ILUTE Urban Land Use Models: An Overview E.J. Miller Bahen-Tanenbaum Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering Director, Urban Transportation Research & Advancement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OVERVIEW OF CMAPS ADVANCED TRAVEL MODEL CADRE Kermit Wies, Deputy Executive Director for Research and Analysis AMPO Modeling Group, November 2010.
Advertisements

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 1: Introduction and the Context The role of, government, urban planners and markets.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Introduction and the Context The Use and value of Urban Planning.
Michael Löchl Institute for Transport Planning and Systems (IVT) July 2005 Modelling businesses and employment: UrbanSim and its application in Zurich.
Utilizing Connected Travel Demand and Land Use Models in the Sacramento Region Gordon R. Garry Sacramento Area Council of Governments April 30, 2010.
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
1 JD Hunt JE Abraham JAS Khan University of Calgary Workshop of the Land Use Transport (LUT) Modelling Group London, UK 2 July 2005 Calgary Testbed for.
Applying the SWIM2 Integrated Model For Freight Planning in Oregon Prepared for the 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011.
1 Chapter 12: Decision-Support Systems for Supply Chain Management CASE: Supply Chain Management Smooths Production Flow Prepared by Hoon Lee Date on 14.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Transportation Planning Analysis UnitPNREC 2006 Transportation Modeling in Oregon: Overview of ODOT Statewide Integrated Model Pacific Northwest Regional.
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Transportation Development Division Oregon Integrated Land Use and Transportation Models Part 1: Statewide Model Part 2: MetroScope Part 3: Land Use Scenario.
Integrated Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Modeling Alan Borning, University of Washington Mark Simonson, Puget Sound Regional Council NSF.
SEMCOG Modeling Peer Exchange Panel Report. Overall Outline Topic Definition Planning Objective Problem Statement Basic Solution Advanced Solution Resources.
Analytical Needs SEMCOG Travel Model Improvement Program Donnelly, Davidson, Binkowski & Arens 12-Dec-2011.
1 Integrating Land Use, Transportation and Air Quality Modeling Socio-Economic Causes and Consequences of Future Environmental Changes Workshop November.
Route Planning and Evaluation
Model Task Force Meeting November 29, 2007 Activity-based Modeling from an Academic Perspective Transportation Research Center (TRC) Dept. of Civil & Coastal.
Big picture transport planning When precision fails and approximation succeeds.
Seoul Development Institute Building a TDM Impact Analysis System for the Introduction of a Short-Term Congestion Management Program in Seoul Jin-Ki Eom,
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Oregon Department of Transportation Oregon Department of Transportation Department of Land Conservation and Development Department of Land Conservation.
Problem Statement and Motivation Key Achievements and Future Goals Technical Approach Kouros Mohammadian, PhD and Yongping Zhang (PhD Candidate), CME,
ILUTE Land use – Transportation Integrated models (The competition to ILUTE) MAMAMIA - module 3 Microsimulation experiences Ilan Elgar.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations.
The use of census data as an input in forecasting population, employment and land use change 5 th October 2010 Andy Dobson David Simmonds Consultancy.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Chapter 8 – The Comprehensive Plan 10/3/ The Goals of Comprehensive Planning  Comprehensive plans are usually prepared for a period of 20 years.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Improving the Models, SACOG Perspectives Sustainable Communities Implementation Challenges and Opportunities UC Davis Policy Forum Gordon Garry March 5,
RPS Modeling Results Presentation to RPS Policy Committee Brian Gregor Transportation Planning Analysis Unit June 6,
TRANSPORTATION ECONOMIC AND LAND USE SYSTEM (TELUS) TELUM – Interactive Software for Evaluating Land Use Implications of Transportation Projects 11th TRB.
Getting to Know Cube.
UrbanSim: Informing Public Deliberation about Land Use and Transportation Decisions using Urban Simulations Alan Borning Dept of Computer Science & Engineering.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
EPA’s Development, Community and Environment Division: T ools for Evaluating Smart Growth and Climate Change February 28, 2002 Ilana Preuss.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.
Www-civil.monash.edu.au/its Institute of Transport Studies National Urban Transport Modelling Workshop, 5 March 2008 Travel Demand Management Geoff Rose.
Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.
OREGON MODELING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM An Analysis Toolbox for Decision-Makers: A Focus on Freight and the Economy May 2004.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.
Simulating Cities: An Overview of the ILUTE Approach
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
The World Bank Toll Road Revenue Forecast Quality Assurance/Quality Control.
Urban Planning Group Implementation of a Model of Dynamic Activity- Travel Rescheduling Decisions: An Agent-Based Micro-Simulation Framework Theo Arentze,
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Strategic Options for Integrating Transportation Innovations and Urban Revitalization (SOTUR) Stakeholder Scenario Building: Imagining Urban Futures Simulation.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Greater Toronto Transportation System
David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Dmitry Messen Houston-Galveston Area Council
NYMTC’s Land Use Model Land Use Model Workshop May 1, 2008
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
VicRoads – Movement & Place
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
2009 Minnesota MPO Conference August 11, 2009
Presentation transcript:

ILUTE Urban Land Use Models: An Overview E.J. Miller Bahen-Tanenbaum Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering Director, Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto Land Use Model Workshop New York Metropolitan Transportation Council University Transportation Research Centre Region 2 New York, May 1, 2009

ILUTE Presentation Outline 1.Urban Form – Transportation Interactions 2.Need for Integrated Urban Models 3.Key Design Elements & Issues 4.Current State

ILUTE Transportation and urban form are fundamentally linked. How we build our city directly determines travel needs, viability of alternative travel modes, etc. Transportation, in turn, influences land development and location choices of people & firms.

ILUTE Factors Influencing Land Use Impact (Knight & Trygg, 1977)

ILUTE To understand these complex transportation – urban form interactions and to analyze the wide variety of policies (transportation, housing, etc.) that affect the urban system requires integrated, comprehensive models of transportation and land use. Land Development Location Choice Activity Schedules Activity Patterns Transportation Network Automobile Ownership Travel Demand Network Flows URBAN ACTIVITY SYSTEMTRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Demographics Regional Economics Government Policies INPUTS

ILUTE Long- & Short-Run Interactions Land Development Location Choice Activity Schedules Activity Patterns Transportation Network Automobile Ownership Travel Demand Network Flows LONG-RUN ACCESSIBILITY INTERACTIONS SHORT-RUN ACTIVITY/TRAVEL INTERACTIONS

ILUTE Example Application: The Toronto Waterfront What would be the impact of tearing down the Gardiner Expressway? What if it wasn’t replaced? What transit options might exist? What would be the impact on population & employment distributions? … 2005 evolve _B 2030_C branch and evolve Base Year Event Year Target Year (Policy Option B) Target Year (Policy Option C) 2030_A Target Year (Policy Option A)

ILUTE Example Application: Places to Grow What will be the impact of a greenbelt on: housing density & prices? employment concentration? transit viability? congestion? emissions? …

ILUTE Example Application What would be the impact of the proposed congestion pricing scheme on Manhattan’s economic activity system and travel patterns?

ILUTE Land Use Models Formal models which try to capture the transportation - land use interaction are usually referred to as land use models, integrated land use - transportation models, or integrated urban models. Such models have existed since the early 1960’s. Histrocially, they have had mixed success, with the result that, until recently few urban areas used formal models. Integrated urban models, however, are increasingly being developed and used in the U.S. and elsewhere.

ILUTE Integrated Models, Typical Sub-models

ILUTE Need for Land Use Models Without an integrated analysis of both land use and transportation, may well “miss” key system responses, and/or over/under-estimate the system responses which are being explicitly modelled. Many “transportation” issues (especially with respect to sustainability) have their origins (and perhaps their solutions as well) in land use design.

ILUTE Policy Options Demand Management Supply Management Land Use Management Community Goals Policy Tools: fiscal regulatory operational infrastructure marketing education information dissemination

ILUTE Need for Integrated Models VKT Time Base Year Forecast Horizon Historical Trend Projection Dynamic, path-dependent response to policy initiatives A complete representation of short- & long-range system responses to policies is required if alternatives to “business as usual” are to be found.

ILUTE Policy Inputs into an Integrated Urban Model

ILUTE Non-Modelling Approaches In the absence of formal land use models (the usual case), scenario-based extrapolations of population and employment by zone are used to provide inputs to the travel demand modeling system.

ILUTE Non-Modelling Approaches, cont’d Problems include: Scenarios are often unrealistic, and/or internally inconsistent Scenarios are often inconsistent with the transportation system Lack of “feedback”/interaction between land use and transportation sectors Lack of detail in attributes of population & employment Lack of policy sensitivity Separation of land use planning from transportation planning

ILUTE Flows, Times, etc.External Impacts Land Use Location Choice Auto Ownership Activity/Travel & Goods Movement Demographics Regional Economics Government Policies Transport System Road & Transit Assignment Models Key Components of an Integrated Model

ILUTE Design Issues Physical System Time Space (land) Building stock Transportation networks Active Agents Persons Households Firms (Employment) Processes Land development Location choices Job market Demographics Regional economics Automobile holdings Activity / travel demand Network performance

ILUTE Performance Issues Theoretical soundness Policy sensitivity Precision (spatial, temporal) Validation Feasibility Computation requirements Data requirements Technical support requirements Cost Applicability Ease of input preparation Model run time Output / presentation capabilities Portability / transferability Flexibility / adaptability Usability

ILUTE Policy Capabilities Pricing Infrastructure and services Regulatory Education / marketing Transportation Pricing Infrastructure and services Regulatory Education / marketing Land Use Pricing Infrastructure and services Regulatory Education / marketing Other

ILUTE Treatment of Time economic conditions economic interactions goods & services movements household travel transport conditions route choice year t economic changes; space changes; migration changes in transport supply economic conditions economic interactions goods & services movements household travel transport conditions route choice year t+1 Source: Hunt & Donnelly (2002)

ILUTE Modeling the Housing Market Vacancies Prices Developers’ decisions to build new housing Type (structure/tenure) Location Number of units Size/quality/price range Occupants’ decisions to move Active households search among selected vacancies Decision to buy/rent Decision to sell/lease Households Developers/Landlords Policies Zoning … Interest Rates … Infrastructure Investment …

ILUTE General Principles 1. Data first. 2. Develop/improve travel demand model. 3. A step-by-step approach is required. 4. An explicit plan is required.

ILUTE Requirements for Model Development/Improvement 1. Data. 2. Staff. 3. Commitment to model development, separate from daily operations. 4. Managerial/institutional commitment. 5. Include modelers in decision-making. 6. Understand the proper role of models. 7. Don’t underestimate or dismiss models. 8. Don’t settle for too little. 9. Don’t accept the status quo. 10. Move incrementally, but move towards the long run.

ILUTE Steps Towards the Ideal Model Travel Demand Model Land Use Model No Transit / mode split None Activity + Judgement DRAM or equivalent Logit allocation w/ price signals Fully integrated market-based model First Path ‘ Advanced ’ Path Transit / no logit (24 hr) Logit / peak-period assignment Activity-based Short-term goal Ideal Model Long-term goal

ILUTE Policy Capabilities of Current Integrated Models

ILUTE Current State Land use models are in operational use in many U.S. cities, and under development in many others. Statewide models also exist. 3 primary “current generation” models in use in the U.S.: –Metroscope –PECAS –UrbanSim

ILUTE Current State, cont’d Other GIS-based land use mapping/scenario- building systems exist (UPLAN, PLACE 3 S, etc.), but these are not full-blown integrated model systems. Commercial transportation modeling software vendors are reportedly developing land use modules, but these are not yet on the market.

ILUTE Current State, cont’d Land use modeling has been shown to be practical and to make a difference in policy analysis. In Oregon, for example, the statewide model has been used to assess freeway options and to design a statewide bridge rehabilitation program.

ILUTE Current State, cont’d While U.S. legislation does not mandate use of land use models, it strongly encourages it. Failure to consider land use options and effects can lead to law suits. More important, failure to consider land use effects can lead to unexpected outcomes and poor investment & other policy decisions.

ILUTE A Final Word Land use models do not make decisions and do not replace planning design. They are another “voice at the table” that allows planners to explore the likely consequences of their policies (infrastructure investment, pricing, zoning, etc.) by tracing the complex chain of spatial processes (travel, auto ownership, location choice, land development) that respond over time to these policies.

ILUTE Any questions? Flows, Times, etc.External Impacts Land Use Location Choice Auto Ownership Activity/Travel & Goods Movement Demographics Regional Economics Government Policies Transport System Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Thank you for your attention.