Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.

Advertisements

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.

Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.

Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.

Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.

Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.

2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

MCAS and PARCC Testing Franklin Public Schools School Committee January 29,

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.

MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.

2015 MAP Scores Fulton 58 School District MAP Facts  Grades 3-8 and English II, Biology, Government and Algebra I and II  First year for online.

1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.

KCS Achievement Data. District-wide Achievement District Achievement  Achievement plots will be included for the following subjects  Algebra I  Algebra.

The Norwood Public Schools 2014 Accountability Overview and MCAS Results Dr. Alexander Wyeth Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, and.

Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.

Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.

Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.

Back to Table of Contents DART for English Language LearnersAnnual SnapshotDART for English Language LearnersAnnual Snapshot DART for English Language.

MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.

Slide 1 1. Profile Summary Report: Presentation Packet 2. Item Response Summary Report 3. Profile Summary Report Three reports to analyze student performance.

1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.

Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.

A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.

MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.

Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.

Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.

Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update

Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview

2012 Accountability Determinations

2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS

Next-Generation MCAS Parent/Guardian Reports

Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District

Assessment Report Dr. Evelyn Ogden, Assistant Superintendent for Assessment and Special Projects East Brunswick Public Schools September 14,

2016 Accountability Reporting

2017 MCAS Reporting Michol Stapel, Associate Commissioner Bob Lee, MCAS Chief Analyst October 23, 2017.

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System

Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results

Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Danvers Public Schools: Our Story

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.

ECHOLS COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL April 12, 2016 Middle School Teachers

Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System

Texas State Accountability

Assessment & Achievement |

Worcester Accountability Results

2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results

PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration

NANTUCKET PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Deeping Deeper into Data and Accountability November 2018

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Watertown Public Schools School Committee Meeting November 13, 2017

Spring 2019 MCAS Grade 10 Annotated Parent/Guardian Reports

Presentation transcript:

Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools Mary Eich, Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning Katy Hogue, District Student Data Manager January 9, 2017

Overall Student Performance Newton continues to be a very high-performing district Grades 3-8 82% of students met expectations* in ELA PARCC 77% of students met expectations* in Math PARCC 67% of students scored Proficient or Advanced in 5th Grade Science MCAS 57% of students scored Proficient or Advanced in 8th Grade Science MCAS High School 98% of students scored Proficient or Advanced in ELA MCAS 94% of students scored Proficient or Advanced in Math MCAS 93% of students scored Proficient or Advanced in High School Science MCAS *For PARCC, a performance level of 4 or 5 indicates that a student “met expectations”

Accountability Proficiency gap-narrowing targets MET for most subgroups DID NOT MEET targets for: African American/Black students in ELA, Math, or Science Hispanic/Latino students in ELA or Math Growth targets for all subgroups MET EXCEPT for students with disabilities in Math Graduation and dropout rates: All graduation rate targets MET All dropout rate targets MET EXCEPT for ELL and Former ELL students Newton is a Level 2 district

What the Results Tell Us Overall Average student performance is high Most students are performing well Overall, Mathematics, English Language Arts and Grade 9 Physics curricula are well-aligned to MA DESE standards based on district- level performance We still have significant achievement gaps High School subgroup achievement gaps are relatively narrow

High School Student Performance by ELL Status

High School Student Performance by Special Education Status

High School Student Performance by Economic Advantage/Disadvantage Status

High School Student Performance by Race and Ethnicity

Grades 3-8 Student Performance by ELL Status

Grades 3-8 Student Performance by Special Education Status

Grades 3-8 Student Performance by Economic Advantage/Disadvantage

Grades 3-8 Student Performance by Race and Ethnicity

Limitations of 2016 MCAS and PARCC Data No state comparative data for 2016 PARCC Unable to benchmark our performance to comparable districts Many comparable districts chose MCAS in 2016 No item-level data for PARCC Unable to assess strengths and weaknesses in curricula Unable to analyze for student misconceptions Next Generation MCAS Math and ELA begins this spring Science and Tech/Engineering standards transitioning, new STE test in 2018 or 2019