CIIMS Proposal for TOP-003 Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Advertisements

Operating Committee Chair Report Scott Kinney, OC Chair March 25, 2015.
The Securities and Exchange Commission: 21 st Century Disclosure Initiative September 9, 2008.
CIIMS Update Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair. Critical Infrastructure & Information Management Subcommittee (CIIMS) 2 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING.
CIIMS Update Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Date Texas RE Board Update to TAC November 5, 2009 Susan Vincent Director, Legal Affairs.
AMIT Transition to RMS Update March 20, 2013 Christine Wright Infrastructure & Reliability Division Public Utility Commission of Texas.
May Agenda  PeopleSoft History at Emory  Program Governance  Why Upgrade Now?  Program Guiding Principles  High-Level Roadmap  What Does This.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Delaware Health Benefit Exchange (HBE) Project Update Delaware Health Care Commission Meeting: March 28, 2013.
Joint Outreach Team Implementation Plan July 12, :30-11:30 a.m.
July 2008 CPS2 Waiver SDT Technical Workshop for Draft BAL-001-TRE-01 Judith A. James Reliability Standards Manager TRE.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
Paragraph 81 Project. 2RELIABILITY | ACCOUNTABILITY Background FERC March 15, 2012 Order regarding the Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) process  Paragraph.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.
Standard Unique Health Identifier for Health Care Providers April 9, th Annual HIPAA Summit Gail Kocher Highmark.
Texas Regional Entity ROS Presentation January 15, 2009 T EXAS RE ROS P RESENTATION J ANUARY 2009.
Projects System Protection Coordination Draft 2 of TOP Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee November 2, 2015.
1 Power System Restoration. 2 Not Active 3 4 Compliance Audit Process APPA E&O Technical Conference – Atlanta April 16, 2007.
Complete Streets COP Feedback on Suggested Activities Please Provide Us With Your Feedback.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
CIIMS Update Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair March 22, 2016.
CIIMS Proposal for TOP-003 Approach Stacen Tyskiewicz WECC CIIMS Chair March 22, 2016.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Path Operator Implementation Task Force Vic Howell, Vice Chair Report to OC March 22, 2016.
TEPPC Review Task Force Ian McKay, Chair, TEPPC W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Under the new grants process, both districts and clubs assume greater responsibility for the management of grants. The Rotary Foundation has established.
District and Club Qualification
WECC MAC Committee Update
Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair July 12, 2016
WP5 Uptake, Outreach and Interaction
Updated ERO Enterprise Guide for Internal Controls
Stacen Tyskiewicz CIIMS Chair October 18, 2016
Pike County Schools Implementing PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Focus on the Students Sherri Heise, Director of Instruction Tonia.
Path Operator Implementation Task Force
TOP-003 Task Force Webinar Update
Nick Hatton Associate Engineer March 9, 2017
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Business Practices Subcommittee Update
ORSTF Proposal.
Kenneth Silver Los Angeles Department of Water & Power
Reliability Assessment Guidebook (RAG): Status Report
Fiscal Agent Role and process for SwP
Reliability Assessment Guidebook (RAG): Status Report
Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Investment
Rates & Regulatory Updates
Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting Team Chair
Security Guidelines Working Group Update
SPR&I Regional Training
Compliance Open Webinar
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
Update - Security Policies
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
Scott Downey Director of Compliance
Mandatory Reliability Standards
Coordinate Operations Standard
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
Compliance Open Webinar
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
North America Energy Standards Board
Performance Measure Recommendations
Eric Baran, WIRAB Staff April 30, 2018
TIBC Budget Formulation Improvement Project
Peak Reliability IRO Webinar
Timeline Overview Planned Timescales
Standards Development Process
MAC Input on Section 4.9 Review
Safety Standards Committee meetings 24th TRANSSC meeting Agenda item 3
Report on CEOS Executive Officer functions
Presentation transcript:

CIIMS Proposal for TOP-003 Approach Stacen Tyskiewicz WECC CIIMS Chair March 22, 2016

TOP-003 New reliability standard TOP-003-3 becomes effective on January 1, 2017 with a stated purpose of ensuring that TOPs and BAs have data needed to fulfill their operational and planning responsibilities. Proposal: Collaborate on a common approach for each TOP and BA within WECC to consider while implementing compliance with TOP-003. Purpose: To offer solutions that help us all manage these data requests most efficiently and effectively.

Requirements 1 & 2: Document Specification Requirements 1 and 2 direct each TOP and BA to maintain a documented specification for the data necessary for it to perform its analysis functions and real‐time monitoring. Recommendation: Each entity will start with the data request specification developed by Peak RC and refine it to address its own needs. This will likely include narrowing the scope from “all BES equipment” to just that needed by the requesting entity. Given that the starting point is a comprehensive list that Peak RC has matured over the years, it’s unlikely that new items will need to be added, but additions can be made as needed. Benefits: Takes advantage of lessons learned on what should be included in the request and details about submittal methods Keeps formatting and vocabulary consistent across all requests to minimize confusion Facilitates keeping all TOPs and BAs in-sync as data needs evolve over the years

Requirements 3 & 4: Distribute Specification Requirements 3 and 4 direct each TOP and BA to distribute its data specification to entities that have data required to perform its analysis functions and Real‐time monitoring. Recommendations: Each entity will post its version of the TOP-003 data request specification to a location on Peak RC’s secure website. It may be necessary to use some other means as well to track receipt, but an effort will be made to accommodate the necessary tracking on the Peak RC site.  To address one of the big challenges that Peak RC has had with IRO-010, a centralized list of entity points-of-contact will also be posted on this site. Benefits: All data requests can be found on one site All points-of-contact can be found on one site; changing a p.o.c. will require an update in one location rather than with each separate data-sharing partner. If tracking receipt can be accommodated on the site, this centralized approach is an improvement over numerous emails.

Requirement 5: Satisfy Specification Requirement 5 directs registered entities receiving a TOP-003 data specification to satisfy the obligations of the documented specification using a mutually agreeable format, process and security protocol. Recommendation: Entities will share data directly, or through Peak RC, or some combination of those approaches. Additionally, we will explore possibilities for tracking and/or providing evidence of meeting this requirement. We envision most BAs and TOPs receiving numerous data specifications and our goal is to provide a centralized and secure location for the data to be posted so that it has, with one effort, been made available to all requesting entities. Benefits: Secure location for file exchange Potentially offers a convenient and consistent approach for tracking fulfillment of this requirement. Note: In addition to TOPs and BAs, Requirement 5 applies to entities registered as a TO, GO, GOP, LSE, and DP. Fulfillment of requests by those entities will likely need to be handled using a separate process.

Other Considerations In addition to the topics covered by previous slides, the team will consider the following while developing the proposal: Ongoing maintenance of data specifications Connection with Peak RC Universal Data-Sharing Agreement (UDSA) Data retention (on Peak RC site) Documentation of agreement by participating entities and/or agreement from WECC compliance staff that the proposal is an approved practice within the Western Interconnect. Other topics as suggested by participating entities

(CIIMS/EMSWG/DEWG Meetings) Timeline December 2015 Initial outreach to EMSWG/DEWG members; ask Peak RC for support February 2016 (CIIMS/EMSWG/DEWG Meetings) Brainstorm/draft high level proposal March 2016 (OC Meeting) Present proposal to OC March – June 2016 Collaborate (emails, Webinar, meetings?) to build out proposal June 2016 Finalize proposal July 2016 Update OC on progress July – October 2016 Implement processes October 2016 Check implementation status; address issues January 1, 2017 All WECC entities compliant with R1-R4 April 1, 2017 All WECC entities compliant with R5

What are we asking from TOPs and BAs at this time? Encourage your EMSWG and DEWG members to participate Review and provide feedback on the proposals developed Consider adopting the recommendations in your implementation of TOP-003-3