Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
Advertisements

Eurocontrol HQ, Brussels September 13-14, 2011 Belgian Civil Aviation Auhtority General Directorate Aviation Belgian approach related to unmanned aircraft.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation UAS Security Antonio Nogueras Head DSS/CM/ATM Security Unit EU UAS Panel Workshop, th.
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
Experiences on the road to Fatigue Risk Management Regulation
Loftur Jónasson, ICAO 11 March 2013
Casa RPAS regulatory Development
Opening the European market for civil drones in an appropriate way: the role of the EU Jean-Pierre LENTZ European Commission DG Growth.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
Drones in the Legal Environment Gene Betler, CLVS CTTS AMA, AUVSI, & Small UAV Coalition member.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
International Civil Aviation Organization WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
International Civil Aviation Organization Unmanned Aircraft Systems International Standards Progress Leslie Cary Secretary UAS Study Group Technical Officer,
Pilotless Aircraft / Remotely Piloted Aircraft Instructor Seminar August 2011.
FAA ICAO ANNEX 6 PROPOSAL & OVERSIGHT ISSUES IN DISPATCH
International Civil Aviation Organization Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology (Bangkok,
Evgeny A. Gorbunov, General Director, Union of Aviation Industrialists
1 Small Unmanned Aircraft – Regulations and Safety Threats AOA Safety Conference – 23 Jun 2015 Gerry Corbett UK CAA UAS Programme Lead.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
Can our ATM systems cope?
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
THE STATE OF UAS REGULATION. T HE FAA M ODERNIZATION AND R EFORM A CT OF 2012 Congress Mandated Safe Integration by Sept., 2015 Why is it taking so long?
PERSONNEL LICENCING REGULATIONS  Afiland adapts ICAO Annex 1 SARPS  Except  Flight Navigator,  Flight Engineers  Flight Radio telephony Operators.
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
ICAO Requirements on Certification of Aerodromes Module - 2
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Air Line Pilots Association, International Shared Skies: Safe Integration of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Captain Sean Cassidy 1 st Vice President National.
1 EUROCONTROL EUROPE AIR SPORTS Sporting & Recreational Aviation Conference GLIDING Günter Bertram.
In-flight & Airport supplies ( )
FAA sUAS ARC Support Documentation © ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. The Unmanned Aircraft System Initiative F38 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
Certification Considerations for the Implementation of ASAS Applications on Aircraft Kevin Hallworth: UK CAA ASAS-TN Seminar – October 2004.
Training Standards & Guidelines Moscow September 2004
  ICAO aims to a- Develop the arts of aircraft design b- Prevent economic waste caused by unreasonable competition c- Control flight in international.
INTEGRATION OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS Into the New York Terminal Area Christopher Kennedy Anthony Peri.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
Module 02 Essential Requirements for ATCOs. Training Objectives  Appreciate the content of the essential requirements for ATCOs as described within EASA.
Topics for Remote Pilot Certification Exam Alexus Garcia Unmanned Aircraft System Safety Center of Excellence University of California.
“The use of RPAS/drones and the impact on aviation safety and security
National Search And Rescue Coordinator Council Meeting
REGULATING DRONES AND LIABILITY ISSUES
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
DRONES: Reaching New Heights in Environmental Consulting
RPAS – legal frame work and normal use
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
DACSC TG3 (UAS Funding) Recommendations for the Near Term
Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems
Juan Vázquez Sanz EUROCONTROL SRU
Aviation Security Expert, AFCAC
Loftur Jónasson, ICAO 11 March 2013
What the US can learn from international UAS law
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
Oceanic and International Operations
Obstacles and lessons learnt by the SRVSOP
ICAO and Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS)
Session – 4: Existing ICAO Standards relating to Air Traffic Control
Safety Risk Management Process (SRMP)
UA.I.A.K2.
Unmanned Aircraft DRONES – UAVs in Cyprus
1 Million+ UAS Registrations
AFILAND FEDERAL CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS
IAOPA Participation Work Efforts IAOPA (and IAOPA Affiliates) are currently participating on the following workgroups that are focused on Integration.
Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Systems
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
2018 Roadmap for the Aerial Industrial Revolution
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
WRC-15 Agenda Item 1.5 Fixed Satellite Service spectrum to support the safe operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Aeronautical Spectrum Workshop Preparation.
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft

What is the use of these systems? Recreational Surveillance Military Weather observations

USING CIVILIAN AIRSPACE Regulations govern manned aviation (110 years of history) Aircraft certification Pilot licensing Organisation certificate

Regulations for Unmanned aircraft? Some countries have made efforts to regulate unmanned flights ICAO RPAS Panel Regulation proportional to risk

Position on UAS UAS technology is not capable of replacing human capabilities – complex in time and safety critical. UAS cannot be used to supplant the role of pilots in any type of air transport operations.

Model aircraft safety vs UAS used for surveillance, recording or photography in VLOS Aim and location differs significantly. Safety comparisons invalid. Formal qualifications for certain sectors of UAS not foreseen therefore unlikely to have a trained, qualified and responsible pilot.

IFALPA’s Position For operations in the airspace where an encounter with a manned aircraft is possible, mandatory training and certificate /license should obligatory. Mitigation of risk of collision and airspace infringement due to lack of formal qualifications of pilots. Introduction of Mandatory Technical Performance limitations e.g. Geofencing and altitude.

Exceptions for qualifications for certain types of UAS – risk mitigation Public awareness campaign by the states regarding safety risks, liabilities, insurance, requirements, responsibilities and third party privacy issues associated with UAS operations. ALL UAS to be registered in a compulsory state system – enforcement of rules, motivation for training.

Safety oversight Delegation by the aviation authorities to other authorities. Responsible authorities have to be staffed, trained and equipped sufficiently to be effective in enforcement

Collision risks Urgent in depth research into the impact of collisions between a small UAS and a manned aircraft to establish severity of impact. The UA has to be conspicuous with a manned aircraft in order to allow see and avoid. States must establish specific rules for the integration of recreational UA into national Model Aircraft Regulations.

Collision risks Closing airspace to facilitate UA flights only. IFALPA does not believe that autonomous unmanned aircraft are ICAO compatible and can be integrated into common airspace yet. Closing airspace to facilitate UA flights only. IFALPA rejects the denial of airspace to manned aviation in order to accommodate ICAO-non compatible UAS

Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) It is not acceptable that rules and regulations have to be changed for manned aviation in order to accommodate RPAS integration. All RPAS engaged in non segregated public airspace should be certified and compliant with the provisions to follow. Non compliant UAS will require segregated airspace or mitigation by special authorisations.

Design and operation Operation in non segregated civilian airspace Civil and military UAS certified with same standards as manned aircraft Safety assessment with target levels of safety Human factors

Design and operation Data link and ground station components must be part of the certification. Human factors consideration for the design of control stations, devices, controls, displays, software, interface and operation. Pilot in command - ability to control the flight path and exercise responsibility of the flight free from distractions (sterile cockpit).

Air Traffic Control Designated pilot in command of a UAS complies with the Rules of the Air and ATC instructions without delay. UAS equipment to enable collision avoidance at all times with other aircraft (C/S transponders or other systems). State operated UAS should not be exempt from the above requirements.

Security Personnel dealing with pre-flight preparation, servicing, programming and operation should have their security background checked. Persons entering UAS control/programming stations screened as per ICAO Annex 17 to prevent unlawful interference. Data link communications and programming to counter cyber attacks

Licensing and duty time Selection, licensing, instruction and training criteria of pilots/operators of UAS to be established by the Certification Authority. Limits on duty time to be regulated based on existing limits for pilots and scientific evidence.

Dangerous Goods Must not be carried by UAS unless there is equivalent safety to manned aircraft: Fitted with fire detection and suppression systems. Follow ICAO rules for safe packaging, transportation and notification of PIC. Notification of authorities in case of incident or accident.

Ground Operations – Airport Layout Consider impact of UAS operations at civilian aerodromes. No special procedures requirement which would cause disruption to normal operations particularly in inclement weather.

Safety Management Systems UAS operators should implement safety management systems in accordance with ICAO provisions and approved by the state of the operator.

CONCLUSION UAS operation poses risks of collisions with manned aircraft in non segregated airspace. Security threats to manned aviation, airports, power stations, etc. Regulation required by ICAO and the Member States. Registration of UAS mandatory. States must make efforts to confine non compliant drone operations to segregated airspace. Impose penalties to unlawful operations in the vicinity of airports, power stations, non segregated airspace.

QUESTIONS? THANK YOU!