TRAINING 4 THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA SESSION WORKSHOP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Food & Nutrition in Refugees Situations
Advertisements

Session 2.3 Applying the INEE Minimum Standards: Emergency assessment and design to BUILD BACK BETTER.
National Strategy Joint Assessment Mission 1.Capacity Building and Institutional Development 2.Governance and Rule of Law 3.Economic Policy 4.Productive.
Humanitarian Response Presented by Garry Dunbar Director, Humanitarian and Emergencies Section Australian Agency for International Development.
Training Overview and Objectives Emergency Health and Nutrition Training.
Transition of Clusters in Zimbabwe September 2013 OCHA Zimbabwe.
Humanitarian Reform and the Cluster Approach: a Stronger More Predictable Humanitarian Response System.
CLUSTER SPECIFIC CASELOAD 5 TARGET GROUPS 1 IDPS IN CAMPS – 20% OF FAMILIES= FAMILIES 2 IDPS OFF CAMPS- 80% OF FAMILIES =
EUROPEAN COMMISSION HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION (DG ECHO) WHO WE ARE OUR FUNDING OUR PARTNERS.
HEALTH SECTOR ASSESSMENTS IN EMERGENCIES 3rd ANNUAL REGIONAL TRAINING COURSE ON THE MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH RISKS IN DISASTERS FOR THE EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN.
Promoting child rights to end child poverty Plan International Typhoon Haiyan Emergency Response Phases November
M3 – S4 FUNCTION 3 – ‘ PLANNING AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ’: Resource Mobilisation.
CORE PROTECTION TRAINING MODULES PROTECTION TRAINING DAY 3: PROTECTION ADVOCACY AND PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE Date and location go here FACILITATORS: Names.
Technical Components of Education in Emergencies.
1Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) CAP (Consolidated Appeal Process) Section The Consolidated Appeal Process Rome, 9-10 May 2012.
Health Cluster Response Plan CAP 2013 SANA”A, YEMEN October 20 th, 2012.
Canadian International Development Agency Agence canadienne de développement international CIDA and Crisis Prevention and Recovery.
Community Preparedness & Disaster Planning. Why Disasters occur ?
H umanitarian R esponse in S indh Update as of: 9 March 2011.
All-Hazard Training RDHS Office - Polonnaruwa
Responding effectively to an emergency and building the capacity for special emergency response and relief … OUTCOME AREA 3: Improved Access to Basic Services.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
Whenever disaster/calamity occurs: 1) DDRMC shall convene 2) DRRMC to conduct a survey of affected area within 24 hours to determine extent of casualties.
Humanitarian Priorities for 2008 Improve monitoring and response to needs and protection concerns of the people affected by conflict, internal disturbances.
CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training 2010 Resource Mobilisation.
Bangladesh Floods UN Inter-Agency Flash Appeal.
Humanitarian Financing ACF Training – March 2010 Session I: Humanitarian Financing (Appeals processes, pooled funding mechanisms, role of clusters, CERF.
The Sphere Project. Why is Sphere needed? Post- Rwanda Multi-donor evaluation “Unnecessary deaths” NGO concern with quality and accountability.
1 Links between environmental issues and other clusters.
UNICEF Core Commitments for Children in Emergencies: Nutrition Core Commitments for Children in Emergencies: Nutrition.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Civilian Humanitarian Agencies Center for Excellence in Disaster Management & Humanitarian Assistance MPAT TE June 2007.
Scenario building workshop Dec Objectives of the workshop: Impact Intervention  Introduce different scenario building concepts and tools  Develop.
Emergency Health and Nutrition Training Key Messages.
Midterm Review of the Food Security Sector 22 – 23 June 2009, Baghdad.
UNFPA Support in Special Circumstances Joint UNHCR/UNFPA Workshop Collaboration on Demographic Data Collection in Emergencies/IDP Situations 7 February.
Inter-agency Global Evaluation of RH Services for Refugees and IDPs Component 4 Part B: Assessment of the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) of Reproductive.
DFID Somalia Humanitarian & Resilience Programme.
Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Workers (CHW) within the overall DRM system in Pakistan Module 1 Session 1.4 National Disaster Management.
TBC Food Security and Livelihoods Programme: Entrepreneurship Development.
S3.1 session day 3 1 training delivered by Oxfam GB, RedR India and Humanitarian Benchmark; January 2012, Yangon, Myanmar approved by the Advisory.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Developing a session plan S3.1 session day Text Dimension 40 Arial BOLD Position: Horizontal 5.44 Vertical 2.40 Text Dimension 24 Arial BOLD ITALICS Position:
18 – 24 APRIL 2015, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND EARLY RECOVERY ADVISOR TRAINING.
Floods in Pakistan: humanitarian health needs & response.
CCfER Training, 7 December, 2015 Integrated Early Recovery Programme Response.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Establishment of a Food Security Policy Framework LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the.
November 7th 2009, the combined effect of Hurricane IDA and low-pressure system off the Pacific Coast led to heavy rainfall (355mm in few hours) Severe.
Development Partners Roundtable
Humanitarian Assistance and Access to Basic Services
Criteria for Assessing MHPSS Proposals Submitted through the CAP, CERF and HRF Funding Mechanisms to the Protection Cluster.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Goals of the Survey To assess how men and women from differing socio-economic contexts in Gaza have been affected by and have responded to the crisis.
Disaster and it’s management
TRAINING 6 WORKING WITH PARTNERS SESSION WORKSHOP.
The Humanitarian Community
September 2017 Juba, South Sudan
Development of the detailed Nutrition Response Plan
The Islamic University of Gaza- Higher Studies Deanery
Coastlands Hotel – Durban, South Africa; November 2016
Contingency Preparedness Plan Sensitisation: Objectives
REFUGEE RETURNEES REGISTRATION
Humanitarian Response Review (HRR) & IASC Emergency Shelter Working Group Process Graham Saunders, CRS, on behalf of Sphere/ICVA/SCHR/InterAction.
Humanitarian Architecture in Bangladesh
Shelter and settlement options
24 January 2018 Juba, Republic of South Sudan
Yemen Towards early recovery
Emergency Telecommunications Cluster
Multi-purpose Cash Budget
The Humanitarian Community
Sahel Emergency: A Coordinated Education Response
Presentation transcript:

TRAINING 4 THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA SESSION WORKSHOP

1. Review process for revised life-saving criteria (January 2010) THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Objectives of this session 1. Review process for revised life-saving criteria (January 2010) 2. Key definitions 3. Discuss possible life-saving activities according to CERF definitions 4. Practical exercises: review summary of submitted proposals and discuss if they should be recommended to the ERC

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Revision The Two-Year Evaluation Independent Report (2008) recommended: Life-saving criteria should be placed in the context of core emergency needs Target the CERF more precisely so that the prioritization of needs becomes clearer. Ensure that CERF only funds activities arising out of humanitarian emergencies, both rapid and chronic. A certain degree of flexibility must be present in their application depending on the context In 2009: Consultations with global cluster leads, UN agencies, IOM and the CERF Advisory Group. 26 January 2010: The revised life-saving criteria were approved by the ERC

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA CERF Funding Criteria Projects must be for: life-saving activities core emergency humanitarian programmes defined as: Activities that within a short time span remedy, mitigate or avert direct loss of life, physical harm or threats to a population or major portion thereof. Also permissible are common humanitarian services that are necessary to enable life-saving activities (see Logistics and Support Services in LSC)

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Examples by Sector SECTOR CRITERIA EXAMPLES Agriculture Activities that have a direct and immediate impact in protecting and restoring the livelihood of families affected by an emergency Provision of seeds, tools and fertilizer to restore food production capacity, survival of productive animals when primary source of livelihood, initial inputs for plague control Coordination and Support Services (Common Services) Activities that support the delivery of priority life-saving activities provided by UN agencies, NGOs and governments in emergency response Emergency telecommunications equipment, evacuation services, transport, Joint Logistics Centers, safety and security measures Education in Emergencies Interventions aiming at restoring educational and recreational activities for children and adolescents during an emergency School tents and other education material, emergency repair of primary education facilities, essential life-saving skills

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Examples by Sector SECTOR CRITERIA EXAMPLES Food Aid Provision of minimum food requirements / basic food rations to people affected by emergencies General food distributions to fill gaps / pipeline breaks for the most vulnerable groups Health Activities that have an immediate impact on the health of population affected by an emergency Mass casualty management, Primary Health Care, SGBV response and psycho-social support, reproductive health emergency interventions, immunizations, outbreak control, HIV/AIDS emergency awareness, disease surveillance Nutrition Management of severe and moderately acute malnutrition Infant feeding in emergencies, micronutrient supplementation, therapeutic feeding centers

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Examples by Sector SECTOR CRITERIA EXAMPLES Shelter and NFIs Immediate provision of temporary/ semi-temporary shelter and basic NFIs for victims of disaster. Provision and distribution of materials, construction / repair of emergency shelter, cash grants / cash for work on a case by case basis Protection / Human Rights / Rule of Law Activities aiming at providing physical, social and legal protection (access to basic rights) to individuals and families affected by emergencies or protracted displacement situations Establishment of IDP/refugee camps, profiling of IDP / refugee populations for registration, child protection, SGBV response, psychosocial counseling and Human Rights awareness. Assistance for relocation and creation of minimum conditions for return

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Examples by Sector SECTOR CRITERIA EXAMPLES Water and Sanitation Provision of minimum requirements of water, sanitation and hygiene standards in emergency situations Provision of drinking water, emergency repair to wells/boreholes/pumps, water purification systems, sanitation systems, hygiene and sanitation supplies and awareness raising Mine action Activities that create immediate conditions of physical safety of populations affected by an emergency Emergency de-mining to allow humanitarian access, mine awareness and education

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Cross-cutting activities Coordination. Under the RR window only, the CERF will fund one cluster coordinator where this is demonstrated need for support. This coordination person must be part of a larger agency project which has been prioritized by the RC/HC and HCT. Coordination will not be supported in a stand alone project. Multi-Agency Assessments The CERF will fund multi-agency needs assessments in new emergencies, only under the RR window. Must be supported by the RC/HC and the HCT. The CERF will not fund single agency/sector specific assessments.

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA The CERF will not fund: Activities not immediately life saving (eg. disaster mitigation, early warning, prevention and preparedness, economic recovery, poverty reduction, and disarmament) Expenditures not covered by the CERF contributions: Recurring budget costs (office and maintenance costs, bank fees, etc.) Regular agency stockpiling Capacity building and training (funded only if related to direct implementation of emergency response)

THE CERF LIFE-SAVING CRITERIA Exercise In groups, discuss some paragraphs extracted from various CERF proposals submitted to the ERC. Please, determine whether or not they comply with the life-saving mandate of the CERF. Tick the appropriate box. YES, THIS FALLS WITHIN THE MANDATE OF THE CERF NO, IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR CERF FUNDING MAYBE, DEPENDING ON THE CONTEXT In plenary, share answers and discuss.

TRAINING 4 QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS SESSION THANK YOU