Stage 1: STUDY PREPARATION 1www.ihpa.gov.au. www.edclassificationstudy.com STUDY PREPARATION OVERVIEW Steps required to prepare for the study implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Advertisements

Health and Safety - an update Ian Gillett Safety Director.
Standard 1 Enhance Access and Continuity NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
56TH ANNUAL WATER AND WASTEWATER OPERATORS' CONFERENCE April 17, 2013 NetDMR Update Shawn Hokanson SWPB Permit Support Supervisor Cheryl Edwards SWPB NetDMR.
Guide to Intern Assessment Processes for Supervisors.
Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 3. SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 3 Jeanne M. Amos HH Data Coordinator.
Planview for Resource Managers: Create Your Project
Unit 4: Monitoring Data Quality For HIV Case Surveillance Systems #6-0-1.
How the MEDISCRIBE © System Works © clark 2010 ASSISTED LIVING ASSISTED LIVING MEDISCRIBEMEDISCRIBE© Copyright © Clark 2010 – Patent Pending ALL RIGHTS.
Counting and Claiming Presented by: Linda Stull Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Training and Programs.
SUBTITLE DAY, MONTH, YEAR Accreditation Support for Teachers Introduction to Accreditation at Proficient Teacher Module 3 of 5.
Data collection, extraction, and central collation Induction Event.
Allied health student training Pre-placement training requirements Welcome to the video-conference. This video-conference will be recorded. Your participation.
Use of OCAN in Crisis Intervention Webinar October, 2014.
Agenda Introduction Student Log Book Guidelines
Andrew Thornton, Chairman, RAH HREC
PREPARING FOR A TRIENNIAL PROGRAM OVERSIGHT AND COMPLIANCE REVIEW PRESENTED BY: ANDREA KUHLEN, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR ISABEL CHAVEZ, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH MANAGER.
Module 3: Informed Consent. This training session contains information regarding: Documenting consent Documenting consent Conducting informed consent.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
LG DATABASE AND REPORTING SYSTEM (LGDRS) 8-9 September 2015
Data Coordinators Conference – 2014 Laura Marroquin CASEWORKER/JCMS Specialist Everything New Data Coordinators Should Know.
Testing Accommodations. Allowable Test Administration Procedures and Materials  Available to any student who regularly benefits from the use of these.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Session 6: Data Flow, Data Management, and Data Quality.
Medidata Rave Start-Up Information
STUDY RESOURCES 1. OVERVIEW OF STUDY RESOURCES Study documents Study overview documents (project overview, data requirements.
PATIENT & FAMILY RIGHTS AT DOHMS. Fully understand and practice all your rights. You will receive a written copy of these rights from the Reception, Registration.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Stage 2 DATA SUBMISSIONS AND TRANSFERS 1www.ihpa.gov.au.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Progress Project Tracking for EGEE Kasia Pokorska, CERN IT-AIS-PM
Case Costing at TBRHSC June 2015.
Pat Nestor MSCSI MRICS Head of Building Control Dublin City Council
2 March 2017 Jevgenija Sevcova, EIFL Programmes and events coordinator
Declaring intent in leo
Q & A Overview of the Coalition Surge Test (CST)
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
Jane Sinson Educational Psychologist
EHR Incentive Program 2017 Program Requirements
MANUALS READ THE MANUALS!!
HCHB 2016.T2 Release August 23, 2016.
TERMS OF REFERENCE - FINANCE COMMITTEE
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Managing a Research Project
Relate to Clients on a business level
Stage 1 and 2 Mentor Training
Employees’ Guide to Parental Leave
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
HREC Operating Procedures for the Review of Low and Moderate to High Risk Projects
Overview of the Children and Families Act 2014
MRA Member Summary, Open Conditions & Clinical Inference
Compliance, Policy and Regulations
21 NOVEMBER 2018 FREE STATE PROVINCE
30 JANUARY 2019 PRIVATE HEALTH ESTABLISHMENTS
Progression and Advancement
17 JANUARY 2019 MPUMALANGA PROVINCE
Clear Coverage User Guide
Welcome Effective May 13, 2019 the following services will require an authorization through the KEPRO Atrezzo Portal: Code Modifier Description T1017 HF.
28 NOVEMBER 2018 PRIVATE HEALTH ESTABLISHMENTS
11 iii. Define management and supervision roles and responsibilities
Allied Health Statistics
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Provider Maintenance—Referrals Module
Click Training Safety Module
HUD’s Coordinated Entry Data & Management Guide
Presentation transcript:

Stage 1: STUDY PREPARATION 1www.ihpa.gov.au

STUDY PREPARATION OVERVIEW Steps required to prepare for the study implementation. Includes: Research ethics/site specific approval – Immediate Initial site set up visit by FMT Study website setup Progress reporting arrangements Study site database set up Submission Part A (Service level data) – 8 April 2016 Decisions on data collection processes Decide on when data collection will occur Review data already routinely collected Identify additional items that will need to be collected Decide on appropriate data collection processes, including for clinician time Train staff in data collection processes

RESEARCH ETHICS/ SITE SPECIFIC APPROVAL The study has ethics approval: This is through the South Australian Department for Health and Ageing Human Ethics Committee (SA HREC) (granted on 1 December 2015, HREC reference No.: HREC/15/SAH/165) The SA HREC is a lead HREC, able to approve multi-site studies. However, acceptance of the approval outside of SA is at the discretion of local research governance offices. In addition to ethics approval, local authorisation to conduct the study is also required: This is through the completion of a site specific assessment (SSA) form.

RESEARCH ETHICS/ SITE SPECIFIC APPROVAL If a state/territory health authority is seeking independent approval, this process should already be underway. For sites completing a site specific assessment, processes must commence immediately.

INITIAL SITE VISIT BY FMT The initial FMT site visit has three major goals: 1.Formal introduction of the FMT to onsite study staff (site co-ordinator and other project staff) 2.Provide education and training to onsite staff (site co- ordinator and other project staff) on: Data requirements and timing Study website Study site data management system 3.Check site progress Setup Submissions A1-9

WEBSITE – LOGIN Access protected area Username and password will be provided by FMT prior to initial visit Login

PROGRESS REPORTING Will occur at regular intervals tied in with submission due dates for the project. Will allow FMTs, state/territory health authorities and project management can monitor progress at a glance. Will be completed by site coordinators through the secure section of the website.

WEBSITE – PROGRESS REPORTING

WEBSITE – PROGRESS REPORTING

WEBSITE – PROGRESS REPORTING A user can add in new activities if and when required

STUDY SITE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SET UP The Study site data management system is available to be downloaded from the project web site. Hardware requirements include: Dual core processor 8G memory At least 50G free disk storage Part of the database set up will be the collection and entry of Submissions A1-A9.

STUDY SITE DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PART A DATA SUBMISSIONS The main role of the system is to collate and process data extracts related to data collection and costing phases of the study. Information regarding the data submissions, timing and content can be found in the Data submissions and transfer module as well as the Data request specification document available for download form the website.

DATA COLLECTION Working with FMTs, sites will need to determine exact dates for data collection as well as the best way for this to occur at the specific site

DATA COLLECTION – TIMING Data collection must start between 1 April and 1 June Part C collection must be carried out over 1 calendar month 2.Part B collection will be carried out over 16 days inside the Part C collection period. The 16 days is made up of 2 days lead-in time, plus 2 weeks data collection.

DATA COLLECTION – DATA ELEMENTS Presenting problem/complaint: Already collected by many emergency departments. Sites need to check mapping of local codes to the code set specified for the study. Additional diagnoses: These are often available in local systems, but not necessarily collected. Collection needs to be priority for the study. Procedures: Already collected by some emergency departments. Sites need to check mapping of local codes to the code set specified for the study.

DATA COLLECTION – DATA ELEMENTS Diagnosis modifiers: Some of these may already be routinely collected (e.g. as additional diagnoses). Some diagnosis modifiers may be better collected at triage and or discharge/ transfer of care. Some sites may decide to undertake retrospective coding from the electronic/paper record to collect some of the diagnosis modifiers. Allied health times/procedures: May already be collected.

DATA COLLECTION – DATA PLAN Sites will need to develop a plan Assisted by FMT and state/territory health authority Should include: what data are already routinely collected, and what data will need to be collected specifically for the study how data already collected will be extracted from local systems and uploaded to the Study site data management system how data not already collected will be collected during the study.

APPROACH TO CAPTURING CLINICIAN TIME Patient attributable time will need to be captured in this study, for a two- week period. This is the time that clinicians spend attending to patients, either at the bed side or undertaking specific tasks in relation to a patient (e.g. interpreting and acting on test results). This is a challenging undertaking. Depending on a sites’ capabilities, two approaches may be adopted by sites: A:Total clinical time method Collect data from all clinicians during the two-week period related to time associated with individual patients, and the related procedures/activities. B:Specific activity/procedure method Collect data on clinical time associated with specific activities/ procedures. For each activity/procedure, a sample of 30 instances is required.

APPROACH TO CLINICAL TIME A:Total clinical time method 24 hours per day collection by all clinicians, over two weeks. Collect time attributable to patients and the procedures carried out. B:Specific activity/procedure method Collection based on discrete activities/ procedures. Uses the list of activities/ procedures detailed in the Data request specification (Submission B3). ‒ At least 30 observations required for each procedure/activity, capturing clinician time to undertake these activities/ procedures. Collection for longer than two weeks may be necessary to capture 30 observations Specific information on technology to capture clinician time can be found in the Clinician time capture module