“Biology Microbial Diversity”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Confirming Student Learning: Using Assessment Techniques in the Classroom Douglas R. Davenport Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Truman State University.
Implementation of a Scientific Literacy Project in a Large First Year Biology Class -Fiona Rawle.
Quality Matters! Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design Susan Bussmann and Sandy Johnson NMSU Quality Matters Institutional.
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Learning and Teaching Conference 2012 Skill integration for students through in-class feedback and continuous assessment. Konstantinos Dimopoulos City.
Cleveland State University ESC 720 Research Communications Dissertation Proposals Dan Simon 1.
Providing Constructive Feedback
Department of Biology Core Courses for Majors Bio 114Organisms Bio 124Ecology and Evolution Bio 214Cell and Molecular Biology Bio 224Genetics and Development.
Page 1, CBSE graduate course Component-Based Software Engineering Building reliable component-based systems Tasks for the CBSE group.
On Scoring Guides everything you were afraid to ask PART TWO.
Principles of Assessment
Engaging First Year Biology Majors in/with the Scientific Literature Jodie Krontiris-Litowitz Youngstown State University.
CISIP Writing Framework Approaches to Teaching and Learning Science and Writing.
Project-Based Learning ITECH 711 Summer 2007 Trena Noval, Instructor.
The Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication WORKSHOP SERIES Giving Students Feedback on Oral Presentations.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
“Biology of Women” Course Context: Learning Objective Taxonomy Level/Category Learning Activities Formative Assessment Summative Assessment Connect sub-
RESPONDENT BACKGROUND DISTRIBUTION Data from 31 survey respondents Student Assessment of Their Learning Gains from Conducting Collaborative Research Projects.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
Consider the types of sources valued in your discipline: Primary sources? Books (how vetted?) Journals – peer review?
LESSON PLANNING W301 Week 8 Adding Detail to Your Preliminary Plan  The preliminary plan allowed you to look at the big idea and make sure it fit with.
August 2010 Mary Moss So, You Want to Plan a Module… A Guide for NYC iSchool Teachers.
Chris Luszczek Biol2050 week 3 Lecture September 23, 2013.
ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES THE FOUR PART MODEL Presented by Daya Chetty 20 APRIL 2013.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader Math Professional Development September 27, 2013 Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach.
Integrating Outcomes Teaching Writing Intensive LSICs.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
Agenda – Week 10, Day 2 Where we’ve been Professional portfolio assignment guidelines Examples and building blocks Personas Conceptual Designs Portfolio.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Making Effective Poster Presentations. Additional Preliminary Research  Talk with PIs, advisors, mentors  Analyze audience  Involve all appropriate.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
So many questions, so little time!. The challenge: Despite giving students rubrics (pre-assignment) and despite giving them detailed feedback on analysis.
Review: Teaching Writing ETC, Chapter 5 Agenda: Starter: Discussion of response journal topics.
Present apply review Introduce students to a new topic by giving them a set of documents using a variety of formats (e.g. text, video, web link etc.) outlining.
Learning Objectives for Senior School Students. Failing to plan is planning to fail. / Psychology of Achievement /
Differentiation through 4MAT
Engaged Excellence in Research & Teaching Practices aura What Makes a Blog Post More Effective? Research Course 4, Session 5, Day One.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Writing Course and Module-Level Objectives
Pilot Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience for 1st-Year Student Success curriculum Regina Williams Davis Asst. Provost for Student Success &
Thinking about assessment…
Academic Conversations
Document Development Cycle
Assessing Students' Understanding of the Scientific Process Amy Marion, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University Abstract The primary goal of.
Online Driver Education and Virtual Classroom
Write your metaphors on the butcher paper
Topics for lessons are on each table
Facilitator Linda C. Hodges
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles in the Community College Classroom
Enabling Student Learning One Bite at a Time
Your Standards TODAY’S FLOW MORNING: Standards & 1st Unit Curriculum
Welcome to HPA 332 Health Systems Management!
UAL level 3 Diploma Print & Journalism
Topics in Applied Microbiology
Online Driver Education and Virtual Classroom
Topics in Applied Microbiology
Catherine Beswick University of Nottingham April 2019
Curriculum Coordinator: Janet Parcell Mitchell January 2016
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
Preparing Written Reports
Presentation transcript:

“Biology 350---Microbial Diversity” Student characteristics: Mostly seniors, Biology majors, 24 total enrolled in lecture, 8 students per lab section (X3). Primarily undergraduate institution in the Northwest. Learning Objective(s) Context: Student teams of two Select a peer reviewed paper fitting into Five Microbial Principles of course. Prepare a 20-30 minute PowerPoint presentation of the article. Write a 2-3 page outline/summary of article. Write two possible exam questions, with a clear grading rubric. Learning Objective Taxonomy Level/Category Learning Activities Formative Assessment Summative Assessment Evaluate, interpret, present current journal article orally and in writing. Bloom: understanding, analyzing, evaluation, creating. Fink: learning how to learn, integration. Paper choice. Collaborative learning PowerPoint prep. Outline prep. Audience comments. Approval topic and scope. Discussion of text and figures. Pre-talk comments from students. Talk eval. Outline eval. Possible Exam Questions. Audience evaluation Exam

Goals and Challenges My overall goal here is to teach seniors to critically read and analyze cutting edge peer reviewed articles in the microbiological literature, with a “Five Overarching Microbial Concepts” framework I use throughout the course. I want students to critically evaluate articles, both in terms of overall content and in particular interpretation of graphs and figures. I want students to be able to orally present an article to peers, as well as write an outline/summary for that audience. I want students to be able to write insightful potential exam questions (and clear and concise answer keys) based on that article. I want students to work collaboratively as a team to achieve these goals. I anticipate the usual problems of engagement, last minute work, and reluctance to think deeply about article choices. Scaffolding, enthusiasm, and clear expectations will help.

Learning Activities The student team will work together to select a journal article with regard to appropriateness (microbiological framework), clarity, etc. Get approval and discussion (and points) from instructor. The student team will work together collaboratively to analyze and explore the article to fit the stated requirements (focusing on two figures, summary, and context to microbiology). They will discuss their understanding with the instructor. The student team will prepare a PowerPoint show following the stated guidelines. The student team will prepare a short outline of the article for their peers. All audience members will have read the paper prior to the presentation, and sent preliminary comments (about unclear and clear concepts) to the presenters prior to their talk. All audience members will ask questions or comment following each presentation, and rate the presentations with an established rubric.

Formative Assessments Each student team will discuss their topic choices with the instructor and receive feedback and suggestions. Each student team will discuss the scope and challenges of their choices with the instructor prior to the presentation and receive feedback and suggestions. Each student team will receive comments from class members prior to their talk regarding “clear as mud” and “very straightforward” portions of their journal article choice, to help make clear how the paper will “appear” to students first encountering it.

Summative Assessments The PowerPoint presentation will be evaluated by the instructor using a standard rubric (distributed earlier to the class to make expectations clear). The outline will be evaluated in a similar manner by the instructor, again using a standard rubric. The audience will evaluate the presentation using an appropriate rubric. Questions will appear on exams for the course that are related to the figure discussion in some presentations.

After the Learning Objective… Students will have experience searching out cutting edge articles in microbiology. Students will have experience critically reading cutting edge articles in microbiology. Students will be able to dissect and analyze particular figures from such articles. Student will gain experience writing challenging exam questions based on such articles and designing answer keys for those questions. Students will gain experience with collaborative learning. Students will gain experience asking insightful scientific questions based on presentations. Students will be able to place such articles into the context of the overall course.

Task Scaffolding for the exercise The following will take place after the student teams have selected their journal articles. T-minus two weeks: journal article made available to laboratory section, while presenters prepare, meet with instructor, etc. T-minus one week: students in relevant laboratory section send comments to presenters (according to rubric), while presenters continue to prepare. Presentation day: presenters show PowerPoint and distribute outline, hand in possible test questions and answer keys, and receive questions from audience. T+2 weeks: presenters receive feedback from instructor on PowerPoint, outline, and possible test questions/keys. Future tests will contain analytical questions based on some of the figures discussed during presentation.

Timeline Because I already use a greatly simplified version of this exercise in my microbiology course, I should be able to easily “insert” this new and improved version into my Fall 2012 Microbiology course. I will model the outline, PowerPoint, and question-building portions of this exercise first (during Week Two of lab), so that students will see what I am requiring in future weeks. Rubrics will be distributed. After discussions with students, I will begin staggering the teams throughout the course (so there will be one presentation per lab section). A formal schedule will be distributed to the class, so that the scaffolding will be multistep and relatively painless.