Business Assessment Test Results

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

USING THE CLA TO INFORM CAMPUS PLANNING Anne L. Hafner Campus WASC Faculty Coordinator Winter 2008.
Academic Outcomes of 4-Year University Freshman Cohorts: A Comparison of Dual Enrollees & Advanced Placement (AP) Credit Recipients Shoumi Mustafa and.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
CSU BAT Results. Results 1. Cal Poly Mean = 46.4 ± San Diego Mean = 41.3 ± Sonoma Mean = 40.5 ± Sacramento Mean = 39.9 ± Long.
Assurance of Learning The School of Business and Economics SUNY Plattsburgh.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
James Scott Ford Northside ISD, San Antonio, TX DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS IN THE NEW TEXAS SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM: GROWTH AND ACHIEVEMENT.
Data Analysis of Sweetwater High School Presented by: LeLycia Henderson & Zorayda Delgado.
San Diego State University  80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics  Administered to 2,025 test takers on 10 CSU campuses during the.
How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.
Highlights of West Virginia’s AP Performance Fall AP Institute West Virginia Center for Professional Development.
What do our students know?. What do we want our UG students to know? Student Learning Outcome Cycle #1 Assessed in: Cycle #2 Assessed in: Cycle #3 Assessed.
The Information Systems Analyst National Assessment Exam: Factors for Success Mark Segall Loren Gollhardt Joe Morrell.
San Diego State University  80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics  Administered to 1,106 test takers on 8 CSU campuses during the.
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
STUDENT AIMS PERFORMANCE IN A PREDOMINANTLY HISPANIC DISTRICT Lance Chebultz Arizona State University 2012.
College of Business San José State University Business Assessment Test Spring 2005.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
ASSURANCE OF LEARNING. WRITTEN COMM (MKT 305) current areas of assessment goates.2011 ORAL COMM (MGT 497) TEAMWORK (MGT 305) KNOWLEDGE computers & tech.
 Committed to the principle that all students deserve an opportunity to participate in rigorous and academically challenging courses and programs. All.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
What do our students know? A complete cycle of assessment: the common learning outcomes we hold for our UG students: Round IV,
A Pilot Program Using Skillsoft. Goal: Demonstrate an understanding of the major functional areas of Business. Learning Outcomes:  Describe basic concepts.
Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.
San Diego State University  80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics  Administered to 1,374 test takers on 9 CSU campuses during the.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Department of Human Resources Equal Opportunity in Employment 2011 Annual Report October 22, 2012.
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH FAST FACTS ACADEMIC YEAR Source:
USU Student Climate for Diversity
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
Student Experience Survey Spring 2009 Report
UMCP Student Loan Default Study & Financial Literacy Initiatives
Florida State University College of Nursing Tallahassee, Florida
Business Assessment Test Results
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Release of PARCC Student Results
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.
MIRACOSTA COLLEGE ISLOs
Business Assessment Test Results
Access Center Assessment Report
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Business Assessment Test Results
Fall 2018 California State University Updates
Engagement Survey Results: Demographics
MIRACOSTA COLLEGE ISLOs
MBA Appendix B Attachments 1 – 29 - Index
Notes Over 11.2 Number Compared to Base is Unknown
University of Washington Tacoma School of Engineering & Technology Student and Faculty Demographics.
Meaningful Methods For Outcomes Assessment: A Case Study
Fall 2018 California State University Updates
A comparative study of UNA students vs

Did not have a usual source of care Went without care because of cost
SUNY Oneonta’s CLA Results:
School Profile Andy Dekaney High School
Disproportionate Impact Study
Advanced Placement Enrollments & Exam Results
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Business Assessment Test Results San Diego State University 2010

General Method 80 Multiple Choice Qs covering all business topics Administered to 1,939 test takers on 7 CSU campuses during the 2009-2010 Academic Year Questions come from a pool of questions developed across the CSU system Analysis in 2007 allowed for the identification of 22 items of questionable validity. Results in years since 2007 are reported both “Unadjusted” (including the 22 items thus allowing for comparisons to previous years’ results) and “Adjusted” (omitting the 22 items thus providing for a more valid test. Efforts in Fall 2009 replaced some questions in Finance & Statistics Efforts underway in 2010 to completely overhaul the exam producing a new and improved, more valid and comprehensive test.

SDSU Method Exam administered in almost all Spring sections of MGT 405, during regular class time 526 students took the exam (27.1% of total sample – largest of all campuses). This included 402 in Spring 2010 & 124 in Fall 2009*. All students received some form of extra credit incentive Not true with all other CSU campuses Following 2008 findings that calculator use did not make a difference in performance, test administration has reverted to “No Calculators Allowed” * One section took the test in Fall 2009 as part of a Closing the Loop pilot project.

Average Performance All CSU SDSU Mean (Adjusted) 52.86% 56.41%

Comparative Statistics CAMPUS MEAN #1 San Diego 56.4% #2 53.1% #3 53.0% #4 52.9% #5 50.8% #6 50.7% #7 47.1%

Subject Area Results – SDSU vs Subject Area Results – SDSU vs. all CSU Percent of questions answered correctly within each subject area (all scores are adjusted to omit 22 questions) All SDSU All CSU Marketing 76.68 70.46 Management 68.44 66.42 MIS 62.48 62.30 Economics 54.90 50.97 Accounting 53.87 52.68 Business Law 49.76 47.88 Finance 44.57 42.51 Statistics 42.30 39.26

SDSU Subject Area Results Percent of questions answered correctly within each subject area (all scores are adjusted to omit 22 questions) All Majors Marketing 76.68 84.27 Management 68.44 72.68 MIS 62.48 84.21 Economics 54.90 Accounting 53.87 74.06 Business Law 49.76 Finance 44.57 58.50 Statistics 42.30

A closer look at statistics Overall Performance: 42.30% 301 Non-Takers 42.33% 37.4% of the test takers (FIN - 45.1%, IS - 36.8%, IB - 38.8%) 301 Takers 42.28% (ACC, MGT, MKT) 62.6% of the test takers Among 301 Takers: MKT (requires “C”) 46.71% Others (ACC, 39.6% & MGT, 39.1%)

Some interesting demographic comparisons . . . Status Full-Time Part-Time Mean Score 56.1 53.8 Age 20-25 26-30 31-35 36+ Mean Score 56.1 54.5 59.2 54.3 Hrs Worked Mean Score 0-10 56.0 11-20 55.4 21-30 57.5 31-40 54.6 > 40 53.6 Gender Male Female Mean Score 57.6 53.8 Ethnicity Mean Score Asian 55.3 Black 56.9 Hispanic 51.6 Middle Eastern 58.0 White 57.7 Other 52.6 Status Native Transfer Mean Score 56.8 55.1 Home Language English Other English/Other Balanced Mean Score 56.7 52.5 51.3

SDSU Longitudinal Comparisons Year Unadjusted Mean Adjusted Mean 2010 53.14% 56.41% 2009 51.48% 55.33% 2008 50.80% 54.86% 2007 50.25% 2006 50.10% 2005 2004 50.63%