7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Bridging the Gap Between Statistics and Engineering Statistical calibration of CFD simulations in Urban street canyons with Experimental data Liora Malki-Epshtein.
Lect.3 Modeling in The Time Domain Basil Hamed
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
1 AirWare : AirWare : C OMPREHENSIVE A IR QUALITY M ODEL WITH E X TENSIONS VERSION 4.30, PBM DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
2012: Hurricane Sandy 125 dead, 60+ billion dollars damage.
An initial linkage of the CMAQ modeling system at neighborhood scales with a human exposure model Jason Ching/Thomas Pierce Air-Surface Processes Modeling.
U. Shankar 1, D. McKenzie 2, J. Bowden 1 and L. Ran 1 Assessing the Impacts on Smoke, Fire and Air Quality Due to Changes in Climate, Fuel Loads, and Wildfire.
BIOGENIC AEROSOLS AND AIR QUALITY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AREA BOND John Bartzis.
AIR POLLUTION. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELS Why models? incomplete information (knowledge) spatial inference = prediction temporal inference.
April “ Despite the increasing importance of mathematics to the progress of our economy and society, enrollment in mathematics programs has been.
1 Modelled Meteorology - Applicability to Well-test Flaring Assessments Environment and Energy Division Alex Schutte Science & Community Environmental.
CHAPTER 3: SIMPLE MODELS
X ONE-BOX MODEL Atmospheric “box”;
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Using Air Quality Models for Emissions Management Decisions
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
Dispersion Modeling A Brief Introduction A Brief Introduction Image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad.
Harikishan Perugu, Ph.D. Heng Wei, Ph.D. PE
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Fig.6a,b. Simulation of wind fields and toluene plumes on (a) May 12 and (b) May 13. Red dot is the beach site. Very low level of toluene was observed.
Emission Inventories and EI Data Sets Sarah Kelly, ITEP Les Benedict, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
PM Model Performance in Southern California Using UAMAERO-LT Joseph Cassmassi Senior Meteorologist SCAQMD February 11, 2004.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Climate Modeling Idania Rodriguez EEES PhD Student Idania Rodriguez EEES PhD Student “Science Explorations Through the Lens of Global Climate Change” Workshop.
Integrated Ecological Assessment February 28, 2006 Long-Term Plan Annual Update Carl Fitz Recovery Model Development and.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
New Techniques for Modeling Air Quality Impacts of DoD Activities Talat Odman and Ted Russell Environmental Engineering Department Georgia Institute of.
A real-time forecast system for air pollution concentrations - Contribution to subproject GLOREAM - GLO-6 Hermann J. Jakobs, Elmar Friese, Michael Memmesheimer,
Regional Modeling Joseph Cassmassi South Coast Air Quality Management District USA.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
The evolution of climate modeling Kevin Hennessy on behalf of CSIRO & the Bureau of Meteorology Tuesday 30 th September 2003 Canberra Short course & Climate.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
NPS Source Attribution Modeling Deterministic Models Dispersion or deterministic models Receptor Models Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Patterns Back Trajectory.
AQ Emissions Data Considerations and Needs Greg Frost NOAA, University of Colorado Two key kinds of AQ data on chemical species: Emissions and Ambient.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Spatial statistics What is spatial statistics?  Refers to a very broad collection of methods and techniques of visualization, exploration and analysis.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
Albert Oliver, Raúl Arasa, Agustí Pérez-Foguet, Mª Ángeles González HARMO17 Budapest May 2016 Simulating large emitters using CMAQ and a local scale finite.
Process and System Characterization Describe and characterize transport and transformation phenomena based reactor dynamics ( 반응공학 ) – natural and engineered.
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
A.Liudchik, V.Pakatashkin, S.Umreika, S.Barodka
Global Circulation Models
The science of urban air quality
US Environmental Protection Agency
Invitation to Computer Science 5th Edition
3. Simple models.
Models of atmospheric chemistry
J. Burke1, K. Wesson2, W. Appel1, A. Vette1, R. Williams1
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Hydrology Modeling in Alaska: Modeling Overview
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Presentation transcript:

7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often nonlinear processes involving environmental physics, chemistry and biology

7.1 Models Models are computer replicas of natural system behavior, so that causes and effects (i.e. feedbacks) may be better understood

Air Quality Model typical components: –emissions –atmospheric chemistry –atmospheric physics Goal: prediction of air pollutant concentrations

7.1.1 Potential Uses of Air Quality Models 1. establishment of emission control legislation 2. evaluation of proposed emission control techniques and strategies 3. planning of locations of future sources of air contaminants 4. planning for the control of air pollution episodes 5. assessment of responsibility of air pollution 6. prediction of future air pollutant concentrations and impacts

7.1.2 Types of Models Two broad categories: –1. Physical models –2. Mathematical models

Physical Models Simulate atmospheric processes affecting pollutants via a small-scale representation of the actual air pollution problem –often use a small-scale replica of an urban area in a wind tunnel –physical models are valuable for isolating certain elements of atmospheric behavior –physical models are limited as they are incapable of simulating a variety of meteorological, chemical and emissions conditions (use mathematical models)

Example: ESE Building Air Quality Engineering and Atmospheric Sciences Laboratories: Will snow accumulate on the outdoor instrument platform?

Mathematical Models Two kinds: 1. Models based on statistical analysis of past air monitoring data 2. Models based on fundamental description of atmospheric transport and chemical processes

7.1.3 Temporal Resolution of Models Temporal resolution is a measure of the time period over which predicted concentrations are averaged Range of concern: few minutes to a year Model selection is often based on temporal resolution

Statistical models: Obtain and use several years of measurements at one or more monitoring stations in an airshed Correlate emissions to ambient concentrations Temporal resolution similar to measurements (hourly, daily)

Example: Predict the probability that the 1 hour average concentration at a certain station will exceed a given level if total emissions in that region are at a prescribed value

Input data: Generally only estimates of source emission levels (meteorology and atmospheric transformation and removal processes are implicit in reported concentration data)

Output: Concentrations (or probabilities)

Fate and transport models: Temporal resolution ranging from the order of several minutes to years Based upon continuity equation for each species (i.e. mass balance)

Dynamic models: Models that require the solution in time of a differential equation based on the continuity equation, as they describe the evolution of pollutant concentrations with time Simulate real-time behavior of air pollutants

Input data: –Spatial and temporal distribution of emissions over the region of interest –Spatial and temporal distribution of meteorological variables –Time rate of change of concentrations at a point resulting from transformations and removal processes

Steady State models: Models with simplifications, such as steady: –Source rates –Meteorology –Atmospheric chemistry Capable of predictions spatial distribution airborne pollutant concentrations under time- invariant source emission rates and atmospheric chemistry and physics

7.1.4 Spatial Resolution of Models Spatial resolution is a measure of the area over which predicted concentrations are averaged Spatial resolution is dependent on domain size (i.e. the total area of consideration)

Statistical models: –Predict concentrations at one or more stations (point measurements) or the average of all stations

Fate and transport models: Discrete grid of points Grid size is determined by: 1.spatial detail of emissions 2.spatial detail of meteorological variables 3. atmospheric fate of pollutant 4. computer time

Spatial resolution cannot be smaller than data resolution Spatial resolution is often coupled to temporal resolution Short-lived species have highly variable concentrations spatially Long-lived species can be transported great distances without much change in concentration

Fig. 8.1 Time and source-to-sink spatial scales

Examples: 1. Impact of autos on CO levels around a highway or intersection –Requires resolution of a few meters 2. Photochemical smog formation –Caused by area wide emissions of HC and NO x –Requires a resolution of several kilometers

Fig.8.2 NO 2 concentrations as predicted for the Atlanta area by the Geographical Environmental Modeling System.

–Fig.8.3 The greater Atlanta metropolitan area.