Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in the Southeastern US Sangil Lee 1, Yongtao Hu 1, Michael Chang 2, Karsten Baumann 2, Armistead (Ted) Russell 1 1 School.
Advertisements

1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
Atmospheric Aerosol From the Source to the Receptor Insights from the Pittsburgh Supersite Spyros Pandis, Allen Robinson, and Cliff Davidson Department.
Update on PM 2.5 – The Scope of the Problem and Overview of Sources Matthew M. Russell, PhD ENVIRON International Corporation Los Angeles, California April.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
Direct PM 2.5 Emissions Data, Testing, and Monitoring Issues Ron Myers Measurement Policy Group SPPD, OAQPS.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOLS WORKSHOP OVERVIEW John G. Watson Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV February 5, 2002.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
From Ammonia to PM 2.5 Brent Auvermann Texas Cooperative Extension Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Amarillo, TX.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
Designations for the 2006 PM2.5 Standards: Evaluating the Nine Factors in Setting Nonattainment Area Boundaries Part 1 – Overview Rich Damberg, Tom Rosendahl.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Air Quality, Atmospheric Deposition, and Lake Tahoe October 15, 2003 Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network Grannlibakken, Lake Tahoe Jim Pederson.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q PM 2.5 Final NSR Implementation Rule Nat’l Tribal Air Assoc. July 16, 2008.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
St. Louis PM 2.5 SIP Modeling Update Calvin Ku, Ph.D. Missouri Department of Natural Resources Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Advisory Committee.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Urban Air Pollution GISAT 112. Learning Objectives Regions of the atmosphere Amount, composition of air we breathe Names of selected air pollutants Health.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation WESTAR Conference on BART Guidelines and Trading September 1, 2005 Tom Moore -
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Update on the PM2.5 Designations Process and the PM2.5 Implementation Rule Joseph Paisie WESTAR April 8, 2004.
Particulate Matter and its Sources in Georgia Sangil Lee.
Template Comparison of PM Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in CAMx Bonyoung Koo, Gary Wilson, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood ENVIRON Alan Dunker.
Reasonable Progress Demonstration Case Study for Saguaro Wilderness Area Arizona Regional Haze Stakeholder Meeting January 22, 2007.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
Status Report on the Role of Ammonia in the San Joaquin Valley December 11, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
October 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Glossary1 Glossary and Acronyms This section provides definitions of acronyms and terms used in the workbook. A.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
Weight of Evidence for Regional Haze Reasonable Progress
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Air Pollution and Stratospheric Ozone Depletion
Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee: Focus and Priorities
CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC
Brian Timin- EPA/OAQPS
Draft Modeling Protocol for PM2.5
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
Stephen Mueller & Jonathan Mallard Tennessee Valley Authority
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, M. Talat Odman and Armistead G. Russell
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Impact of NOx Emissions in Georgia on Annual PM2.5
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Regional Modeling Update
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
PM Trends PM10, PM2.5, PM10-PM2.5 (not possible in 90s)
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Guidance on Attainment Tests for O3 / PM / Regional Haze
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007 Finding of Significant PM2.5 Precursors for SIP and Conformity Analysis Washington DC-MD-VA PM2.5 NAA Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007

Washington DC-MD-VA PM2.5 NAA

Significant Precursors: Two-stage Process Determine PM2.5 Precursors for SIP Base Year inventory must include all precursors (PM10, PM2.5, NOx, SO2, NH3, VOC) in emissions inventory SIP: Focus on significant precursors NEXT, Determine PM2.5 Precursors for Mobile Budgets/Conformity

Evidence for Finding of Significance for Plan

PM2.5 Composition – STN Data McMillan (Washington, DC) - 2004

PM2.5 Composition – High Level Days McMillan (Washington, DC) - 2001-2003 Winter Spring Summer Fall

PM2.5 Precursors for SIP Planning PM2.5-Pri, SO2, NOx – Presumed significant by EPA VOC & NH3 - Presumed insignificant by EPA OC: Part of PM2.5-Pri emissions. Some OC also indirectly formed in the atmosphere due to VOC reactions (pathway not very well understood). PM2.5-Pri, SO2, and NOx – Role in PM2.5 formation well established. EPA considers these pollutants to be significant PM2.5 precursors. Basis of significance or insignificance: - Role in organic & elemental carbon, sulfate, & nitrate formation - Main constituents of PM2.5

PM2.5 Precursors for SIP Planning VOC – EPA presumes insignificant. Role of VOC varies by region and is not well understood yet. NH3 – Limited control options Uncertainties in inventories NH3 reduction increases precipitation acidity (ecological & health hazard) After SO2 reduction, PM2.5 more responsive to NOx reduction than NH3. VOC – High molecular weight VOC are direct organic carbon particle emissions. Role of VOC in the formation of secondary organic aerosol variable (area, local emissions sources, atmospheric chemistry, season) and is also the lest understood component of PM2.5 formation. EPA presumes VOC as insignificant. States need to demonstrate through detailed technical analyses including sensitivity modeling its significance if they want it as a precursor. NH3 – Reacts with sulfuric acid and nitric acid to form ammonium sulfate (both summer & winter) and ammonium nitrate (mainly in winter) respectively. Reducing SO2 reduces sulfate formation and therefore overall PM2.5 levels considerably. In areas with high SO2 emissions, ammonia reductions may marginally reduce PM2.5 concentrations, but particle and precipitation acidity may increase. Increased acidity is linked to adverse ecological and human health effects and with an increase in the formation of secondary organic compounds. Limited control options. Uncertainties in emission inventories. Improvements through process-based inventory approaches for animal feeding operations being looked into. Monitoring of ammonia gas and nitric acid is important for identifying when PM2.5 formation in an area is limited by ammonia or by nitric acid. However, there are a limited number of such monitoring sites. After substantial SO2 reductions in the east, in general PM2.5 changes are predicted to be less responsive to reductions in ammonia than to reductions in nitric acid.

Detailed technical analyses needed to prove VOC & NH3 significant Photochemical modeling – zero-out analysis; sensitivity analysis Photochemical source apportionment tools (PSAT, DDM, TSSA, etc.) for estimating impact of all sources Receptor modeling (e.g. PMF, CMB) Have Analysis of ambient monitoring data, speciation data, and trends Analysis of emissions inventories and trends

Recommendation PM2.5 Precursors for SIP Planning Limited timeline to submit Annual PM2.5 SIP Limited time/resources for modeling Follow EPA’s recommendation – Consider PM2.5, SO2 and NOx as significant in absence of modeling

Significance Test for Conformity

PM2.5 Precursors for Conformity Analysis PM2.5-Pri and NOx - Mobile budgets needed (Conformity rule). SO2 - Need to demonstrate significant contribution from mobile sources and also look at other criteria for setting up mobile budget. VOC & NH3 – If found significant for PM2.5 SIP, then need to look at contribution from mobile sources and other criteria for setting up mobile budget.

Checklist PM2.5 Precursors for Conformity Analysis

Checklist PM2.5 Precursors for Conformity Analysis