Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
Getting on the MOVES: Using Dynameq and the US EPA MOVES Model to Measure the Air Pollution Emissions TRPC – Smart Corridors Project Chris Breiland Fehr.
SUZANNE CHILDRESS, ERIK SABINA, DAVID KURTH, TOM ROSSI, JENNIFER MALM DRCOG Focus Activity-Based Model Calibration/Validation Innovations in Travel Modeling.
NCHRP Renaissance Planning Group Rich Kuzmyak Chris Sinclair Alex Bell TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6, 2013 Columbus,
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Improving the Treatment of Priced Roadways in Mode Choice.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE. What Smartphone Bicycle GPS Data Can Tell Us About Current Modeling Efforts Katie Kam, The University of Texas at Austin.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Evaluating and Communicating Model Results: Guidebook for.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Transportation Planning Applications Committee (ADB50) presented by Sarah Sun Federal Highway Administration.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
PresentationA Explore Detroit Region Trip Chaining Behavior Presented by Liyang Feng & Jilan Chen Southeast Michigan Council of Governments The 12 th TRB.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Big Data “Triage” for Long Range Planning Transportation Engineering and Safety Conference Reuben S MacMartin December 12, 2014.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Evaluating Transportation Impacts of Forecast Demographic Scenarios Using Population Synthesis and Data Simulation Joshua Auld Kouros Mohammadian Taha.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
EFFECTS OF HOUSEHOLD LIFE CYCLE CHANGES ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOR EVIDENCE FROM MICHIGAN STATEWIDE HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL SURVEYS 13th TRB National Transportation Planning.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
an Iowa State University center SIMPCO Traffic Modeling Workshop Presented by: Iowa Department of Transportation and Center for Transportation Research.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Brian D. Mohr, Li-yang Feng, and Tom Bruff Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 11 th TRB Applications.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference CORRADINO May 9, Validation of Speeds and Volumes in a Large Regional Model Southeast.
Understanding Cellular-based Travel Data Experience from Phoenix Metropolitan Region Wang Zhang, Maricopa Association of Governments Arun Kuppam (Presenter),
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Livingston Washtenaw Monroe Oakland Wayne Macomb St. Clair SEMCOG Region.
Brian D. Mohr and Jilan Chen Southeast Michigan Council of Governments 11 th TRB Applications Conference Daytona Beach, FL May 8, 2007 SEMCOG Household.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
Transportation Planning Asian Institute of Technology
Tennessee Statewide Model Integration with the National Long Distance Passenger Model and Calibration to AirSage Data Vince Bernardin, PhD, RSG Hadi.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Robust Estimation Techniques for Trip Generation in Tennessee
Developing External and Truck Trips for a Regional Travel Model
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Using Linked Non-Home-Based Trips in Virginia
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Statewide Mode Choice Models for Tennessee
TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPDATE
APPLICATIONS OF STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL
Network Assignment and Equilibrium for Disaggregate Models
Transportation Engineering Mode Choice January 21, 2011
Auto Ownership Model For Southeast Florida Models Southeast Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 16, 2008 Corradino.
Traffic Engineering with VISUM
Building Confidence in TFlowFuzzy
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Yijing Lu (Baltimore Metropolitan Council)
Using Google’s Aggregated and Anonymized Trip Data to Estimate Dynamic Origin-Destination Matrices for San Francisco TRB Applications Conference 2017 Bhargava.
Making Activity-Based Models Easier to Use
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Chattanooga Transportation Data Collection Review
TNMUG – MPO Data Needs Discussion Knoxville Regional TPO Perspective
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Developing Regional Solutions
Comparison and Analysis of Big Data for a Regional Freeway Study in Washington State Amanda Deering, DKS Associates.
Presentation transcript:

Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data In Southeast Michigan 2017 Transportation Planning and Applications Conference Sean McAtee May 15, 2017

Presentation Overview Zone to Zone Travel Time Personal Vehicle Trip Patterns Commercial Vehicle Trip Patterns

Travel Times (Personal Travel)

Validate Network "Skims" Survey vs. StreetLight Skims vs. Survey Skims vs. StreetLight

Observed: StreetLight vs. Survey

Comparison: Skim vs. StreetLight

Comparison to Model  Walking to/from the vehicle = Not Included The model is running fast! How does StreetLight reflect Terminal Time?  Driving around looking for parking = Included  Walking to/from the vehicle = Not Included Speed and terminal times adjustments are necessary prior to trip distribution calibration Bigger sample size helps with localized adjustments (e.g., county and area type)

Passenger Vehicles

Household Survey Difference: StreetLight – [2015 HH Survey] 134% RMSE   Detroit Wayne Oakland Macomb Washtenaw Monroe St. Clair Livingston Total (521,918) (34,080) 71,759 (25,454) 3,034 (77) (555) 379 (506,912) (34,792) (856,192) 125,202 19,008 17,472 (8,398) 776 (4,793) (741,717) 79,092 124,302 2,140,679 56,052 21,684 2,277 (833) (7,660) 2,415,593 (32,297) 20,462 59,127 (808,758) 2,609 626 (22,159) 8 (780,382) 3,800 13,028 22,365 1,873 274,617 (5,528) 181 (92) 310,245 (443) (9,168) 2,265 135 (6,341) (193,425) 95 242 (206,641) (490) 743 19 (22,856) 186 (162) (294,363) (520) (317,442) (113) (8,178) (3,606) (1,069) 132 217 (527) (159,602) (172,746) (507,162) (749,083) 2,417,810 (781,069) 313,393 (204,468) (317,384) (172,037) Survey filtered to include only auto driver trips

County Level % Difference Trip Difference VMT Difference Detroit -14% -20% Wayne -21% Oakland 50% 26% Macomb -31% -15% Washtenaw 29% 11% Monroe -58% -32% St. Clair -68% -57% Livingston -36% 4% Assign scaled & expanded StreetLight trip table High Income County High Income County

StreetLight vs Activity Blue = StreetLight LOWER than Activity Red = StreetLight HIGHER than Activity Activity Index: Population + Employment * [Sum(Pop) / Sum(Emp)] StreetLight Index: Scaled so the regional total matches Activity Index

Median Income Blue = LOWER relative income Red = HIGHER relative income

% Differences by Income

Expansion Options Origin-Destination Matrix Estimation TAZ-Level IPF Adjust data using SEMCOG's assignment procedure and traffic counts Requires disaggregation and re-aggregation of the StreetLight data TAZ-Level IPF Start with activity index Adjust for income trip rate variation Adjust for auto mode share

Commercial Vehicles

Truck Activity Heat Map What? Not much here!

Truck Activity Heat Map

Monroe County

Monroe County A D C B

Monroe County - A Large Truck Stop: TL America

Monroe County - D Large Auto Auction Site Manheim Detroit

Monroe County Cabella’s, Truck Stop Large Warehouse Recycler Rest Area

Solution Identify major convenience stops Add small zones to data structure Link trips through these small zones

We are working with a sample Summary Biases can still creep into the datasets We are working with a sample Evaluate the data in a way that accounts for possible biases Travel time: seems reliable It may be necessary to adjust for income or other demographics Passenger vehicles: can be biased But it is important to understand the definition of a trip. Commercial vehicles: seems more robust

Collaborators SEMCOG Cambridge Systematics StreetLight Li-yang Feng Jilan Chen Cambridge Systematics Maria Martchouk Mathew Trostle David Kurth StreetLight Laura Schewel Neal Bowman

Questions?