend further teachers’ understanding of the Department's Assessment Advice. This workshop.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Exploring the Instructional Shifts Inherent in the 2020 CAS
Presentation transcript:

Effective Feedback that Improves Teacher Performance and Student Achievement

The School Turnaround Group We are a group of transformative and transactional educational leaders, each with more than 20 years of educational experience in the public and charter school sectors.  That experience covers all areas in K-12 education and includes, but is not limited to; significant academic gains for children, reduction in suspensions, culture and climate improvements and building capacity of the instructional staff. Our work includes teacher and administrative evaluations Formative and summative assessment development Data analysis and interpretation Organizational analysis Instructional staff and teacher training Staff development on differentiated instruction, strategic planning, early childhood education, facility management, RTI, EWI ( Early Warning Indicators) and all special education matters.

Expected Outcomes Develop a common language for the term “Rigor” and how it is to be used school wide in classroom instruction. Develop a common understanding of the importance of giving effective feedback and the role(s) of the administrator. Use a Depth of Knowledge Rigor Matrix to identify the level of rigor of the lesson and provide effective feedback to the teacher. Use a 3-2-1 self-reflection tool to organize thoughts and next steps.

Developing a culture and a common definition of Rigor What is your definition of rigor? What is your staff’s definition of rigor? What is the district wide definition of rigor? Do these 3 things match? Did your staff have input into the school wide definition of rigor?

Think-Pair-Share Directions: Take three minutes to list the strategies and professional developments used in your school to increase the level of RIGOR in classroom instruction.

Rigor is creating an environment in which each student is expected to learn at high levels, each student is supported so he or she can learn at high levels, and each student demonstrates learning at high levels (Blackburn, 2008)

What rigor is and what it isn’t…. Rigor is not about giving students more to do. Rigor is not about punishing students with more homework. Rigor is about creating an environment where each student is expected to learn at high levels. Rigor is about supporting students to learn at higher levels. Rigor is about pushing students to respond at higher levels. Rigor is about providing opportunities for students to demonstrate higher levels of learning. (Blackburn, 2008)

What Is Depth of Knowledge(DOK) DOK is the complexity or depth of understanding required to answer or explain an assessment related item. There are four levels: Recall Skills Strategic thinking Extended thinking

Let’s practice

Self-Assessment How do you debrief with teachers? What strategies have been particularly effective? What are some challenges you’ve had with providing feedback? Is the implementation of the feedback monitored? How is it monitored? Is there feedback after the monitoring?

Feedback is a gift

The value of feedback Targeted, Ongoing Feedback Improved Educator Practice Improved Student Achievement

Feedback Is NOT advice Is based on evidence and engagement

Effective Feedback Uses evidence Advice Uses evidence Incorporates questioning and professional conversation Reinforces effective practice and identifies areas for continued growth Culminates in concrete action steps “You need more examples.” “You should include an essential question in your lesson plan.” “You need to improve classroom management.” “The Do Now activity took too long to complete.”

What does effective feedback look like? Watch and record a conversation between administrator and teacher during a post-conference to identify the following: Using Evidence Incorporates Questioning and Professional Conversation Reinforces Effective Practice and Areas for Continued Growth Culminating Concrete Action Steps

Consulting The observer/evaluator: Consulting occurs when: Defines the problem for the teacher. Provides the solution and specific advice. Consulting occurs when: A teacher needs immediate advice. A teacher is still relatively new. It is needed as a scaffold to move a teacher into deeper conversations.

Collaborating The observer/evaluator: Collaborating occurs when: Defines the problem with the teacher. Co-constructs solutions to the problem. Shares responsibility for moving the conversation forward. Collaborating occurs when: There is trust between the teacher and the observer/evaluator. The teacher and the evaluator share a common goal.

Reflecting Reflecting occurs over time when: Teachers develop the capacity to think critically about their practice. The observer/evaluator is able to realize that he or she does not have all the answers. The evaluator learns how to ask questions to get the teacher to think deeply.

Different Roles for Different Types of Feedback Which role do you usually take when providing feedback? Why do you take that role? What supports do you need in order to adopt a different role?

World’s Simplest Feedback Model 1. What is one thing that you did well? 3. What is one thing that you would do differently? 2. Here’s one thing that you did well. 4. Here’s one thing that you can do differently. 1. What is one thing that you did well? 3. What is one thing that you would do differently? 2. Here’s one thing that you did well. 4. Here’s one thing that you can do differently. Builds confidence Builds confidence Builds skill Builds skill

I Wonder” Statements Example: I wonder if you had placed the Depth-of-Knowledge questions on the board, would that have given students a visual reminder of what they are expected to know?

Rating the lesson for its level of Rigor

Rating a Lesson for Rigor

Three things that I have learned. Two questions that I still have. Exit Ticket 3-2-1 Three things that I have learned. Two questions that I still have. One aspect of the training I will build on or implement.

References Goe, L., & Croft, A. (2009). Methods of evaluating teacher effectiveness (Research-to-Practice Brief). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/RestoPractice_Evalu atingTeacherEffectiveness.pdf Hess, K. (2009). Hess’ cognitive rigor matrix and curricular examples. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. Jerald, C. (2012). Ensuring accurate feedback from observations. Seattle, WA: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S., & Brown, E. (2011). Rethinking teacher evaluation in Chicago. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago. Retrieved from https://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/rethinking-teacher-evaluation- chicago-lessons-learned-classroom-observations-principal Wiggins, G. (2012). Seven keys to effective feedback. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 10–16. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational- leadership/sept12/vol70/num01/Seven-Keys-to-Effective-Feedback.aspx

References Stulman, M., Hamre, B., Downer, J., & Pianta, R. (2010). A practitioner’s guide to conducting classroom observations: What the research tells us about choosing and using observational systems. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://curry.virginia.edu/resource- library/practitioners-guide-to-classroom-observations

Contact Information www.theschoolturnaroundgrp.org Mark.king@theschoolturnaroundgrp.org 904-372-3443 Twitter KingMark01 Carlton.carter@theschoolturnaroundgrp.org 301-832-0968