Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
Advertisements

Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Natural Background Visibility Feb. 6, 2004 Presentation to VISTAS State Air Directors Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtn. National Park.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Integration of PMF Data into AoH Analyses AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 A First Look at Interstate Haze Transport at 2 Border Oregon Class I Areas: Mt. Hood.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
Attribution of Haze Report Status Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting December 8, 2004 Tom Moore Marc Pitchford.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
TSS Project Update and Demo of Selected Tools WRAP IWG Meeting Santa Fe, NM December 7, 2006.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Projection of Visibility Changes and Modeling Sensitivity Analysis.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Regional Air Quality Modeling Results for Elemental and Organic Carbon John Vimont, National Park Service WRAP Fire, Carbon, and Dust Workshop Sacramento,
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Regional Haze Rule Promulgated in 1999 Requires states to set RPGs based on 4 statutory factors and consideration of a URP URP = 20% reduction in manmade.
IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction Draft Recommendations to the IMPROVE Steering Committee.
Natural Background Conditions: Items for discussion with the Inter-RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Naresh Kumar EPRI 5 March 2004.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Reasonable Progress Demonstration Case Study for Saguaro Wilderness Area Arizona Regional Haze Stakeholder Meeting January 22, 2007.
Summary of WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Ambient Monitoring Data Summary: Dust WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,
CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006.
WRAP Technical Work Overview
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress Demonstrations
Review upcoming Teach-Ins and participation in WRAP Regional Haze Planning Work Group - Jay Baker and Tina Suarez-Murias.
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Species Specific Reasonable Progress Analysis
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Regional Haze Rule: Natural Conditions Concepts & Approaches
IMPROVE Data Processing
Sources of Haze - North Cascades and Mt. Rainier National Parks
TAF Regional Haze Plan Update
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
New CoHA Product Access Page & Representativeness Analysis
Stationary Source NOx and PM Report: An Update Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Market Trading Forum Meeting September 19-20, 2002 Snowbird,
Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling
Implementation Workgroup April 19, 2007
Paved and Unpaved Road Dust
Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region
Alaska Visibility Analysis
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Species-Specific Data Trends
Presentation transcript:

Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.

Overview How much of baseline regional haze in WRAP states is due to nitrate? How much of baseline regional haze in WRAP states is due to nitrate? What are the historical trends in nitrate concentrations? What are the historical trends in nitrate concentrations? What are the contributions of natural and manmade emissions to nitrate? What are the contributions of natural and manmade emissions to nitrate? How are emissions expected to change by 2018? How are emissions expected to change by 2018? How is visibility expected to change? How is visibility expected to change? How does this compare with the glidepath? How does this compare with the glidepath? Selected case studies Selected case studies

IMPROVE Monitoring Locations

Baseline Extinction: 20% Worst Days

Baseline Extinction: 20% Best Days

Baseline Nitrate: 20% Worst Days

Historical Trends in 20% Worst Days: Total and Nitrate Extinction 16 year trends (1989 – 2004) required 12 complete years of data 16 year trends (1989 – 2004) required 12 complete years of data 8 year trends (1997 – 2004) required 6 complete years of data 8 year trends (1997 – 2004) required 6 complete years of data Theil slopes (Mm -1 /yr) calculated for all sites with sufficient data Theil slopes (Mm -1 /yr) calculated for all sites with sufficient data P-values of 0.2 required to identify trend as significant P-values of 0.2 required to identify trend as significant Changes in monitoring or analytical protocol over the years may affect trends Changes in monitoring or analytical protocol over the years may affect trends

16-yr Trends 8-yr Trends

Historical Trends, 20% Worst Days Mount Rainier NP 16-yr decrease in Bext 8-yr increase in NO3 16-yr decrease in NO3

Historical Trends, 20% Worst Days Chiricahua NM 16-yr increase in NO3 8-yr increase in Bext

Historical Trends, 20% Worst Days Redwood NP 16-yr decrease in Bext 16-yr decrease in NO3

Historical Trends, 20% Worst Days Rocky Mountain NP 8-yr increase in Bext 8-yr increase in NO3

Anthropogenic and Natural NOx Emissions by State (Plan02)

Total WRAP Region SO2 and NOx Emissions (2002, 2018, and difference)

All NOx Emissions

Gridded Model Results for Annual Average Nitrate Mass Annual average modeled mass (not 20% worst days) Annual average modeled mass (not 20% worst days) 2002 and and 2018 Difference (2018 – 2002) Difference (2018 – 2002) Ratio (2018/2002) Ratio (2018/2002)

Modeled 2002 NO3 Modeled 2018 NO3

Baseline and Projected 2018 Extinction: 20% Worst Days 2000 – 2004 Baseline ExtinctionProjected 2018 Extinction

Baseline and Projected 2018 Nitrate Extinction: 20% Worst Days 2000 – 2004 Baseline Nitrate Extinction Projected 2018 Nitrate Extinction

Baseline dv and Projected 2018 dv Reduction: 20% Worst Days 2000 – 2004 Baseline DeciviewsProjected 2018 Deciview Reduction

Variation in Baseline Deciview Values

Percent of 2018 Target Reduction Achieved

Hells Canyon, OR/ID

2002 NOx Emissions: Hells Canyon

2018 NOx Reductions: Hells Canyon

Model Comparison: Hells Canyon, OR

Hells Canyon, OR/ID2002 IMPROVE Data 2002 Model Results

2018 Model Changes: Hells Canyon, OR

Baseline Variability (dv) Baseline Variability by Species Glide Path: Hells Canyon, OR/ID

Medicine Lakes, MT

2002 NOx Emissions: Medicine Lakes

2018 NOx Reductions: Medicine Lakes

Model Comparison: Medicine Lakes, MT

Medicine Lakes, MT2002 IMPROVE Data 2002 Model Results

2018 Model Changes: Medicine Lakes

Baseline Variability (dv) Baseline Variability by Species Glide Path: Medicine Lakes, MT

Agua Tibia, CA

2002 NOx Emissions: Agua Tibia

2018 NOx Reductions: Agua Tibia

Model Comparison: Agua Tibia, CA

Agua Tibia, CA2002 IMPROVE Data 2002 Model Results

2018 Model Changes: Agua Tibia, CA

Baseline Variability (dv) Baseline Variability by Species Glide Path: Agua Tibia, CA