UNC NOMINATION & ELECTION PROCESSES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Code Governance Review: WWU views on potential changes to UNC and the Modification Panel Simon Trivella – 30 th March 2010 Governance Workstream.
Advertisements

Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
Pro’s and Con’s of Codes UNC Code Administrator Working Group 28 August 2008.
1 Public Outreach October 2008 By Adelina Murtezaj – Public Relation Officer For Inaugural Partnership Activity between ICC and ERO.
REF Information Session August Research Excellence Framework (REF)
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services Progress Report for Ofgem 5 th December 2006.
Structure of the National Council for Journalism Ethics Bulgaria.
Modification Panel Constitution and Voting Rights Tim Davis March 2010.
1) Establish & Identify Scheme 5) Evolve Scheme 4) Review & Modify Scheme Deliverables 3) Operate the Framework 2) Manage Performance Assurance Scheme.
Gas Forum Proposed Process for UNC Modification Panel & Committee Elections.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Learning for Life: The Place of Assessment Encouraging, Guiding and Creating.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Administrative Changes to the UK-Link Manual Modification 414 and SIS Removal David Addison.
Modification: Inclusion of as a valid UNC communication Allowing as a valid form of UNC communication in specific circumstances.
1 UK Link Security Policy Review January UK Link Security Policy UK Link Security Policy requires review –Administrative changes Amendment of.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Modification 0232 Presentation for Total By Gareth Evans.
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
GUIDELINES FOR ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS – KEY CONCEPTS AND PROCESSES.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PROCESS FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS PLAN DEVELOPMENT March, 2016.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
CHAPTER 13 SECTION 4 Presidential Nominations. Starter.
ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT. The formal title of the Agreement is Australian National University Student Associations Enterprise Agreement 2016 – 2019.
Post Elections January 21, 2017
RBD NOTIFICATION PROCESS
INAS GOVERNANCE CONSULTATION September 2016
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 4th October 2011.
PROPOSED NEW STRUCTURE
ENCOURAGE YOUR MEMBERS TO VOTE
Recruiting Candidates
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 4
Chapter Elections: Incorporated & Unincorporated
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
State Elections: Incorporated & Unincorporated
Gemini Code Contingency Testing – Exercise Star
XRN4770 – NDM Sample Data – Modification 0654 delivery – Amended file format ChMC – 9th January 2019.
UNC User Representatives Process
2009 Standards Committee Elections Information
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 4
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 4
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Chapter 13: The Presidency Section 4
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
Development of Firm Monitor & GBA
Background MDD is currently managed within SPAA
Proposer: Penny Garner Panel Date: 19 April 2018
Workgroup Timetable Tim Davis.
DSC Credit Committee DSC Credit Committee – Present
UNC Modification Proposal 0385 Inclusion of DNOs as Users in User Pays Arrangements Phil Lucas 7 June 2011.
Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010
Stefan Leedham 22 November 2007
Modification proposal 330
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
UNC User Representatives Process
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
UNC MOD 213: USER PAYS GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
30th November 2007 Beverley Grubb SGN
Joint Office UNC Elections
OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES
Capacity Access Review
Presentation transcript:

UNC NOMINATION & ELECTION PROCESSES STEFAN LEEDHAM 21 JANUARY 2010

WHAT IS IN SCOPE? Process for electing Shipper representatives to the UNC Panel, UNCC, UK Link Committee, Energy Balancing Credit Committee, DESC, RbD Audit and Standards of Service including: Nomination Process Shipper Voting Administration Notification Does not cover: Transporter “election” process Any changes to the role of Shipper representation – e.g. constituency representation etc Role of Shipper representatives at the Panel

WHY SHOULD THE ELECTION PROCESS BE IN THE UNC? Provides Transparency? Provides formal Governance process? Inclusivity? Gas Forum utilises Joint Office distribution lists to administer the process already Ensures impartiality? Consistent with other codes?

HIGHLEVEL PRINCIPLES Process should be administered by the Joint Office? Shipper nominations should be supported by an independent company Shipper nominations should be open for 4 weeks Shipper elections (if required) should be open for 4 weeks and should be completed by the last Business Day before the 24th of September. Votes can be submitted either by fax, email or post but have to be received by 17.00 on the last Business Day before the 24th of September. Only companies with a Shipper Licence should be eligible to vote Each company who is eligible to vote will only have 1 vote regardless of the number of Shipper Licences held

HIGHLEVEL PRINCIPLES CONT. Discretion will be provided to the Joint Office to decide whether a vote is eligible or not? In instances when voting eligibility is not clear the Joint Office if they wish can seek a view from the UNC Panel who will decide by simple majority? On completion of an election the Joint Office will notify the industry of the results including: Names of representatives Votes cast for each candidate (if applicable) Number of ineligible votes (if applicable)

GOVERNANCE OF PROCESS Referenced in UNC? Detailed process and rules to be incorporated as a UNC Related Document? Changes to process to follow same route as normal changes to UNC Related Documents?

QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU