Detector Control for the Insertable B-Layer Susanne Kersten Wuppertal University ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, February

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECAL Electronics, DCS Main DCS console (PVSS, JCOP Framework) Main DCS console (PVSS, JCOP Framework) HV (PVSS) LV (?) DSS (PVSS) Cooling (?) Laser (?)
Advertisements

Preparation for ATLAS SCT/ID Endcap Completion at CERN Jo Pater Manchester, 4 January 2006.
TPC-RO DCS set-up PVSS main(s) Iseg OPC server HV Iseg crates (3)LV Wiener crates (22) CAN bus Interface to FEE -temp.mon -I &V mon. Wiener OPC server.
Joachim Schultes University of Wuppertal Interlock System DCS Training Session 2.3.
PIXEL WEEK September 1999 S. Kersten University of Wuppertal 1 Status of Interlock Box New Interlock Box: NTC -I Box q relative changes in resistor values.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Introduction -
David Emschermann DCS Workshop – PI Heidelberg – 22/01/2007 How to power up the TRD David Emschermann Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg updated.
DCS aspects of TDAQ racks in USA15 and SDX1 Y. Ermoline et al. ATLAS Week, CERN, 15 February 2005.
Pixel Detector Control System 1st training session May 10, 2007 Overview CANbus and ELMB Pixel DCS Computers in the pit ELMB integration ELMB control CAN.
TRT DCS overview Elzbieta Banas Zbigniew Hajduk Jolanta Olszowska (INP PAS Cracow) ID Week /TRT Operation1.
Infrastructure for LHCb Upgrade workshop – MUON detector Infrastructure for LHCB Upgrade workshop: MUON power, electronics, cable Muon upgrade in a nutshell.
DSS Advisory Board Christoph Schäfer Rack Safety System.
CMS ECAL End Cap EDR Meeting CERN 28 Nov. to 29 Nov 2000 A.B.Lodge - RAL 1 ECAL End Cap CMS ECAL End Cap Engineering Design Review. EDR meeting held 28.
3 June 2003U. Frankenfeld1 TPC Detector Control System Status.
System Integration Tool Basic Introduction. „System Integration Tool “2Content I.Nomenclature I.Nomenclature II.Introduction II.Introduction III.Implementation.
Susanne Kersten, Wuppertal University November 21/22, 2013.
DCS TCSG November 10th 1999, H.J.Burckhart1 Status of the general purpose I/O system LMB u DCS Architecture u LMB u Local Monitor Box (LMB) u Concept u.
13 Dec. 2007Switched Capacitor DCDC Update --- M. Garcia-Sciveres1 Pixel integrated stave concepts Valencia 2007 SLHC workshop.
Pixel Upgrade Plans ROD/BOC PRR July 17, 2013 T. Flick University of Wuppertal.
Towards a Detector Control System for the ATLAS Pixeldetector Susanne Kersten, University of Wuppertal Pixel2002, Carmel September 2002 Overview of the.
1 5 December 2012 Laurent Roy Infrastructure / Electronics Upgrade -Cabling (long distance) -Rack and Crate (space, electrical distribution, cooling) -Detector.
Id week, , Kerstin Lantzsch Joachim Schultes University of Wuppertal FSM configuration and functionality - current status - plans.
Pixel Systemtest Workshop, , Kerstin Lantzsch Joachim Schultes University of Wuppertal DCS status and experience in the system test.
D0 Workshop Bagby, Foglesong John Foglesong Run 2B SMT Low Voltage Power The present location of the SMT DC power supply units creates a problem.
André Augustinus 6 October 2005 Cabling, Interlocks, Racks Some remarks.
André Augustinus OPC news, versions to use on behalf of Sorina Popescu.
Power Distribution Existing Systems Power in the trackers Power in the calorimeters Need for changes.
2 Silicon pixel part Done and to be written Written! Under way To be done Introduction 1.Hybrid Pixel Assembly Concept 2.Silicon sensor 1.First thinned.
L0 Technical Readiness Review-Electronics Installation Linda Bagby L0 Electronics Installation  System Electronics Overview u Low Voltage s Filter.
Alice DCS workshop S.Popescu 1 1. News from TPC DCS cooling prototype Project overview: Aim of the prototype: investigating and developing standard.
1 LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov [ ITEP / LAPP ] Introduction Status bits of the LHCb readout supervisor ODIN HVSB board specification.
July 17, 2013 CERN T. Flick University of Wuppertal.
CERN Single Phase Prototype Initial Discussion on Power/Space Requirements Terri Shaw Neutrino Platform July 30, 2015.
R. Boyd 1 February  Dr. M. Saleem  D. Jana  M. R. Meera Labbai  R. Boyd.
NA62 straw tracker DCS Straw tracker overview Bulk power supply Power supply distribution and monitoring LV + monitoring HV Temperature monitoring Gas.
DCS Workshop 17 June 2002 PHOS DCS status Serguei Sadovski.
9/18/2003Safety Review Electronics Electronics design LV, HV power supply Fusing Heat.
ATLAS DCS ELMB PRR, CERN, March 2002Fernando Varela ELMB Networks CAN/CANopen Interoperability of the ELMB Usage of the ELMB in ATLAS ELMB Networks Full.
24/03/2010ALICE TOF General Meeting March TOF hardware and data taking 2010 Andrea Alici Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche “Enrico.
Infrastructure for LHCb Upgrade workshop – MUON detector Infrastructure for LHCB Upgrade workshop: MUON power, electronics Muon upgrade in a nutshell LV.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector
AFP Trigger DAQ and DCS Krzysztof Korcyl Institute of Nuclear Physics - Cracow on behalf of TDAQ and DCS subsystems.
Distributed Low Voltage Power Supply System for Front End Electronics of the TRT Detector in ATLAS Experiment E.Banaś a, P.Farthouat b, Z.Hajduk a, B.Kisielewski.
14 February 2007 G. Bohner, R. Bonnefoy, M. Crouau, P. Jacquet, C. Lacan, J. Lecoq, S. Monteil, P. Perret, G. Reinmuth, K. Suchorski LPC Clermont PS Very-Front-End.
ATLAS DCS ELMB PRR, March 4th 2002, H.J.Burckhart1 Embedded Local Monitor Board ELMB  Context  Aim  Requirements  Add-ons  Our aims of PRR.
S. K. PalDCS WORKSHOP 17 JUN 2002 FRONT VIEW PMD Layout and Design Two planes: Veto + PreShower Gas detector with hexagonal cells Cell cross section: 0.22.
André Augustinus 17 June 2002 Detector URD summaries or, what we understand from your URD.
D. EliaALICE week / DCS workshop - Sept 20, SPD Power Supply System DCS status Domenico Elia INFN Bari.
ATLAS DCS Workshop on PLCs and Fieldbusses, November 26th 1999, H.J.Burckhart1 CAN and LMB in ATLAS u Controls in ATLAS u CAN u Local Monitor Box u Concept.
André Augustinus 13 June 2005 User Requirements, interlocks, cabling, racks, etc. Some remarks.
1 DCS Meeting, CERN (vydio), Jun 25th 2013, A. Cotta Ramusino for INFN and Dip. Fisica FE Preliminary DCS technical specifications (v1.0) for the Gigatracker.
Mauro Citterio Milano, PP2/Services - an update - Mauro Citterio INFN Milano Type II cables  Layout in progress  Duplication of VVDC wires.
Interventions on electrical distribution and racks’ infrastructure still to be done during LS1 and their impact W.Iwanski.
Martin van Beuzekom, Jan Buytaert, Lars Eklund Opto & Power Board (OPB) Summary of the functionality of the opto & power board.
FTK crates, power supplies and cooling issues 13/03/20131FTK-IAPP workshop - A. Lanza  Racks, crates and PS: requirements  Wiener crates  Rittal crates.
Wiener crates; An installation and power supply analysis. Magnus Bjork Be/Co/Fe
Power consumption (Watts) LBB27 ROS18 TSC50 TIM8 1 SC crate416 Alignment20 TOTAL per rack906~1 kW X2J22X2J02 With a water flow of 10 l/min, it should.
FTK infrastructures and DCS 02/12/20101FTK Initial Design Review - A. Lanza  Crates  Single rack layout  Cabling  Rack placement  DSS  DCS.
Mauro Citterio - Mi meeting
ProtoDUNE - SP SLOW CONTROLS MEETING 11/11/2016 CERN – EP/DT
Preliminary thoughts on SVT services
General aspects: Optical links :
Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences
Services – First Considerations Sigi Wenig / Nicolas Massol ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Workshop Valencia December 2007 Existing services (in cryostat.
Mini-drawers, FE-ASIC , Integrator
Old ROD + new BOC design plans
ALICE Muon Tracking Upgrade EDR Answers
Radiation- and Magnet field- Tolerant Power Supply System
Pierluigi Paolucci - I.N.F.N. Naples
TPC Detector Control System
Presentation transcript:

Detector Control for the Insertable B-Layer Susanne Kersten Wuppertal University ATLAS Upgrade Workshop, February

Outline Introduction Requirements –Power supplies –Monitoring crates at PP3 –Interlock System summary

Guidelines Power supplies and DCS as similar as possible to current detector Improve designs where obvious weak points Installation in USA15 strongly preferred (better access) If installation split on US and USA side –rack space –Costs go up Numbers given in this talk (crate requirements and costs) assume USA15

Basic assumptions 120 module a 1 LV, 2 HV 15 staves 4 module = 1 half stave 4 LV/Wiener channel 60 opto boards

BBM DCS-PCs CAN-Open protocol TCP/IP Environ ment SC OLink BOC Optoboard Door Cover T Data Vpin Viset Regulator Station Detector Module T HVVdd Vdda WIENER LV-PP4 T Interlock System Distance from interaction point Sensors CAN-Open protocol Vvdc BBIM Heater iseg HV-PP4 Opto Heater Current DCS system

HV (Iseg): depletion of sensors Requirements strongly depend on the sensor technology actually we have iseg HV modules (700 V, 4 mA, 16 channels) HV module costs ca. 5 K€, crate 4k € If we need 2 HV channel/detector module  15 HV module + 2 crates without HV-PP4 or  splitting factor 4: 4 HV module + 1 crate + 2 HV-PP4 Attention: other requirements might require new design of HV modules! –time –money

LV (Wiener) for front end electronics Actually we have PL512 from Wiener: 18V, 20 A, 12 channel Splitting factor of 4  3 PL512 1 PL512: 6 k€ + power bin (houses 2 PL512): 1k€ Other LV power requirements no problem with PL512 1 LV-PP4 handles 1 PL512, splits + can measure up to 2A beyond that a re-design of the circuit itself necessary Happy with actual design Costs 3 k€/crate Use current design, equip boards just partly? Anyhow re-design of services between PP4 and PP2 necessary?

Supply and Control for the OptoLink (LV + reset for opto boards) actually 16 complex channels/crate 1 complex channel –Vvdc 10 V, 800 mA –Vpin 20 V, 20 mA –Viset 5V, 20 mA –Reset Cost 4 k€/crate We would need 4 SC-OL crates Add interlock monitoring –ELMB channels available, routing tbd Can we use Vvcdc again for VCSEL and driver chips? Higher power need of opto board require modified design of power supply channels themselves

Regulator Station PP2 Actually 1 regulator station houses 12 regulator boards each regulator board handles –7 Vdd (front end electronics) –7 Vdda (front end electronics) –2 Vvdc (opto board) Alltogether 192 regulator channel/crate Cost 10 k€/crate, 1 k€/regulator board Current consumption of new LV up to 2 A Still inside LHC4913 Regulators still available

Regulator Station PP2 IBL requires different grouping of channels on regulator board We need 60 LVopto LVfrontend prefer 1 group: 4 LVfrontend + 2 LVopto a new regulator board could support 2 groups Gives 15 regulator boards + 2 PP2 crate If distributed over 2 PP2 crates, heat load should be acceptable for current cooling of PP2 crates In all cases: New design of regulator/daughter board required Input and output board must be redesigned Gives overhead in cost 1 PP2 aux PS required (PL512)

PP3 crates Actually 1 Building Block Interlock Monitoring = –4 Interlock boards –4 * 14 temp. signals BBM: 2 blocks temp + 1 block humidity readout Opto PP3 (3 U) up to 84 opto boards 1 interlock board ca. 100 €; PP3 crates ca. 500 – 1000 € IBL will need: –60 temp module/side  5 I-boards –30 opto boards/side  3 I-boards –1 PP2 crate/side  1 I-board

PP3 crates Solution A: –3 BBIM blocks/side + 1 Monitoring block/ side = 1 x 6U/side –All together 2 BBIM crate (a 6U) + 2 Opto PP3 Solution B: –combine all services in one position –1 BBIM crate + 1 BBM crate could be sufficient + 2 Opto PP3 Solution C: –As solution B, but -Place everything in USA15 -Precision of temp. measurement acceptable? -No Rad-tolerance of Interlock board required! PP3 aux. PS: if more than one BBIM crate an additional PP3 auxPS crate is required -

Interlock system Actual design: Logic Units (decision) 3 interlock distribution boxes (mapping) on detector, off-detector laser interlock, DSS handling Several add-on crates due to later upcoming needs (e.g. Opto heater Interlock) Cost per interlock crate: ca 1 k€ Keeping the actual structure: LU + IDB: different ratio module/opto board – modifications necessary re-design of other interlock components (laser, bake-out, etc.) required recomment: Keep basic concept and electrical circuits Reorganize LU, IDBs + further Interlock completely Clear grouping of services simplifies design!!

What else? Will we need another opto heater system? Foresee 2 separate Local control stations! …….

Summary Goal for power supply and DCS concept: use design of actual detector! Aim to have all DCS and power supplies in USA15 possible to keep basic designs Different number of HV, LV, opto service per group (half stave)  most of patch panels, input output boards need re-design Availability of currently used components? Costs of various components given Whenever a re-design is necessary additional cost