1 WIOA Review. Try This Cross your arms 2 Now cross your arms the other way. How does it feel? 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January,  Title I – Workforce Development Activities ◦ Subtitle A: System Alignment ◦ Subtitle B: Workforce Activities and Providers  Title.
Advertisements

Coordinator Call November 20, Program Alignment Unified strategic planning across core programs Enhances role of State and Local Workforce Development.
It must be borne in mind that the tragedy of life does not live in not reaching your goal. The tragedy of live is having no goal to reach. Benjamin E.
Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12,
1 Literacy and Numeracy Gains Webinar February 3, :00 am - 11:00 am.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
LIVING WITH WIOA.  WIA= Workforce Investment ACT  WIOA= Workplace Innovation and Opportunity Act (July 2014)
Brette Kaplan WurzburgSteven Spillan Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015 An Overview of the New AEFLA.
NRS JEOPARDY! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Quiz Show.
A Call to Action for 2016 Student Success Anson Green Director Texas Workforce Commission November 17, 2016 WIOA UPDATE NOVEMBER 17,
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
Defining Student Success in WIOA*
Understanding the National Reporting System Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability NRS.
ADULT EDUCATION AND FAMILY LITERACY ACT (AEFL) 2014 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) – Title II 1.
Documenting California Program and Learner Outcomes to Federal and State Policymakers for the ACSA presentation on September 25, 2003 and for the California.
Durham Workforce Development Board Request for Proposals Bidders’ Conference February 16, 2016.
WIOA: Priority of Service for Title I Adult Programs Training facilitated by Kate Anderson, and Rob Hanni Sept. 23 rd, 2015.
TOPSpro Special Topics V: Meeting Federal Accountability Requirements.
MAERS Quick Reference Tool Kit MAERS Development Team.
WIOA Performance Regulations and New NRS Tables CARRIE TUPA TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY.
WIOA’s Goal Make Participants’ Skills Everyone’s Business
WIOA Performance Workgroup
WIOA Performance Accountability -
LEAP Into WIOA, Part II: NRS Measures and Reporting
Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation
Dr. Kristen Corbell Director of Program Quality and Accountability
Brian Frazier Talent Investment Agency Office of Adult Education
WIOA Performance Accountability guidance overview
Integrated Education and Training (IET)
NRS Regional Trainings Part 2
ABE Policy & Accountability
Presented at: INA Multi-Regional Conference Miami, FL January 2017
Unpacking the Regulations: Adult Education and Literacy Activities – Session I Chris Coro.
Introduction to Credentials
Todd Wagner, Brad Hasskamp, and Jodi Versaw August 2016
WIOA Section 166 – Indian and Native American Program
Attainment of Credentials, Degrees and Certificates
Measurable Skill Gains
Dr. Kristen Corbell Jannai Johnson
WIOA + MAERS = Performance
TOPSpro Special Topics
LEAP Into WIOA, Part II: NRS Measures and Reporting
YCC Performance and Reporting
WIOA and Performance Enhancements
PoPs and MSGs How reporting will be affected in 17/18 based on new Period of Participation and Measurables Skills Gain tracking.
Introduction to Performance and Accountability in Adult Education
WIOA Annual Performance Report
Part 2 Carrie Tupa Texas Workforce Commission December 6, 2017
Adult Education Directors Meeting March 12, 2015
Defining Student Success in WIOA*
Getting Started Discuss at your table. How long have you been in ABE?
New York State Report Cards
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Eligibility
WIOA Accountability Ben Konruff
Introduction to Credentials
ABE Performance Measures, Accountability and Assessment
Basic Skills and Continuing Education: Working Together for the Future
NCETA SPRING 2018 CONFERENCE
English Language Acquisition
Managing Performance Under WIOA
Making Common Sense of the Common Measures
Office of Adult Education Instructional Services Team
Office of Adult Education Instructional Services Team
WIOA Youth Performance
Data Management for FY2017 Reporting
CSAVR Conference Long Beach, CA October 31, 2018
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)
NRS Training: Reporting Student Performance on Table 4 - ABE Scenarios
NRS Training: Reporting Student Performance on Table 4 - ESL Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

1 WIOA Review

Try This Cross your arms 2

Now cross your arms the other way. How does it feel? 3

 An ICR is a “Federal Rules Package” for information requested by the federal government.  The NRS is an ICR, it describes the policies and procedures for AEFLA information and reporting.  Substantial and Non-Substantial (NonSub) changes to an ICR.  Substantial changes must go through a public comment period.  NRS to change substantially – expect revision in Sept. with comment period to follow. 4

ParticipantReportable Individual A reportable individual who has received services other than the services described in § (a)(3), after satisfying all applicable programmatic requirements for the provision of services, such as eligibility determination. Reportable individual. An individual who has taken action that demonstrates an intent to use program services and who meets specific reporting criteria of the program, including: (1) Individuals who provide identifying information; (2) Individuals who only use the self-service system; or (3) Individuals who only receive information-only services or activities. For Title II, when an individual in an AEFLA program has completed at least 12 contact hours they are considered a participant. An adult in an AEFLA program who has completed less than 12 contact hours. Participants count towards accountability measures.Reportable Individuals DO NOT count towards accountability measures. 5

6 Program Entry- is the date that a reportable individual enrolls in an adult education and family literacy program. Program Exit - As defined for the purpose of performance calculations, exit is the point after which a participant who has received services through any program meets the following criteria: For the adult, dislocated worker, and youth programs authorized under WIOA title I, the AEFLA program authorized under WIOA title II, and the Employment Service program authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act, as amended by WIOA title III, exit date is the last date of service. **The last day of service cannot be determined until at least 90 days have elapsed since the participant last received services; services do not include self-service, information-only services, activities, or follow-up services. This also requires that there are no plans to provide the participant with future services.

7 Employment, the second quarter after exit: The percentage of participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit. Employment, fourth quarter after exit: The percentage of participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the fourth quarter after exit. Median Earnings, second quarter after exit: Median earnings of participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit from the program.

 For purposes of determining program performance levels under indicators set forth in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iv) and (vi) of § , a “participant” does not include a participant who received services under sec. 225 of WIOA and exits such program while still in a correctional institution as defined in sec. 225(e)(1) of WIOA Sec. 225 participants (Corrections) who remain incarcerated are only counted for the Measurable Skill Gain Indicator. ***THIS IS THE ONLY EXCLUSION*** 8

A participant who has attained a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent is included in the percentage of participants who have attained a secondary school diploma or recognized equivalent only if the participant also is employed or is enrolled in an education or training program leading to a recognized postsecondary credential within 1 year after exit from the program; HSE + Exit + PSE/Training Enrollment OR Employment in One Year of Exit 9 The percentage of those participants enrolled in an education or training program (excluding those in on-the-job training [OJT] and customized training) who attained a recognized postsecondary credential or a secondary school diploma, or its recognized equivalent, during participation in or within 1 year after exit from the program.

 The Secondary Credential attainment measure is limited to participants who exit AND began the program year at or above the 9 th grade level who did not previously possess a high school equivalency.  The Postsecondary Education attainment measure is limited to participants who exited and were enrolled in either a postsecondary education or training program.  Could include participants in IET programs (if continue in PSE or training after exit) 10

The percentage of participants who, during a program year, are in an education or training program that leads to a recognized postsecondary credential or employment and who are achieving measurable skill gains, defined as academic, technical, occupational, or other forms of progress, towards such a credential or employment. 11 Official Definition that Applies to All Four Core Programs

12 Measurable Skill Gain Secondary Diploma/ Equivalent Secondary or Post- Secondary Transcript Educational Functioning Level Gain Pre-Post Test Completion of Carnegie Units Program Exit + Entry into Postsecondary Education Progress toward Milestones Passing Technical / Occupational Knowledge Based Exam Used in Title II Other Titles

Documented achievement of at least once educational functioning level of a participant who is receiving instruction below the postsecondary education level. Programs may measure educational functioning level gain in one of three ways: (4) Documented attainment of a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent. 13 (1) Comparing the participant’s initial educational functioning level, as measured by a pre-test, with the participant’s educational functioning level, as measured by a post-test. (2) States that offer adult high school programs that lead to a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent may measure and report educational gain through the awarding of credits or Carnegie units. (3) States may report an educational functioning level gain for participants who exit the program and enroll in postsecondary education and training during the program year.

For the purposes of reporting measurable skill gain, each program entry per participant during the reporting period is considered a period of participation. For the purposes of reporting on Employment 2 nd Quarter, Employment 4 th Quarter, Median Earnings, and the Credential indicators, each program entry and exit per participant during the reporting period is considered a period of participation. 14 A new period of participation is counted each time a participant exits and reenters again, even if it occurs during the same program year.

15 Jul 1 st Jun 30 th Program Entry/ Reentry Program Exit PoP 1PoP 2PoP 3 MSG is evaluated. Follow-up must occur for exit-based measures. MSG is evaluated again. Follow-up must occur again for exit- based measures. MSG is evaluated again. Exit based measures are NOT evaluated because there is not an exit.

 One data collection and accountability approach  Two reporting mechanisms: ◦ Joint WIOA reporting template (Joint ICR) ◦ NRS tables, additional information specific to adult education 16

 For reporting common WIOA performance measures across Titles  Includes total participants and funds expended  Breaks out measureable skill gains and credential types  Breaks out measures by sex, age, ethnicity and 11 categories of barriers or employment  Detailed guidance on completing is forthcoming ◦ Minimal or no local agency involvement in Joint Template 17

 Displaced homemakers  English language learners, low literacy levels, cultural barriers  Exhausting TANF within two years  Ex-offenders  Homeless/runaway youth  Long-term unemployed  Low income  Migrants and seasonal farmworkers  Individuals with disabilities  Single parents  Youth in foster care/aged out of system 18

 Names for educational functioning levels changed to Level 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (also in other Tables 4, 4b and 4c)  ABE 1, ABE 2, ESL 1, Etc.  No other changes 19

20

21

22

23

24

25

 Outcomes changed to WIOA required measures  Rows and columns for sampling eliminated  Rows and columns for number used for data matching or survey eliminated  Number and outcomes also reported by Period of Participation  Table 5a identical for distance education students 26

27

28

29

 Table 7 – No Changes  Table 8 (Family Literacy Program Outcomes) ◦ Optional Table, added row for MSG  Table 9 (Secondary Outcome Measures) ◦ Same as former Table 11 ◦ Work-Based Project Learner category eliminated ◦ Still includes “Achieved Citizenship Skills”  Table 10 (Corrections Program Outcomes) ◦ Same as Table 5 w/ added row for MSG  Table 14 (Local Grantees By Funding Source) ◦ State only Table – new column for IELC 30