Discussion & Conclusion Predictives of Meningioma Grading

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neoplasia II: Tumor Characteristics
Advertisements

FOLLICULAR DENDRITIC CELL SARCOMA R4 洪逸平 /VS 顏厥全大夫 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會.
CNS Tumors Pathology.
Module 6: Clinical Stage and Grade. Introduction Stage and grade determine prognosis Staging reflects the clinical extent of the tumor Grading a tumor.
Neoplasia 1: Introduction. terminology oncology: the study of tumors neoplasia: new growth (indicates autonomy with a loss of response to growth controls)
Introduction to Neoplasia
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) overexpression is associated with a poor prognosis in chondrosarcomas Makoto Endo, 1 Tadaki Matsumura, 2 Umio Yamaguchi, 1 Fumihiko.
Malignant Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast with Lymph Node Metastasis
A significant increase in the incidence of endometrial cancer. This increased incidence of endometrial cancer has been widely interpreted to be a result.
Neoplasia Dr. Raid Jastania. Neoplasia: Terminology Cancer is the 2 nd cause of death in the US Neoplasia is “new growth” Neoplasm is an abnormal mass.
Ji Young Lee, MD, PhD, David Marchetti, MD, M Steven Piver, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Sisters of Charity Hospital, Buffalo, NY The Clinical.
Neoplasia Lecture 2 Dr. Maha Arafah.
NEOPLASIA (Malignant Tumors)
Management of Meningiomas. DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS MRI –Dural tail, edema CT SCAN:CT SCAN –Hyperostosis, intratumoral calcifications ANGIOGRAPHY: –embolization.
Case Study 62 Kenneth Clark, MD. Question 1 This is a 32-year-old woman with progressive distortion of taste and smell. After seeing her primary care.
 Histological distinction between benign and malignant lesions may be more subtle  The anatomic site of the neoplasm can have lethal consequences irrespective.
2 years later, she noticed multiple cm
CNS Neoplasm Dr. Raid Jastania, FRCPC Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Alqura University Vice Dean, Faculty of Dentistry.
Section 2 Atypia.
Introduction to Cancer
Principles of Surgical Oncology Salah R. Elfaqih.
Principles of Surgical Oncology Salah R. Elfaqih.
LUNG ADENOCARCINOMAS. CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY WITH RESPECT TO THE UPCOMING NEW CLASSIFICATION AND EGFR-KRAS MUTATION ANALYSIS IMPLICATIONS. First author:
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Shahla Masood, M.D. Professor of Pathology University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville Chief of Pathology and Laboratory.
Notes by Dr Sanjay A Pai. Neoplasm An abnormal proliferation of cells, resulting in a mass called a neoplasm.
Changes in Breast Cancer Reports After Second Opinion Dr. Vicente Marco Department of Pathology Hospital Quiron Barcelona. Spain.
Survivin and XIAP expression in multiple pulmonal metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients: results of tissue micro array (TMA) studies P. Schneider.
Principles of Surgical Oncology Done by : 428 surgery team surgery team.
INCREASED EXPRESSION OF PROTEIN KINASE CK2  SUBUNIT IN HUMAN GASTRIC CARCINOMA Kai-Yuan Lin 1 and Yih-Huei Uen 1,2,3 1 Department of Medical Research,
Pathology of Brain Tumors. Objectives:  - Appreciate how the anatomy of the skull and the spinal column influences the prognosis of both benign and malignant.
ANNUAL SLIDE SEMINAR June Bratislava Slovakia B. Fredrik Petersson MD, PhD Department of Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm.
Neurology Case Conference 4
ENDOCRINE CELLS OF THE GASTROENTROPANCREATIC TRACT Stomach Small Large CellMain ProductPaCFAnDJIApCR P/D 1 Ghrelinf+rr EC5HTr DSomatostatin++++rr+r+
Ki-67 index cutoff value of 1% is a valuable prognostic biomarker for pulmonary carcinoids based on this large cohort. Our data also provide strong evidence.
Principles of Surgical Oncology
Malignant Epithelial Tumors
Respiratory practical II
Finding cancerous anaplastic cells with image analysis K. Nicol, M. Plaskow, T. Barr, D. Billiter.
What is your clinical impression? What are the differential diagnosis?
Neoplasia Basics, Grading and Staging Kimiko Suzue MD, Ph.D. Department of Pathology Mt. Sinai Hospital.
The role of regulatory B cells on hepatocellular carcinoma progression Conclusion Results Fig2. (A and B) In vivo, Bregs in SCID mice increased the size.
Cancer: Staging and Grading What is meant by the term “biopsy”? How do tumors behave differently from one another ? Examples of the stages of cancer and.
CLINICAL ASPECT OF GRADING AND STAGING Hanggoro Tri Rinonce, MD, PhD Department of Anatomical Pathology Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University.
GRADING AND STAGING OF TUMORS Dr.Ashraf Abdelfatah Deyab Assistant Professor of Pathology Faculty of Medicine Almajma’ah Univeristy.
Case 11/2011 B. Lach Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. CANADA Abbreviations used: B-brain, M-meningioma,
RECURRENT METASTATIC LARGE CELL NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOMA OF CAECUM
Number of brain metastasis
Comparison between Pathologic Characteristics of Her2 Negative and Positive Breast Cancer in a Single Cancer Center in Jordan DR Majdi A. Al Soudi, MD,
The utility of the Bethesda category and its association with BRAF mutation in the prediction of papillary thyroid cancer stage Augustas Beiša1, Mindaugas.
CHARACTERISTICS OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT TUMORS
Discussion & Conclusion
Meningeal tumor pathology
Principles of Surgical Oncology
CLASSIFICATION OF TUMORS
Figure 2. Histopathologic findings
Cancer Cancer – A general term for more than 250 diseases characterized by abnormal and uncontrolled growth of cells.
NEOPLASIA (Malignant Tumors)
EMT inducing transcription factor SIP1: a predictive biomarker of colorectal cancer survival and recurrence? A Patel, R Sreekumar, R Bhome, KA Moutasim,
Case Study 2 Harry Kellermier.
徐慧萍1 羅竹君1,2 郭耀隆1 李國鼎1 國立成功大學醫學院附設醫院外科部1 國立成功大學醫學院臨床醫學研究所2
Case Study 46 Julia Kofler, M.D..
Figure 2 Haematoxylin and eosin staining
SOFT TISSUE & SKELETAL SYSTEM LABORATORY
Molecular Markers Help Characterize Neuroendocrine Lung Tumors
Handling and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Biopsy
Malignant odontogenic tumors
The neuropathology of brain metastases
A Nonresponding Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
CASE REVIEW 강동경희대병원 이한나.
Presentation transcript:

Discussion & Conclusion Predictives of Meningioma Grading Predictive Markers for Meningioma Grading Hussam Abu-Farsakh1 ,Noor Abu-Farsakh2 and, Ibrahim Sbeih 3    1First Medical Lab   2Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University;  3 Neurosurgery center, Ibn Hytham Hospital. Jordan. Replace with logo Abstract Results Material & Methods Discussion & Conclusion Context: Meningiomas are divided into 3 grades according to the WHO 2007 classification: grade I, grade II and grade III. Grading is important to predict survival and plan further therapy. Histomorphology and immunohistochemistry markers are important aids for grading. Design: We studied 244 meningioma cases during the last 10 years at our center. All cases were studied for the following: gender, tumor size, mitotic count, the presence of small cell component (SCC), brain invasion (BRI), bone invasion (BNI), necrosis, and atypia (defined as pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli +/- large hyperchromatic nuclei). Additionally, Immunohistochemistry for the percentage of progesterone receptors(PRG) expresoin, p53 and Ki 67 were calculated. Results: Grade I and II meningiomas were more common in females, but Grade III were equally distributed (p<0.05). See Table for all parameters. Conclusions: Meningioma are more common in females except for Grade III. Grade III are likely to be larger in size than Grade I and Grade II. Grade II and Grade III have higher mitotic counts, a higher chance of having necrosis, are more likely to have a small cell component, and are more likely to have brain or bone invasion. The higher the grade, the higher the Ki67 index, the higher the percentage of p53 expressing cells and the less likely to have progesterone expression. We studied 244 meningioma cases during the last 10 years at our center. All cases were studied for the following: gender, tumor size, mitotic count, the presence of small cell component (SCC), brain invasion (BRI), bone invasion (BNI), necrosis, and atypia (defined as pleomorphism, prominent nucleoli +/- large hyperchromatic nuclei). Additionally, Immunohistochemistry for the percentage of progesterone receptors(PRG) expression, p53 and Ki 67 were calculated. Results: Grade I and II meningiomas were more common in females, but Grade III were equally distributed (p<0.05). See Table for all parameters. Meningioma are more common in females except for Grade III. Grade III are likely to be larger in size than Grade I and Grade II. Grade II and Grade III have higher mitotic counts, a higher chance of having necrosis, are more likely to have a small cell component, and are more likely to have brain or bone invasion. The higher the grade, the higher the Ki67 index, the higher the percentage of p53 expressing cells and the less likely to have progesterone expression.. Predictives of Meningioma Grading Grade I Grade II Grade III P value Size cm, average 3.9 3.8 9.5 <0.0065 Atypia presence in cases 8% 9% 55% <0.001 Mitotic figures/10HPF average in Grade 0.2 1.2 11.6 <0.0001 Necrosis presence in cases 3% 14% SCC presence in cases 4% 27% BRI presence in cases 0% 58% 91% BNI presence in cases 1% 6% PRG% average in grade 65% 32% p53% average in grade 0.9% 3.1% 7% Ki67% average in grade 2.9% 6.4% 23.5% Fig 1: Ki67% in Grade I meningioma 1%, Grade II: 6%, Grade III: 17% Background Meningioma Grading is done by histological examination using 5 histological features into WHO grade I, II (atypical), or III (anaplastic). Meningioma peaks at 65-75 years; with F:M = 2:1. The natural history of Grade I: Grows slowly and compress adjacent structures. Grade II: Variable; some recur or invade brain. Grade III: Sarcoma-like; recur, invade, and may metastasize to extracranial sites: lung, liver, bone, lymph nodes, The Prognosis is Excellent for completely excised WHO grade I and II tumors. But poor for grade III, anaplastic tumors. The Recurrence risk increases with grade and presence of residual tumor. The Skull base meningiomas often recur. Mitotic figures varies according to the grade, in Grade I they are usually ≤ 3 mitoses/10 HPF: Grade II, ≥ 4 mitoses/10 HPF, Grade III ≥ 20 mitoses/10 HPF: Small cell changes occurs in some grade II types. Ki-67 is one of the markers that varies with grading. Grade I lesions usually have ≤ 5% but no defined threshold for grade I vs. II or II vs. III but in general it is high in grade III. WHO Grade I has the following subtypes: Meningothelial, fibrous, transitional, angiomatous, microcystic, secretory, metaplastic, lymphoplasmacyte rich, psammomatous ≤ 3 mitoses per 10 high-power fields. No brain invasion. WHO Grade II has ≥ 4 mitoses/10 high-power fields or 3 of the following High cellularity, Small cells with high N:C ratio, clustered Prominent nucleoli, Uninterrupted growth pattern ("sheeting") Necrosis ± palisading, brain invasion or chordoid or clear cell subtype. WHO Grade III has ≥ 20 mitoses/10 high-power fields or Overt malignant features resembling carcinoma, melanoma, sarcoma or Rhabdoid or papillary subtype, Necrosis frequent but not required Fig 2: Brain invasion and GFAP in atypical meningioma Background Fig 7: A: p53 nuclear staining in malignant meningioma Fig 6::: p63 nuclear staining in atypical meningioma Fig 4: Small cell component in atypical meningioma References Fig 3: Mitotic figure in atypia meningioma Perry A et al: The prognostic significance of MIB-1, p53, and DNA flow cytometry in completely resected primary meningiomas. Cancer. 82(11):2262-9, 1998 Perry A et al: Merlin, DAL-1, and progesterone receptor expression in clinicopathologic subsets of meningioma: a correlative immunohistochemical study of 175 cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 59(10):872-9, 2000 Fig5: Progesterone level in meningioma Grade I and in grade II