HIGH POWER TARGET DEVELOPMENT AT FERMILAB Accelerator Sector Planning and Strategy Workshop P. Hurh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WG1: High Power Targets PASI 2013 Working Group Sessions Introduction Convened by: Dr. C. Densham (STFC/RAL), Mr. P. Hurh (FNAL)
Advertisements

AP-0 Target Hall Experience Fermilab Anti-Proton Source P. Hurh ( ) Mechanical Support Dept. Fermilab Anti-Proton Source P. Hurh ( ) Mechanical.
U.S. Department of Energy Brookhaven Science Associates BNL’s Role in High Energy Physics Thomas B.W. Kirk Associate Director for High Energy and Nuclear.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
LBNE Target R&D/Conceptual Design Activities and Opportunities Path to a 2 MW LBNE Target P. Hurh 9/9/09 Updated 10/14/09.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
FNAL Target Related Capabilities PASI 2013 Working Group 1 P. Hurh (FNAL)
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.
Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.
SNuMI 1 Outline Action Items PP2 Progress [Nancy/Elaine] –Org Chart Update –FY07 Budget/Plans Discussion –FY08 Summer Shutdown –Overall cost Reduction.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
Commodity Node Procurement Process Task Force: Status Stephen Wolbers Run 2 Computing Review September 13, 2005.
Challenges & Issues for SBNE Nigel S. Lockyer 4/4/14.
RaDIATE October Technical MeetingOctober BLIP Irradiation Planning Radiation Damage In Accelerator Target Environments.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Overlap of Project X and Beamline to DUSEL June 2, 2008.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
The CNGS Target Station By L.Bruno, S.Péraire, P.Sala SL/BT Targets & Dumps Section.
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
RaDIATE Meeting September /22/13P. Hurh RaDIATE July 2013 Meeting 1.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
Management February 20, Annual Review of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) Subcommittee members: Ron Prwivo, Ron Lutha, and Jim Kerby.
Fermilab: Present and Future Young-Kee Kim Data Preservation Workshop May 16, 2011.
RaDIATE Meeting February /20/13P. Hurh RaDIATE February 2013 Meeting 1.
Budget Outlook Glen Crawford P5 Meeting Sep
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
HLTC 28 th June Aim and expected results The aim of the workshop was: To create a CERN wide survey of all needs in the mentioned domain To collect.
EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe Introduction Aims Structure Tasks Link to other activities Future dates.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
HIGH POWER TARGETS AND MACHINE/DETECTOR INTERFACE WORKING GROUP SUMMARY REPORT PASI 2012 Workshop, 1/14/12 Co-conveners: C. Densham, P. Hurh, J. Thomas,
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Beamline optimization schedule Vaia Papadimitriou LBNF Beamline Manager Accelerator and Beam Interface Group Meeting.
DETECTOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fred Borcherding 1.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM physics with a μ storage ring.
Fermilab: Introduction Young-Kee Kim DOE KA12 (Electron Research)Review June 22-23, 2010.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
HPT & M/D I WG DISCUSSION SLIDES PASI 2012 Hurh et al.
1 Target Introduction Chris Densham STFC/RAL Mu2e Target, Remote Handling, and Heat & Radiation Shield Review Nov
Fermilab Budget Briefing FY 2014 Intensity Frontier Proton Research KA Breakout February 28, 2013 Office of High Energy Physics Germantown, MD.
Accelerator Division View Sergei Nagaitsev DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
1 Sam Childress. 2 S. Childress NNN11 Existing Fermilab Neutrino Beams 120 GeV NuMI 8 GeV BNB 2 J. Strait.
Steve Holmes DNP Meeting/Santa Fe November 6, 2010 Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab.
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
Jefferson Lab Overview
LHC Science Goals & Objectives
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Materials for extreme thermal management (PowerMat)
Beam Window Studies for Superbeams
Joint Meeting SPS Upgrade Study Group and SPS Task Force
The LARP Collimation Program
nuSTORM and the Physics Beyond Colliders workshop
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
NSS integrated installation plan workshop Introduction
Presentation transcript:

HIGH POWER TARGET DEVELOPMENT AT FERMILAB Accelerator Sector Planning and Strategy Workshop P. Hurh

Introduction- Where we are  AD/MS and Pbar and Ext. Beams operates 3 target facilities:  P-bar Source (off) – 70 kW proton beam on inconel (nickel alloy) target with Be cover (110 kW/mm 2 )  NuMI/MINOS – 400 kW proton beam on graphite (carbon) target (14 kW/mm 2 )  MiniBooNE – 32 kW proton beam on beryllium target (1 kW/mm 2 ) Note: Values in red refer to total beam power divided by nominal 3 sigma spot size

Introduction- What we are working on  Currently have resources working on:  ANU/NOvA upgrade kW proton beam on graphite (carbon) target (15 kW/mm 2 )  LBNE kW proton beam on graphite (beryllium?) target (15 kW/mm 2 )  LBNE upgrade – 2.3 MW proton beam on graphite (beryllium?) target (36 kW/mm 2 )  Mu2e – 25 kW-8 GeV (maybe lower now) proton beam on gold (tungsten?) target (1 kW/mm 2 )  G-2 – 27 kW-8 GeV proton beam on inconel target (??) Note: Values in red refer to total beam power divided by nominal 3 sigma spot size

Introduction – Current Issues  Design Challenges  Heat removal  Thermal Shock (Stress Waves)  Radiation Damage  Radiation Accelerated Corrosion  Spatial Constraints  Residual Radiation  Manufacturing techniques  Physics Optimization  Not just targets, but entire target systems (beam windows, collection optics, absorber, decay pipe, etc.)

Introduction – Current Issues  Operational/Infrastructure Challenges  Operational crises divert scarce resources from R&D and future projects  Reliance on Single Source Vendors  Radiological Issues Shielding Air Activation Tritium Remote handling and long term storage requirements Current long term storage filled after 3-4 years of NOvA Not just targets, but whole facility design

Introduction – Current Issues  Organizational Challenges  Resources spread among different organizations with diffuse accountability and competing responsibilities  Projects only fund specific R&D efforts, not fundamental, general R&D efforts that benefit all  Success at the High Intensity Frontier requires success at High Power Target Facilities

Strategy – Ultimate Goal (10 year)  Support all target facility needs in the Project X era  LBNE at 2.4 MW  Muon Experimental Facility at 1 MW  Kaon Experimental Facility at 1 MW  Nuclear Experimental Facility at 1 MW  Be poised to embark on informed design of the next large machine (Nu Factory/Muon Collider)

Strategy – Near Term Goals (1-3 yrs)  Remote Handling and Long Term Radioactive Component Storage  Commission C-0 Remote Handling Facility  Begin construction of LT RC Storage Facility  Continue radiation damage materials testing  Finish current data analysis of LBNE graphite testing  Start irradiation of 2 nd generation candidate materials  Single pulse failure testing of target materials at a suitable facility (GSI, AP-0, CERN) Note: Not including Project CD milestones

Strategy – Near Term Goals (1-3 yrs)  Organizational  Create HPT team or department  Tap into global HPT community to form R&D collaboration  Establish network of vendors (incl labs and universities) to design/build high quality target facility components  Fully understand Project X era experiment target requirements Note: Not including Project CD milestones

Project X era target requirements (?) EnergyPowerTarget materialPower (in target)SigmaPower/3sigma BeamlineGeVkW mmkW/mm^2 Neutrino (LBNE) graphite (Be?) Muon (Ring)31000tungsten?? Muon (CRFI)31000tungsten?? Kaon (Chrg/Ntrl)31000carbon?? Nuclear11000Thorium?? Irradiation11000Various ADSR11000Lead-Bismuth Eutectic Spill lengthBunchesP per BunchP per spillBunch lengthBunch spacingSpill spacing usec###nsec sec Neutrino (LBNE) E E Muon (Ring)?? 1.90E+08?? E-06 Muon (CRFI)?? 1.90E+08?? E-06 Kaon (Chrg/Ntrl)?? 1.90E+08?? E-06 Nuclear?? 1.90E+08?? E-06 Irradiation?? 1.90E+08?? E-06 ADSR?? 1.90E+08?? E-06

Strategy – Mid-term Goals (4-7 yrs)  PoT (protons on target) goals for operating target facilities  Complete conceptual design of Project X era target facilities  Continue radiation damage and single pulse failure testing of candidate target/window materials  Commission new Long Term Radioactive Component Storage Facility  Continue to build, fill in the HPT group with needed personnel Note: Not including Project CD milestones

Strategy – Long Term Goals (8-10 yrs)  Complete detailed design and begin construction of Project X era target facilities  PoT goals of operating target facilities  Continue to contribute to the global HPT community by establishing a sustained HPT R&D program including:  Irradiation Testing (Nuclear facility)  Single Pulse Failure Testing  Simulation and Analysis  Exploring novel target technologies and their applications Note: Not including Project CD milestones

Strategy – Overall Plan  Recent “white paper” on Target Support at the Intensity Frontier presents, in detail, the overall plan  Lacks implementation schedule, but instead identifies the organization that needs to be in place over the next 5-10 years  Reviewed by Target experts from ORNL, RAL, and CERN

 Scope  Operational Support NuMI/NOvA (700 kW) LBNE (700 kW) Mu2e G-2 MiniBooNE  Future Target Facility R&D LBNE (2.4 MW) Project X era facilities (Kaon, Muon, Nuclear) Muon Collider/NuFact LHC Collimators

 Capabilities Required  Leadership  Mechanical Design  Multi-Physics Analysis  Physics Simulation  Material Science  Fabrication & Assembly  Pulsed Power Engineering  Cooling Utilities  Remote Handling  Alignment and Metrology  Health Physics  Instrumentation Note: Text in red denotes areas of great need

Red indicates roles could be “matrixed” from other organizations

 74 FTE required for full support  Approximately twice what we have currently  Probably a low estimate depending upon Project X era target facilities requirements

 Current Facilities  MI-8  C-0 RHF  TSB  AP-0  MI-65  Additional Req’d Facilities  LT Radioactive Component Storage  Assembly and Test Area  Radioactive Work Cell  Offices Note: Does not include actual experimental target facilities

Note: Only includes General Target R&D M&S costs (not labor, experiment/project and/or facility M&S costs) Expense Description Year-One Costs (K$) Out-Year Costs (K$) Thermal Shock Testing 5030 Irradiation Testing10050 Remote Handling Concepts 30 Material Studies5030 Analysis (software & computing) Travel75 Professional Development 50 Test Stand Development 5020 Specialized Tools (LDV, etc) 5030 Totals765390

Strategy - Barriers  Budget  Not enough to fund from projects alone  People  Need more in specific areas  Can’t do this alone: Need to extend/expand current collaborative activities  R&D/Remote Handling gets pushed “off-project”  Fine, in theory, but rarely gets addressed appropriately once off the radar

Near Term Plan – FY 12 Activities, Deliverables (D), Metrics (M)  Project/Operations related  Mu2e CD-1 (D: CDR, M: Approval)  G-2 CD-1 (D: CDR, M: Approval)  LBNE CD-1 (D: CDR, M: Approval)  NOvA upgrade construction/installation  Complete NuMI/MINOS/MINERvA runs (D/M: PoT goals)  Continue MiniBooNE running (D/M: PoT goals)  R&D related (LBNE currently funding)  Complete BLIP graphite irradiation test data analysis (D: Final Report)  Begin Be 2.4 MW target conceptual design study (D: Accord in place)  Be single pulse testing plan (NOvA, GSI?)

Near Term Plan – FY 12 Activities, Deliverables, Metrics  Infrastructure/Organization related  Project X era target facilities requirements report (D: Report, M: Review)  LT Radioactive Storage Task Force Recommendation (D: Report)  MOU with STFC in place (with work packages for collaboration identified) (Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation Workshop, January, 2012) (D: MOU)  Identify collaborators with material science experience for material characterization (ANL?, LANL?, GSI?)

Near Term Plan – FY 13/14 Activities  Project/Operational related  Mu2e CD-2/3?  G-2 CD-2/3?  LBNE CD-2  NOvA CD-4  Project X era experiments CD-0/1??  NOvA (and MiniBooNE) operations

Near Term Plan – FY 13/14 Activities  R&D related  Finish LBNE 2.4 MW Be target conceptual design study  Finish Be single pulse failure testing(?)  Any required Project X era HPT R&D (may be quite a lot)  Infrastructure/Organizational related  Construction of LT Rad Storage Facility  HPT Support organization established

Resources  Near Term  Project and operational activities utilize almost all available resources  Leaves few resources to accomplish R&D and Infrastructure/Organization activities  Some minor progress in R&D and Infrastructure/Organizational activities by myself and collaborators (RAL, BNL, ORNL), but need at least 4-5 FTE more to achieve FY12-14 goals listed  Long Term  White Paper indicates FTE needed to achieve 10 year goals (plus additional facilities and infrastructure)

Risks  Technical Risks  Could be many of these depending upon Project X era target facilities requirements  See list of engineering challenges PLUS: ADSR – spent fuel on site? Increased radiological release? Approaching “Nuclear Facility”  Scope, and Schedule Risks  Largely related to lack of available, knowledgeable resources and lack of “generic” HPT R&D funding  Visibility of HPT challenges appears to be lower than appropriate at FNAL (talk to SNS, CERN, and PSI)  HPT facility requirements need to be determined and “vetted” ASAP to determine HPT R&D work in near future.

Motivation!