ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 9  Fall 2009 DART.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 03 - Spring 2013 Ryan Pawling Spencer Julian Josh Hunsberger Robert Harris.
Advertisements

ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 6  Spring 2010 Digital Sound Projection.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 13  Spring 2006 Elmer Chao (not pictured), Matt Cozza (not pictured), Joe Waugh (not pictured), Evan Zelkowitz (not pictured)
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team ??  Fall 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 10  Spring 2008 Paul Ng Daniel Bixby Matt Ligocki David Collins Paul Ng Daniel Bixby Matt Ligocki David Collins.
S.W.A.T (Security Watching All the Time) Jeff Shin Tyler Stubbs Paul Kasemir Pavel Mayyak.
The purpose of this project was to develop a portable G-Meter, roughly the size of a cell phone. Potential applications of the product include logging.
ECE 477 F INAL P RESENTATION T EAM 10  S PRING 2013 Ruiyang Lin Vipul Bhat Julia Liston Krithika Iyer.
Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 03  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 FINAL PRESENTATION TEAM 7  SPRING 2013 COST ROBOT ERIC OSBORNE, BRYAN DALLAS, ANDREW LOVELESS, CAROLINE TRIPPEL.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Spring 2010 Digi-Brush Josh LongCaleb Ayew-ewKatie Schremser.
Solar Telematics System ECE 477 Design Review, Team 8, Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members here, annotated with names of team members. Craig Lechlitner,
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 16 − Spring 2013 Scott Stack Neil Kumar Jon Roose John Hubberts.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 09  Spring 2010 Luke Ethan Andy Dhruv.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 7  Spring 2011 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 9  Fall 2005 Tim Miller Clif Barnes Drew Heinrich Steven Kady.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 20  Spring 2013 Jordan Wagner Justin Spencer Mark Sears John Jachna.
Treasure Chess ECE 477 Team 2 - Spring 2013 Parul Schroff, Brock Caley, Sidharth Malik, Jeremy Stork Final Presentation Final Packaged Design.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 11  Fall 2005 ChadJeffMel Maruf.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 9  Fall 2009 Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips,
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 12  Spring 2010 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 5  Fall 2009 Left to right: Ben, Dennis, Jacqui, Ian.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 21 - Spring 2013 Team Members: Duncan Swartz, Jacqueline Greer, Tom Pansino, Mark Tubergen.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 3  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 12  Spring 2013 Xirong Ye Zongyang Zhu Chun Ta Huang Libo Dong.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2012 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2012.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 14  Spring 2010.
Alumoline Fuel-Cell Instrumentation Nissan GT-R Naman Chopra Suan-Aik Yeo Ronny Wijaya Darin Tanaka.
HMI System for Solar Powered Race Car Jevon Raghubir Mohit Mendiratta Eugene Gordon April 25, 2011 ECE 4007L01 - Dr. Whit Smith.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 18  Spring 2013 Derek Pesyna, Tim Brown, Evan Foote, Doug Wile.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 2  Spring 2005 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2014 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 3  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
CS-EE 481 Spring February, 2005 University of Portland School of Engineering Project Swift Fox Automotive Accelerometer & RPM Monitor Team Andrew.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 9  Spring 2011 Above (Left to Right): Nick Gentry, Oliver Staton, Vineet Ahuja, and Vinayak Gokhale.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 4  Spring 2006 Justin Thacker, Matt Kocsis, Ian Snyder, Dustin Poe.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 2  Spring 2010 Caleb Ayew-ew Josh Long Katie Schremser The Digi-Brush.
1 © 2008 RoboRubik ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 11 – Spring 2008 Tyler Heck Dave Bukiet Erik Carron Casey Kloiber.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 3  SPRING 2015 Garrett Bernichon Bryan Marquet John Skubic Tim Trippel.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 3  Fall 2012 Daniel Carolyn Jonathan Mihir Stein McMican Kuntzman Shah.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Spring 2010 Mike Wei Jon SchwarzCarlo Mesina Bill Bergquist.
 Project overview  Block diagram  Design challenges  Individual contributions  Project demonstration  Questions / discussion.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 2  Fall 2010 Shannon Abrell Ben Laskowski Andrew Phillips Rob Swanson.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 10  Spring 2009 Scott Shaw Hussain Vasi Matt Sbai John Fawcett.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Spring 2011 Petra M. Alex B. Alex G. Kim S.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2012 Martin Pendergast, Stephen Edwards, Nick Kwolek, David Duelmler.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4 Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Design Review Team 2  Fall 2006 Wirelessly Integrated Menu System (WIMS) Ryan Coppa Lee Bush Aaron Replogle Neil Bedwell.
ECE 477 Design Review Group 5  Spring Outline Project overviewProject overview Project-specific success criteriaProject-specific success criteria.
ECE 477 DESIGN REVIEW TEAM 14  SPRING Project Overview  Target Audience: Amateur Musicians  Obtain a “Guitar Tab” format of music  View Tabs.
Josh Piron, Jacob Pfister, Kevin Templar, Mike Phillips グループ 9 (Group 9) ‏ PCB Design DART.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 22  Spring 2013 Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 01  Fall Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges.
ECE 477 Final Design Review
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2008 Varun Srichand Anvesh Madhu.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 04  Spring 2010
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 8 Spring 2013
TEAM BRIGHTRIDERS Schematic and PCB.
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 4  Fall 2011
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 2 Spring 2012
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 10  Spring 2008
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 1  Spring 2008
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 15  Spring 2010
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 13  Spring 2011
ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 10  Spring 2005
Presentation transcript:

ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 9  Fall 2009 DART

Outline Project overviewProject overview Block diagramBlock diagram Design challengesDesign challenges Individual contributionsIndividual contributions Project demonstrationProject demonstration Questions / discussionQuestions / discussion

Project Overview Driver’s Assistant Recorder TrackerDriver’s Assistant Recorder Tracker Purpose: High-end go kart data acquisitionPurpose: High-end go kart data acquisition Track Sensor DataTrack Sensor Data –Speed –Two-Axis Accelerometer –Exhaust Thermocouple –Lap Count and Timing Record to External MemoryRecord to External Memory –SD Card

Block Diagram

Design Challenges - Packaging RobustRobust –Water-resistant Lid SealLid Seal External ConnectorsExternal Connectors SD Card Slot CoverSD Card Slot Cover –Secure: Mounting Bracket EfficientEfficient –Optimally Stacked –Header Placement/Removal

Design Challenges - Software Interrupt-Driven Program StructureInterrupt-Driven Program Structure –Real-Time Synchronous StopwatchStopwatch Data WriteData Write –DMA UARTUART Analog to DigitalAnalog to Digital –Hardware SpeedSpeed Battery Fuel GaugeBattery Fuel Gauge

Individual Contributions Jacob PfisterJacob Pfister Mike PhillipsMike Phillips Josh PironJosh Piron Kevin TemplarKevin Templar

Jacob Pfister Design/SelectionDesign/Selection –Power Supply –Thermocouple –PCB Infrared EmitterInfrared Emitter SolderingSoldering HW6: PCBHW6: PCB HW12: Ethical/EnvironmentalHW12: Ethical/Environmental Demo VideoDemo Video

Michael Phillips Major component selectionMajor component selection Prototyping/PCB solderingPrototyping/PCB soldering Sensor testingSensor testing Microcontroller debuggingMicrocontroller debugging LCD menu design, construction, programmingLCD menu design, construction, programming Mounting hardwareMounting hardware System integrationSystem integration HW4: PackagingHW4: Packaging HW11: Safety AnalysisHW11: Safety Analysis

Josh Piron Major component selectionMajor component selection Prototyping sensorsPrototyping sensors Microcontroller programming/debuggingMicrocontroller programming/debugging –Timer, sensors, SD card, menu interface –Customizable features Bill of materialsBill of materials Maintain block diagramMaintain block diagram HW5: Theory of OperationHW5: Theory of Operation HW10: Patent Liability AnalysisHW10: Patent Liability Analysis

Kevin Templar Microcontroller selectionMicrocontroller selection WebsiteWebsite Microcontroller programming/debuggingMicrocontroller programming/debugging –Timer interrupts, hardware interrupts, UART, SPI, DMA – Interfacing with uALFAT board, thermocouple converter chip, and battery monitoring hardware HW3: Design Constraint AnalysisHW3: Design Constraint Analysis HW9: Software Design NarrativeHW9: Software Design Narrative

Project Demonstration 1. An ability to log data from various sensors. 2. An ability to time and count laps. 3. An ability to monitor battery life. 4. An ability to store data on external memory. 5. An ability to customize race display.

Demonstration

Questions / Discussion