Socioeconomic factors in development and behavioural outcomes in Uruguayan children under 4 years old.  La situación conductual y del desarrollo en.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developmental Screening and Surveillance DENVER II
Advertisements

Equity - Research Reveals the What, the Where and the How November 21, 2011.
ECD INSTRUMENTS Important Considerations for Assessing the Development of Young Children across Cultures and Socio-Economic Contexts Sophie Naudeau (HDNCY)
Promise of Preschool in Africa: Community-Based Preschools in Rural Mozambique Pablo A. Stansbery Sebastian Martinez Sophie Naudeau Vitor Pereira Melissa.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
The Survey of Well-being of Young Children (SWYC)
Introduction When a child is referred for a neuropsychological evaluation, a battery of cognitive tests is typically administered to the child directly.
By Vicki Lopes. Purpose Vicki Lopes is in her first year of her Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology at Queen’s University Investigate the role of child characteristics,
Kindergarten Cohort Chris Chapman National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education Sciences IES Research Conference June 2006.
Ten Year Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Mothers and their Children Catholic Family Service of Calgary Louise Dean Centre Holly Charles & Brenda Simpson.
High Quality Health and Social Care Close to Home 1 Terrific 2 ’ s Gilda Lewis Health Visitor Practice Teacher.
Infant Hearing Screening in the US, 2001: Results from the ECLS-B Study May S. Chiu, B.S. Magdaliz Gorritz, B.S. Howard J. Hoffman, M.A. National Institute.
Early Childhood Development (ECD) Scales: Overview & Lessons Learned Dr. Ghazala Rafique Aga Khan University Pakistan Regional Consultative Meetings on.
Slide 1. slide 2 slide 3 Risk to Ready begins with the Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 through.
Oklahoma Parents as Teachers (OPAT) Program Results 1.
Chapter 7: Achievement Gap Starts Early: Preschool Can Help PRESENTED BY CHAPTER 7 GROUP.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Qatar World Health Survey Socio demographic Risk Factors Morbidity Health State Valuation Health System Responsiveness.
On Health, Human Development Potential and the Quality of Life: Towards Biological-based Indexes of Human Development Potential for Assessing the Quality.
Right Information Right people Right time Performance & Evaluation Division Snapshot Health and developmental differences between boys and girls at school.
PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP Seminar Unit 3 Identification and Early Intervention.
Why should you care about diversity?. 2 There are significant disparities in the education, economic well- being, and health of children in the U.S. based.
Sociocultural Influences Related to Language, Cognition, and Social Emotional Developmental Relationships Presenters: Kimberly Sharkins & Dr. James Ernest.
Comparing Year 9 and Year 10 May, Background Assessment and Action Record Interviews (AAR’s) are completed annually with all children and youth.
Innovative methodologies: Using brain imaging to evaluate nutritional intervention strategies in resource-poor settings Sophie E. Moore Group Leader: Maternal.
1 A Comparison of Motor Delays in Young Children: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental Delay, and Developmental Concerns Beth Provost, Brian R. Lopez,
Investigating parental socioeconomic position, in utero growth and risk of child development disorders using linked administrative data Dr Chris Playford.
Jean Lowe Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Pediatrics Collaborators: Department of Pediatrics Pediatric Research Committee Division of Neonatology.
The Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC)
European Early Childhood Education Research Association
M. Boyle1,3,4, R. Pinnamaneni 2,3,4, F. Malone 2,4, J
Measures of Infant and Early Childhood Development Pertemuan 13
using Denver II subscales
A Structured Approach to Equity Analysis of SEL outcomes: Evidence from IRS’s 3EA in Niger Silvia Diazgranados, Senior Researcher for Education, IRC;
ASQ : SE 2 Webinar.
Nicolette Roman* & Adele Grosse INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Dr Chris Playford @playford_chris Data Linkage Scotland Showcase 2016
Limited psychosocial stimulation and nutritional problems as associates of developmental performances of children in extreme poverty in Jimma, Ethiopia.
The New York State Core Body of KNowledge
Janet Vogt, Kim Ankers, Barry Isaacs Surrey Place Centre
Father play in multiple contexts: Study Site Information
Parenting behaviors predict effortful control and internalizing/externalizing problems among children during the first year of a cancer diagnosis Emily.
Human Factors, Age Grading, and Design Evaluations
Child Development for High School Students
Mean of Subjectivity of Self Mean of Objectivity of Self
Overview for Birth to Six Initiative
EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY Unit 6 – Part 2 Intelligence Ms. Markham.
Travis Wright, Ed.D April 26, 2018
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Using Standards and Assessment in Early Childhood Education
Health in the Americas: Regional Challenges and Strategic Directions
Sel in ymca afterschool project results
Development and Milestones Krzysztof Narębski
An Overview of the Areas of Child Development
Orphaned Children Morrison and Ellwood (2000):
TLC Personnel Mary Muhlenhaupt, OTD, OTR/L, FAOTA Robin Miccio, MS
ASQ Ages Stages Questionnaires
A Shared Developmental Approach: Meeting Well-Being Needs and Addressing Trauma to Promote Healthy Development CLARE ANDERSON, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION.
ELM DICIPE Mozambique Gaza, Nampula, and Tete Midline 2016
Early Childhood Special Education
An Examination of the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children in Care: The Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Minorities and the ASQ:SE Barbara Greenberga,
A holistic approach to child development: factors influencing overall development in children in care in Ontario, Canada Meagan Millera, Barbara Greenberga,
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Northwest Early Learning
Study Design/Methods Used
Kristin E. Gross & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
EDI Neighbourhood Data
Profiles of Everyday Executive Function with the Behavior Rating of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF2) Presented by Jennifer Greene, MSPH Melissa.
Chapter 9 - Physical and Cognitive Development in middle childhood (7-12 years)
Presentation transcript:

Socioeconomic factors in development and behavioural outcomes in Uruguayan children under 4 years old.  La situación conductual y del desarrollo en la primera infancia (0-4) y su asociación con factores socioeconómicos. Un análisis del caso uruguayo. Peter Fitermann Juan Mila GEF-Grupo de Estudios de Familia - UDELAR (English translation)

The objective of the assesment in early child development Get free access databases about life conditions and context of children and child development (0-3 ) Collect detailed data about health , nutrition and child development and their causes. Follow up of a Panel Sample (next wave: November 2015) Have insights to monitor and design public policies

Instruments Sample: 0–47months N=1163. Socioeconomic questionnaire with contextual information Anthropometric data: height, weight and head circumference Psychometric tests       ASQ: SE       ASQ 3 (from 3rd month )       CBCL (from 18th month)       EEDP (up to 23rd month)       TEPSI language (from the 24th month)       MSP instrument (Uruguay)       Bedregal Instrument(DIEH-Chile)

Socio-Emotional Development Self-regulation Compliance Communication Adaptative functioning Autonomy Affect Interaction with people

ASQ:SE SOCIO-EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

ASQ:SE SOCIO-EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

ASQ:SE Frequencies and % USA Montevideo 6 m 15% 4% 12 m 12% 3% 18 m 9%   USA Montevideo ASQ  Total Risk Risk % Risk % 6 m 71 11 15% 101 4 4% 12 m 85 10 12% 132 3% 18 m 99 9 9% 192 5% 24 m 152 17 11% 188 19 10% 30 m 116 179 22 36 m 28 16% 244 27 48 m 174 20 50 6 TOTAL 876 105 1086 91 8%

ASQ: SE (age in monts) Nomal range Monitoring range

Socio-Emotional Development. Risk Range Normal Range Above Poverty Below Poverty Household Income by quintiles Poverty

Boys Girls Below Poverty Above Poverty Monitoring Range Monitoring Range

CBCL PREESCHOOLARS

CBCL 1 ½-5 preeschoolars Internalized Problems ( %) Externalized Normal Distribution (Percentiles P83-P90)

It is premature to extract optimistic conclusions from the relatively low values from the ASQ:SE and CBCL 1.5 / 5. analysis. CBCL: Total and Internalized problems, parents have reported fewer symptoms and problem behaviors than the average founded in other societies; otherwise, the prevalence of Externalized Problems is similar to the values found in other societies. ASQ:SE: low prevalence of difficulties are founded at low ages (less than 24 months) Cbcl and ASQ:SE search for similar difficulties, sharing only aprox. 10 % of items. Both evaluate the emotional, social and behavioral areas. Both show slightly low means (raw scores). Is the first use in our society in large scale and these results should be analyzed carefully.

URUGUAY

CBCL 1 1/2 - 5 Household Income quintiles Household Income quintiles: from low income (1) to high (5)

CBCL Preschoolars -Clinical Range 18 -23 months 24 -35 months Total Total Problems 5.03 3.07 2.02 3.78 Internalized Problems 1.44 2.92 3.14 2.31 Externalized Problems 11.14 7.44 5.47 8.79

Probability of having problems in different domains, related with educational background (years) of principal caretaker.

ASQ:3 18 Questionnaires, 30 items each (aprox.) From 1 to 47 months in this study (66 months max. the instrument) 5 areas of develoment: Comunication Fine Motor skills Gross Motor skills Problem Resolution Social- Individual

Grafico 1.- Resultados globales para ASQ:3 Sub-muestra Montevideo, 1-47 meses, N=1163 Gross Motor Gross Motor Fine Motor

ASQ:3 % of children within Risk Range <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months Communication Gross Motor Fine Motor Problem Solving Socio-individual

Gross Motor Communication Problem Fine Motor Solving <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months <24 months >24 months Expected Gross Motor Problem Solving Communication Fine Motor

Gross Motor Skills Fine Motor Skills Problem Solving Communication Social-Individual

ASQ:3 results by Household poverty condition Pov Not Pov Pov Not Pov Pov Not Pov Pov Not Pov Pov Not Pov Communication Gross Motor Fine Motor Problem Solving Risk Range Monitoring Range

ASQ:3 Normal Range by Household income quintiles Gross Motor Problem Solving Communication Fine Motor Quintil 1 Quintil 2 Quintil 3 Quintil 4 Quintil 5

ASQ:3 allows to screen motor and psicological -cognitive, social and afective- basic skills Near twice of % expected of children in the Risk Range: 4 - 8 %. Aprox. 11% of children in Monitoring Range (acording to expected %)

ASQ:3.- In four of the five areas evaluated, better performances are achieved in 3 years old children. By contrast, Problem Solving area (Cognitive) show an increased value of children in the Risk zone, reaching values of 8.6% in 3 years old children. In the next wave, the age range studied will include children up to 6 years old.

ASQ:3 and Household Income Worst performances are found in lower income households in four areas: communication, fine motor skills, problem solving and social-individual. Only gross motor skills area show no differences in results by household income.

The following table summarizes the main findings by gender. Statistical tests shows differences between genders are significant at 5% for all areas except Gross Motor. The results indicate a slight advantage in performance for girls. With different methodology, only found in the sample without expanding statistically significant differences in the 95% CI for the areas of communication and fine motor skills. The following table summarizes the main findings by gender.  Range  Communication Gross Motor Skills Fine Motor Skills Problem Solving Social-individual Boys Girls Risk 7,2% 3,4% 4,8% 6,4% 6,2% 2,5% 6,7% 3,8% Monitoring 9,8% 9,0% 9,1% 6,3% 14,0% 8,5% 10,7% 8,9% Normal 83,0% 87,6% 86,0% 87,3% 79,8% 89,0% 82,6%

Risk and Monitoring Ranges. ASQ:3 - Girls and Boys – Risk and Monitoring Ranges. Monitoring Range Risk Range Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Fine Motor Communication Gross Motor Problem Solving