POLITECNICO di MILANO PhD COURSE session II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing and writing learning objectives
Advertisements

Mark Freeman, Fiona Skillen and Valerie Wright Small-group teaching.
CAREWARE TRAINING Adult Learners. Approach Getting It Done Framework Concepts vs. Recipes.
CMEF 2014 BOOTSTRAPPING THINKING: THE ROLE OF ENGAGING MATHEMATICAL TASKS - Peter Liljedahl.
Inspiration by Design (adapted from “Approaching the Ineffable: Flow, Sublimity, and Student Learning”) Donna Heiland NEASC Annual Meeting and Conference.
GOALS & GOAL ORIENTATION. Needs Drive Human Behavior  Murray  Maslow.
Tutoring and Learning: Keeping in Step David Wood Learning Sciences Research Institute: University of Nottingham.
Why Are My Students So Bored?
CMM 2015 PÓLYA, CARDS, and CSÍKSZENTMIHÁLYI: THE PHENOMENON OF FLOW - Peter Liljedahl.
Marica Romano1 Teaching English Language in Mixed Ability Classes The Challenge of Heterogeneous Classes.
 MOVING BEYOND UNDERSTANDING: Developing authentic learning tasks and assessments for problems based curricular approach in Family and Consumer Sciences.
Leading Group Discussions David M. Irby, PhD University of California San Francisco.
Evaluating and measuring impact in career development: extension workshop Presented by – Date – Just to identify strengths and areas to improve are no.
Conditions of Learning The Learning Task (Ray) The student will be able to correctly process film from a camera.
Formative Assessment/ Assessment for Learning A4L
Response to Intervention Motivation: An Introduction.
TLC 2014 WHAT COULD LEARNING LOOK LIKE? YOUR TURN TO SHUFFLE - Peter Liljedahl & Kathryn Ricketts.
CtC 2014 MOTIVATING STUDENTS - Peter Liljedahl. CtC 2014 ENGAGEENTERTAINCURIOSITYINTERESTMOTIVATE.
Response to Intervention Motivation: An Introduction Presenter: Jim Wright central.org.
The Inner Coach Workshop for CIO Leadership Summit Organised By: IDG, India.
A305: Week 5 Deep Learning in the Long Run. Goals for Today (+ Section) Understand/analyze/reflect: What conditions or experiences are needed to build.
Milano 2016 POLITECNICO di MILANO PhD COURSE session II.
Differentiation through 4MAT
Milano 2016 POLITECNICO di MILANO PhD COURSE day 1.
Devising Assessment Tasks PGCE CS IT. Objectives To consider how to plan for assessment To consider progression To think about collaborative learning.
Learning Objectives By the end of this session you… MUST: have pretended to enjoy it. SHOULD: have stayed awake. COULD: even have got a couple of ideas.
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
Leading Group Discussions
Flow: a framework for discussing teaching
JOT2 – LEARNING THEORIES
Identifying learning barriers
Exploring Focus in the 2011 MA Curriculum Framework for Mathematics
FLOW AND THE THINKING CLASSROOM
Flow: a framework for discussing teaching
“Make it Stick”- Study Strategies for Retention
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Module 2: Introduction to Using OER for Math Instruction
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
ENGAGING STUDENTS: UNDERSTANDING FLOW
Introducing a new generation of readers for your students
POLITECNICO di MILANO PhD COURSE session III
Using the Workshop Format for Writing/Grammar Instruction
THIS IS Instructor Jeopardy. THIS IS Instructor Jeopardy.
Encouraging student autonomy through collaborative curriculum development Jesmond Lewis Sudesh Gurung Freya Saffell.
Lesson Planning and Evaluation
Field-based Inquiry Dr. Lo Tin Yau Joe 12/9/2009.
Using Peer Assessment to Stretch and Challenge
Student Problem Solving Behaviour in a Thinking Classroom
FLOW IN THE CLASSROOM: LOOKING AT TEACHER MOVES AND STUDENTS' AUTONOMOUS ACTIONS - Peter Liljedahl.
Growth Mindset Task Framework
Differentiation is not a dirty word
BUILDING CRITICAL THINKERS & COLLABORATIVE LEADERS
3 Stages of Backward Design
FLOW.
Student learning at Geelong High School
ON THE EDGES OF FLOW: STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN PROBLEM SOLVING
ENGAGING STUDENTS: UNDERSTANDING FLOW
4 Somatic Awareness.
Assignment Design Workshop
ENGAGING STUDENTS: UNDERSTANDING FLOW
Daria Łęska-Osiak Ph.D. NATO BILC Seminar , Zagreb
WHAT IS CONNECT?.
It’s that word again – Differentiation!
Mastery Comprehensive knowledge or skill in a particular subject or activity. Control over something.
The Art & Science of Goal Meeting
Paying Attention •
Classroom Management Tips – Introduction
Why Aren’t these Kids Engaged?
Being SMARTER with your Objectives
TESOL II Theory & Practice
Presentation transcript:

POLITECNICO di MILANO PhD COURSE session II

http://www.peterliljedahl.com/courses/politecnicodimilano

MIHALY CSÍKSZENTMIHÁLYI

FLOW EXPERIENCE There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. Attention is focused on one’s actions. Distractions are excluded from consciousness. There is no worry of failure. Self-consciousness disappears. The sense of time becomes distorted. The activity becomes satisfying in its own right. - Csíkszentmihályi (1990) FLOW EXPERIENCE

FLOW EXPERIENCE - internal There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. Attention is focused on one’s actions. Distractions are excluded from consciousness. There is no worry of failure. Self-consciousness disappears. The sense of time becomes distorted. The activity becomes satisfying in its own right. - Csíkszentmihályi (1990) FLOW EXPERIENCE - internal

FLOW EXPERIENCE - external There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. Attention is focused on one’s actions. Distractions are excluded from consciousness. There is no worry of failure. Self-consciousness disappears. The sense of time becomes distorted. The activity becomes satisfying in its own right. - Csíkszentmihályi (1990) FLOW EXPERIENCE - external

FLOW EXPERIENCE FLOW There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. ANXIETY FLOW BOREDOM FLOW EXPERIENCE

FLOW EXPERIENCE FLOW = ENGAGEMENT There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. ANXIETY FLOW = ENGAGEMENT BOREDOM FLOW EXPERIENCE

- CREATING FLOW - FLOW EXPERIENCE There are clear goals every step of the way. There is immediate feedback on one’s actions. There is a balance between challenges and skills. - CREATING FLOW - FLOW EXPERIENCE

FLOW ANXIETY BOREDOM CREATING FLOW

MANAGING FLOW FLOW ANXIETY BOREDOM Give extension Introduce doubt Pair with another group FLOW ANXIETY Remove a member of the group Pair with another group BOREDOM MANAGING FLOW

MANAGING FLOW FLOW ANXIETY BOREDOM Give hint Join the group Pair with a stronger group FLOW ANXIETY Give an easier task Answer some of the task Give a hint BOREDOM MANAGING FLOW

STUDENTS SELF-MANAGING FLOW ANXIETY BOREDOM STUDENTS SELF-MANAGING FLOW

THEORIES OF LEARNING meta-cognition affect / meta-affect (Goldin) multiple intelligences (Gardner) illumination (Liljedahl) transfer surprise (Adler) analogical reasoning (Novick) flow (Csíkszentmihályi) critical incidents (Tripp) counter culture/norms (Liljedahl) variation theory (Mortens) problem posing (Brown & Walters) creeping determinism (Fischoff) modelling discourse RME tensions (Berry) learner generated examples (Watson & Mason) thickening (Geertz) empirical (Liljedahl) etc. THEORIES OF LEARNING

THEORIES OF LEARNING meta-cognition affect / meta-affect (Goldin) multiple intelligences (Gardner) illumination (Liljedahl) transfer surprise (Adler) analogical reasoning (Novick) flow (Csíkszentmihályi) * critical incidents (Tripp) counter culture/norms (Liljedahl) * variation theory (Mortens) problem posing (Brown & Walters) ← creeping determinism (Fischoff) modelling ← discourse RME ← tensions (Berry) learner generated examples (Watson & Mason) * ← thickening (Geertz) empirical (Liljedahl) * etc. l * I will demonstrate ← theory for l suitable for large classes THEORIES OF LEARNING

DIVERSE WORKSHOP OUTCOMES POSSIBLE WORKSHOP OUTCOMES: enjoy the learning experience learn some things about teaching convert a theory of learning into a theory for teaching extract a theory for teaching from empirical work define requirements of a theory for teaching WORKSHOP EXPECTATION: you will achieve at least two of the above outcomes quick and dirty presentation on Wednesday afternoon DIVERSE WORKSHOP OUTCOMES

QUICK AND DIRTY PRESENTATION N groups of 2-4 200/N minutes each give a presentation on one of the following: teach a lesson using interesting mathematics demonstrating your use of one of the theories for teaching demonstrated in the workshop thus far teach a lesson on any topic by converting one of the theories of learning listed (or a different theory of learning) into a theory for teaching present a new theory for teaching from some empirical work you may have done or data you may have access to in the case of a) a brief introduction as to why you chose that theories for teaching is warranted in the case of b) and c) a brief introduction to the theory of learning or theory of teaching (who, when what, etc. ) is warranted QUICK AND DIRTY PRESENTATION

http://www.peterliljedahl.com/courses/politecnicodimilano