1. Assignment Design Workshop
Dr. Sarah L. Strout
Assistant Vice President of Assessment and Planning
Worcester State University
Sponsored by the Department of Higher Education

2. Outline Why assignment design matters
What makes an effective assignment
Paired work
Discussion

3. Thought Experiment
Imagine you are student in a course and these are your instructions for your final project. What is good about these instructions and what is missing and/or problematic?
You’ll produce a minimum 6 page research paper on a popular culture phenomenon of your choosing. Your paper must be a critical analysis of your chosen topic, based in the appropriate theory and methodology, with summary and description kept to a bare minimum. Your research should be supported with a minimum of 3 scholarly sources (only one of which can be an assigned course reading) and 2 popular or primary sources.

4. Why Assignment Design Matters
Students do better when assignment instructions are clear and rubrics are shared with them
TILT (Transparency in Learning and Teaching) found transparency enhanced the success of first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented college students in multiple ways at statistically significant levels, with a medium-to- large sized magnitude of effect.

5. Inclusive Assignments
Poorly written and ambiguous student learning outcomes make it difficult for students to understand what is expected of them and thus, demonstrate their learning.
Assessment approaches should allow for multiple ways for students to demonstrate mastery, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
Clearly defined rubrics allow students to see exactly what is expected of them, and help instructors avoid bias when assessing student work.
Instructions for student work should include as much information as possible, so that students do not need to ‘read between the lines.’

6. Inclusive Assignments, cont.
Do not assume that students have entered your course or program with specific skills already developed. Writing, critical thinking, and information literacy skills (just to name a few) may not have been emphasized in the students’ high-school education.
Disaggregating assessment data when possible allows faculty to develop interventions to help struggling students.
Avoid comparing students against peers. Having a standard judgement (for example, a rubric) allows instructors to compare students against a pre-determined standard.
When students do not perform well on assignments, ask them why. It may be that the instructions were not as clear as the instructor thought, or the students did not understand a concept and need review.

7. What Makes an Effective Assignment (NILOA)
Intentional
Clear to students
Explicit about evaluation
Engaging
Responsive
Reflective
Linked to/aligned with other assignments

8. Assignment Design Steps
For each step, please consider the answers for this assignment and keep note of your answers.

9. Step 1: What outcomes are you assessing?
How many outcomes can you effectively assess in this assignment?
What are the most important outcomes for this assignment?
How do these outcomes relate to the major, general education, or institution- wide outcomes?
Are the outcomes written in a way that students would understand what is expected of them?

10. Step 2: Who are your students
What level students are in this course?
Are the students all majors, mostly majors, mostly non-majors?
Has this course or other courses prepared students to demonstrate competency on these outcomes?

11. Step 3: Assignment Assessment
Do you have a rubric or scoring guide?
Does the rubric include each of the outcomes you are assessing?
Is there a description for each outcome what performance would look like at each level (e.g. not competent, competent, highly competent)?
Are those descriptions clear and written in a way that a student would understand?

12. Step 4: Assignment Instructions
Are the instructions clear, concise, and written at a level the student would understand?
Do the instructions include:
The purpose of the assignment?
The outcomes being measured?
A rubric or scoring guide?
Details about length, sources, style, formatting etc?
Frequently asked questions?

13. Paired work (30 min each- 60 min total)
Introduce your assignment to your partner (for context and purpose)
Discuss and give feedback on the outcomes for the assignment
Discuss and give feedback on the rubric/scoring for the assignment
Discuss and give feedback on the instructions for the assignment
See handout for suggested questions
Write a brief summary of feedback
Switch to the other partner
*try to look at the assignment from the student’s perspective

14. Group Discussion What surprised you about this exercise?
What was most helpful?
What is something you learned that you can share with your colleagues?
What are your next steps?

15. Resources NILOA Assignment Library: https://www.assignmentlibrary.org/
TILT:
Hutchings- Aligning Outcomes and Educational Practices pdf