Loughborough University research areas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pete Thomas Professor in Road and Vehicle Safety Vehicle Safety Research Centre Loughborough University, UK A review of ITS and their safety.
Advertisements

ESafety 8 July e-Safety Working Group Brussels 8 July 2002 Sub-group 1: Autonomous In-vehicle Technologies.
the European Union policy
1 European Motorcyclists' Forum Brussels, 28 June 2010 Powered two-wheelers safety policy in France Joël Valmain Adviser for European and International.
Field Operational Tests in 7FP Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector DG INFSO - ICT for transport.
Date: 1 October2013 Meeting: Concertation meeting VRA Speaker and organisation: Maarten Oonk, TNO [ Roadmap Automation in Road Transport.
Powered-Two-Wheelers Road Safety The commitment of Piaggio & C. SpA Ljubliana, 23 April 2008.
58 th Traffic Safety Conference Romell Cooks Regional Administrator Central Region May 10,
Vulnerable Road User needs towards ITS. HUMANIST Conference, June 2014, Vienna Duration: Consortium: Associated Members: Ertico, ECF,
Overview of program TAC has adopted an aggressive approach to public education by addressing the key causes of road accidents - the attitudes and behaviours.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
66th ECE Commission Geneva, April 2015 Connectivity and Competitiveness for Sustainable Lives Sustainable Connectivity Includes Safe Mobility Which.
Road safety in Australia Chris Brooks Australian Transport Safety Bureau Road safety in Australia Chris Brooks Australian Transport Safety Bureau.
Vision Statement Sharing in the responsibility to help eliminate trauma from the road network and reduce the risks of using land transport.
Bringing intelligent systems to the market: the new European research challenge of Field Operational Tests Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector ICT for Transport.
Safety support in the automotive industry Jacob Bangsgaard Director of External Affairs and Communications 1st Annual International Conference on ICTs.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
Safer Journeys: New Zealand’s Road Safety Strategy to 2020 Chris Foley NEW ZEALAND.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
-1/17-. September. 2 5 th GRSG-AECD Informal Meeting Korea Transportation Safety Authority Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute Chief Researcher.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
IntelliDriveSM Update
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
GRIDLOCK? – TRANSPORT IN 2030 THE FUTURE FOR PRIVATE TRANSPORT Professor Mike McDonald Director, Transportation Research Group Vice-Chair, European Road.
TMALL 0143 Presentation engelsk v 1.0 Dr. Matts-Åke Belin Swedish Transport Administration Vision Zero Academy
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
 Introduction  What is Driverless Car ?  History  Component  Action  Technology  Advantages  Disadvantages  Conclusion  Reference.
Engineering College, Tuwa. Design Engineering 1 - B  Guided by, SUBMITTED BY, PRAGNESH PATEL SHAH HETAXI ( ) RAJPUT VIVEK ( ) SOLANKI.
2013 WORKPLACE ROAD SAFETY TOWARDS ZERO THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ROAD SAFETY STRATEGY
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2007 Page 1 Improve Road Safety – Target the Right User “ Results of the European Truck Accident Causation study”
Challenge: Numerous Governmental Layers
Regional Road Safety Workshop
Intelligent Transportation System
Autonomous Vehicles in California
Winter Driving Video clip
Reporting on new technologies and the way forward
DIRECTOR, ROAD SAFETY ANALYSIS
Road Safety Behaviour Symposium: New technology, new connectivity
ISO TC204 Structure 12 Active Working Groups: WG1: Architecture
Sources of Road Danger and a Vision Zero approach
Connected Vehicle Deployment – DfT perspective
Envisioning the Future: Effects of Crash Countermeasures
Staff Family Day: understanding safe road use
Understanding safe road use
Understanding safe road use
Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems 3. Problems with ADAS 4. Strategy Analytics 5. Conclusion 6. Q&A.
What We Don’t Yet Know, What We Know & What We Can Do Now
Signing the Pledge Vision Zero UNHCR Safe Road Use campaign.
The Importance of ADAS Technology
Project Edward….
Anti-Collision Sensor Market
Hur klarar infrastrukturen?
Functional Safety Automation in road transportation and its implications on user safety and cyber-security Dr Ireri Ibarra Chief Engineer, Functional.
Thank you for this opportunity.
ISO TC204 Structure 12 Active Working Groups: WG1: Architecture
The Driving Task DRIVER EDUCATION.
Accelerating the Introduction of
Internet of Things.
FREIGHT PLANNING & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
2018 Summit of the National Association of State Motorcycle Safety
Using Autonomous Vehicle Standards to Extract Traffic Signal Data
The future is already here
How technology and data can bring needed improvements to air quality and the environment Dr Dave Williams 8th November 2018.
Erasmus Intensive Program
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
Vision ZERO Good Public Health Policy
Effects of an Aftermarket Crash Avoidance System on Warning Rates and Driver Acceptance in Urban and Rural Environments ADTSEA 2019 Burlington VT July.
Presentation transcript:

Where next for infrastructure and vehicles Where next for infrastructure and vehicles? Autonomous transport and casualty reduction Road Safety Behaviour Symposium Coventry 14 – 15 March 2017 Pete Thomas Professor of Road and Vehicle Safety Safe and Smart Mobility Research Cluster

Loughborough University research areas Accident Analysis and vehicle safety Human Factors and driving trials Intelligent Mobility Digital Engineering and Test Centre Big data analysis and visualisation Autonomous vehicles Multi-modal Real-world traffic analysis and use-cases Alternative Fuels Transport Impacts

Presentation Connected and automated mobility technologies are fast arriving – how can we get the best safety value? What are the problems we should avoid? What are the implications for road user behaviour?

Future mobility Complete safety Achieve vision zero The way forward for casualty reduction Crashes will be obsolete Fernando Livschitz of Black Sheep Films 

National mobility priorities Andrew Jones, Road Safety Minister. Dec 2015 Road safety is a matter of national importance…..The government is committed to investing in national road safety. Human error is reported to be a factor in 94% of road collisions, so driverless cars have huge potential to improve road safety KPMG report to SMMT – 2,500 deaths and 25,000 serious injuries prevented between 2014 - 2030 …………………………but how will this happen?

Existing safety priorities Urban safety technologies to prevent pedestrian, car occupant, PTW and cyclist crashes Rural roads – car occupants and PTW riders Improving M’way safety, while valuable, does not address the most common groups of casualties.

ERTRAC technology deployment roadmap Highway technologies Parking technologies European Road Transport Research Advisory Council

Crash avoidance technologies Anti-lock braking Electronic stability control Autonomous Emergency braking (City, inter-urban) Lane keeping/change ……. ESC – 17% reduction in accidents ABS – 2% reduction in accidents AEB city – 38% reduction in relevant accidents

Increasing automation Urban mobility Low speed, high automation Cyber cars Automated buses Private vehicles Higher speeds, progressively higher automation Based on existing technologies (ABS, ESC, LDW, LKA, FCW, ACC etc.) https://wepods.nl Renault 

Growing the driverless fleet Today High penetration of driverless vehicles Level 4 Driverless vehicles sometimes human driven Highly managed mobility Mature technologies Increasing penetration of ADAS Level 1 – 4 vehicles Some driving conditions Less experienced road users Improving technologies Fleet penetration Conventional technologies Regular drivers 0%

Automation today and tomorrow Electronic stability control Emergency braking systems Autonomous emergency braking Including VRU detection Lane support systems Blind spot detection Intelligent Speed adaptation Individual systems already effective Intervening when humans are unable Tomorrow Emergency steering Cooperative systems Intersection management VRU detection Vehicles integrated with traffic management AV as part of integrated and managed mobility provision Complete door to door journeys mean No speeding crashes No alcohol crashes No risky driving No fatigue No distraction …………………….amongst users of AV

Monitoring deployment How can we monitor their introduction properly to inform further development? Measuring accident reductions when vehicles are equipped with new systems Measuring how systems perform in normal use What is the real-world safety benefit of autonomous systems? What levels of automation give us the greatest societal benefit? Impact on Safety Mobility Environment

What are the limitations of new systems ? How do they compare to the human? There are currently 1 deaths per 280 million vehicle km in GB, 1 serious injury for every 19 million km and 1 minor crash every 1.4 million km Human drivers are very safe – how do automatic systems compare?

Reducing existing risks What is safety? Reducing existing risks Use of new technologies to reduce existing road risks Avoiding new risks Avoiding the introduction of new risks from ADAS and automated vehicle systems

Potential introduced risks Transfer of control Situational awareness ‘limp to safety mode’ Interactions with other road users System resilience to unanticipated behaviour Progressive de-skilling of drivers Limitations of functionality Validation and verification

Other human factors challenges How are CAV systems used in real driving? How do we maximise consumer acceptance of automated systems? What are the implications for driver training and rules of the road? How do we design AV systems that are supportive for all road users? How can we design systems that compensate for human limitations and do not introduce new risks?

Takeaway thoughts Prioritisation of automation technologies to reduce existing road risks Improve our understanding of human factors relating to driverless technologies Evaluate technologies that provide greatest benefit Monitor the roll-out of ADAS and autonomous systems to measure the real- world effect Actively promote the safest mobility environment

Short course – road safety management Loughborough 11 – 12 April 2017 Safe system approach to road safety Links Programme Register safesystem@lboro.ac.uk

Pete Thomas Professor of Road and Vehicle Safety p.d.thomas@lboro.ac.uk Safe and Smart Mobility Research Cluster Loughborough University Leicestershire LE11 3TU United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1509 226931