Failed to Meet Standard 6

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WV High Quality Standards for Schools

Advertisements

David J. Sammons, Dean UF International Center. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools: SACS is our regional accrediting authority. The last SACS.

Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.

What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.

Enhancing Teaching & Learning at Harvard Kennedy School December 5, 2011.

College Council Presentation Proposed Re-Alignment of College Standing Committees: Strengthening Shared Governance October 23, 2013.

As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.

Expected Visit Date Spring  Pam Campbell  Patti Chance  Kathi Ducasse  Sandra Odell  Tom Pierce  LeAnn Putney  Nancy Sileo  Shannon Smith.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.

Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.

Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.

PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.

Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.

Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.

University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.

 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.

Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.

Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.

Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.

NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University

2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.

Graduate School of Education Assessment October 10, 2013.

 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.

University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.

Unit Assessment System Teacher Education at Purdue March 4, 2012.

A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-

The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.

© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.

Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.

Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.

Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.

Who We Are When Working in Assessment  Carl Brun works with Gen Ed and other programs  Aligning curriculum with standards  Collecting syllabi and posting.

Office of Academic Affairs July 18, 2012 Faculty Focus Newsletter O Purpose: To keep faculty informed about key academic policies and college wide issues,

Standard 6 Unit Governance and Resources. 6a: Unit Leadership and Authority The unit and other faculty collaborate with P-12 practitioners in program.

Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.

College Success Program John Cowles, Ph.D. Dean of Student Success and Retention Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Candidate Learning Outcomes. REPORTING AGENCIES STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION (SBEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCTION.

Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage

Erik Shearer, Professor of Art, Accreditation Faculty Co-chair

AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016

Creating a Culture of Assessment

Writing Program-level Student Learning Outcomes (PSLOs)

QM, Health Care, Adult Learners, and Leadership

The assessment process For Administrative units

Assessment & Evaluation Committee

Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)

Angelo State University College of Education August 17, 2011

Expectations for Degree Programs: Curriculum & Assessment

Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.

Shared Governance at Colorado State University:

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Buffalo Public Schools

Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update

Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009

Considerations in Engineering

College Council Presentation

Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations

Assessment Committee Meeting December 15, 2010

Assessment & Evaluation Committee

Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW

Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University

Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College

Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair

Florida State University PhD Completion Project Phases I & II

NCATE Standard Five Jim Summerlin Maggie Blair Stephen Emmons

Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair

Navigating Institutional Improvement and Accreditation

Elizabeth Crawford The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Responsibility for assessment at Brooklyn college – a distributed leadership model OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness September 9, 2019.

Presentation transcript:

Failed to Meet Standard 6

Standard 6: Goverance The unit has the leadership, authority, budget, personnel, facilities, and resources, including technology resources, for the preparation of candidates to meet professional, state, and institutional standards.

Standard 6.2 Target Level Describe areas of the standard at which the unit is currently performing. Summarize activities and impact on candidate performance. Discuss plans and timelines for obtaining/sustaining.

Exhibits Policy, procedures, and practices (PPP) This will include all aspects for all candidates in our programs – here or distant. Informal PPP will be formalized this year with input from all stakeholders. If we say, this is the way we do “it” then we will develop written PPP. All we be published online.

Areas for Improvement 1. The unit governance structure does not facilitate effective unit planning and operation across programs of study for other school professionals. Graduate Advisory Committee Department Meetings to discuss graduate program issues. Program leaders meetings to assure coordination and cooperation. Effective reviews of Graduate Programs

AFIs 2. The unit governance structure does not ensure the review and use of data to improve the quality of programs, unit operations, and the performance of candidates. Data session today to analyze data from 2010 academic year (2009-2010) Identify what is collected. Analyze what is collected. Determine what is needed for program improvement. Fall 2011, data analysis for 2011 academic year (2010-2011). Must be addressed by program for initial, advanced, and other school personnel. Each program will produce a report stating success, failures, areas for improvement, etc.

Area for improvement 3. The unit governance structure does not facility collaboration among unit faculty to plan, deliver, and operated coherent programs of study. Policy development for unit. Both initial, advanced, and other school personnel collaboration QM for DE courses Common graduate core Common TaskStream Collection of data. Graduate Advisory Group Interdepartmental discussions

Areas for Improvement 4. The unit governance structure does not ensure effective use of unit-wide assessment data. All data repository in EPI Center Periodic review of data across all programs Use of TaskStream to collect, report, and analyze data. Annual report of data use by all programs

What is being done! 1. All programs review of 2010 data and report generation today. 2. All program review of 2011 data and report Fall 2011. 3. Policy and procedure manual for unit governance. 4. Common graduate core 5. Unit Graduate Advisory Committee 6. Unit Undergraduate Advisory Committee 7. Unite Distance Education Graduate Advisory Committee 8. Coordinated Faculty Development as part of evaluation 9. Alignment of all data with ASEP, NCATE, SACS 10. TaskStream for program SLOs, EPI data central, access for SBEC

Standard 6 Committee Dr. John Miazga, Chair Dr. Richard Bain, C&I Dr. Judith Hakes, TED Dr. Jim Summerlin, C&I Dr. Linda Lucksinger, TED Dr. Brian May, Provost and Graduate Dean