R. van Weelderen31.05.2007 Overview of the LHC cryogenic system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cryogenic system in P4: Possible options S. Claudet & U. Wagner LHC Workshop, “Chamonix XlV” January 2005 (Mostly for RF & beam scrubbing)
Advertisements

19th – 20th of September 2007Cryogenic Expert Meeting at GSI, Jan Patrick Meier1/11 Cryogenic Experts Meeting at GSI, 2007 The SIS 100 Cryogenic Jumper.
Mar 13, Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) CRYOGENICS Mar 13, 2014.
Cryogenics at CERN (LHC)&Helium Inventory Brief review with emphasis given on cryogen management Americas Workshop on Linear Colliders 2014 Fermilab,
Raffael‘s Sixtinische Madonna in der Galerie Alte Meister in Dresden.
Status of the LHC Project L.Evans - C.Wyss Riunione CSN1 INFN Napoli, 21 Settembre 2005.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
Laurent Tavian Thanks to contribution and helpful discussions with M. Jimenez, V. Parma, F. Bertinelli, J.Ph. Tock, R. van weelderen, S. Claudet, A. Perin,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
LHC Experimental Areas Forum - 03/07/ ATLAS Helium Cryogenics Nicolas Delruelle on behalf of the AT / ECR group.
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
LARP LQX and MQX Magnets Cryogenic Testing at Fermilab’s Industrial Building 1 Roger Rabehl Technical Division/Test & Instrumentation Department.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
LHC Status ReportLHC Status Report Lyn Evans 96 th LHCC meeting, CERN 19 th November 2008.
HC review - 12 May 2005Luigi SERIO - AT/ACR/OP1 SECTOR COOL DOWN AND CRYOGENIC COMMISSIONING L. Serio.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Roberto Than CRYOGENICS SYSTEM.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
Introduction to LHC cryogenic system (layout, architecture) Preparation before cool-down (Purge, flushing) Transient operations to reach nominal operating.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Partikeldagarna, Göteborg 21 September 2007 LHC: Status and Plans Lyn Evans.
05 Novembre 2003Chamonix XIV Workshop, January How to deal with leaks in the QRL and magnet insulation vacuum Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC Germana.
S. Claudet - 31st May 2007Power refrigeration for LHC Power refrigeration at 4.5K & 1.8K for the LHC S. Claudet, CERN AT-ACR.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
L. Serio COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
C.KotnigFCC Design Meeting FCC Beam Screen cooling Claudio Kotnig.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
Luigi Serio CRYOGENICS PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION L. Serio, on behalf of the LHC Cryogenics Operation and Cryogenics Performance Panel.
GLA2011 The cryogenic systems of the LHC experiments Johan Bremer on behalf of TE/CRG, ATLAS collaboration and CMS collaboration.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Heat loads and cryogenics L.Tavian, D. Delikaris CERN, Cryogenics Group, Technology Department Accelerators & Technology Sector Friday, October 15, 20101HE-LHC'10.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
Cryogenics for SuperB IR Magnets J. G. Weisend II SLAC National Accelerator Lab.
Logo area HL LHC IT STRING M. Bajko CERN TE-TM and QXF Review.
Bruno Vullierme Sept LHC-CC09 - 3rd LHC Crab Cavity Workshop Slide 1 CRAB CAVITY INTEGRATION CRYOGENICS INSTALLATION.
Workshop on cryogenic & vacuum sectorisation of the SPL Vacuum Sectorisation Paul Cruikshank, CERN Technology Department (TE) Vacuum Surfaces & Coatings.
The Large Hadron Collider The 19 th Sep 2008 incident [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] NIKHEF Seminar ( )
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
FCC Infrastructure & Operation Update on the cryogenics study Laurent Tavian CERN, TE-CRG 28 October 2015.
NIKHEF Annual Meeting, December 18, The LHC Project Status report to the NIKHEF annual meeting Jos Engelen Based on last week’s reports to CERN.
TDR Cryogenics Parameters Tom Peterson 28 September 2011.
ESS | Helium Distribution | | Torsten Koettig Linac – Helium distribution 1.
FCC Week 2016, Roma Cryogenics overview Laurent Tavian, CERN, ATS-DO On behalf of the FCC cryogenics study collaboration 14 April 2016.
SIS 100 Vacuum chamber Recooler String system Components
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
ILC Cryogenics: Study of Emergency Action and Recovery - in progress -
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
M Chorowski, H Correia Rodrigues, D Delikaris, P Duda, C Haberstroh,
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
Powering the LHC Magnets
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
ILC Cryogenic Systems Draft EDR Plan
How does a cryogenic system cope with e-cloud induced heat load
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
Cryogenic management of the LHC Run 2 dynamic heat loads
Laurent Delprat CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

R. van Weelderen Overview of the LHC cryogenic system

R. van Weelderen Overview  The LHC accelerator layout  Functions, constraints, architecture  Temperature levels  Heat loads  Cooling schemes  Operating modes  Refrigeration plants  Instrumentation  Helium storage and management

R. van Weelderen The LHC accelerator layout The 27 km long LHC main accelerator ring is installed underground at a slope of 1.41 % and at depths ranging from 50 m to 150 m. The accelerator is divided in 8 bending (the ARCs) and 8 straight parts. There are 8 access points in the straight parts, making for stretches of 3.3 km of accelerator needing to be serviced per access point. Four particle physics experiments, ATLAS, CMS, ALICE, LHCb, are installed in points 1, 5, 2, and 8.

R. van Weelderen The LHC accelerator layout The main dipole and quadrupole magnets, providing the guiding fields for the two counter circulating particle beams (red and blue), occupy the ARCs. The straight sections of the machine are for the experiments, particle acceleration, final focusing and defocusing of the beams, beam cleaning, beam injection, and beam dump.

R. van Weelderen Cryogenics: functional requirements  The design of the LHC accelerator is based on 25-km of superconducting magnets, the vast majority operating below 1.9 K and using pressurized superfluid helium as coolant.  The necessity to operate at 1.9 K was given by the high field strength needed and the use of Nb-Ti superconductors, which were the only accelerator grade superconducting cable which could be provided in high quantities.  Only in the long straight sections, with the exception of the inner triplets and the superconducting dipoles D1, the field strength and heat extraction requirements are such that operation at 1.9 K is not necessary. These magnets will have their superconducting windings immersed in a bath of saturated helium at a temperature of 4.5 K.

R. van Weelderen Functional requirements: Critical current density of technical superconductors LHC

R. van Weelderen Cryogenics: functional requirements  The main magnets must be maintained at temperatures below 1.9 K. This cooling requirement applies during both ramping and stored-beam operation. In the case of fast current discharge, the temperature excursion may be larger but must still remain below the helium II/helium I phase transition (lambda line).  Cope with load variations and large dynamic range induced by operation of the accelerator.  Be able to cool down and fill the huge cold mass of the LHC, 37x10 6 kg in a maximum time of 15 days while avoiding thermal gradients in the cryo-magnet structure higher than 75 K. This limit in thermal gradient and time also applies to the forced emptying and warm-up of the machine prior to shutdown periods.  Cope with the resistive transitions of the superconducting magnets while minimizing loss of cryogen and system perturbations.  In addition to these basic operational duties, the LHC cryogenic system should allow for rapid cool-down and warm-up of limited lengths of cryo-magnet strings, e.g. for repairing or exchanging a defective unit.

R. van Weelderen Design constraints: transverse cross-section of the LHC tunnel  Use of LEP tunnel & infrastructure.  The limited number of access points to the underground areas.  The cryogenic headers distributing the cooling power along a machine sector as well as all remaining active cryogenic components in the tunnel are contained in a compound cryogenic distribution line (QRL). The QRL runs alongside the cryo-magnet strings in the tunnel and feeds each m- long lattice cell in parallel via a jumper connection.

R. van Weelderen General architecture: general layout of the cryogenic system Five cryogenic "islands" at access points 1.8, 2, 4, 6 and 8 where all refrigeration and ancillary equipment is concentrated. Each cryogenic island houses one or two refrigeration plants that feed one or two adjacent tunnel sectors, requiring distribution and recovery of the cooling fluids over distances of 3.3 km underground. Equipment at ground level includes electrical substation, warm compressor station (QCS_A,B,C), cryogen storage (helium and liquid nitrogen), cooling towers, cold-boxes (QSR_A,B) Underground are the lower cold-boxes (QURA), 1.8 K refrigeration unit boxes (QURC), interconnecting lines, and interconnection boxes (QUI_A,B,C).

R. van Weelderen General architecture: above ground Warm compressor station Gaseous helium storage Liquid Nitrogen storage

R. van Weelderen General architecture: above ground 4.5 K cold boxes Pit lines

R. van Weelderen General architecture: underground Cryogenic interconnection boxcold compressor elements QRL (no magnets attached yet)ARC magnets

R. van Weelderen General architecture: general layout of the cryogenic system

R. van Weelderen Temperature levels

R. van Weelderen Temperature levels

R. van Weelderen Temperature levels To minimize the cost of refrigeration the thermal design of the LHC cryogenic components aims at intercepting the largest fraction of applied heat loads at the highest temperature possible, hence the multiple, staged temperature levels in the system:  50 K to 75 K for thermal shield as a first major heat intercept, sheltering the cold mass from the bulk of heat in-leaks from ambient.  4.6 K to 20 K for lower temperature heat interception and for the cooling of the beam screens which protect the magnet cold bore from beam- induced loads.  1.9 K quasi-isothermal superfluid helium for cooling the magnet cold mass.  4 K at very low pressure (VLP) for transporting the superheated helium flow coming from the distributed 1.8 K heat exchanger tubes across the sector length to the 1.8 K refrigeration units.  4.5 K normal saturated helium for cooling special superconducting magnets in insertion regions, superconducting acceleration cavities, and the lower sections of high temperature superconductor (HTS) current leads.  20 K to 300 K cooling for the resistive upper sections of HTS current leads.

R. van Weelderen Temperature levels

R. van Weelderen Cooling schemes: 1.9 K principle

R. van Weelderen Cooling schemes: ARC and dispersion suppressor

R. van Weelderen Heat loads: sources  Static due to heat from ambient (cryostat design)  Resistive heating due to non-superconducting sections of magnet circuits  Beam-induced heat loads which are deposited in the cryo-magnets through several processes and by the circulating and colliding proton beams themselves. They depend strongly on the energy, the bunch intensity, number and length of the circulating bunches as well as on the luminosity in collision  Transient due to eddy currents when ramping the magnetic fields up and down

R. van Weelderen Heat loads: static  Typical magnet-side static heat in-leaks are: T-level50-75 K [W] K [W] 4.5 K LHe [W] 1.9 K LHe [W] K [g/s] Cell (107 m) ARC (23 cells) /2-Straight Section , 313 at Point 4 (RF) 409

R. van Weelderen Heat loads: static  Typical distribution-side static heat in-leaks are: T-level50-75 K [W] K [W] 4.5 K LHe [W] 1.9 K LHe [W] K [g/s] Sector: QRL Sector: interconnec tion boxes and transfer lines

R. van Weelderen Heat loads: beam-induced  Typical (nominal/ultimate) magnet-side beam induced heat in-leaks are: T-level K [W] 4.5 K LHe [W] 1.9 K LHe [W] Cell (107 m) 169/ /9-14 ARC (23 cells) 3880/ /284 DS320/910-40/100 Straight: Low- luminosity 40/1006/1240/95 Straight: High- luminosity 45/12010/22193/440 Straight: RF31/87214/5292/2

R. van Weelderen Refrigeration plants  Installed refrigeration capacity in the LHC sectors  The 4.5 K refrigerators and 1.8 K cold compressor units will be addressed in the talk by S. Claudet

R. van Weelderen Cooling schemes: sub-sectorization  To avoid parts of the cold mass going sub-atmospheric due to hydrostatic head (1.41 % tunnel slope), the cold mass volume within a sector has been sub-sectorised by adding hydraulic restrictions every two or three cells  The cryogenic vacuum is also sub-sectorised in order to limit the extent of a degraded vacuum zone created by a possible helium leak of the internal circuit. On the cryo-magnet side, every two cells. On the cryogenic distribution line side, every four cells. The jumper connection between QRL and magnet cryostats always contains a vacuum barrier.

R. van Weelderen Cooling schemes: Matching sector and special equipment  The special magnets of the matching section, which do not require cooling at 1.9 K for field strength and heat extraction, operate in baths of saturated helium I at 4.5 K.  The inner-triplet quadrupoles in the insertion regions are subject to dynamic heating from secondaries of up to 10 W/m at each of the high luminosity insertions 1 and 5 and up to about 2 W/m at the low luminosity insertions 2 and 8 from the particle interactions. Although this represents a much higher heat load than the magnets in the arc and DS receive, they can be cooled by a scheme similar to the standard cell.

R. van Weelderen Cooling schemes: special equipment  The electrical distribution feed boxes which are the equipments interfacing the room-temperature powering and the superconducting magnet busbars, as well as the RF cavities are low design pressure equipment (0.35 MPa for the DFBs and 0.25 MPa for the RF cavities) connected to high design pressure (2 MPa) equipment and cryogen supplies. This peculiarity has specific consequences for their cryogenic implementation. Electrical current feed box, housing HTS current leads RF cavities

R. van Weelderen Cooling schemes: electrical distribution feed boxes Lower parts of current leads in pool boiling helium with dedicated feed at 20 K, exit at room temperature, hydraulic plugs between feed boxes and magnets.

R. van Weelderen Operating modes  Steady state -Nominal: 7 TeV beam energy, 2×0.582 A beam current and cm -2 s -1 luminosity -Ultimate: 7 TeV beam energy, 2 × 0.86 A beam current and 2.5x10 34 cm -2 s -1 luminosity -Low beam intensity: full beam energy but low beam-induced heat loads -Injection standby: negligible resistive dissipation and beam-induced heat loads in the magnets.

R. van Weelderen Operating modes  Four transient modes are considered (see talk by L. Serio, CERN): -cool-down from 300 K to 4.5 K (the aim is to cool down the cold mass of a LHC sector in a maximum time of 15 days), -magnet filling and cool-down from 4.5 K to 1.9 K, -resistive transition (see spot by M. Chorowski, WUT) -warm-up from 4.5 K to 300 K (the aim is to warm-up the huge cold mass of a sector in a maximum time of 15 days).

R. van Weelderen Instrumentation and process control  The cryogenic operation of the LHC requires a large number of sensors, electronic conditioning units and actuators, most of which are located inside the machine tunnel and must therefore withstand the radiation environment.  The instrumentation issues and process control will be specifically addressed in the talk by J. Casas-Cubillos.

R. van Weelderen Cryogen storage and management: helium inventory  Helium is mainly contained in the magnet cold masses which require a minimum filling ratio of 15 l/m of superfluid helium for enthalpy buffering (measured cold masses filling ratio is about 26 l/m) and in the header C of the cryogenic distribution line.  The total helium inventory of the whole machine is about 96 × 10 3 kg. To limit costs and reduce the environmental impact, it was decided to provide gas storage for only half of the inventory.

R. van Weelderen Cryogen storage and management: helium inventory  The gaseous helium is stored at a maximum working pressure of 2 MPa (20 bar) and ambient temperature.  At each point, four 250 m3 vessels are used as buffer in case of resistive transition of multiple magnets during operation.  The remaining vessels will be used as make-up gas storage for the cryogenic system.  A helium line interconnecting the different storage areas will is installed in the tunnel and the access shafts  "Virtual" or liquid storage As the gas management allows storing only half of the inventory, during winter shutdown the excess (50 tonnes or about litres of liquid helium) has to be either “virtually” recovered by a gas distributor or stored in liquid state in a central storage.

R. van Weelderen Conclusions  Largest distributed superfluid helium system in the world is on its way to become operational and to function according to design!