Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Associate Prof. Hanan Eltobgy Benha University Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Quality Assurance in Faculty of Eng. at Shoubra Associate Prof. Hanan Eltobgy Civil Engineering Department Vice director of University Center of Quality Assurance Previously, Consultant for Program of Continuous Improvement and Qualifying for Accreditation (PCIQA), Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education

Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Benha University Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, “FES” got the institutional accreditation in July 2016 From The National Authority of Quality Assurance and Accreditation of Education “NAQAAE” An independent governmental entity under the Prime Minister’s governance

Evaluation and Accreditation Process “FES” has primary responsibility for the quality of her provision and its assurance Internal QA is administered by “FES” QA Units and University QA Center The main task of “FES” during the accreditation process is the fulfilment of criteria covering various areas of the institution, including teaching and learning, research and community service.

Evaluation and Accreditation Process This assessment is based on institutional mission within Two main areas: Institutional Capacity and Educational Effectiveness against pre-set of standards. The evaluation process depends on documents and evidences. Surveys are also conducted to recognize the opinions of students, teaching staff, employees, and community parties are a fundamental part of the evaluation process.

Standards of Institutional Accreditation 1- Institutional Capacity 1-Strategic Planning 2-Organizational Structure 3-Leadership & Governance 4-Creditability & Ethics 5-Administratiion 6-Resources 7-Community Participation 8-Quality systems management

Standards of Educational Effectiveness 2- Educational Effectiveness 1-Students & Graduates 2- Academic Standards 3-Educational Programs 4- Teaching and Learning Resources 5- Academic Staff 6-Scientific Research 7- Post-Graduate Studies 8- Continuous Assessment

Comparison of ESG and Egyptian Quality Assurance Standards Egyptian Quality Assurance is in great alignment with Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) on the basis of; ESG principles for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area EHEA. ESG Standards for internal quality assurance, (Consideration of internal QA, designing methodologies, Implementing processes) ESG Standards for external quality assurance, (Peer-review experts, outcomes criteria, Complaints and appeals)

Evaluating FES Performance Development after Getting the Accreditation Faculty of Eng. –Shoubra, FES, sets an evaluation methodology for the accepted work plans, that is complying with the strategic plans for improving the faculty, using the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is an integrated performance management system that enables FES to clarify her strategy and translate it into action

Proposed Performance Monitoring Perspectives for FES Educational and learning excellence Scientific research excellence FES Performance Monitoring Perspectives Community participation, environment development, and stakeholders Human and material resources Financial resources Institutional capacity and Quality management

Balanced Scorecard Methodology Performance Evaluation of overall performance by measuring the progress in achieving systems’ components of the strategic plan Perspective The perspective has objectives The progress of achieving the perspective is measured by monitoring the objectives’ performance Objectives Achieving the objectives is monitored by measuring specific indicators (KPIs) Indicators The indicators are measurable, and its target value is specified The performance of each indicator is measured and referred to the targeted value

Assessment of Institution Overall Performance

2) Scientific research excellence perspective

Indicators of Effectiveness of scientific research on a local/regional/international scale Number of annual research published locally and internationally compared to the number of faculty members in the institution Number of researches published in international journals with an impact factor compared with the total number of published researches. Satisfaction Survey results of production and service companies, (governmental and private) on assessment of the results of scientific researches of the institution. Number of applied scientific researches that have benefited the productive and service enterprises in community, compared to previous years. Number of scientific researches done by faculty members and benefited the institution in supporting and enhancing the educational process compared to previous years. The Impact factor of institution journal.

THANK YOU