Luminosity Monitor Status

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

Measuring Cosmic Ray Flux with a trigger and CAMAC readout - Page 1 Connect the Fluke 415 HV supply output to the input of the voltage distribution box.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.
Particle ID in the MICE Beamline MICE Collaboration Meeting 30 March Paul Soler, Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
Beam Position Monitors MICE CM Harbin January, 2009.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update End of Sept Run Linda R. Coney 05 October, 2009.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
MOM Report Paul Soler MICE Operations Manager University of Glasgow MICO April 12, 2010.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
MICO 8 th February 2010 Terry Hart (MOM) - Decay Solenoid and Target - MICE Machine Physics runs - Problems and Issues.
MOM - M.ApollonioAccel. R&D/Physics and IADR - RAL - 19/3/ Summary of MICE operations – 14/15 March 2008 AIMS - establish MICE beamline in ISIS synchrotron.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
CMPB Alain Blondel 14 April STATUS OF MICE.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 7 September, 2009.
1 M. Bonesini - CM 25 RAL 5/11/09 PID status report M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
MICE CM26 March '10Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM25 o DAQ System Upgrade o Luminosity Monitors o Sequels of.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Background measurements and simulation Hayg Guler Marc Verderi LLR – Ecole polytechnique ATF2 project meeting, June 2009.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )
Energy Distribution of Cosmic Ray Muons Paul Hinrichs With David Lee Advised by Phil Dudero.
MICE CM16 Oct 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Status o Since CM15 o Detector DAQ software o Interface DDAQ / Mice Control & Monitoring.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Status of Beam loss Monitoring on CTF3 Results of Tests on LINAC and PETS as R&D for TBL Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Thibaut Lefevre CERN CTF3.
M. Aoki Translation of slides in 2010 JPS meeting (Okayama) By K. Shimomura and M. Aoki M. Aoki A , T. Ebihara A , N. Kawamura , Y. Kuno A , P. Strasser.
PANDA FTOF Prototyping Anton A. Izotov, Gatchina
Yury Gurchin June 2011 MEASUREMENT OF THE CROSS-SECTION IN DP-ELASTIC SCATTERING AT THE ENERGIES OF 500 AND 880 MEV AT NUCLOTRON.
Preparation for E Pi0 Collaboration Meeting Tuesday Feb R.Lindgren.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 24 September, 2009.
Tracker Timing and ISIS RF Edward Overton 1. At CM32… 2 Had done some preliminary checks on the ISIS RF. Was beginning to think about how to handle the.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
Alain Blondel MICE VC 12 March 2009 Brief MICE news 1. Decay solenoid: operations will restart in early July. Criteria for acceptance have been specified.
1 Measurement of particle production from the MICE target Kenny Walaron, Paul Soler University of Glasgow.
MICE Run Plan Sept/Oct 2009 m. apollonio – IC MACHINE PHYSICS USERs RUN NO SHIFT A B C D E.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
Target tests 1 st – 2 nd Nov. Chris Booth Sheffield 7 th December 2006.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
Running plan Step I.1 Basic radiation levels. I.1.1 ISIS running with beam elements on, target off, beam stop shut. Establish permanent MICE monitoring.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
MICE CM39 St Catherine’s, Oxford, 26 June 2014 Paul Soler Instrumentation Global Commissioning Plan.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.
M. apollonio 7/7/2010CM27 - RAL11 Beam-Line Analysis …
Eli Piasetzky Tel Aviv University Beam Scintillating Fibers PSI, Technical Review, July 2012 Guy Ron Hebrew University Israel.
FTOF Status Anton A. Izotov, Frascati
TOF Emittance Emittance measurements with the TOFs Mark Rayner 4 December 2008.
"North American" Electronics
Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
F.Guber, A.Ivashkin INR, Moscow
Status of the TOF Detector
Conceptual design of TOF and beam test results
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Segmented high resolution fast neutron spectrometer:
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity Monitor Status MICE Collaboration Meeting 5 November 2009 Paul Soler

Purpose of Luminosity Monitors Luminosity monitor to determine particle rate close to target and extract protons on target as function of depth – independent of beam loss monitors. Luminosity monitor will record the number of particles crossing 4 scintillators for every spill – can build up high statistics to validate particle production in target. By having a small plastic filter we can also reduce low energy protons – some sensitivity to proton energy. Can be used to compare particle rates close to target (luminosity monitor measures mainly protons and pions) with other counters along beamline (GVA1, TOF0, CKOV, TOF1 and FBPM counters which measure pions, muons, electrons) – validate beamline simulations For this reason, the luminosity monitor will be very useful for beam commissioning P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

Purpose of Luminosity Monitors (cont.) Validation of beamline simulations Comparison with beam-loss monitors to determine protons-on-target (pot) and cross-correlate BLM calibrations BLM calibrations as function of KE: P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

Particle Counters in 2006 We already did particle monitoring during first target test in November 2006: two sets of detectors at 10 m distance, 30o angle (where D1 is now) 1 pair of shielded scintillators: 3x3x30 mm3 (with 5 cm polyethylene shielding) 1 unshielded pair of detectors: 10x10x10 mm3 Scope DAQ and readout to Linux PC via GPIB Signals from scintillators and ISIS were read out and recorded using oscilloscopes for each burst Discrimination and coincidence of signals performed offline Position of detectors (same angle as MICE beam) Unshielded detectors All described in MICE-NOTE-227 P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

Data taking Nov 2006 Number of particles recorded by detectors during last 2 ms of spill (KE=778+22-64 MeV) when target expects to dip in beam Correlation between beam loss and number of particles in last 2 ms of spill recorded by detectors Unshielded detectors Shielded detectors 50 mV integrated beam loss signal corresponds to 2.8x109 protons on target (calibration: 3.5x10-14 V s/proton at 9 ms with ~50% error) P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

MARS Distributions at Scintillator Plane Number particles Simulations: 10 Million protons on MICE target, KE = 800 MeV (from 2006) Number particles Unshielded 5 cm polyethylene shielding P (MeV/c) P (MeV/c) MARS yields in simulated area of 40x40 cm2 at 10 m distance P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

GEANT4 Distributions at Scintillator Plane Number particles Simulations: 10 Million protons on MICE target, KE = 800 MeV (from 2006) Number particles Unshielded 5 cm polyethylene shielding P (MeV/c) P (MeV/c) GEANT4 yields in simulated area of 40x40 cm2 at 10 m distance P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

Back of envelope calculations For example, let’s take beam loss of 50 mV: From MARS simulation at 800 MeV: So, the expected number of singles in 1 cm2 is: So, most particles observed in target test were protons Found agreement between MARS, GEANT4 and data If we want to discriminate integrated proton flux above some energy threshold then introduce shielding between first pair and second pair scintillators (in last two milliseconds) (compare to observed rate in slide 5) P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

Proposed design of Luminosity Monitors Final design of luminosity monitor: Rate: for beam loss monitors running 50 times higher level (ie. beam loss ~2.5 V) would mean around 2000 particles/cm2 in final 2 ms of spill (ie ~4 MHz proton rate in 4 cm2) Cuts off: protons ~500 MeV/c pions ~150 MeV/c Beam P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

Photomultipliers PMTs: Hamamatsu H5783P 0.8 ns rise time ~1x106 gain Only need to provide 15V to power PMT Cost: £632/PMT. Had two already, only needed to buy two extra (~£1300) Readout: use NIM coincidence units and count three channels using VME scalers already in DAQ 50 mm High rate capability with 10 ns coincidence gate If rate still an issue, can make more shielding P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009

Status Luminosity Monitor The box with four scintillators+PMTs is ready Was going to install during shutdown on 26 October but communication with MICE-OM and management was not optimum to schedule installation, so decided to delay until next shutdown Biggest challenge: need to install RG58 cables (8 x 50 m between ISIS and MICE counting room) through synchrotron vault – coordinate with ISIS, MICE-OM and Willy Also coordinate stand for luminosity monitor. Can have luminosity monitor ready for run in new year Independently: MSci project student to work on simulations and final analysis of luminosity monitor data in MICE P Soler, MICE CM25, 5 November 2009