Laura Fricke, Jan Kloberdanz, and Dr. Susan Pecinovsky

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications for Math Instruction Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Illustrating the 3 Shifts K-1 Common Core Lead Teachers Spring 2012.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Focus Grade 3.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 3.
Common Core Aligned Report Card Report Card
NAESP Webinar: Common Core State Standards April 23, 2012 Kenny L. Jones, Principal - Parkside Elementary School NAESP Zone 7 Director and Lucille E. Davy,
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on As of November 29, 2010,
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on As of December 1, 2011, 45.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
D34 Math Program Jane Tangney, District 34 Math Coach Beth Tsoumas, Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Assessment, and Instruction Dr. Mike Nicholson,
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: The Key Shifts.
New York State Common Core Curriculum Grade 4 Math Information for parents November 2012.
Everyday Mathematics Allendale Board of Education Presentation April 6, 2015 Cathy Danahy Amy D’Ambola.
EngageNY.org Adopt or Adapt in Math: Support for Districts and Schools on Curriculum Decision Making.
Math Instructional Practice Guides RESA 3 Principals’ Forum March 17 th, 2015.
 Jillian had 15 cookies to bring in and share with the class and Mike had 17. If their class has 35 students, will there be enough cookies for everyone.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Getting to a Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum Empowering Teacher Leaders to Develop District Level Rigorous Curriculum October 24, 2011.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Mathematics Iowa Core Implementation Network February 2013.
Common Core State Standards in Connecticut ELMS PTA Presentation October 16, 2012 Dr. Judy DeLeeuw, Principal Jason Bitgood, Assistant Principal Jennifer.
CFN 204 Network Math Meeting Monday, December 3, 2012 PS 29 Paul Perskin.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
MCC PTA September 28, 2010 Chris Minnich, CCSSO. Common Core State Standards Initiative  Why Common Core?  Adoption status  High-level implementation.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE March 2011.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Summative Assessment November
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Late Start February 9, 2012 Diane Burtchin
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math October 23, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Mathematics Normandy School District Leadership March 7, 2013.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
Common Core Math Introduction Part 1: Instructional Shifts.
Iowa Core Mathematics Standards Focusing on Fewer Topics and Learning More in Marshalltown.
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
Elementary Math Work – Spring 2013 Des Moines Public Schools Mathematics Expectation: All students will demonstrate mastery of the rigorous Common Core.
Secondary Math Olympia School District Fall 2015.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
May 8, Let’s Do Some Math 6 cats catch 6 rats in 6 minutes. How many cats will it take to catch 100 rats in 50 minutes?
PARCC Model Content Frameworks A Review. 2 Structure of the Frameworks Examples of key advances from the previous grade; Fluency expectations or examples.
OHIO LEARNING STANDARDS K-12 MATHEMATICS GRADE 3 BY: AMY FURMAN.
EnVisionMATH Common Core K-8 Publisher’s Criteria for the Common Core State Standards.
Mathematics Curriculum Evaluation Toolkit Transitioning to the Common Core May 16, 2014 Pam Tyson & Hilary Dito.
Why Common Core State Standards and Why Eureka
Shift Happens Or does it? Leadership Summit Thursday, November 10
Incorporating Standards of Mathematical Practice in Classroom Lessons
Rivendell School Town Meeting October 19, 2017
Making Connections in Mathematics
Transitioning to Common Core Math
The Year of Core Instruction
Using the Michigan Focal Points to Guide Instruction and Assessment
UNDERSTANDING COMMON CORE MATH
Curriculum Structures
Overview of the Initiative
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
Illustrative Mathematics
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption
Network Team Institute July 8-12, 2013
Written by Oklahoma teachers,
Making Connections in Mathematics
Overview of the Initiative
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Math Information Map and Guide.
AT PEQUEA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Getting Into the Grade Level Content Standards
Presentation transcript:

Laura Fricke, Jan Kloberdanz, and Dr. Susan Pecinovsky Iowa Core Mathematics Standards: Focusing on Fewer Topics and Learning More Laura Fricke, Jan Kloberdanz, and Dr. Susan Pecinovsky

Math Pilot Team 2008-2009 – Materials Adoption Committee Committee of teachers One from each building and each grade level Curriculum materials replacement very old no curricular cycle Iowa Basic Skills – low performance Investigations = Standards Team has evolved to Elementary Math Leadership Team Heart and soul of elementary mathematics curriculum A team with courage!

The Way It Used to Be enVision Math – drove the curriculum Previous standards – locally developed Coverage and spiraling back Pacing guides designed to support enVision Math Grade level islands Grade level growth The curriculum was spiraled back, and there was not enough time for the students we serve. We were trying to do every lesson. “It does not feel like students are understanding.” Little time in deep conceptual understanding. Began to randomly delete topics – teacher dependent Previous standards (locally developed) were too many, not used and piece-mealed with no connection. Curriculum materials led the instruction. Never questioned enVision – year after year

Data After Four Years Iowa Assessment Scores: 6th grade: Proficiency 56%, did not make growth goal 5th grade: Proficiency 68%, did make growth goal

The Problem Clearly Defined •Elementary Math Leadership Team •Data discussions across the grades Never noticed with the data viewed by grade level as opposed to across grade levels or system That “ah-ha” moment. - They became “our” students.

Our Vision Prioritize standards for critical learning Align enVision Math lessons Realign lessons for which there are no standards Identify and assess mastery content to support students’ learning of upper grade- level math Aligned to vision of Iowa Core

The Way It Is Now… enVision Math – supports the curriculum Content is aligned to Iowa Core Focus (314 lessons out of 960, 33%, realigned) Pacing guides designed to support instruction Interdependence among grade levels Pilot year growth in grade 5 almost 6% Bullet 3: 314 lessons out of 960, realigned refers to grades K-6.

Our Process, The Products Prioritize IC Standards Align enVision Math lessons into prioritized standards Realign lessons for which there are no standards (focus) Identify and assess mastery content (coherence and mastery) The Products: 1. Grade 5 IC Standards, Prioritized (working copy) Content Emphasis by Cluster K-8 2. Grade 5 Alignment Guide and Pacing Guide 3. Realigned Content and Transitional Content Tables 4. Mastery Content Table and Iowa Core Mastery Content 1 and 2 - Jan 3 and 4 - Laura Pacing Guides - 65-85 percent of time spent in critical areas

What We Learned FOLLOW THE IOWA CORE: Prioritize and align Keep content - Paperclips and 5th grade fractions Let go of content – Greatest Common Factor Research current curriculum first Jason Zimba and the Design Principles Don’t Assume! Letting go of what is familiar is difficult. Even master teachers will need coaching. 1. First bullet - more efficient to use progressions which include the standards Third bullet - Do not use the words “skip” or “delete” to refer to realigned content 2. Video link

Iowa Core Resources Focus by Mike Schmoker How the Brain Learns Mathematics by David A. Sousa www.corestandards.org (Common Core Standards) https://www.educateiowa.gov/iowacore (Iowa Common Core) http://ime.math.arizona.edu/progressions/ (Progressions of Content) http://www.illustrativemathematics.org/ (Illustrative Mathematics)

Iowa Core Resources http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Math_Publishers_Criteria _K-8_Spring 2013_FINAL.pdf(“K-8 Publisher’s Criteria for the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics”) http://www.smarterbalanced.org/k-12-education/common- core-state-standards-tools-resources/ (IC Design Principles Video with Jason Zimba) http://www.achievethecore.org/content/upload/Focus_in_Math _06.12.2013.pdf (“Content Emphases by Cluster K-8,” both consortia have designated clusters at each grade level as major, supporting, or additional)

Thank you!