Penelitian Ilmiah dan Penulisan Proposal Penelitian untuk menghasilkan Publikasi pada Internasional Jurnal Bereputasi Teddy Mantoro teddy@ieee.org

About (Prof. Dr. Ir. Teddy Mantoro, MSc., SMIEEE) Professor and researcher in the Faculty Science and Technology, Sampoerna University, Jakarta, Indonesia Adjunct Professor, Advanced Informatics School, Universiti Technologi Malaysia (UTM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (http://www.ais.utm.my/teddy/) Invited Lecturer - Pasca Sarjana: FTI-UBL dan PMPBI-UNJ, Guest Lecture – postgrad-Fasilkom-UI . Chair of SKKNI-Mobile Computing, Kemkominfo (2015-6), member of tim- Ahli penyusunan standard hasil penelitian –BSNP (2016) and deputy chair of KKNI Development, APTIKOM (2014-2017). Awarded a PhD - CS (Australian National University, Canberra, Australia) and MSc – CS (Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand).

Academic Profile 130+ Publications [Scopus: 94 papers] 25+ Awards TPC/reviewer 2016 (27 conferences) SCIEMATHIC 2016 (Bali, Indonesia), ISYM 2016, APACE 2016 (Langkawi, Malaysia), CITSM 2016 (Bandung, Indonesia), IEACon 2016, AnDIC 2016, ICIC 2016 (Lombok, Indonesia), ICSN 2016, ICMCS 2016 (Marrakech, Morocco), UBICOMM 2016 (Venice, Italy), MoMM 2016 (Singapore), ICACI 2016, ICCN 2016, PECON 2016 (Melaka, Malaysia), ICIICC 2016, SYSSARM 2016, PIAMSE 2016, IEEE-GCC 2016, ICINN 2016, IACe-T 2016, NCM 2016 (Seoul, Korea), EECSI 2016, EDUSTS 2017, etc. TPC 2015 (34 conferences): ICCVIA 2015 (Sousse, Tunisia), EQESS 2015 (Dubai, UEA), CSNT 2015, PECON 2015 (Kuching, Serawak, Malaysia), UBICOMM 2015 (Nice, France), ICoICT 2015 (Bali, Indonesia), EECSI 2015 (Palembang, Indonesia), MEI 2015 (Orlando, USA), Awarecast 2015 (Seattle, Washington, US), TIME-E 2015 (Samosir Island, Indonesia), IIC 2015, CSNT 2015, MoMM 2015, ISySM'2015 (Bandung, Indonesia), ICACCI-2015 (Kerala, India), MobiApps, 2015 (Rome, Italy), ICACOMIT 2015 (Bandung, Indonesia), ICSPDM' 2015, WoTBD 2015 (Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada), GAMEPEC 2015, ICSPDM 2015, PIAMSE 2015), ICOED 2015, EQESS 2015 (Dubai, UEA), PECON 2015 (Kuching, Serawak, Malaysia), ICACCI 2015, CGMIP2015, CyberSec2015, CITSM 2016, etc. TPC 2014: AINA 2014 (Victoria, Canada), ICMCS 2014 (Marakkesh, Morocco), UBICOMM 2014 (Rome, Italy), ICT4M 2014 (Kuching-MY), LTIA2014 (Delhi-India), ICoSSEET 2014 (Penang, MY), ICoICT 2014 (Bandung, Indonesia), CHUSER 2014 (Penang, MY), TIME-E 2014 (Bandung, Indonesia), Awarecast 2014 (Seattle, Washington, US), ARICT 2014 (Duhok, Irak), ACSAT 2014 (Amman, Jordan), SNATi 2014 (Yogjakarta, Indonesia), etc. TPC 2013: ICICM 2013 (KL, MY) , ICT4M 2013 (Rabat, Morocco), ICCNT 2013 (Busan, Korea), ICIS 2013 (Beijing, China), TIME-E 2013 (Bandung, Indonesia), IGCESH 2013 (Johor, MY), CSIT 2013 (Yogja, Indonesia), Shuser 2013 (Penang, MY), IDCTA 2013 (Beijing, China), ICMIC 2013, (Bangkok, Thailand), INC 2013 (Busan, Korea), NCM 2013 (Jeju Island, Korea), ICIPM 2013 (Seoul, Korea), ICIDT 2013 (Beijing, China), WVNT/NETYS 2013 (Marrakech, Morroco), BWCCA- 2013 (Compiegne, France), IPIN 2013 (Montbéliard, France), AwarecasT 2013, ACSAT 2013, etc. General chair for CGMIP 2015 and CYBERSEC 2015, (29-31 October 2015, Jakarta, Indonesia), Chair of ICCMT 2013 (Chiang May, Thailand), Co-chairs for ICT4M 2013, Serawak, MY, ICIMC 2013, KL, MY and ARICT 2014, Irak), TPC chair for ICIC 2016, Lombok, Indonesia. 130+ Publications [Scopus: 94 papers] 25+ Awards 20+ Research Grants 5 Books (Elsevier/Atlantic, IEEE, Lambert, IIUM, IGI) 4 Patents Filing 4 Int’l Journal Editors Orientasi kebaruan: menciptakan kebaruan dalam keseluruhan proses riset Merumuskan masalah dan pertanyaan penelitian Menentukan state of the art dan gap in knowledge Mengembangkan teori dan kerangka konsepsual Kreatif dalam merangkai dan menghubungkan konsep yang satu dengan konsep lainnya Menggunakan metodologi Memiliki kecakapan dalam memanfaatkan metodologi yang ada untuk membantu memahami fenomena yang ditelitinya Mempresentasikan hasil Cara mempublikasi dan presentasi hasil riset Kegigihan dalam mencari data Menggunakan berbagai cara yang wajar untuk memperoleh data yang dicari Tidak mudah menyerah Orientasi pada kualitas Standar kualitas yang tinggi pada keseluruhan proses riset Standar kualitas yang harus diterapkan pada semua kegiatan riset

Agenda Pengindeks bereputasi Penelitian Ilmiah Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF) h-index dan g-index Penelitian Ilmiah Mencari bidang yang akan diteliti AI Method in Brief Jenis Publikasi karya ilmiah Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) Penulisan Proposal dan publikasi Ilmiah Judul Abstract Introduction, methodology, etc. Contoh penelitian dan hasilnya

Capaian Pembelajaran (Learning Outcome): Setelah mengikuti pelatihan ini Peserta diharapkan dapat: Menjelaskan tentang pengindeks bereputasi Membedakan Jenis Indeks dan faktor dampak (IF) Dapat menghitung h-index dan g-index Dapat menetapkan area yang akan diteliti Dapat menetapkan Idea (Problem dan Solusi yang diusulkan) pada suatu penelitian Menulis proposal penelitian/paper dengan Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) yang rendah. Penulisan Proposal yang berpotensi menghasilkan publikasi Ilmiah di jurnal Internasional bereputasi

Positioning

Positioning

Positioning

Cites Per Doc by Country (Scopus, 12/10/2016)

Perbandingan Jumlah Riset Paper di Scopus (Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei) 31/8/2015

Google Scholar Variables: Author Area – define by author Citations: All and the last 5 years h-Index i10-index Total papers

Google Scholar Peneliti A Peneliti B +++ reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF --- first author atau corresponding author ---- bahasa Indonesia Disiplin ilmu: Biologi Citations=660 h-index = 14 I10-index=18 Peneliti B --- reputable papers: journal atau conf ber-IF +++ first author atau corresponding author +++ bahasa Indonesia Disiplin ilmu: Ilmu komputer Citations=1176 h-index = 17 I10-index=35

Scopus Peneliti A Peneliti B h-index=12 h-index=0 Docs=26 Docs=1 Citations=390 from 322 docs Peneliti B h-index=0 Docs=1 Citations=0 from 0 docs

Scopus Variables: Author Id ORCID # docs # Citations # docs yg mengutip h-Index # co-authors Subject area Graph visualization

Web of Science – Thomson Reuters Variables: Jumlah Docs Jumlah sitasi Jumlah sitasi tanpa self-citation Citing-articles tanpa self-citation Rata-2 citation per paper h-index Graph visualization (ResearchID)

h-index The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar. Proposed by Jorge E. Hirsch (2005). The index is a measure of the number of highly impactful papers a scientist has published. The larger the number of important papers, the higher the h-index, regardless of where the work was published. To calculate it, only two pieces of information are required: the total number of papers published (Np) and the number of citations (Nc) for each paper. The h-index is defined by how many h of a researcher’s publications (Np) have at least h citations each. Source: http://www.benchfly.com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/

h-index ‘The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number greater than or equal to h, is a useful index to characterise the scientific output of a researcher.’  (JE Hirsch) The h-index is a measure of the number of publications published (productivity) as well as how often they are cited (impact). PRODUCTIVITY + IMPACT = INFLUENCE If your h-index is 15, you have 15 papers cited 15 times or more. If your h-index is 20, you have 20 papers cited 20 times or more.

h-index h-index’s weakness -- not consider: Type of author # papers   Peneliti C Peneliti D H Kutipan/Sitasi 1 386 145 2 247 40 3 313 27 4 37 18 5 26 14 6 7 Total 1109 257 h-index’s weakness -- not consider: Type of author # papers # citations # span of time

g-index The G-index was proposed by Leo Egghe in his paper "Theory and Practice of the G-Index" in 2006 as an improvement on the H-Index.   G-Index is calculated this way: "[Given a set of articles] ranked in decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the G-Index is the (unique) largest number such that the top g articles received (together) at least g^2 citations." (from Harzig's Publish or Perish Manual) Advantages of the G-Index: Accounts for the performance of author's top articles Helps to make more apparent the difference between authors' respective impacts.  The inflated values of the G-Index help to give credit to lowly-cited or non-cited papers while giving credit for highly-cited papers.   Disadvantages of the G-Index: Introduced in 2006 and debate continues whether G-Index is superior to H-Index.  Might not be as widely accepted as H-Index.  

g-index g-index’s weakness -- not consider: Type of Author # papers # citations # span of time

Kumulatif Kutipan/Sitasi g-index   Peneliti C Peneliti D N Kutipan/Sitasi Kumulatif Kutipan/Sitasi N x N 1 386 145 2 247 633 4 40 185 3 313 946 9 27 212 37 983 16 18 230 5 26 1009 25 14 234 6 36 239 7 49 244 8 64 245 81 246 10 100 11 121 12 144 13 169 196 15 225 256 17 289 324 19 361 20 400 21 441 22 484 23 529 24 576 625 676 729 28 784 29 841 30 900 31 961 32 1024 33 1089 34 1156 h-index=5 g-index=31 g-index=15

i10-index (similar with h-index with # citatition >=10)   Peneliti C Peneliti D H Kutipan/Sitasi 1 386 145 2 247 40 3 313 27 4 37 18 5 26 14 6 7 Total 1109 257 i10-index’s weakness -- not consider: Type of author # papers # citations # span of time

SJR: Scientific Journal Rankings

ISI WoS – Thomson Reuters

ISI WoS – Thomson Reuters

ISI WoS – Thomson Reuters

WoS – Thomson Reuters Master Journal List (http://ip-science

Journal Impact Factor (IF) IF originally belong to Web of Science (WoS) of Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Report (JCR) – WoS and Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR) The journal Impact Factor is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past two years have been cited in the JCR year. The Impact Factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the JCR year by the total number of articles published in the two previous years. http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/help/h_impfact.htm

How to find the impact factor for a journal? Answer: Use Journal Citation Reports (JCR)

How to find the impact factor for a journal? Answer: Use Journal Citation Reports (JCR)

Contoh Perhitungan Impact Factor (WoS Thomson Reuters) Impact factor tahun 2015 (diumumkan ~Juni 2016) Jurnal X mempunyai IF=0.5 Cites in 2015 to items published in: 2014 = 6    Number of items published in: 2014 = 10    2013 = 4      2013 = 10    Sum = 10    Sum = 20  Calculation: Cites to recent items  10 = 0.5    Number of recent items  20  Jurnal Y memiliki IF: 0.696 Cites in 2015 to items published in: 2014 = 17    Number of items published in: 2014 = 10    2013 = 23      2013 =10    Sum = 40      Sum = 20  Calculation: Cites to recent items  40 = 2.0   

Impact Factor Palsu (Bogus) Seminar “Strategi Publikasi, Pengelolaan Jurnal Ilmiah dan Launching Jurnal On Line Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Indonesia [JKKI]” 5 September 2015 Impact Factor Palsu (Bogus) Journal Impact Factor is from Journal Citation Report (JCR), a product of Thomson ISI (Institute for Scientific Information). JCR provides quantitative tools for evaluating journals. Perhitungan impact factor PALSU (Bogus Impact Factor Companies)? CiteFactor  http://www.citefactor.org Global Impact Factor  http://globalimpactfactor.com ISRA: Journal Impact Factor(JIF)  http://www.israjif.org IMPACT Journals  http://www.impactjournals.us General Impact Factor (GIF)  http://generalimpactfactor.com Journal Impact Factor (JIF)  http://www.jifactor.com Universal Impact Factor  http://uifactor.org IndexCopernicus  http://journals.indexcopernicus.com International Impact Factor Services (IIFS)  http://impactfactorservice.com ISI International Scientific Indexing  http://isindexing.com Selain DOAJ terdapat beberapa indeking serupa: Directory of Research Journals Indexing  www.drji.org CABELL’S Directories  http://www.cabells.com Other providers documents, papers and essays? EDU Libs  https://edulibs.org ISSUU  http://issuu.com Modified from Tole S, Rakornas APTIKOM, 2016

Penelitian Ilmiah Find the Area and build Idea Writing Proposal Road-map Methodology Secured Funding Do the Research Research output Prototype Patent Paper publication

Publikasi karya Ilmiah adalah salah satu Target Output dari suatu Penelitian. Jenis Publikasi Karya Ilmiah Journal Paper Conference Paper Book (edited & author) Book Chapter

Type of Research Papers (Literature) Review paper Conceptual paper Experimental paper Literature Review paper Conceptual paper Experimental paper Weak Medium Strong Not Always, depend on how do you cook it Ex.: SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) - SPSS - Amos Proof of Concept Proof of Existence Proof of performance

Finding the Research Fields Area vs Idea Searching the seed topic in the High Impact Factor Journals (in ISI WoS or Scopus) or use Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, Open Access Journals, etc.

Determining the Research Target: Not a stagnant research area (too old and many researchers) Not a new field but hard to grow (small & too specific number of researchers) Search a new and fast growing field (based on publications and labs, new field and fast growing researchers)

Example IEEE-Journal rank (2004)

Example IEEE-Journal rank (2004)

Research Area (in my case)

Finding Research Problem and Contribution   How to find a strong problem Understanding the Problem Domain Thinking of Contribution

Building the understanding of the research domain Finding Core Research Papers Reading Research Papers Writing Critical Reports Build a Mind Mapping Positioning: using table (as a part of state of the art literature review)

Reading papers Why do we have to read good papers? The quality of your writing depends on the quality of your reading. Failure of reading a good paper can bring you to failure in understanding the problem domain, the strong solution, the strong methods, etc.

Reading a paper Read only a good paper, but how to find a good paper? Can we set-up a framework in our mind (structured thinking ) even before we read a paper Join the communication among the researchers in a specific research area, by reading and try to find a way to improve their research work. If the idea to improve it is a good idea, then publish it. What is the best way to read papers? Find the most important thing in the paper, but what is it?

Research Process: Formulating the research idea Source of idea for project Scientific literature, own observations, other individuals expert, etc. Literature review Read literature Integrate & cross reference ideas Critically evaluate & discuss ideas Formulate research questions Consider theoretical foundations Refine project idea (identify constructs

Research Process: Formulating the idea (cont.) Select methodological approach Descriptive Select way to study phenomenon of interest (survey, case study, naturalistic observation) Experimental Identify and formulate the hypotheses Correlational Identify specific variables of interest (predict nature of relationship)

Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level) Normally about 30% (in USA, UK, etc.) Turnitin, Viber, iAuthenticate, etc. To make it safe: 15% exclusing the references or 20% including reference

Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level)

Similarity Score (Plagiarism Level)

Summary so far Type of Research Papers Finding the research field Area and Idea Searching the seed topic Determine the research target Define a research problem Research methodology formulation

Where to Publish? Contraints: Budget: Free or low cost, location Time of publishing Type of publications: Journal Paper – Scopus (SCImago) Conference Paper - IEEE Xplore, ACM-DL  Scopus Book (editor & author) – Elsevier  Scopus Book Chapter – Elsevier  Scopus

Before Publishing your paper Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers http://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20conduct%20for%20publishers%20FINAL_1_0.pdf Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles%20of%20Transparency%20and%20Best%20Practice%20in%20Scholarly%20Publishing.pdf From: COPE - Committee on Publication Ethics. Sample of debatting for journal paper in using COPE`: here Sample of answer: here

Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers 2015 https://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/criteria-2015.pdf https://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/ https://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/ Jurnal predator definition is debatable. Someone asked: I wonder why you have not added these Predatory Publishers in your list yet * Plos * Hindawi * Elsevier Hindawi was in Beall’s list (2012?) Now, some countries realease their own list (list in the next page).

Release Journal List Publishers by Country Now, some countries realease their own list, example: Australia: http://www.arc.gov.au/era-2015-submitted-journal-list download: http://www.arc.gov.au/sites/default/files/filedepot/Public/ERA/ERA%202015/ERA2015_Submitted_Journal_ListV2.xlsx Malaysia: Publishers NOT Recognized by Malaysia Ministry of Education (MOE) http://epsas.upm.edu.my/psasrip/images/pdf2015/publishers.pdf http://zetty1977.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/6/4/26648302/blacklisted_journal_by_moe.pdf Iran: (Black List) http://ceit.aut.ac.ir/autcms/news/newsDetail.htm?id=1777500177&depurl=computer-engineering&lang=en&cid=1865 Thailand: (Approved) http://www.elearning.au.edu/publications/ Pakistan: (Recognised) http://www.hec.gov.pk/insidehec/divisions/qali/qadivision/pages/hecrecognizedjournals.aspx

Release List Publishers by University Malaysia: Publishers NOT Recognized by UPM http://epsas.upm.edu.my/psasrip/images/pdf2015/publishers.pdf ITB: (Black List) https://www.itb.ac.id/files/12/20131121/BlacklistedPublishers-and-theirRespectiveJournals.pdf

Release List Publishers by Dikti Jurnal yang Perlu Dipertimbangkan untuk Kenaikan Pangkat/Jabatan Dosen http://pak.dikti.go.id/portal/?p=41 Daftar Jurnal yang Masuk Blacklist Tim PAK Dikti http://www.kopertis12.or.id/2014/04/11/daftar-jurnal-yang-masuk-blacklist-tim-pak-dikti.html (Sayangnya tidak di update, 2013).

Where to Publish? Scimago Science Direct Emerald IGI Global Hindawi IEEE Xplore Etc.

SCImago http://scimagojr.com/

SJR: Scientific Journal Rankings

Emerald http://www.emeraldinsight.com/

IGI Global http://www.igi-global.com/journals/indices/index/all

Hindawi https://www.hindawi.com/

Science Direct http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journals

Contoh hasil hasil penelitian: Surelator: Optimal Quality Translation from Bahasa Indonesia to English (vice versa) Indonesia has 722 living language + 1 official language used by more than 240 million people (Lewis, 2009). Estimated only less than 10% Indonesian has the capability in a reasonable level of English. Research on machine translation has been done extensively for certain languages such as English, Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, and French but not in Bahasa Indonesia. Currently we have developed our own good quality corpus from multi domain (3 millions words parallel corpus). 28 parameters have been studied including language modelling (3), n-gram (8 parameters), alighment (9 parameters), and reordering (8 parameters) producing ~270 millions experiments to find the optimal quality translation (Noted: an experiments took between 2-9 hours).

English to Indonesian SURELATOR Performance Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and SURElator English to Indonesian

Indonesian to English SURELATOR Performance Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and SURElator Indonesian to English

The latest result SURELATOR Performance English to Indonesian Comparison with other translation tools: Google Translator, Rekso Translator and SURElator The latest result English to Indonesian Scheme (NIST) NIST BLEU Time Google 7.2177 0.2697 8 Rekso 3.8365 0.0726 196 Surelator Speed 8.5465 0.4023 29 Surelator Quality 8.4962 0.4230 75 Indonesian to English Scheme (NIST) NIST BLEU Time Google 7.3531 0.2875 8 Rekso 4.1575 0.0860 135 Surelator Speed 8.5842 0.4032 23 Surelator Quality 8.7183 0.4181 87

Interactive Peer-Tracking Framework for Hajj Pilgrims

PROBLEM ANALYSIS The number of people who went to the Hajj pilgrimage in 2006 is 2,130,594, where 73% of the pilgrims are non-saudi pilgrims [1]. In 2010, 64.27% (1,799,601) of total 2.8 million pilgrims were non Saudi [2]. In 2011, 62,44% (1,828,195) of total pilgrims [3]. In Indonesia, hajj quota has been reduced by 20%, from the original quota of 211,000 pilgrims (2013) [5] and Increase again to 168.800 in 2014 [6]. In Malaysia, Hajj Quota is increased to 28,000 in 2011 from 26,000 in 2010 [4] and decrease to 22,320 in 2014. More than 2,500 cases of missing people in the area of Masjid al-Haram, the grand mosque in Makkah, during Ramadan 2005. Increasing 14% each year and many more are not reported [1] for umrah only, and for Hajj, it is estimated 4 times of cases of missing people. It is estimated more than 30 people die everyday during Hajj peak time, most of them are elderly. [1] Statistic released by Ministry of Hajj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), 2006. [2] Framework for Hajj Pilgrimage Tracking System in a Pervasive Computing Environment. IJMCMC, IGI Global, July 2011. [3] Information office of the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia in Washington DC, 2011. [4] Hajj Quota for Malaysian pilgrims to 28,000, the Star Online. [5] Jakarta post, available at http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/indonesia-hajj-quota-slashed-by-20/. [6] Antara News, http://www.antaranews.com/berita/455840/seluruh-jamaah-haji-indonesia-tuntas-ke-tanah-suci

Mainly HajjLocator has two aims: AIMS AND BENEFITS Mainly HajjLocator has two aims: 1- To reduce worrying (peace of mind). Provide a tracking facility to the users when they perform hajj, for their family in their home country. 2- To save life. Provide carefully designed SOS button, when a user (especially elderly) in panic situation.

HajjLocator Framework ver 1.0 Client-side application interface HajjLocator framework The design on how the internet technology can help to reduce worrying and save a live.

HajjLocator Setting Running the test on SmartPhone Location projection in Makkah surroundings for user testing purpose HajjLocator Client application interface

Key Features of Reliable Emergency Communication Infrastructure Model Key Feature for a Reliable Emergency Communication for the Server and Mobile client apps.: Tracking user based on time, distance and user request. SOS Tracking and SOS Saved SOS button Life Update Geolocation (Single/multiple users and User Distribution) Geo-Fencing Update History (With Filtering) Auto-reboot History of user location (google map) Text Based Monitoring SMS notification of user location SMS triggering for peers/family Update multi-user location (google map) Silent call function Speeding detection Control remotely

Tracking User Based on Time, Distance and User Request Example: Tracking user based on time (yellow), distance (blue) and user request (red).

Tracking User Based on Time and Distance Comparison of actual GPS coordinates in location test bed in the university and Makkah

Geofence SMS or others massaging system is currently used for user when it comes or goes to a fence

HajjLocator on iPhone

HajjLocator clients on Blackberry Award for HajjLocator so far: Gold Medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition – IRIIE 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Gold Medal - Innovation Showcase in the International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems – ICRIIS 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. WIAF 2013 winner, on category “Software Engineering of Merit”, the 2nd Annual 2013 World Inventor Award Festival, Seoul, Korea. ISIF 2012 Award Winner, 1st rank, on Community Choice Award on category Code for the Common Good. Gold medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition - IRIIE 2012, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. Silver Medal - Malaysia Technology Expo - MTE 2011, Kuala Lumpur Convention Center, 17-19 February 2011. Silver Medal - IIUM Research, Invention and Innovation Exhibition 2011 - IRIIE 2011, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.

Thakn yuo for yrou atteniton… teddy@ieee.org