How to get a paper published in IEEE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Understanding the Basics of Peer Review: Part 1 – Receiving a Manuscript IMPULSE Journal for Undergraduate Neuroscience This is a the first of a two part.
1 Publishing in European Journal of Teacher Education 28th August 2010 Kay Livingston, Editor, EJTE Geri Smyth, Co-Editor, EJTE Katie Peace, Publisher,
The Art of Publishing Aka “just the facts ma’am”.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Writing an original research paper Part one: Important considerations
I NFORMATION L ITERACY R ESEARCH AND A SSESSMENT P APERS.
Announcements ●Exam II range ; mean 72
Reviewing the work of others Referee reports. Components of a referee report Summary of the paper Overall evaluation Comments about content Comments about.
Reading and Writing Research Reports in Psychology 3 characteristics of good scientific writing Parts of a psychology research article Steps in the publication.
Basic Scientific Writing in English Lecture 3 Professor Ralph Kirby Faculty of Life Sciences Extension 7323 Room B322.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Publishing Research Papers Charles E. Dunlap, Ph.D. U.S. Civilian Research & Development Foundation Arlington, Virginia
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Writing Scientific Manuscripts. Table of Contents Introduction Part I: Publication & Peer Review –Deciding to Publish –Submitting Your Paper –After Submission.
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
Publishing Research Outcomes Bruce Gnade, Ph.D. University of Texas Touradj Solouki, Ph.D. Baylor University.
In the name of God How To Get A Paper Accepted In TRANSACTIONS? Dr. Bimal K. Bose, Life Fellow, IEEE Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Writing Scientific Articles – General Structures Agus Suryanto Department of Mathematics FMIPA – Brawijaya University.
Introduction Why we do it? To disseminate research To report a new result; To report a new technique; To critique/confirm another's result. Each discipline.
Publication in scholarly journals Graham H Fleet Food Science Group School of Chemical Engineering, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia .
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
 Jennifer Sadowski & Kaati Schreier May 30, 2012.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
Chris Luszczek Biol2050 week 3 Lecture September 23, 2013.
Thomas HeckeleiPublishing and Writing in Agricultural Economics 1 … 4 The review process  Overview  The author’s role  The referee’s role  The editor’s.
Passive vs. Active voice Carolyn Brown Taller especializado de inglés científico para publicaciones académicas D.F., México de junio de 2013 UNDERSTANDING.
How to Write Defne Apul and Jill Shalabi. Papers Summarized Johnson, T.M Tips on how to write a paper. J Am Acad Dermatol 59:6, Lee,
Instructions for Preparing Laboratory Reports EnvE 214 Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences Fall 2005.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
Report Technical Writing
Thomas HeckeleiPublishing and Writing in Agricultural Economics 1 Observations on assignment 4 - Reviews General observations  Good effort! Some even.
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
Le parc japonais est beau et calme La fille japonaise est belle mais bavarde Ritsurin Park, Takamatsu.
B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department of Plant Physiology FS CU RNDr. Jan Petrášek, Ph.D. 5. Presentation.
Technical Report Outline Title Page Frontispiece Abstract Table of Contents List of Figures/ List of Tables.
Technical Reports ELEC422 Design II. Objectives To gain experience in the process of generating disseminating and sharing of technical knowledge in electrical.
Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.
Revising Your Paper Paul Lewis With thanks to Mark Weal.
How to get your research published.
Project Report Format for Final Year Engineering Students.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Dr.V.Jaiganesh Professor
Journeys into journals: publishing for the new professional
CSE594 Fall 2009 Jennifer Wong Oct. 14, 2009
Experimental Psychology
Writing Effective Abstracts
Technical Reading & Writing
APA Format What you need to know
Components of thesis.
How to Write a High-Quality Technical Paper for Publication
Scientific Lab. Reports
A quick tutorial in technical writing
Outline Goals: Searching scientific journal articles
Summaries due next week
Writing Scientific Manuscripts
Observations on assignment 3 - Reviews
How to publish your research
ECE 3000: Engineering Seminar
Information Literacy Peer Reviewed Sources
In Class Essay Guidelines
Writing an Article for Publication
Writing reports Wrea Mohammed
Research Methods Technical Writing Thesis Report Writing
Advice on getting published
5. Presenting a scientific work
5. Presenting a scientific work
CSE594 Fall 2009 Jennifer Wong Oct. 14, 2009
Strategi Memperbaiki dan Menyiapkan Naskah (Manuscript) Hasil Review
Presentation transcript:

How to get a paper published in IEEE Research by Suhas. D. Ph.D. Research Scholar Tezpur University Tezpur, Assam India

Article and Publications Research Article: Papers in the journals use the IEEE standard format and must include a Title, Abstract, Introduction, Technical Content, Conclusions, and References. The transactions also include the author biographies.

Paper Writing / Approval Process Science depends on the peer review process to assess paper technical correctness, novelty, significance.

10 reasons to reject your paper Not in the proper format Not within the scope of the journal. Does not have sufficient technical content Paper is very similar to another paper by the authors that was not referenced (not referencing your own work that is similar almost always results in rejection). Idea not novel or it is an obvious (incremental variation over prior art). Results are not state of the art (non comparable, new results must be better than previous ones). Unsupported claims made in the paper (Do not make any claims that are not supported by measurements, simulations, or comparisons to prior papers.) Method or circuit are not fully explained (Give all dimensions, important equations, materials, and circuit element values. Explain how the circuit works, and why the new circuit works better. Adding another circuit component to the model without explaining what it does and why will result in rejection.) Measured results not presented. (The MWCL, the Trans. on Microwave Theory and Tech., the JSSC and almost every journal requires that all components and circuits be fabricated, a photo included, and measured results presented. Theory and numerical method papers require a comparison to another method. ) Poor grammar or use of English.

Organization of Paper Title and authors Abstract: 50 to 250 words that summarize the paper. – 1st to 3rd sentence tell what problem is being investigated. – How you performed the investigation. – Accomplishments and conclusions (summarize your results)

Introduction: (Hardest and most important part of paper, write this last) – 1st paragraph states problem to be solved and its importance – 2nd to nth paragraph states previous state of the art (Reference previous papers here, do not show bias towards or against any specific author or paper. Simply state the facts!) – Last paragraph states what is new in this paper (This statement is maybe the most important in the Introduction) and organization of the paper Many papers are rejected because of errors in the Introduction

Body of Paper Body of paper separated into sections: 1. Procedure – (Design of the experiment) 2. Results – Use clear figures and discuss all figures in the text – If paper is long, start each section with an introduction and end with a summary (few sentences) 3. Summary or Conclusions (Emphasize what novel or good results were demonstrated. This is best done with a Table of Comparison or the use of Figure of Merit.) 4. Acknowledgements (This can be added after acceptance of paper)

Submisssions: Before Submissions Have all co-authors read the paper and make revisions. Have a non-author read the paper for clarity. After spending several weeks writing the paper, you tend to overlook obvious errors. Submit required government and company forms. For Submission: Visit submission web site http://www.mtt.org/publications/index.htm and follow procedures for respective journals.

After Submissions Letter from Editor after review (whether rejected or accepted). Reviewers Comments Author’s reply with re-submission. 4. Paper rejected or accepted: If rejected: read all of the reviewer comments. This helps in strengthening of the paper. Revise your paper and highlight all revisions made. If editor does not invite resubmission, suggest selecting a different journal or sending the editor a letter asking if a resubmission would be welcome.

Additional Tips. Submit the best version that you can. Can’t edit after acceptance. Write papers in the present tense {(is, are) not (was, were)}. Do not reuse symbols Do not overuse acronyms, use acronyms that are not common to the journal you are submitting to, or invent new acronyms. Be patient; although the editors try hard to return papers to authors as quickly as possible, some papers may take longer. Reviews to IEEE journals can take one year. Do not think of plagiarism.