North Kingstown School Committee March 11, 2014 MH 3/11/2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Impact on Student Learning The conversation is about multiple indicators for this category BUT Few if any places actually have viable multiple indicators.

Advertisements

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.

Wisconsin Student Assessment System Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 8 WSAS Test Proficiency Summary Report Assessment Seminar #2.

Freshman Parent Night SKHS Graduation Requirements.

Junior Parent Night SKHS Graduation Requirements.

Sophomore Parent Night The Portfolio process. Rhode Island Diploma System Adopted by the RI Board of Regents in January of 2003 (updated 2008) ► Move.

RI High School Diploma System Requirements January 2013.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.

MERCED CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2002 REPORT ON THE CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TESTS AND STANFORD ACHIEVEMENT TEST.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.

State testing is one important way to demonstrate that our students are learning at Bristol. The following slides show how Bristol ranks with state proficiency.

Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:

Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.

Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.

Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.

BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,

Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.

PVAAS – Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System added_assessment_system_(pvaas)/8751.

Sustaining Reform - We all have a role October 14, (James Starr, Executive Director – commentary at 10/14 State of schools address)

U-32 Spring 2013 NECAP Presentation March 27,

End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.

Mission: The Hancock Central School District believes that every child can learn and challenges all students to reach their full potential in a caring.

1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.

North Side Elementary School Dr. Mary Nardo, Principal North Side is making AYP. In addition to making Adequate Yearly Progress for the year, North.

Graduation Required Assessment for Diploma (GRAD) & MCA-II 2011 Results & Trends READING, MATH & WRITING REAOffice of Research Evaluation and Assessment,

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.

Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.

2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress: National and State-Level Science Results JANUARY 25, 2011.

NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.

2.2 The Addition and Multiplication Properties of Equality Math, Statistics & Physics 1.

The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

HANOVER HIGH SCHOOL GRADE 11 NECAP SCORES

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics

Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.

The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),

This year’s PSSA results show that Pennsylvania is on track to move all students to proficiency by 2014 as required by the federal No Child Left Behind.

1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.

KAREN CONROY RESULTS OF NYSTP : ELA AND MATH PROFICIENCY 2015.

Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.

PDSA/Fractal Data 8 th Grade Math. Steps to Identify Areas of Need Decided to focus on 8 th grade students in 8 th grade math Determined that I would.

Educator Effectiveness Summit School District’s Recommendation for the School Year.

ACT ASPIRE GROWTH REPORTS. DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS THAT PARTICIPATED IN ACT ASPIRE ASSESSMENTS (READING, MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE AND WRITING) WITH AN N COUNT.

March 26, 2012 North Scott School Board Presentation.

Freshman Parent Night SKHS Graduation Requirements.

NECAP Presentation for School Year March 26,

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

Participation in Math Class: The Effect on Student Achievement By: Nicolas Millet.

Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.

Student Growth and Performance Update: A Comparison of RttT & Non-RttT Ohio Public School Districts An Overview of Local LEA Data: Nordonia Hills City.

Swampscott Elementary Schools MCAS Results Grade 3 ELA Performance Level Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement

December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.

Report to North Kingstown School Committee October 11, 2011.

Data Review /27/

Student Assessment Results Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Spring Dashboard prepared by Ellis Ott, Ph.D., Research & Accountability.

Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.

North Kingstown School Committee Feb. 29, 2012 MH 2/23/2012.

Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.

Corona-Norco Unified School District Accountability Update RAN Meeting May 15, 2015.

North Kingstown School Committee March 28,  One of multiple measures we use to measure progress. We also use our own benchmark assessments, NWEA,

Lakeview Community Schools NeSA Results

76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income

2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS

Student Growth and Performance Update:

Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016

Presentation transcript:

North Kingstown School Committee March 11, 2014 MH 3/11/2014

 One of multiple measures we use to measure progress. We use formative, interim, and summative assessments. NECAP is considered a summative assessment.  Interpretation of Data:  Different cohorts of students  Longitudinal data for schools  Based on statistical significance MH 3/11/2014

 One of 6 RI public school districts that demonstrated statistically significant gains in both reading and math from 2009 to 2013 Reading: 6% increase Math: 8% increase (difference of % proficient or above between 2009 and 2013) MH 3/11/2014

 Statistically significant gains in both reading and math from 2009 to 2013 READING HES 11% NKHS 9% MATH WMS 9% NKHS 16% (difference of % proficient or above between 2009 and 2013) MH 3/11/2014

 One of 6 RI public school districts that performed significantly higher than the state average in Writing Grade 5: 16% (State 64% NK 80%) Grade 8: 27% (State 56% NK 83%) Grade 11: 9% (State 66% NK 75%) (% Proficiency and above) MH 3/11/2014

 WRITING School/State Differences HES 18% SLES 28% DMS 21% WMS 36% NKHS 9% Statistically significant % proficient MH 3/11/2014

Reading82% 86%87% Math69%71% 75%77% Writing65%67%66%72%79% MH 3/11/2014

% Proficient% Proficient

% Proficient% Proficient

% Proficient% Proficient

 Cohort 5-yr. trend (Gr. 4, 5, 6,7, 8) % Proficient% Proficient MH 3/11/2014

 Maintaining high reading scores NKHS  Different Cohorts of Students % Proficient% Proficient MH 3/11/2014

 Cohort 5-year trend (Gr. 4, 5,6, 7, 8) % Proficient% Proficient MH 3/11/2014

 NKHS 13% gain 7 yr. trend  State: 34% proficiency for grade 11 (same 2012) MH 3/11/2014

Math Difference Low Income54%56% 3% IEP31%22%-9% MH 3/11/2014 % Proficiency and above Reading Difference Low Income67%73% 5% (rounded) IEP43% -1% (rounded)

 4-yr graduation rate 91% (class of 2013)  5-yr graduation rate 90% (class of 2012)  6-yr graduation rate 90% (class of 2011) MH 3/11/ yr graduation rates %88%90%