Ensuring Data Quality for Monitoring and Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Quality Considerations
Advertisements

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
Is There a Causal Relationship Between Maternal Health Care Utilization and Subsequent Contraceptive Use?: Evidence from Kenya and Zambia Mai Do and David.
Begin with the End in Mind
Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
Indicators, Data Sources, and Data Quality for TB M&E
Dimensions of Data Quality M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
RESEARCH A systematic quest for undiscovered truth A way of thinking
Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.
Ensuring the quality of Qualitative Data Presented by Lorie Broomhall, Ph.D. Senior HIV/AIDS Advisor Nigeria Monitoring and Evaluation Management Services.
Data Quality Assessment
Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Linking Data with Action Part 2: Understanding Data Discrepancies.
Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
STUDY IMPLEMENTATION Day 2 - Session 5 Interview guides and tips for effective strategies.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
USAID’s Data Quality Standards & Conducting a DQA # ? % ?
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.
Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC)
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:
RHIS Data Integration and Interoperability
Difference-in-Differences Models
MODULE 8: GOVERNANCE AUDIT EVIDENCE AND REVIEW
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
Introduction to Data Quality
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Session: 8 Disseminating Results
Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.
ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Measuring Success Toolkit
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation
Writing Effective Short Reports
EmONC Scale-up In Kenya Results of Health Facility Assessments
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Information Systems for Health:
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Information Systems for Health:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Writing Effective Short Reports
Data and Interoperability:
Measuring Data Quality
Roles of District Community-Directed Intervention (CDI) Team Members
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs
Presentation transcript:

Ensuring Data Quality for Monitoring and Evaluation EmONC Toolkit Appendix 3 Ensuring Data Quality for Monitoring and Evaluation

Objectives To define high-quality data To discuss the characteristics of good- quality data To describe the ethical considerations in collecting data for M&E

What Are Data? Facts or information, especially when examined and used to find out things or to make decisions The plural of datum Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary

What Are High-Quality Data? Data are of high quality if they are fit for their intended use in operations, decisionmaking, and planning. Source: Juran, J. M. (1964). Managerial breakthrough. New York, N.Y., USA: McGraw-Hill.

What Are High-Quality Data? Data are of high quality if they are fit for their intended use in operations, decisionmaking, and planning. Source: Juran, J. M. (1964). Managerial breakthrough. New York, N.Y., USA: McGraw-Hill.

Importance of High-Quality Data High-quality information is an important resource for the health sector in planning, managing, delivering, and monitoring high quality, safe, and reliable health care The Ministry of Health recommends that data quality review fora (meetings, workshops, conferences) be held periodically at each appropriate level (national, county / subcounty, facility, and community).

Dimensions of High-Quality Data Accuracy Precision Completeness Reliability Timeliness Relevance Ethical integrity

Accuracy Data should provide a clear representation of the activity/interaction Data should be in sufficient detail Data should be captured once only, as close to the point of activity as possible Data sources: Direct visual inspection, interview, review of medical records Accuracy can be ascertained by supervision and verification

Precision The number of observations (e.g., health facilities or medical records) sampled should be sufficient to estimate measures to an acceptable level of refinement The fewer the number of observations, the lower the precision Need to balance precision with the logistical challenge of increasing the number of observations sampled

Accuracy versus Precision Accuracy: The tendency of a measurement to center around the true value Precision: The refinement or exactness of a measurement

Completeness Y N Y N Missing data are impossible to interpret Leaving a field blank does not equate to absence of the indicator being accessed or “not applicable” Y N Y N Does not equate to

Reliability Data collection processes must be clearly defined and stable to ensure consistency over time Standard operating procedures enhance consistency in process of data collection across locations and over time

Timeliness Data should be collected and recorded as quickly as possible after the event or activity Data should remain available for the intended use within a reasonable or agreed period Delayed transmission of data reduces data’s utility for decisionmaking

Relevance Data should be relevant for the purposes for which they are used Data requirements should be clearly specified and regularly reviewed to reflect any change in needs The amount of data collected should be proportional to the value gained from them

Ethical integrity Appropriate authorization is essential Data from medical records must be handled with confidentiality and extracted data must be made anonymous Data storage must be secure and only accessible to authorized people Highest standards of integrity are required among those collecting data. Falsification of data may result in serious consequences. [Group to discuss possible consequences of data falsification.]

References Government of Kenya. (2014). Kenya health sector data quality assurance protocol. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Health, AfyaInfo Project. Government of Kenya. (2015). Addendum to Kenya health sector data quality assurance protocol (2014) data quality review: Guidelines for conducting data quality reviews at all levels. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Health, AfyaInfo Project.

MEASURE Evaluation PIMA is funded by the U. S MEASURE Evaluation PIMA is funded by the U. S. Agency for International Development (USAID) through associate award AID-623-LA-12-00001 and is implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in partnership with ICF International; Management Sciences for Health; Palladium; and Tulane University. The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. www.measureevaluation.org/pima