SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: Breakfast with Andy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustaining your Community Strategies & Structures Fran Butterfoss Coalitions Work Tim LaPier CDC’s Healthy Communities Program.
Advertisements

Action Writing Action Statements Writing action statements is the first step in the second (action) stage of the public health nutrition (PHN) intervention.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sustaining Local Public Health and Built Environment Programs Fit Nation NYC November 3, 2011 Annaliese Calhoun.
UNDERSTANDING SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM EDUCATION (SNAP-ED) Gerry Howell, MS, RD, Nutritionist July 12, 2012.
Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Good Heath and Wellness in Indian Country Major Activities PHASE I Annually award $5,000 - $15,000.
Models for Program Planning in Health Promotion
ORIENTATION SESSION Strengthening Chronic Disease Prevention & Management.
Gita Rampersad, JD, MHA 2012 USPHS Conference University of Maryland College Park.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
ASSOCIATION OF STATE PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITIONISTS.
Collective Impact in SNAP-Ed Julia L. Carboni, PhD IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs IU Lilly Family School of Philanthropy Indiana University.
Role of the Government in promoting healthy eating I wish someone would offer me a low fat slice of cake to have with this cuppa!
Evaluating Sodium Initiatives Rashon I. Lane, M.A. Evaluation and Program Effectiveness Team Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention September.
Food and Nutrition Service June 2 nd, 2014 Seattle, Washington Andrew Riesenberg, Western Star Morrison, Mountain Plains Nancy Ranieri, Midwest Tips for.
Equity Impact Review Guide American Public Health Association November 5, 2013.
Kaiser Permanente Community Benefit Healthy Eating Active Living Reduce Obesity and Improve Health by Transforming Communities and Empowering Individuals.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence National Coordination Center at the University of Kentucky.
Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence-Western Region at Colorado State University SNAP & EFNEP: Regional Nutrition.
Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence Interagency & Partner Briefing Jamie Dollahite Northeast Regional Center Cornell.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
1 SNAP-E D E VALUATION F RAMEWORK : T HE PAST, P RESENT, AND FUTURE.
Public Health in Simcoe Muskoka Charles Gardner, Medical Officer of Health Carol Yandreski, Public Health Nurse, School Board Liaison Presented to Simcoe.
Public Health for Dummies Kristin McCartney, MPH, RD, LD Extension Specialist-Public Health Family Nutrition Program.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
South Dakota Department of Health
Alabama Made the Evaluation Framework Work
FFY17-FFY19 Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention (NEOP) grant
National Coordination Center at the University of Kentucky
FFY17-FFY19 Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention (NEOP) grant
The Alberta Policy Coalition for Chronic Disease Prevention (APCCP): An Innovative Community-University Partnership to Address Obesity and Chronic Diseases.
Components of a National Action Plan Ala Alwan Assistant Director-General World Health Organization 1.
_______________________
Community Gardens Cooking classes Inputs
How well are we addressing Asthma Disparities
Health Promotion & Aging
Working well.
Committed to equipping, training, and empowering SNAP-Ed and EFNEP networks to go beyond direct education to include impactful PSE strategies that will.
Faulkner County Urban Farm Project: Service-Learning Fall 2017
Good Health and Wellness in Indian Country
PHE National Update London Obesity Network meeting 21st September 2015
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework in New Mexico
SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework and FFY 2016 Annual Report
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
Evaluating Partnerships
Desert Healthcare District
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Committed to equipping, training, and empowering SNAP-Ed and EFNEP networks to go beyond direct education to include impactful PSE strategies that will.
Strategic Prevention Framework - Evaluation
Kelsey Keel, MPH Director, Childhood obesity initiative
Evaluating the Impacts of Multi-layered Interventions in MD Schools
A 10-year Plan Presented by: Andrea Ridgway, MS, RD, LD, CDE
VMOSA: Developing Strategic and Action Plans
Health Impact Assessment in Michigan
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program – Education (SNAP-Ed):
Kimberly Keller, Ph.D. University of Missouri
National Coordination Center at the University of Kentucky
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
October 23, 2018 Amy DeLisio MPH, RD Suzanne Ryan-Ibarra PhD, MPH
Introduction to Public Health Nutrition
Alliance for a Healthier Generation and SNAP-Ed
Southeast Region FFY 17 SNAP-Ed Outcome Evaluation Results
Goals and Objectives.
MPR Impact Reporting Survey questions, aggregation, and moving forward
Missouri Healthy Schools: A Comprehensive Approach to Student Success
Coosa County Health Coalition Coosa County Extension Coordinator
Supporting Healthy Out-of-School Time
Presentation transcript:

SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: Breakfast with Andy

Session Overview Describe the SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework; Understand essential steps in using the SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework for programs, partnerships, and policies, systems, and environmental (PSE) changes; and Recall priority indicators of success in comprehensive SNAP-Ed programs

Who’s in the Room? Are you in the process of using the SNAP-Ed Evaluating Framework? Yes, I have been for MORE than 6 months. Yes, I have been for LESS than 6 months. No, but I intend to in the next 30 days. No, but I intend to in the next 6 months. No, and I do NOT intend to in the next 6 months.

Social-Ecological Model Source: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2015–2020. http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/chapter-3/social-ecological-model/

Background: WRO Framework

Definition of Programs, Policy, Systems & Environmental Changes Programs: Activities targeted to individuals or groups to change knowledge or behaviors, typically has a beginning and an end. Policy: A written statement of an organizational position, decision, or course of action. Systems: unwritten, ongoing, organization decisions or changes that result in new activities reaching large proportions of people the organization serves. Environmental Change: Includes the built or physical environments which are visual/observable, but may include economic, social, normative or message environments.

Solutions: Programs and PSEs There are few places to buy healthy food at affordable prices in my community. Program Response PSE Response

Nobody is playing at the local park. Program Response? PSE Response? Solutions: Programs and PSEs Nobody is playing at the local park. Program Response? PSE Response?

Solutions: programs and PSEs My children don’t like the food from the pantry. Program Response? PSE Response?

ABCDs of PSEs Assessments of need and organizational readiness Buy-in from key decision-makers, leaders, champions, and partners Changes take effect and are evaluated for effectiveness, mid-course changes occur Disparities based on race/ethnicity, income, geography, etc. reduced Sustainability to endure new leadership and resource availability

Evaluation Questions Individual: To what extent does SNAP‐Ed programming improve and sustain participants’ dietary and physical activity behaviors? Environmental: To what extent does SNAP-Ed programming create and sustain access and appeal for improved dietary and physical activity choices in the settings where people eat, learn, live, play, shop, and work? Sectors of Influence: To what extent is SNAP-Ed programming working with other sectors to collectively impact lifelong healthy eating and active living in low‐income communities? Population Results: To what extent does SNAP-Ed programming improve the low-income population’s achievement of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans’ recommendations and other health risk behaviors, compared to the general population? Social and Cultural Norms and Values: To what extent do community-level obesity prevention strategies impact the public’s priorities, lifestyle choices, and values for healthy living?

Individual Level Participant behavioral changes resulting from nutrition education and physical activity programs Post-only, Pre-and-post, Pre-post-post

Environmental Settings Policy, systems, environmental changes and promotion in the places where we eat, learn, live, play, shop, and work Need, readiness, reach, adoption, implementation, effectiveness, and maintenance

Sectors of Influence Changes at the local (neighborhood, city, town, county), state, tribal, or territorial levels Changes involve multiple sectors, accountability is shared Secondary data sources and tools (e.g., Community Commons)

Population Results Low-income population’s achievement of recommendations put forth in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) and Physical Activity Guidelines for American (PAGA), and their associated health and well-being Reduction in disparities Data Source Web link: Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity: Data, Trends and Maps https://nccd.cdc.gov/NPAO_DTM/Default.aspx State of Obesity http://stateofobesity.org/ County Health Rankings http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/   Chronic Disease Indicators http://www.cdc.gov/cdi/index.html Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.html Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/index.htm 500 Cities Project www.cdc.gov/500Cities

Interpretive Guide Format

Using the Framework IG Step 1 Reflect on your State SNAP-Ed Plan goals and objectives and state or local needs assessment results.

Using the Framework IG Step 2 Review the framework diagram to identify which indicators overlap with your goals and objectives.

Using the Framework IG Step 3 Familiarize yourself with the terms used in the glossary understand the language of the framework.

Using the Framework IG Step 4 Develop a set of criteria for selecting indicators for your state or local project.

Using the Framework IG Step 5 Choose one or more indicators for your monitoring and evaluation plan.

Using the Framework IG Step 6 Study the indicator interpretive guide write-ups for your selected indicators.

Step 7 Select appropriate outcome measures for each indicator. Using the Framework IG Step 7 Select appropriate outcome measures for each indicator.

Using the Framework IG Step 8 Communicate your indicators and outcome measures to senior management and other stakeholders, and where applicable, sub-grantees or local providers.

Step 9 Implement your training and technical assistance plans. Using the Framework IG Step 9 Implement your training and technical assistance plans.

FFY ‘17 Priority Indicators MT 1 – Healthy Eating Behaviors MT 2 – Food Resource Management Behaviors MT 3 – Physical Activity and Reduced Sedentary Behaviors MT 5 – Nutrition Supports Adopted ST 7 – Organizational Partnerships ST 8 – Multi-Sector Partnerships and Planning R2 – Fruits and Vegetables