Developing Intervention Guidelines with Student Outcomes in Mind PBIS CI3T Summer Institute June 8, 2015 Matthew Berry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Advertisements

Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (CI3T) Models of Prevention: Why does my school – and district – need an integrated approach to meet students’
PBIS Overview Wohlwend Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Universal Screening: A Look at Behavior Screening Tools in Tiered Systems of Support Chicago, October 29, 2014 Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D, University.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Multidisciplinary Teams
Guiding and Evaluating Positive Behavioral Support Implementation Shawn Fleming.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
RTI at the High School Level JoAnne Malloy, MSW Project Director Institute on Disability/UCED University of New Hampshire Maria Agorastou, MSW Research.
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Low-Intensity Strategies: Using Behavior Specific Praise to Support Instruction.
Tier 2 Strategies: A Look at Self-Monitoring Wendy Peia Oakes, Ph.D. Arizona State University Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
RTI & THE CONNECTION TO PLC’S Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Low-Intensity Strategies: Using Instructional Feedback to Support Instruction Lane and Oakes 2013.
Low-Intensity Strategies for Academics and Behavior Opportunities to RespondBehavior Specific PraiseActive SupervisionInstructional FeedbackHigh p RequestsPrecorrectionIncorporating.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
A Look at Repeated Readings. Agenda What is repeated readings? Why is repeated readings effective? What does the supporting research for repeated readings.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Precorrection
Implement with Intent Comprehensive School Counseling Program with Outcomes in Mind.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
PBIS Overview Cedar Hill Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
Coaching at the Grade Level: Using Screening Data to Inform Instruction Presented by: Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D University of Kansas Catherine.
Universal Screening for Behavior: SRSS & SRSS-IE SSD PBIS TEAM, 2014.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Implementing Comprehensive, Integrated, Three- Tiered (Ci3T) Models of Prevention: Installing Systematic Screening for Behavior Council for Children with.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Scott Crooks Alicia Sachan Judy Felts Matthew Berry Systemic Supports & Interventions for Students with Behavioral Challenges Fall Regional Meeting November.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
Review of the Three - Tier Intervention Process
Agenda What is a high probability (high-p) request sequence?
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Implementing Efective Interventions
3 Tier Leadership Team Implementation Training: Day 5 The Intervention Continuum Oakland Schools Early Childhood Special Education
PBIS Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
What is Positive Behavior Intervetions and Supports (PBIS)?
B15 - Tier II Intervention: Using Academic Supports to Meet the Needs of High School Level Students Lead Presenter: Kathleen Lynne Lane, Ph.D., BCBA-D,
NC DPI Exemplar Recognition Criteria
XXXXX School Ci3T Implementation Report Social Validity and Treatment Integrity 20XX – 20XX ____________________________________ Fall 20XX Lane and Oakes.
Tier 2 Strategies: A Look at Self-Monitoring
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
RTI: Response To Instruction
Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session
Agenda Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (Ci3T) Models of Prevention A Look at Active Supervision What is active supervision? Why is active supervision.
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Data-Based Decision Making
Student Support Team (SST) Training
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Liberty Elementary staff training
Building Secondary (Tier 2)Prevention Efforts
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

Developing Intervention Guidelines with Student Outcomes in Mind PBIS CI3T Summer Institute June 8, 2015 Matthew Berry

Outcomes  Participants will understand the rationale and critical features of developing Intervention Guidelines  Participants will complete one Intervention Guideline for a school-wide targeted intervention Agenda  Steps to Building Intervention Guidelines  Key Features of Secondary Interventions  Invention Inventory & Intervention Guideline For this Session

Organization for Today  SSD PBIS Compendium- has materials for today SSD PBIS Compendium-  Today’s Meet- to network with each other during this institute Today’s Meet-  Twitter- #allmeansall15  Planning Tool  Notes Page ( enter your arrow for the specific session)

 Share one celebration regarding a targeted/secondary intervention in your building/classroom you have experienced this past year.  What might be the benefits for your school to work from a CI3T Framework? Entering Activity

Supporting Research  

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 6 Essential Components of Primary Prevention Efforts Systematic Screening AcademicBehavior Treatment Integrity Social Validity

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 7 Goal: Reduce Harm Specialized Individual Systems for Students with High-Risk Goal: Reverse Harm Specialized Group Systems for Students At-Risk Goal: Prevent Harm School/Classroom-Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings AcademicBehavioral Social Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-tiered (CI3T) Model of Prevention (Lane, Kalberg, & Menzies, 2009) Tertiary Prevention (Tier 3) Secondary Prevention (Tier 2) Primary Prevention (Tier 1) ≈ ≈ ≈ PBIS Framework Validated Social Skills/ Character Education Curricula

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 8 Secondary Prevention (Tier 2): Reverse Harm Students who do not respond to the primary prevention plan, 10-15% of students Focused intervention to address academic, behavior, or social concerns: Acquisition (can’t do) Fluency (trouble doing) Performance (won’t do) Examples of Secondary Prevention Small group instruction in anger management Reading comprehension strategies Comprehensive math intervention

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 9 Secondary Prevention (Tier 2): Reverse Harm Are at-risk for an academic and/or social- behavioral concern Continue to engage in frequent problem behavior despite effective school-wide, tier 1 prevention efforts Need additional teaching, monitoring and feedback Could benefit from extra attention or support at school before they are in crisis

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 10 Key Features of Targeted Interventions Increase structure and feedback Is temporary Provides regular & frequent opportunities for success and recognition May include social, social emotional and/or behavior skills instruction May require academic assistance Transfer and Generalization Plan

Universal Targeted Intensive Integrated Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007 Label behavior…not people Think about your profile

Universal Targeted Intensive Integrated Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007 Science Soc Studies Reading Math Soc skills Basketball Spanish Label behavior…not people

 What are your school’s current targeted interventions?  Complete this inventory of your current practices and identify the following components within those interventions.  We will use this information to develop an Intervention Guideline! Tier 2 Targeted Intervention Inventory

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 14 A Step-By-Step Process Step 1: Construct your assessment schedule Step 2: Identify your secondary (Tier 2) supports Existing and new interventions Step 3: Determine entry criteria Nomination, academic failure, behavior and academic screening scores, attendance data etc. Step 4: Identify outcome measures Pre and post tests, CBM, office discipline data, GPA, state assessments, etc. Step 5: Identify exit criteria Reduction of discipline contacts, demonstration of grade level performance based on academic progress monitoring data, reduction of truancies and absences, etc. Step 6: Consider additional needs

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 15 Measure Aug SeptOctNovDecJan FebMarApr May School Demographics Student Demographic Information X X X X X X X X X X Screening Measures Behavior Screeners: SRSS-IE X X X Academic Screeners: AIMSweb - Reading X X X Academic Screeners: AIMSweb - Math X X X Student Outcome Measures - Academic Report Card Grades X X X State Assessment X Unit Tests XXXXX XX X X Student Outcome Measures - Behavior Discipline: ODRs X X X X X X X X X X Suspensions/ Expulsions X X X X X X X X X X Attendance (Absenteeism) X X X X X X X X X X Program Measures Social Validity – PIRS X X X Schoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET) X X X MTSS: CI3T Treatment Integrity X X X Procedures for Monitoring: Assessment Schedule

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 16 Examining academic and behavioral data MS/ HS

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 17 Examining Academic and Behavioral Data Middle and High School Levels Lane, Oakes, Ennis & Hirsch, (2014)

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 18 Examining Academic and Behavioral Data Elementary Level Do you have a school team that examines academic and behavioral data? If so, where and when does this occur?

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 19 After Reviewing Your Assessment Schedule Make a master list of all “extra” supports Create an intervention guideline for each support Select additional supports with sufficient evidence to support their use Enlist needed professional development to assist with implementation

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 20 A Step-By-Step Process Step 1: Construct your assessment schedule Step 2: Identify your secondary (Tier 2) supports Existing and new interventions Step 3: Determine entry criteria Nomination, academic failure, behavior and academic screening scores, attendance data etc. Step 4: Identify outcome measures Pre and post tests, CBM, office discipline data, GPA, state assessments, etc. Step 5: Identify exit criteria Reduction of discipline contacts, demonstration of grade level performance based on academic progress monitoring data, reduction of truancies and absences, etc. Step 6: Consider additional needs Shout out! What were some of your school’s current targeted interventions?

SupportDescriptionSchool-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria The Name of the Intervention Academic, Behavioral, Or Social Skills Grade Level A Brief description of what the intervention is, length of time, and what the outcome would be. Resources allocated to the intervention Data sources that determine which students are best for this intervention Function Based Attention or Avoidance Process on how data will be monitored Process on how often data will be monitored What data will be monitored Data sources that will determine when: Adjustments need to be made Fading in order to graduate Discontinuation of interventions Intervention Guidelines

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 22 Sample Secondary Intervention Grid SupportDescriptionSchoolwide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Behavior Contract A written agreement between two parties used to specify the contingent relationship between the completion of a behavior and access to or delivery of a specific reward. Contract may involve administrator, teacher, parent, and student. Stepping Stones to Literacy (Nelson, Cooper, & Gonzalez, 2004) Supplemental reading program to address rapid automatic naming, print awareness, alphabetic phonics, phonological awareness, listening comprehension. K-3 Students Small Group (<5) or one-on- one format. Five days/week for minutes Secondary (Tier 2) Intervention Guideline Intervention Development Label your intervention support & description for your Intervention Guideline

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 23 A Step-By-Step Process Step 1: Construct your assessment schedule Step 2: Identify your secondary (Tier 2) supports Existing and new interventions Step 3: Determine entry criteria Nomination, academic failure, behavior and academic screening scores, attendance data etc. Step 4: Identify outcome measures Pre and post tests, CBM, office discipline data, GPA, state assessments, etc. Step 5: Identify exit criteria Reduction of discipline contacts, demonstration of grade level performance based on academic progress monitoring data, reduction of truancies and absences, etc. Step 6: Consider additional needs

SupportDescriptionSchool-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria The Name of the Intervention Academic, Behavioral, Or Social Skills Grade Level A Brief description of what the intervention is, length of time, and what the outcome would be. Resources allocated to the intervention Data sources that determine which students are best for this intervention Function Based Attention or Avoidance Process on how data will be monitored Process on how often data will be monitored What data will be monitored Data sources that will determine when: Adjustments need to be made Fading in order to graduate Discontinuation of interventions Intervention Guidelines

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 25 Additional Entry Criteria Used to Identify Students in Need of Tier 2 Universal Screeners (SRSS, AIMSweb, SSBD, BESS etc.) Student outcome data: – Office Discipline Referrals (ODRs) – Suspensions – Attendance – Tardies – Academics Minors – In-School detentions – Interclass Time-out / “Think Time”

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 26 Entry Criteria: Key Features At least 2 data sources are used to identify students for Tier 2 and Tier 3 supports at least twice a year. A documented process exists and staff are trained Staff are notified of a decision within 10 days of making a referral. Students begin receiving supports within 30 days of referral.

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 27 Sample Secondary Intervention Grid SupportDescriptionSchoolwide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Behavior Contract A written agreement between two parties used to specify the contingent relationship between the completion of a behavior and access to or delivery of a specific reward. Contract may involve administrator, teacher, parent, and student. Behavior: SRSS - mod to high risk Academic: 2 or more missing assignments within a grading period Stepping Stones to Literacy (Nelson, Cooper, & Gonzalez, 2004) Supplemental reading program to address rapid automatic naming, print awareness, alphabetic phonics, phonological awareness, listening comprehension. K-3 Students Small Group (<5) or one-on-one format. Five days/week for minutes Academic: K-3 Students AIMSweb reading— deficient or emerging in Fall and Winter And Behavior: SSBD exceeded normative criteria for internalizing or externalizing dimension Secondary Intervention Guidelines

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 28 Intervention Development: Entry Criteria What criteria or possible data sources will you use to determine which students need a Tier 2/3 targeted intervention? Add Entry Criteria information to your Intervention Guideline

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 29 A Step-By-Step Process Step 1: Construct your assessment schedule Step 2: Identify your secondary (Tier 2) supports Existing and new interventions Step 3: Determine entry criteria Nomination, academic failure, behavior and academic screening scores, attendance data etc. Step 4: Identify outcome measures Pre and post tests, CBM, office discipline data, GPA, state assessments, etc. Step 5: Identify exit criteria Reduction of discipline contacts, demonstration of grade level performance based on academic progress monitoring data, reduction of truancies and absences, etc. Step 6: Consider additional needs

SupportDescriptionSchool-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria The Name of the Intervention Academic, Behavioral, Or Social Skills Grade Level A Brief description of what the intervention is, length of time, and what the outcome would be. Resources allocated to the intervention Data sources that determine which students are best for this intervention Function Based Attention or Avoidance Process on how data will be monitored Process on how often data will be monitored What data will be monitored Social Validity Treatment Integrity Data sources that will determine when: Adjustments need to be made Fading in order to graduate Discontinuation of interventions Intervention Guidelines

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 31 Intervention Development: Data to Progress Monitor How will data be gathered by the designated teacher for this intervention? How will it be reported? How will it be communicated to all stakeholders? When will it be reviewed? How will treatment and social validity data be collected?

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 32 Social Validity Social validity refers to the social significance of the intervention goals, the social acceptability of the intervention procedures, and the social importance of effects of the intervention (Kazdin, 1977) Is the intervention practical? Is the intervention feasible? Is the intervention cost-effective? Does the intervention target socially important goals? Does the intervention result in socially important outcomes?

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 33 Social Validity When? Before implementation During implementation After implementation Who? Multiple perspectives Teachers Administrators Paraprofessionals Staff Students Parents

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 34 Treatment Integrity Treatment integrity is a measure of the accuracy with which the plan is implemented as intended Treatment integrity may serve as a behavioral marker for social validity (Gresham & Lopez, 1996) Types of Treatment Integrity: Teacher Self-Assessment The School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Source: Lane, K. L., Kalberg, J. R., & Menzies, H. M. (2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A step-by-step approach. New York: Guilford Press.

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 35 Intervention Treatment Integrity Measures Teacher Self- Report Direct Observations School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Behavior Checklist

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 36 Sample Secondary Intervention Grid SupportDescriptionSchoolwide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Behavior Contract A written agreement between two parties used to specify the contingent relationship between the completion of a behavior and access to or delivery of a specific reward. Contract may involve administrator, teacher, parent, and student. Behavior: SRSS - mod to high risk Academic: 2 or more missing assignments within a grading period 2-5 ODR re: disruptive attention-seeking behavior Work completion, or other behavior addressed in contract collected weely Treatment Integrity Social Validity Stepping Stones to Literacy (Nelson, Cooper, & Gonzalez, 2004) Supplemental reading program to address rapid automatic naming, print awareness, alphabetic phonics, phonological awareness, listening comprehension. K-3 Students Small Group (<5) or one-on- one format. Five days/week for minutes Academic: K-3 Students AIMSweb reading— deficient or emerging in Fall and Winter And Behavior: SSBD exceeded normative criteria for internalizing or externalizing dimension Weekly reading probes— AIMSweb Treatment Integrity Social Validity Secondary Intervention Grid What could Social Validity & Treatment Integrity look like for both of these interventions?

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 37 A Step-By-Step Process Step 1: Construct your assessment schedule Step 2: Identify your secondary (Tier 2) supports Existing and new interventions Step 3: Determine entry criteria Nomination, academic failure, behavior and academic screening scores, attendance data etc. Step 4: Identify outcome measures Pre and post tests, CBM, office discipline data, GPA, state assessments, etc. Step 5: Identify exit criteria Reduction of discipline contacts, demonstration of grade level performance based on academic progress monitoring data, reduction of truancies and absences, etc. Step 6: Consider additional needs

SupportDescriptionSchool-wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria The Name of the Interventio n Academic, Behavioral, Or Social Skills Grade Level A Brief description of what the intervention is, length of time, and what the outcome would be. Resources allocated to the intervention Data sources that determine which students are best for this intervention Function Based Attention or Avoidance Process on how data will be monitored Process on how often data will be monitored What data will be monitored Treatment Integrity Social Validity Data sources that will determine when: Adjustments need to be made Fading in order to graduate Discontinuation of interventions Intervention Guidelines

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 39 Exit Criteria What student outcome do you intend to impact? – Related back to your Decision Rules of “Student Response to Interventions” How much of the progress monitoring is a part of this criteria? Time bound - (ex: 4 weeks of meeting criteria) Transition Plan- How will we fade out or transition students to additional intervention.

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 40 Exit Criteria Screening scores with marked improvement ODR Office Discipline Referrals Suspensions Attendance Tardies Academics Follow-up questionnaire for teachers, family member, or student who made referral

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 41 Sample Secondary Intervention Grid SupportDescriptionSchool wide Data: Entry Criteria Data to Monitor Progress Exit Criteria Behavior Contract A written agreement between two parties used to specify the contingent relationship between the completion of a behavior and access to or delivery of a specific reward. Contract may involve administrator, teacher, parent, and student. Behavior: SRSS - mod to high risk Academic: 2 or more missing assignments within a grading period 2-5 ODR re: disruptive attention-seeking behavior Work completion, or other behavior addressed in contract Treatment Integrity Social Validity Behavior: SRSS: - low to mod risk Academic: reduced rate of missing assignments over designated time frame Reduced ODR’s Stepping Stones to Literacy (Nelson, Cooper, & Gonzalez, 2004) Supplemental reading program to address rapid automatic naming, print awareness, alphabetic phonics, phonological awareness, listening comprehension. K-3 Students Small Group (<5) or one-on-one format. Five days/week for minutes Academic: K-3 Students AIMSweb reading— deficient or emerging in Fall and Winter And Behavior: SSBD exceeded normative criteria for internalizing or externalizing dimension Weekly reading probes— AIMSweb Treatment Integrity Social Validity Academic: AIMSweb – meet reading bench mark at Spring time point Secondary Intervention Guideline Intervention Development Complete what exit criteria data you may utilize for your intervention

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 42 A Step-By-Step Process Step 1: Construct your assessment schedule Step 2: Identify your secondary (Tier 2) supports Existing and new interventions Step 3: Determine entry criteria Nomination, academic failure, behavior and academic screening scores, attendance data etc. Step 4: Identify outcome measures Pre and post tests, CBM, office discipline data, GPA, state assessments, etc. Step 5: Identify exit criteria Reduction of discipline contacts, demonstration of grade level performance based on academic progress monitoring data, reduction of truancies and absences, etc. Step 6: Consider additional needs

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 43 Small group Reading Instruction with Self- Monitoring Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Ennis, R. P., & Hirsch, S. E. (2014). Identifying students for secondary and tertiary prevention efforts: How do we determine which students have Tier 2 and Tier 3 needs? Preventing School Failure, 58,

STL CI3T TRAINING PROJECT 44 Questions? Considerations? What opportunities might creating intervention guidelines surface for your school?

For this session…did we? Outcomes Participants will understand the rationale and critical features of developing Intervention Guidelines Participants will complete one Intervention Guideline for a school-wide targeted intervention Agenda Steps to Building Intervention Guidelines Key Features of Targeted Interventions Invention Inventory & Intervention Guideline

PREVIEW PBIS Tier 2/3 Systems Team – Getting Started – Day 1 – October 8, 2015 – Day 2 – October 29, 2015 Information for registration can be found at CUE USE Share information with your administrator Share information with your school team Contact your PBIS Facilitator to assist with Developing Intervention Guidelines

Evaluation Please take time to complete the Professional Learning Evaluation Thank you!