ARL New Measures MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cancer Research UK Library The e-journals experience April 28 th 2010.
Advertisements

Dental Treatment Needs of Active Duty Military Personnel 1994 and 2003 Andrew K. York, CAPT, DC, USN Susan W. Mongeau, Lt Col, USAF, DC David L. Moss,
Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Resources: Developing an Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The.
Nancy Turner Syracuse University Library ARL Survey Coordinators and SPEC Liaisons January 19, 2007 E-Metrics Services and ARL Statistics.
Area 4 SHARP Face-to-Face Conference Phenotyping Team – Centerphase Project Assessing the Value of Phenotyping Algorithms June 30, 2011.
Academic Research Library Support of Sponsored Research in the United States Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries Qualitative.
Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services: Developing Assessment Infrastructure for Libraries, State, and Other Types of Consortia Presented.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
The ARL E-Metrics Project Measures for Electronic Resources ACRL/NEC Information Technology Interest Group May 17, 2002 Brinley Franklin Director, University.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
Martha Kyrillidou Brinley Franklin Terry Plum MINES for Libraries TM ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES Assessing the Value of Networked Electronic Services:
Demonstrating Value and Creating Value: Evidence-Based Library Management through MINES for Libraries™
SOS EGEE ‘06 GGF Security Auditing Service: Draft Architecture Brian Tierney Dan Gunter Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Marty Humphrey University.
September 9, 2005 Washington, D.C. My.Medicare.gov - The Medicare Beneficiary Portal The Future of Beneficiary Self-Service.
Transforming the Traditional Media Center into a Learning Resources Center Presented by Mantra Henderson Assistant Director/Head of Public Services James.
Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program.
Web-Based Usage Surveys MINES for Libraries TM Brinley Franklin University of Connecticut Terry Plum Simmons GSLIS
Single Copy Task Group TRLN Zari Kamarei University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill June 4, :30 PAM-Wide RT.
Assessing the Scholars Portal Melody Burton, Queen’s University Toni Olshen, York University Ontario Library Association Superconference February 3, 2005.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory and Practice A Librarian’s Perspective ALA / ALCTS June 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Brinley Franklin Vice.
MINES for Libraries™ Presented by Martha Kyrillidou Director of the ARL Statistics and Service.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries MINES for Libraries.
Independent Schools Survey— Fall 2005 Summary Report Conducted by the Data Committee of the Independent School Section of the AASL.
Do Students Want Mobile Library Access And Are Librarians Ready to Deliver? Electronic Resources & Libraries, February 28, 2011 Angela Dresselhaus, Electronic.
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Greater Western Library Alliance 2006 Spring Membership Meeting Arizona State University, Tempe AZ February 27, 2006 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Webmetrics Workshop American Library Association Chicago, IL June 24, 2004 Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL Statistics and Measurement Program Association.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Assessing the Value and Impact of Digital Content Brinley Franklin Vice Provost for University Libraries University of Connecticut March 1, 2007.
Jordan J 1,2, Jones D 3, Williams D 4, Druck J 5 1 Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 2 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
HCS 465 OUTLET Experience Tradition /hcs465outlet.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Making MINES for Libraries © Work for Your Library Karen R. Harker, Collection Assessment Librarian Priya B. Parwani, Collection Development Graduate Library.
REDCap Basics Michael Gleason, Ph.D. Emily Glenn, MSLS
2016 STS Data Manager Survey Results
Brinley Franklin and Terry Plum August 18, 2005
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Impact of State Reporting Laws on Central Line– Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in U.S. Adult Intensive Care Units Hangsheng Liu, Carolyn T. A.
Evaluating the Portal: The Story Behind the Numbers
Assessing Library Performance:
Defining and Analyzing Financial Wellness
M-Learning Libraries in Distance Education: A Proposed Model for IGNOU
Cluster Randomized Trials
The Library is Our Lab: The Case for Print Books in an Academic Library Peggy Ellis and Fran Gray, Research and Instruction Librarians, Western University.
Understanding the Issues: Textbook Affordability at USF
Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries.
Amie Freeman, University of south Carolina
Information Seeking Behavior of Scientists
DAY 2 Single-Case Design Drug Intervention Research Tom Kratochwill
Standards for Use Measures for Electronic Resources
FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT
MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES): The North American Experience Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University.
New Position Proposal: EPIC Coordinator
Is There a (Data) Point? Are All of These Measures Useful?
The Story Behind the Numbers: Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) and the Assessment of the Ontario Council of University Libraries’
LibQUAL+TM : A Total Market Survey
1.) Come up with 10 examples of how statistics are used in the real life. Be specific and unique. 2.) Video.
Mining EZProxy Data: User Demographics and Electronic Resources
Collecting Library Statistics for Management Decision-making
USER’S PERCEPTION AND ATTITUDE ABOUT E- LEARNING
Health Centers in Medicaid Expansion States Were More Likely to Address Behavioral Health Needs of Patients Health center usually or often offers the following.
Understanding the Issues: Textbook Affordability at USF
DAY 2 Single-Case Design Drug Intervention Research Tom Kratochwill
Presentation transcript:

ARL New Measures MINES for Libraries Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services Brinley Franklin Vice Provost University of Connecticut Libraries

What is Mines? Measuring the Impact of Networked Electronic Services (MINES) is a research methodology consisting of a web-based survey form and a sampling plan. MINES measures who is using electronic resources, where users are located at the time of use, and their purpose of use. MINES was adopted by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) as part of the “New Measures” toolkit in May, 2003. MINES is different from other electronic resource usage measures because most studies of electronic information usage have been related to usage counts (e.g., COUNTER, EQUINOX, E-metrics, ICOLC Guidelines, ISO and NISO standards) or how well a library makes electronic resources accessible (LibQual+TM).

Recent MINES Collection Activities Data was collected at seven main campus libraries and seven academic health science libraries, between January, 2003 and January, 2005. At each library, the real-time MINES survey was one component of a comprehensive cost analysis study that assigned all library costs to sponsored research, instruction/education/non-sponsored research, patient care, other sponsored activities and other activities. More than 45,000 networked electronic service users were surveyed. MINES is also being conducted by the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) in conjunction with ARL in 2004-2005. Main University Libraries Academic Medical Libraries University of Colorado UConn Health Center University of Connecticut University of North Carolina University of Texas Medical Branch Oregon State University University of Texas Southwestern University of Utah University of Virginia Washington University

Questions Addressed by MINES How extensively do sponsored researchers use the new digital information environment? Are researchers more likely to use networked electronic resources from inside or outside the library? Are there differences in usage of electronic information based on the user’s location (e.g., in the library; on-campus, but not in the library; or off-campus)? How does purpose of use (e.g., sponsored research, instruction, patient care) differ between electronic services use and traditional library services (e.g., print collections, reference services, etc.)? What is a statistically valid methodology for capturing electronic services usage both in the library and remotely through web surveys? Are particular network configurations more conducive to studies of networked electronic services use?

MINES Methodological Considerations A representative sampling plan, including sample size, is determined at the outset. Typically, there are 48 hours of surveying over 12 months at a medical library and 24 hours a year at a main library. Random moment/web-based surveys is employed at each site. Participation is mandatory, negating non-respondent bias, and is based on actual use in real-time. Libraries with database-to-web gateways or proxy re-writers offer the most comprehensive networking solution for surveying all networked services users during survey periods.

MINES Web-based User Survey

MINES Web-based User Survey

MINES Web-based User Survey

MINES Web-based User Survey

Purpose of Use By Location – 7 Medical Libraries MINES Data, 2003 - 2005 Purpose of Use By Location – 7 Medical Libraries In The Library On-Campus, Not in Library Off-Campus Overall Use 3 *83% of sponsored research usage of electronic resources occurred outside the library, 92% of this use took place on-campus.

MINES DATA 2003 - 2005 Purpose of Use By Location – Main Campus Libraries In The Library Outside The Library Outside The Library All Usage * 72% of sponsored research usage of electronic resources occurred outside the library; 83% of this took place on campus.

MINES DATA 2003 - 2005 Location of Users Medical Library Main Library All Libraries

brinley.franklin@uconn.edu http://www.lib.uconn.edu/~bfranklin/xxxxxxx