Frank Schipplick Work Package Coordinator WP1 - eSignatures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Universal Electronic Signatures Tarvi Martens ESTONIA.
Advertisements

Using PHINMS and Web-Services for Interoperability The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent.
PEPPOL is owned by OpenPEPPOL AISBL OpenPEPPOL – Making Procurement Better André Hoddevik Head of e-procurement unit, Agency for Public Management.
17 March 2010 Workshop on Efficient and Effective eGovernment FASTeTEN : a Flexible Technology in Different European Administrative Contexts
How eID and eSignatures work in a cross-border setting Wendy Carrara SPOCS Deputy Programme Director eID workshop Reaping the benefits of eID in different.
The European Activities of BR Communication e-CODEX e-Justice Communication via Online Data Exchange Bucharest, June 14 th 2013.
Practical Digital Signature Issues. Paving the way and new opportunities. Juan Carlos Cruellas – DSS-X co-chair Stefan Drees - DSS-X.
0 DOD/DT/CEDCV – 20 th & 21 st January Paris meeting SAGEM RTD Activities C2-Sense project Paris – 20 & 21 January 2015.
ETen E-Poll ID – Strasbourg COE meeting November, 2006 Slide 1 E-TEN E-POLL Project Electronic Polling System for Remote Operation Strasbourg.
Electronic Submission of Medical Documentation (esMD) Face to Face Informational Session esMD Requirements, Priorities and Potential Workgroups – 2:00pm.
Stork is an EU co-funded project INFSO-ICT-PSP Secure Identity Across Borders Linked Secure Electronic Identity Across Europe! STORK – 4 TH I NDUSTRY.
PEPPOL is an EU co-funded project CIP-ICT PSP-2007 No PEPPOL – Vision and status André Hoddevik, Project Director Agency for Public.
Cross Platform Single Sign On using client certificates Emmanuel Ormancey, Alberto Pace Internet Services group CERN, Information Technology department.
21 mai 2015 Bridges between Certification Authorities.
BioSec Biometrics & Security IST © 2005 BIOSEC Consortium 1February 2005 BioSec Biometrics & Security Orestes SanchezBioSec Coordinator Telefónica.
Stork is an EU co-funded project INFSO-ICT-PSP STORK PRESENTATION STORK Presentation Lithuania March 2010.
CDC Confiance Electronique Européenne Presentation of FAST project CDC Confiance Electronique Européenne Bertrand AIT-TOUATI – Architecture & new services.
Evolution in cross-border interoperability of eSignatures and eID Tarvi Martens SK, Estonia.
X-Road (X-tee) A platform-independent secure standard interface between databases and information systems to connect databases and information systems.
Exchange of digitally signed SPSCertificate messages Overview of prototype of digital signature applied to SPSCertificate message between national systems.
E-TrustEx | CIPA Reuse across e-Government services 17 April2012 Joao Rodrigues Frade.
AQA Computing A2 © Nelson Thornes 2009 Section Unit 3 Section 6.4: Internet Security Digital Signatures and Certificates.
LCG Milestones for Deployment, Fabric, & Grid Technology Ian Bird LCG Deployment Area Manager PEB 3-Dec-2002.
Harmonisation of electronic Identities for the European Citizen Jan van Arkel, co- chair Porvoo group, May 11, 2006 Ljubljana.
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
Business Register Interoperability Throughout Europe Vito Giannella European Business Register eeig.
Introduction to Secure Messaging The Open Group Messaging Forum April 30, 2003.
Intelligent Cargo in Efficient and Sustainable Global Logistics Operations WP5 – Open End-to-End Pilots Implementation Jose Gato Luis –
1 The INSPIRE Geoportal Ioannis Kanellopoulos Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and.
EMI INFSO-RI SA2 - Quality Assurance Alberto Aimar (CERN) SA2 Leader EMI First EC Review 22 June 2011, Brussels.
Quality Management (WP5) Roman CHIRCA Agency for Innovation and Technological Transfer TecTNet ………... This project has been funded with support from the.
Secure Messaging Workshop The Open Group Messaging Forum February 6, 2003.
SGCC 6.1 Kick-off Project Setup. Introduction Tour de Table –Who’s who –Attendance list, s Scope of CC 6.1.
CLARIN work packages. Conference Place yyyy-mm-dd
Creating a European entity Management Architecture for eGovernment CUB - corvinus.hu Id Réka Vas
Semantic Annotation of Services and Processes in Business Alliances Karol Furdík 1,2 1 InterSoft, a.s., Floriánska 19, Košice, Slovakia
Demonstrators and Pan-European Services Laboratory WP5 session.
Identity Proofing, Signatures, & Encryption in Direct esMD Author of Record Workgroup John Hall Coordinator, Direct Project June 13, 2012.
Belgian EID Card 15/12/2004 Derette Willy eID program manager.
JRA1.4 Models for implementing Attribute Providers and Token Translation Services Andrea Biancini.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
Thomas Gutberlet HZB User Coordination NMI3-II Neutron scattering and Muon spectroscopy Integrated Initiative WP5 Integrated User Access.
Stefan Krammer, Work Package Coordinator 2. Status report from WP4 eOrdering 11th December 08.
2. Status report from WP 3 eCatalogues Copenhagen - 11 December 2008 Giancarlo De Stefano Work Package 3 Coordinator.
Radu Boncea – ICI Bucharest Monica Anghel – ICI Bucharest SPOCS – Simple Procedures for Cross-Border Services Bucharest 10 February 2012.
Stork is an EU co-funded project INFSO-ICT-PSP STORK PRESENTATION Frank LEYMAN Manager International Relations 04/06/2009.
PEPPOL meeting - Sweden country presentation Irene Andersson, Swedish Agency for Administrative Development, VERVA, June 11, 2008.
Implementing eProcurement with PEPPOL Tim McGrath, Deputy WPM WP8 Malmö, February 9 th 2010.
André Hoddevik, Project Director Enlargement of the PEPPOL-consortium 2009.
© The InfoCitizen Consortium Project Presentation Agent based negotiation for inter- and intra-enterprise coordination employing a European Information.
WP8: PEPPOL infrastructure WP8 - Solution architecture, design and validation.
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
Training for developers of X-Road interfaces
Data management in energy systems, a regulator’s perspective
Pan-European Public procurement Online
Steve Brewer Stichting European Grid Initiaitive
e-Health Platform End 2 End encryption
Session II: System authority for ERTMS 4RP Trackside approval
SPOCS : Simple Procedures Online for Crossborder Services
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Description of Revision
ICT-PreAward-eCAT- Pre_Award_Conformance_and_ Test_Strategy-1.0.1
Digital Signatures and Forms
ESSnet Linked Open Statistics Update
Business Registers Interconnection System
Dashboard eHealth services: actual mockup
PKI (Public Key Infrastructure)
E-identities (and e-signatures)
Presentation transcript:

Frank Schipplick Work Package Coordinator WP1 - eSignatures

High level vision of WP1  The aim is to provide cross European interoperability of electronic signatures, particular regarding the verification process. 3 steps to reach this goal.  Definition of a trust model for pan-european eProcurement processes to overcome the legal obstacles.  Specify the way of signing eProcurement data to enable cross-border eProcurement.  Provision of solutions for verification of signatures for awarding entities

WP 1 Participants Consortium Members WP 1 Members CNIPA (ITA) DGME (France) DIFI/DNV (NOR) City of Bremen/bos (GER)

Tasks of WP 1  Task 1: The design phase – specification – Analysing the legal, organizational and technical situation of the use of eSignatures in the field of E-Procurement in selected European countries. – Revision of existing studies on eSignature. – Defining a technical specification.  Task 2: The construction phase – implementation – Building up a validation authority  Task 3: The operational phase – pilot – Running the pilot

NoTitle Delivery Date D1.1 Specification of eSignature solution for eProcurement /Trust model Month 10 D1.2 Transnational verification solutions – Prototype documentation Month 24 D1.3 Demonstrator and revised specification for eSignature solution for eProcurement / trust model Month 30 D1.4 Pilot report and recommendations for European Roll-Out Month 36 Deliverables of WP 1

Final outcome of WP 1  Certificate Validation Service for Europe – Provide the receiver of signed documents a service to verify the signatures whereas the sender can sign these documents with his national signature solutions. – Integration of the validation service in some national applications  Demonstrator Software – Installation of validation authorities – Provision of client solutions (probably not in all languages) – Provision of APIs for the application integration  The validation service is application independent. – It can be used for every business process with signed documents. – Not only in the procurement segment.

Objective of the WP1 pilot  Allow the use of foreign eID signatures in eprocurement processes – Assumption 1: a national eProcurement application is able to verify signatures compliant to national laws – Assumption 2: If the existing eProcurement application can verify a foreign eID signature itself, the application does not have to use the WP1 solution  Proof of ability of the certificate validation infrastructure

Architecture of the pilot Direct access, if foreign CA known

Company ACompany B Country A Country B Operator 1 Company C Operator 2 PEDRI Access point, national Company F Operator 3 Access point 3, Operator 3 Company E PEDRI Registry Registry A Invoice Access point, VAN 1 Access point 2, Operator 2 Registry B Transport properties Secure Reliable Profile properties Transport + QoS Registry C Public agency D Security Token Server PEDRI Architecture

Direct access, if foreign CA known System boundaries between WP1 and WP8 Validation of certificates by sender‘s STS before sending. The role VA and STS can be merged in one component. Recipient can (re-)validate sender‘s certificates.

Pilot pre-requirements  All actors sign locally with own signature creation software – Signing in user interface of platform is optional – Platform/application cannot support all possible cards  Platform/application must support a download functionality for forms/documents that need to be signed  Platform must offer an upload functionality to submit signed documents and – A clever upload functionality with encryption (optional)

Pilot Member States Norway, Finland, Denmark, Germany, Austria, France, Italy

Implementation phase  Start of implementation work (adaptation of national infrastructures) in February 2009 after end of specification phase.  Detailed implementation plan has to be worked out and agreed with pilot partners. This is in progress. Actually 5 phases are defined:  Phase 1: Lab-Test, no WP 8 outcomes needed.  Phase 2: Lab-Test, integration phase with PEDRI.  Phase 3: Beta-Test, close cooperation with WP 8.  Phase 4: System scale up phase, close cooperation with WP 8.  Phase 5: Rollout phase.  End of implementation phase (phase 4): April 2010