CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
Advertisements

Worst 20% Hazes Across the Country Based on IMPROVE Speciation Data by Marc Pitchford August 2001.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
CALIFORNIA CASE STUDIES WRAP Implementation Working Group Meeting San Diego, California ♦ April 17-19, 2007.
Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Case Study: Using the AoH Report for a Preliminary Look at Glacier National Park Trista Glazier March 2005 WRAP Implementation Workgroup Meeting San Francisco,
1 BART in California WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum November 15-16, 2006 Tempe, Arizona Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Brief Description of CALPUFF Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
Projects:/WRAP RMC/309_SIP/progress_sep02/Annex_MTF_Sep20.ppt Preliminary Mobile Source Significance Test Modeling Results WRAP Regional Modeling Center.
Reasonable Progress Demonstration Case Study (Dec 7, 2006) Analysis done for Dec 7, 2006 WRAP IWG meeting Starkey (STAR1) monitoring site in northeast.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
REGIONAL HAZE Progress Report IASC Meeting Clovis, California ♦ April 1-2, 2008 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Preliminary Evaluation of Data for Reasonable Progress Montana RH FIP Laurel Dygowski, EPA Region 8 IWG Meeting – April 2007.
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Projection of Visibility Changes and Modeling Sensitivity Analysis.
§309 Technical Support Document “Table of Contents” First Draft Tom Moore WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
Regional Haze Rule Promulgated in 1999 Requires states to set RPGs based on 4 statutory factors and consideration of a URP URP = 20% reduction in manmade.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
2018 Emission Reductions from the Base 18b Emission Inventory Lee Gribovicz Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, California February 22-23, 2007.
Regional Haze SIP Long-term Strategies Implementation Work Group Meeting August 30, 2007 ~ Denver, CO Corky Martinkovic, Air Quality Division Arizona Department.
Reasonable Progress Demonstration Case Study for Saguaro Wilderness Area Arizona Regional Haze Stakeholder Meeting January 22, 2007.
2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.
Regional Haze Rule Promulgated in 1999 Requires states to set RPGs based on 4 statutory factors and consideration of a URP URP = 20% reduction in manmade.
Progress on Technical Work to Support Haze SIPs Planning and Policy Group Colorado APCD October 11, 2007.
Summary of WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
State Regional Haze SIP Development Critical Path for Western States.
Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,
Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Review upcoming Teach-Ins and participation in WRAP Regional Haze Planning Work Group - Jay Baker and Tina Suarez-Murias.
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Species Specific Reasonable Progress Analysis
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Sources of Haze - North Cascades and Mt. Rainier National Parks
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Implementation Workgroup April 19, 2007
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006

HIGHLIGHTS Federal Land Managers IMPROVE BART Interstate Consultation Interstate Transport Reasonable Progress

FEDERAL LAND MANAGERS Intra-State Consultation Bi-Annual Meetings Regional Haze Teach-In

IMPROVE MONITORING Match Air Basins Similar Elevations Reasonable Distance Future Growth and Land Use Research Value Rank Importance

BART-eligible FACILITIES Possibly 30 facilities outside the SJV and SC Sixteen BART categories RACT and rule stringency Q/D elimination, then Subject-to-BART modeling Title V permits TPY reductions minimal

FAR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA REDWOODS Coastal Avg. Worst dv TRINITY Remote Forest Coast Range (lee) Avg. Worst dv LAVA BEDS Inland Plain Avg. Worst dv Species Analysis –Haze Drivers –Seasonality –Concentration –Extinction Geography –Terrain –Meteorology –Regional vs. Local –Proximity to eight Class 1 Areas concentrationextinction LASSEN VOLCANIC Western Base of Mountain Avg. Worst dv

FAR NORTHERN ISSUES Surrounding Land Use - Natural - Anthropogenic - Transport (Pacific, OR, WA, NV, Asia) Long-Term Strategy – Smoke Management – On/Off Road Mobile Species Reductions –Nitrates, sulfates, woodsmoke - BART - SB 656

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Species Analysis –Nitrates, Sulfates, OC, Coarse Mass, EC Attribution –Mobile Sources primarily; Boundary Transport Strategies (NAAQS non-attainment) –Diesel Risk Reduction, Goods Movement, BACM

GLIDE PATH BENCHMARKS Lowest Hurdles –coast at sea level –lee of Sierra Highest Hurdles –southern Sierra –southernmost C1As Regional Response to Reductions Gap Analysis

VISIBILITY IMPROVEMENT San Gorgonio GAP Analysis –Achieve 70% of 2018 deciview benchmark –45% reduction in nitrate extinction –11% reduction in OMC; 37% reduction in EC –slight increase in sulfate, coarse mass, and fine soil extinction Overall Trend is Improvement

WHO IMPACTS WHOM Uncontrollable Boundary Sources BART Sources Large Nearby Sources Caveats for Attribution Modeling Results Relative Percentage for Consultation >50%25-50%<25% Phase 1 Report TSSA: Combined Nitrate & Sulfate

REASONABLE PROGRESS Justify Reasonable Progress Goal using WRAP data analyses –Wildfires –Transport –Mobile sources, transportation corridors –Population growth and land use –Nearby stationary source facility Long Term Strategy –Explaining California SIP Commitments –Don’t shoot the messenger!

CALIFORNIA Class 1 Areas