SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Panda Solenoid Timelines. General Layout constraints and HOLD POINTS.
Advertisements

Properties of cast resin transformers
V. Carassiti - Princeton (USA) 9-13/01/ BABAR IFR UPGRADE DETECTOR ASSEMBLING AND MOUNTING.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Michael P. Andrews NuMI Shutdown & Facility Coordinator LBNE Project ESH Manager AD ESH Special Projects Coordinator.
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Design Effort Safety Requirements for IR Conventional Facilities and Siting Group Safety Requirements for IR.
31, May 2007 ILC DESY 07 1 Surface Building Design Development Tom Lackowski GDE.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Conventional Facilities & Beam Stability Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities NSLS-II Beam Stability Workshop.
LCC Linear Collider Collaboratio ILC - CFS 12 November 2013 LCWS13 Tokyo University 1 Site-specific CF design from TDR LCWS13, 12 November 2013 Atsushi.
Hall D Civil and Detector Progress Elliott Wolin 12-Sep-2002 U. Of Regina Middle of Nowhere Canada.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet and Girder Integration Lewis Doom, NSLS-II Project National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS-II) will.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
VENTILATION PRINCIPLE FOR THE DRIVE BEAM TUNNEL M Nonis – EN/CV – 28/7/2009 Already presented by C. Martel/ J Inigo Golfin on15 th October 2008 CLIC WORKSHOP.
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Thickness of the Kamaboko Tunnel Shield Wall under Different Assumptions Ewan Paterson Technical Board June 23,
ORKA Preservation Task Force ORKA Preservation Task Force first meeting Wednesday, February 8, Notes by Peter H. Garbincius Notes from meeting are.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
Experimental Areas Studies Lessons learnt at CMS M Gastal & CMS Technical Coordination (A Ball, W Zeuner)
3/20/11 ALCPG11 Global Design Effort 1 CFS Detector Hall Considerations Tom Lackowski.
Global Design Effort Working Group C Conventional Facilities Parallel Session IRENG07 V. Kuchler, A. Enomoto, J. Osborne September 19, 2007.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Unit – I Presentation. Unit – 1 (Introduction to Software Project management) Definition:-  Software project management is the art and science of planning.
EUROnu Costing Workshop May 2011 Beta-Beam Costing Exercise Elena Wildner, CERN 25/05/11 1 EUROnu Costing Workshop, CERN May 2011.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Accelerator Tunnel Layout (G01) Nick Gazis Senior Mechanical Engineer Review of ESS Accelerator Conventional Facility Design.
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
Contract: EIE/07/069/SI Duration: October 2007 – March 2010Version: July 7, 2009 Ventilation for buildings Energy performance of buildings Guidelines.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
1. Road to the EDR 2 Requirements Safety system Transfer line concept Plant concept design Requirements Evaporator concept and performance Transfer line.
LHCb CO 2 cooling meeting Burkhard Schmidt – May 20,
PRELIMINARY VERSION Mechanical integration in the ESS Accelerator tunnel HENRY PRZYBILSKI.
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
DTU A VISION OF SUPPORTING NEUTRON CHOPPER ESS PT 1 - BUNKER SYSTEMS Discussion Document.
01 June 2011F. Raffaelli1 Super B Mechanical integration. List of reference persons and institutions for the mechanic of the sub detectors. Review of the.
E- source kick-off meeting e- Source RDR- Conventional Facility & Siting Overview Fred Asiri/SLAC.
Kitakami Side AHCAL Assembly or anywhere in any detector.
1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
Beam Dump Hall Volume Beam Dump Meeting at SLAC May S.Ban
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group (ARCFS)
Conventional Facility & Siting (CF&S) Overview for the Positron Source
Detector Utility/Service Cavern
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
M. Sullivan SuperB General Meeting Perugia, Italy June 15-20, 2009
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
INSTALLATION SEQUENCE
BDS Cryogenic System RDR Status and EDR Plans
Detector Service Cavern for ILC
Accelerator and Experiment Interface Session: LS2, LS3
List of changes and improvements for the next generation CLIC module
Detector hall in mountain regions
SuperB Experimental Hall
A very first look at siting issues
CLIC: from 380 GeV up to 3 TeV Will also study klystron based machine for initial stage.
Unit# 9: Computer Program Development
Integration and IR Hall
Detector hall in mountain regions
RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region
SuperB Integration Summary of previous integration sessions.
Inner DET. Integration Inner detector envelope Radial clearances.
Project GEOCOND: Advanced materials and processes to improve performance and cost-efficiency of Shallow Geothermal systems and UTES Javier Urchueguía,
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
SuperB Integration Summary of the Integration Status
CDS-EL IRR Closeout 28 March 2019 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman.
Considerations about triangular and L-shaped detectors
Presentation transcript:

SuperB Experimental hall General considerations on the Babar experimental area Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. A floor plan. Specification step plan. Design Process and specifications Conclusions

General considerations on the Babar experimental area The design of the Babar hall was driven by an exiting building structure. Floor plan is about 38mX22m The actual space in the interaction area does not allow an easy access to the detector for maintenances. The doors can not clear complete the central part of the detector (IFR). The new inner tracker + machine interface will require maybe more longitudinal space for extraction.

General considerations on the Babar experimental area The door sliding system must be redone. We have to include a central stops to protect the beam line and an large travel to clear IFR complete. The position of the beam axis respected to the floor should be increase at least of.5m + the increase of the steel size. The previous beam height from the floor was 3.5m The increase of height of the beam axis respects to the floor is going to facilitate the positioning of doors and service passages on the bottom. The overhead crane hook high was 34.10’ ( 10.39meter). It was not comfortable for assembly the detector. We need to increase at least.5 meter or more.

General considerations m Assembly configuration Architecture of the Babar experimental area 38m

General considerations m Running configuration Architecture of the Babar experimental area 38m

Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. Assuming to adopt the Babar architecture that It is convenient for the independence of accelerator and detector activities. 1)We need a large collision area for an easy maintenance. 2)A temporary storage and preparation area for mounting parts. 3) Enough space for the required service. 4) Space for mounting the detector. 5) We need to define if it necessary to have an area for the service accessible during all phases, assembly commissioning and running.

Preliminary space requirements hall proposal. Heavy parts stored on the assembly collision hall have advantages: a) tooling for preparation and adjusting are present in only one place; b) only a big crane can handle all the operations; c) Commissioning of the subsector using the final services.

A floor plan proposals. 1)Super B detector assembled, commissioned at proper beam axis distance, minimizing the travel to his final position. 2)It is important to define the beam axis position respect to the ground level. Depending of what we could have: a) a pit with a crane on surface level; b) a dedicate access ramp. 3)The two configurations have an impact of the way of organizing the handling and commissioning of the sub detector and safety issues. 4)The accelerator tunnel will be enlarged in the interaction area to locate the machine apparatus. This must be integrate in the design of the experimental hall.

A floor plan proposals. 1)We need a shielding specification around the beam pipe. 2)All services must be place in the experimental area cryogenic cooler, storage thanks, chiller, air conditioning, auxiliary tooling, etc. 3)Specification for the temperature and humidity control must be addressed considering the heat dissipated inside and the thermal insulation of the hall.

A floor plan proposals. Assembly stage Radiation shielding

A floor plan proposals. Assembly stage

A floor plan proposals. Assembly stage

A floor plan proposals.

Beam pipe location

Specifications Step Plan. (SSP) 1)Define the architecture of the experimental area such that makes the works of the detector and accelerator people easy and economical. This work needs to be made involving the machine people that are the interface with the experimental area. I believe that the solution with an access ramp in which everything is at the same level is the more economical and efficient. 2)We need to get all the information from the sub component and detector in term of needs of service (size, position respect to detector, energy dissipated and cooling required, etc). In the region of the interaction we need to establish a direct line with the machine people. Furthermore to understand better of the requirements of detectors in term of accuracy, environmental control services, this will add many specification to the experimental area. 3)Iteration while the design of the experiment will be in progress will make changes on the specification document.

Design Process and the Specification Define the specification is the first step but the design of the apparatus or system to fulfill the specification require the definition of the boundary conditions. For instance setting the temperature variation on the experimental area of +/-2 degree. The design can be carried out knowing the thermal input location coming for the internal apparatus and for the surface of the exp. Area. The solutions implemented can be different for price and environmental impact and expected performance. Focus on precise goals in the specification defined by precise requirements obtained by deep technical discussion help to make a best design.

Conclusions At this stage of the project is premature to go in deep in precise study when it is not clear for instance location space available for access, constrain on environmental impact,etc. We need to have an interaction with the machine people to understand: the machine equipment near to the detector; the position of the tunnel; the constrain of the experimental building. Furthermore to understand better of the requirements of detectors services, this will add many specification to the experimental area. To gathering all the information we need to start circulating some questionnaire to all people involved of detector.