This project is co-funded by the European Union I3U “Investigating the Impact of the Innovation Union“ Vienna meeting – 14-15 September 2015 WP8 – Making it happen Carlo Sessa – ISIS - mc7920@mclink.it ISIS – Institute of Studies for the Integration of Systems Largo dei Lombardi, 4 00186 Rome, Italy This project is co-funded by the European Union

WP8 - MAKING IT HAPPEN WP objectives Self-assessment of Member States reform programmes (state of the art of IU committment 33) Assessment of the Research and Innovation Union scoreboard and headline indicator (state of the art of IU committment 34) Qualitative assessment of innovation governance at EU level and in the individual Member States

WP8 - MAKING IT HAPPEN Tasks description Task 8.1 Assessment of the state of implementation of the Member States reform programme (IU committment 33), based on IU state of art reports and national sources (when available in English) Task 8.2 Assessment of the Innovation Union scoreboard and headline innovation output indicator (IU committment 34) and development of linkages to use them as inputs in NEMESIS Task 8.3 Qualitative assessment of the Innovation Union governance, at EU and member states level, based on literature and a number (20 to 30) of interviews Task leaders: ISIS (tasks 8.1 and 8.3), SEURECO (task 8.2)

Resources ISIS: 20 man/months SEURECO: 2 man/months UN-MERIT: 1,50 man/months

WP8 – IU committments 33 Commitment 33 – Member States R&I Systems: Member States are invited to carry out self-assessment based on the policy features identified in Annex I of the IU and identify key challenges and critical reforms as part of their National Reform Programmes. The Commission will support this process through exchanges of best practice, peer reviews and developing the evidence base. It will also apply them to its own research and innovation initiatives. Progress will be monitored in the framework of the integrated economic coordination (“European semester”). State of the art (2010-2014): Innovation Union Self-Assessment Tool (SAT) – Annex I of the IU Only 5 countries (Belgium, Estonia, Denmark, Spain, Iceland) used the tool to carry out peer reviews New tool launched under H2020: Policy Support Facility

WP8 – IU committment 34 State of the art (2010-2014): Commitment 34 – Develop an Innovation Headline Indicator and monitor progress using Innovation Union Scoreboard: The Commission proposes to launch the necessary work for the development of a new indicator measuring the share of fast growing innovative companies in the economy. This will require the full cooperation of Member States and international partners. Subject to these commitments, the Commission will submit the necessary proposals and take urgent action to develop this indicator within the next two years, working with OECD as appropriate, so that it can become, over time, a new headline indicator allowing as part of the EU2020 strategy to benchmark the EU’s performance against its main trading partners. Starting immediately, the Commission will monitor overall progress on innovation performance using the Research and Innovation Union scoreboard. State of the art (2010-2014): Innovation output indicator: Communication «Measuring Innovation output in Europe: towards a new indicator» adopted in 2013. Used for country specific recommendations in 2014 Innovation Union scoreboard: Updated in 2010 with 25 indicators. Published yearly, latest available issue in 2014

Literature sources Commission, E., 2011. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010–Methodology report. Mimeo, (September 2010). European Commission, 2012a. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2011. European Commission, 2013a. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013. Available at: European Commission, 2014a. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014. European Commission, Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014 The Innovation Union’s performance scoreboard for Research and Innovation. 2014. European Commission, 2013b. Lessons from a Decade of Innovation Policy What can be learnt from the INNO Policy TrendChart and The Innovation Union Scoreboard. European Commission, 2012b. Regional Innovation Index Regional champions within national Innovation Systems. European Commission, Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012. 2012. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ris-2012_en.pdf [Accessed March 20, 2015b]. European Commission, 2014b. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014. European Commission, Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014 Executive summary. European Commission, 2013c. Research and Innovation performance in Israel Country profile. European Commission, 2014c. Research and Innovation performance Innovation Union progress at country level in the EU. European Commission, 2014d. State of the Innovation Union - tacking stock 2010/2014.

I3U-Cube Assessment of the multi-governance Innovation Union A union of democratic change I3U-Cube Assessment of the multi-governance Innovation Union system effectiveness A stronger global actor Towards one policy on migration An area of justice and fundamental rights based on mutual trust Reasonable and balanced fair trade agreement with the U.S. EU Policy goals (Junker Plan) Deeper and fairer economic and monetary union Deeper and fairer internal market with a strenghtened industrial base Resilient energy union with a forward looking climate change policy Stakeholders views Connected digital single market Research institutions, Researchers, innovators And scientists Research Funding organizations Small and Medium sized entrprises Civil Society Organizations New boast for jobs, growth and investment Large corporations Policy makers WP1 WP2 WP3 Innovation Union commitments wp4 Member states implementation and innovation scoreboard wp5 wp6 wp7 wp8

Key questions on Innovation Union implementation and effects How it works now at EU, Member States (MS) and regional level? - Main source: stock tacking EC reports + I3U Wps state of the art information What is the current performance? - Main source: Innovation Scoreboard releases + available indicators from I3U Wps How it could work better at EU, MS and regional level with the I3U solutions? Qualitative stakeholders-based assessment What could be the effects? Quantitative NEMESIS-based assessment Policy recommendations To implement the I3U solutions To improve the monitoring (innovation scoreboard) and impact assessment practices

Thank you In modalità Presentazione fare clic sulla freccia per accedere alla pagina della guida introduttiva di PowerPoint.