2012 Pavement Management Update June 12, 2012 BoCC Work Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Road Maintenance & Planning AUDUBON PARK. ASPHALT FAILURE TYPES ALLIGATOR CRACKING – AS SEEN ON CARDINAL.
Advertisements

Pavement Management Engineer
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
City of Bloomfield Hills Asset Management Plan. Outline Overview plan Challenges and community input Recommendations for others.
Comparative Analysis of Emulsion and Hot Asphalt Cement Chip Seal Performance Douglas D. Gransberg, P.E., C.C.E. University of Oklahoma.
1 Preserving Municipality Roadways Federal = 3% State = 20% Local = 77% 94% of paved roads have an Asphalt surface FHWA Source: Stephen R. Mueller,
Pavement/Infrastructure Management Program Review April 6, 2009 Remington & Vernick Engineers.
City of Willows Pavement Management Program Road Maintenance Needs March 25, 2014.
“Practical Pavement Management with Micro PAVER”
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
LUNENBURG DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Pavement Funding and Maintenance.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Lecture 12 Lecture 1L PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES.
FDOT Aviation Pavement Inspection Training Module 2 – Pavement Fundamentals – Overview Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Pavement Management.
County of Orange Pavement Management System and Sustainable Treatment Program Clark Shen, Manager OC Construction Materials Lab Krishna Nadaraja, Senior.
Presented by Matthew J. LaChance Pavement Solutions for State, County, and Municipal Infrastructures.
Herriman City Engineering Department.  Herriman City has experienced tremendous growth over the last several years  Many new subdivisions and associated.
Simple.. convenient.. inexpensive Prepared by Mohammed ALMannaa & Abdullah Asharef & Abdulrhman min Mahmoud.
See the Present… Know the Future…. RECAPP ® Markets Telecom Facilities Municipalities Government Transportation.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
Development of GIS integrated Pavement Management System (PMS) for small cities. Golam Mohammad Moinuddin.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDICES. n Historic development of pavement condition indices n The basic functions of condition indices in PMS n Different types of.
PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
Performance & Distress of Flexible Pavement Serviceability/Performance Concept.
N ORTHWEST GIS U SERS G ROUP C ONFERENCE – O CTOBER 20, 2011 Dynamic GIS-based Pavement Condition Tracking.
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1:
Paving for Progress Aaron D. Granquist, Project Manager, HR Green, Inc. Doug Wilson, Capital Improvement Project Manager, Cedar Rapids Handouts and presentations.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Plan and TIP Prioritization Process September 2015.
ODOT. Taking Care of What We Have. Asset Management, Life Cycle Analysis : A Three-Pronged Approach September 9th, 2015 Andrew Williams, Ohio DOT.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
S ALES T AX : P AVEMENT M ANAGEMENT P ROGRAM P RESENTATION TO THE A LACHUA C OUNTY B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS A ND T HE C ITIZENS OF A LACHUA C OUNTY.
Street Maintenance Program Update City Council Work Session February 5, 2013 Department of Public Works & Transportation.
User perceptions of highway roughness Kevan Shafizadeh and Fred Mannering.
A Perspective from PennDOT James D. Ritzman, P.E. Deputy Secretary for Planning It’s that Time of Year.
User perceptions of highway roughness
Expanded Shave and Pave Program Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division October 23, 2012.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
HDM-4: Pavement Deterioration Modeling and Road User Effects
Town of Chapel Hill | 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. | Proposed Resurfacing FY16 and FY17 (Spring/Summer 2016)
Protecting Your Pavement Investment Jeff Stokes. 4 R’s for Paving Success 1 Risk Management Identifying and minimizing your risk factors 2 Right Repair.
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
STRONG NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVE Public Works Department January 30, 2007 Agenda item 8.01.
“Analysis of Pavement Condition along Ramon Magsaysay Boulevard by Pavement Distress Approach” Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Major in Transportation.
April 14, – 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Alabama Asphalt Pavement Association
A Data-Driven Strategy to Improve the Quality
Transportation Development District Presentation
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
Village of Woodridge 2011 Pavement Analysis
AN-Najah National University AN-Najah National University
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Multi-Year Programming and Predictive Modelling
Boulder Junction Town Road Improvement Project
Town of Clayton 2016 Pavement Condition Survey
Boulder Junction Town Road Improvement Project
Duffin Creek WPCP Optimized Renewal Planning & Decision-Making
Know More About These Pavement Flaws
Street Improvement Plan
Determine Reinvestment
Pavement condition index calculation
Consequences of Delayed Maintenance of Pavement Networks
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area
Pavement Maintenance and Microsurfacing
Pavement Preservation Philosophy utilizing Pavement Management Systems
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

2012 Pavement Management Update June 12, 2012 BoCC Work Session

2 Pavement Management What is Pavement Management? – Pavement Life-Cycle – Pavement Condition Index Methodology Results Budget Recommendations

3 Pavement Management Pavements are one of the largest capital investments of Eagle County. Limited funding requires prioritization of maintenance needs Pavement Management provides an analytical approach Eagle County initiated a Pavement Management Program in 2003

4 Pavement Life-Cycle

5

6 Methodology 2011 Surveyed all Asphalt Roads – Evaluated for seven distress types: Alligator cracking, cracking, raveling, patching, rutting, shoving and settlement The most prevelent distress is rated for severity Pavement Condition Index (PCI) – The PCI is calculated by a two-step process Deduct curves for each distress are programmed in the software Deductions are totaled and subtracted from 100

7 Methodology Condition Description Pavement Condition Rating Description Excellent91-100Pavement structure is stable, with distresses in low density and severity. Roadways in this category are usually fairly new or recently repaired. Good81-90Pavement structure is stable, but may have surface erosion or minor cracking, which is generally hairline and hard to detect, minor patching, and possibly some minor deformation. Riding qualities are very good. Fair66-80Pavement structure is generally stable with minor areas of structural weakness evident. Cracking is easier to detect. The pavement might be patched, but not excessively. Although riding qualities are good, deformation is more pronounced and easily noticed. Poor51-65Roadway has areas of instability, marked evidence of structural deficiency, large crack patterns, heavy and numerous patches, and very noticeable deformation. Riding qualities range from acceptable to poor. Spot repair of the pavement base may be required. Critical0-50Cost of saving the pavement structural section would equal or exceed complete reconstruction of roadway

8 Methodology Pavement Conditions Alligator Cracking – PCI = 65 (Poor)Cracking – PCI = 68 (Fair)

9 Methodology Pavement Conditions Patching PCI = 91 (Excellent)

Results Current Pavement Condition – Asphalt ratings from 6 (Critical) to 100 (Excellent) – Average asphalt rating of 66 (Fair) – 2003 asphalt ratings from 55 (Poor) to 100 (Excellent) – 2003 average asphalt rating of 86 (Good)

11 Budget YearPavementGravelTotal 2006$1,078,306$414,696$1,493, $1,021,324$358,530$1,379, $608,795$436,128$1,044, $311,602$449,212$760, $30,000$0$30, $30,000$20,000$50, $30,000$420,000$450,000

12 Budget YearRoad Maintenance BudgetFund Balance 2013$1,100,953$6,115, $1,351,015$5,062, $1,321,734$3,970, $745,593$3,458, $782,874$2,837, $822,017$2,258, $635,382$1,791, $980,820$1,062, $716,884($80,735)

13 Recommendations $22 million in asphalt maintenance needs Recent Budgets not sufficient to complete projects Average PCI is declining Increase R&B spending to proposed levels Use Fund Balance for 4 years Continue to refine and improve Program Provide priority guidance to R&B in future