Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Crash Cushion and Guardrail Approach Terminal In-Service Performance Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M.A.S.H.: The New Safety Hardware Crash Testing Criteria
Advertisements

Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Baton Rouge, LA June 16, 2011 Terri Monaghan, P.E. Highway Safety Manager Louisiana Department of Transportation &
Kronos Overview Go-Live Date June 17, Why are we implementing Kronos? Current Process: – Sign in / out on paper – Fill out AU-15 turn into supervisor.
Severe Winter Weather Warning and Preparedness 2014 Meg Pirkle, P.E., Director of Operations Georgia Department of Transportation.
Joe Turner, PE Disaster Recovery Engineer. DIVISIONS AND DISTRICTS.
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Managing Non-Traditional Asset Classes Managing Non-Traditional Asset Classes SHA’s Perspective Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Transportation Working Group ITS Experts Group Chicago, Illinois September 2002 Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office of.
Green Light-Go Program Pennsylvania’s Municipal Signal Partnership Program April 7, 2015 Daniel Farley Chief, Traffic Signal and Arterial Management Section.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
Mobile Technology Changing the Business of Road Maintenance Chris McCurry Senior Information Resource Consultant.
SIGN MANAGEMENT UPDATE Tracy Nowaczyk Pavement Management and Operations Section Engineer Meeting Fall 2013.
Badger TraCS – A Coordinated Effort
Workforce Management System presented by Crystal Woods, Human Resources Division Head Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.
Data Technology Project. Our Purpose “ To functionally support and complete a COMPSTAT approach by interoperable data sharing using a common standard.
Collision Recording And Sharing System (CRASH)
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
Old Policy – which no one ever seem to have heard of.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
Proposed DriveCam ® Program Board of County Commissioners November 13, 2007.
Advancing Public Safety Through Technology Integration Advancing Public Safety Through Technology Integration National Model Scanning Tour May 7, 2003.
Jeff Shelley, P.E. Project Delivery Team Leader FHWA, Alabama Division 9500 Wynlakes Place Montgomery, AL (334) Fax: (334) Mail.
Florida Transportation Commission TEAMFL January 21, 2011 Stephen Reich, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida.
How Mobile Technologies Impact the Transportation Workforce TRB ABG20 (July 1, 2015) Michigan Department of Transportation Mark Chaput, P.E. Deputy Director,
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
1 Approaches for Integrating Systems Engineering into Your Agency’s Business Practices Presented by: Amy Tang McElwain August 2, 2007 Talking Technology.
Mark Nelson, Program Manager for Statewide Planning and Data Analysis TRB International Partnership Meeting January 14, 2015.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THIRD PARTY DAMAGES Rudy Powell, P.E., State Construction Engineer 2014 FTBA.
Keeping You Moving. Work Zones Original Maintenance of Traffic.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development Executing the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Research Program: Enabling Technology September 25, 2013 Deborah.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Bureau of Federal Educational Programs Updates _________________________________.
Florida Traffic Incident Management Performance Measures Paul Clark – Florida DOT Traffic Incident Management and Road Ranger Program Manager.
Orange County Traffic Signal System Consolidation of Services Study Commission Meeting September 8, 2005.
The New World of Data Information Exchange Can It Work For Massachusetts? Dave Krasnow e.
Connected Vehicles Workforce FHWA Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
1 Transportation Systems Management & Operations A New Paradigm for the 21 st Century Transportation Department Group 3 3 Notches Above the Rest.
Office of State Fire Marshal Oregon State Police Creating Opportunities For Improvement In Preparedness And Response Community Capability Assessment.
TraCS National Model Overview T3 Webinar Thursday, June 12, 2014 David Meyers Program Manager for Traffic and Criminal Software (TraCS) Program Iowa Department.
SADES DOT Legislative DPWRPC’sDESDOS Technology Transfer Center Hardware Software Training Tech Support Forecasting QA/QC Backup Pedestrian Culverts Roads.
Bay County’s Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Keith C. Bryant, P.E., PTOE Public Works Director Bay County, FL 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYMPOSIUM November.
Clay Packard, PE ITS GC Software Project Manager Florida Department of Transportation WAZE – FDOT Integration.
Using GPS To Locate Collisions Lessons Learned Division of Traffic Accident Surveillance Section.
1 Florida Department of Transportation ITS Performance Measures Breakout Session 2 – Elizabeth Birriel, P.E.
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AVIATION | CIVIL | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | DATA SYSTEMS | ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING | GEOSPATIAL.
December 16, :00 – 2:45. MPM Team Agenda 1.Review of MPM Program and Team 2.Consensus items document 3. Upcoming activities 4. Discussion.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Towards Zero Copies Brian Alconcel, P.E. Chief, Office of Highway System Information & Performance CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - CALTRANS.
1 U.S. Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office CASE STUDY #3 INTEGRATING THIRD PARTY CROWDSOURCED DATA Elizabeth Birriel, Florida DOT.
Joe Horton, P.E., Chief Office of Safety Innovation and Cooperative Research, Division of Research, Innovation and System Information FHWA/AASHTO TAM Webinar.
April 4, 2011 ITE Technical Conference Lake Buena Vista, Fl Implementation of AASHTO’s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Update from the.
EMIS Update: State Board of Education January 11, 2016.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM.
Michael Soto Program Resources Administrator Office of Maintenance.
Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Sponsorship Program Rudy Powell, P.E., Director, Office of Maintenance FDOT Maintenance Conference May 2016.
Future of Roadway Characteristics Inventory (RCI) Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Kirk Hutchison Office of Maintenance.
ODOT Culvert Inventory & Inspection Program. Ohio defines a bridge as any structure with span or diameter equal to or greater than 10 feet as measured.
CONTRACT AWARD TO ALTA PLANNING AND DESIGN FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO CONDUCT SAFETY OUTREACH AND UPDATE THE SUGGESTED ROUTES TO SCHOOL MAPS FOR THE SAFER.
Florida Citation Inventory System and Improvements to Citation / Adjudication Data 4/11/2016 4/11/2016.
DATA COLLECTION, MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS
Florida Transportation Commission FY 2009
Presented to the Project Certification Committee on November 16, 2011.
Focus State Initiative: TIM Performance Measures
NM Department of Public Safety
Executive Sponsor: Tom Church, Cabinet Secretary
Presentation transcript:

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Crash Cushion and Guardrail Approach Terminal In-Service Performance Evaluation (ISPE) Rudy Powell, P.E., Director, Office of Maintenance FDOT Maintenance Conference May 2016 Orlando, FL

Road Map What are In-Service Performance Evaluations (ISPE)? Why perform ISPEs? How will ISPEs be performed? How will the data be collected? What is E-Maintenance? In-Service Performance Evaluations

In-Service Performance Evaluations are the gathering and evaluation of data to assess the safety performance of crash cushions and guardrail approach terminals that have been installed on roads. These evaluations will be performed thru the joint efforts of the Safety, Design, Traffic Operations, Program Management, and Maintenance Offices. What are ISPEs?

On September 11, 2015, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) released the findings of the FHWA-AASHTO Joint Task Force in a report titled, “Report from Joint AASHTO-FHWA Task Force on Guardrail Terminal Crash Analysis.” One of the recommendations in the findings was to conduct in- service performance evaluations of guardrail approach terminals that have been installed on roads. Based on this recommendation, the Department will move forward with performing in-service performance evaluations. Why perform ISPEs?

In-Service Performance Evaluations consist of three phases. Phase 1. Collection of Inventory Data. Phase 2. Collection of Incident Data. Phase 3. Evaluation of Data. In-Service Performance Evaluations are the gathering and evaluation of data to assess the safety performance of crash cushions and guardrail approach terminals that have been installed on roads. How will ISPEs be performed?

Approach terminals. Collected by in-house or contract maintenance forces as part of the guardrail inspection performed every two years. Crash Cushions. Collected by in-house or contract maintenance forces as part of the crash cushion inspections performed every year. Inventory data is type (manufacturer, make, model), location, and photos. Training is planned for October Implementation is planned for January 1, Phase 1- Inventory Data

Collected by in-house or contract maintenance forces. If an incident occurs within the limits of a Traffic Monitoring Center (TMC), the TMC will determine if a guardrail approach terminal or crash cushion is impacted and if so, notify the appropriate maintenance office contacts. If an incident occurs outside the limits of a TMC, law enforcement will notify the appropriate maintenance office contacts and the maintenance office will determine if a guardrail approach terminal or crash cushion is impacted. Phase 2- Incident Data

Maintenance forces will collect the data, ideally, before the vehicles involved in the incident are removed from the site, but at least prior to repair or replacement of the end terminal or crash cushion. Incident data is crash report information plus addition data (over/ under/ through, location of impact, and photos). Training is planned for October Implementation is planned for January 1, Phase 2- Incident Data (continued)

Phase 3 is the evaluation of the data collected from Phase 1 and Phase 2. Evaluation will be performed by a third party such as a university or research facility and is not anticipated to start for several years. Phase 3- Evaluation of Data

In-Service Performance Evaluations consists of three phases. Phase 1. Collection of Inventory Data. Phase 2. Collection of Incident Data. Phase 3. Evaluation of Data. In-Service Performance Evaluations are the gathering and evaluation of data to assess the safety performance of crash cushions and guardrail approach terminals that have been installed on roads. How will ISPEs be performed? Maintenance Third Party- University

A Guardrail Approach Terminal and Crash Cushion In- Service Performance Evaluation Statewide Maintenance Task Team has been formed to discuss and finalize the implementation details. These individuals are working within their district and will be the face of ISPEs in their district. These individuals will participate in training hosted by the Roadway Design and Product Evaluation Offices and take that information and knowledge back to each district. Statewide Maintenance Task Team

Statewide Task Team DistrictIn-Service Performance Evaluation CORudy Powell COKirk Hutchison COKristin McCrary CODale Cook/ Tim Allen 1Paul Barnes 2Paul Grochowski 3Windle Tharp 4Zachary Taylor 5Barry Hallman 6David Calhoun 7Pedro Lopez TPTrevor Colley

How will this Data be collected? Option 1Option 2 Clipboards Paper Forms Pens and Pencils Camera Enter data into a database Mobile Devices- tablets or smart phones Electronic Forms Statewide reportable database E-Maintenance!

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION E-Maintenance Rudy Powell, P.E., Director, Office of Maintenance FDOT Maintenance Conference May 2016 Orlando, FL

E-Maintenance is the use of mobile devices coupled with software applications as tools to perform maintenance work in a more efficient, streamlined manner; in a paperless, cloud environment; and with statewide data reporting capabilities. E-Maintenance

E-Maintenance consists of two phases. Phase 1. Inventory, inspection, and evaluation. – Roadway Characteristics Inventory (RCI). – Sign, guardrail, and crash cushion inspections. – Rest Area Inspections. – Maintenance Rating Program (MRP). Phase 2. Contract administration. E-Maintenance The focus is currently Phase 1.

Phase 1- Inventory, Inspection, and Evaluation This work is currently performed using clipboards, standard paper forms, and pencils. Subsequent work is then necessary to file the standard form as a hardcopy; scan and file the standard form as an electronic file; and hard code the data written on the form into a database with limited statewide reporting capabilities. E-Maintenance Phase 1 is the use of mobile devices with GPS and camera capabilities, electronic forms which are app based portals to enter data in real time, and creation of a statewide reportable database. E-Maintenance The focus is In-Service Performance Evaluations

A Statewide E-Maintenance Task Team has been formed to establish direction, details, and implementation. These individuals are working within their district and will be the face of E-Maintenance in their district. Mobile Devices. Tablets or smartphones. Front End Mobile Application. Software development and support of electronic forms as mobile apps to allow electronic forms to be populated and at the same time allow the data to be uploaded in real time to a database. Back End Database. Data is searchable, retrievable, and reportable. Funding and budget. A possible grant thru FHWA is being reviewed for E-Operations. E- Maintenance

DistrictE-Maintenance CORudy Powell COKirk Hutchison COMike Soto COFred Noble 1 Melody Joyner/ Erik Padron 2Barbara Brannon 3Jeff Barbee 4Lloyd McPherson 5Raul Artuz 6Bryan Holm 7Pedro Lopez TPTrevor Colley

Summary In-Service Performance Evaluations Gathering and evaluation of data to assess the safety performance. Phase 1. Collection of Inventory Data. Phase 2. Collection of Incident Data. Phase 3. Evaluation of Data. Joint effort between Traffic Operations, Design, Safety, Program Management, and Maintenance Offices. Statewide maintenance task team. E-Maintenance Mobile devices, front end apps, back end reportable statewide database. Phase 1. Inventory, inspection, and evaluation. Phase 2. Contract administration. Statewide maintenance task team. ISPEs and E-Maintenance

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Questions/ Comments? For more information contact: Rudy Powell, P.E. Director, Office of Maintenance Florida Department of Transportation (850)