Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS Overview Stan Thompson ~22 m ~44m. Inner Detector.
Advertisements

Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Dimuon Channel ( Z  μμ ) L uminosity ~180 pb -1 (recorded) 2 isolated muons with both having matching central tracks |η μ | 15 GeV 65.0 < M μ 1 μ 2
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
Detecting Particles Martin Gallacher – University of Birmingham.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Workshop on Quarkonium, November 8-10, 2002 at CERN Heriberto Castilla DØ at Run IIa as the new B-Physics/charmonium player Heriberto Castilla Cinvestav-IPN.
Jornadas LIP, Dez P. Martins - CFTP-IST The NA60 Silicon Vertex Telescopes Dimuon measurements Dimuon measurements Vertex telescope used in: Vertex.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Discovery potential of the Z´ boson with the 2010 ATLAS data Ariadni Antonaki Dimitris Fassouliotis Christine Kourkoumelis University of Athens XXIX Workshop.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
G. Eigen, LISHEP2011, Rio de Janeiro, July 5 th, Outline Introduction Introduction ATLAS detector and performance Vertex and impact parameter resolution.
Gideon Bella Tel Aviv University On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration ATL-PHYS-PUB ATL-PHYS-PUB Prospects of measuring ZZ and WZ polarization.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Herbstschule fuer Hochenergiephysik, Maria Laach, September 2007.
Z boson mass reconstruction Caroline Steiblin Prof. Al Goshaw Dr. Andrea Bocci Duke University 1.
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
1 c. mills (Harvard U.) 20 September, 2010 W and Z Physics at ATLAS Corrinne Mills Harvard DOE Site Visit 20 September 2010.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Detecting & observing particles
María Cepeda (CIEMAT, Madrid) Valencia, II CPAN days 1.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
A Search For Technicolor with the ATLAS Detector Jeremy Love.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE.
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
Associated production of weak bosons at LHC with the ATLAS detector
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
G Watts/UW Seattle2 SM Hidden Sector Phenomenology as complex as you wish Decay back to SM particles Scalar.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL Z′ Mass Reach MC Analysis USCMS meeting Brown University May 6 – 8, 2010.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Search for Supersymmetry in ATLAS with Early LHC Data Natalia Panikashvili University of Michigan HEP seminar, USTC August 25, 2010, Hefei, China.
H Y P A T I A HYbrid Pupil’s Analysis Tool for Interactions in Atlas
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
7/6/20101L. Rossi – IPRD10 - Siena Leonardo Rossi (INFN Genova) on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration IPRD10, Siena, June 7, 2010 ATLAS Status Brief recall.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Zvi Citron Correlations Between Neutral Bosons and Jets in Pb+Pb Collisions at 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS Detector Zvi Citron for the ATLAS Collaboration.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
Measurement of Muon Energy Loss in ATLAS
Top Quark Production at the Large Hadron Collider
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Di-muon decays of J/ψ mesons and Z bosons have been used to study the muon reconstruction and identification efficiency of the ATLAS detector as a function of the muon transverse momentum, from p T =4 GeV to p T =100 GeV, and the number of inelastic collisions per event. The results show a steep efficiency turn-on curve reaching its plateau value of 100% at p T ~ 6 GeV and no dependence of the muon reconstruction efficiency on the of pile-up. The studies also reveal that the use of inner detector tracks allows us to distinguish between isolated muons and non-isolated muons produced in jets with high separation power even at the highest pile-up levels. PLHC June, Vancouver ATLAS Inner Detector The pixel detector provides precise vertexing. The semiconductor tracker (SCT) provides precise momentum measurement. The transition radiation detector (TRT) gives additional R – ϕ information and improves momentum resolution. Together these systems provide precise momentum and vertex information. Inner Detector (ID) Track Uses the inner detector to measure particle momentum and position. Calorimeter-Tagged (calo-tagged) Muon An inner detector track with energy deposition in the calorimeter consistent with the ionization of a muon. ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Triggering and ϕ -positioning is provided by the RPC (in Barrel) and TGC (in Endcap). Precision positioning (in η) comes from the MDT and CSC. Together the MDT, CSC, RPC, and TGC provide muon reconstruction for all ϕ and |η| < 2.7. Stand Alone Muon Spectrometer (MS) Track Reconstructed muon using only the muon spectrometer. Combined (CB) Muon A MS Track matched to and statistically combined with an ID track (for Chain 1). The most accurate measurement of the momentum and position of a muon. Segment Tagged (CB+ST) Muon An ID track matched to segments in the muon spectrometer H  WW  lνlν Combined Muon H  ZZ  4l Segment-Tagged Muon SM WW  lνlν Combined Muon Z’  μμ Combined Muon Below 30 GeV: muon efficiencies and scale factors measured using J/ψ Tag and Probe. Tag: Chain 1 combined muon. Probe: a calorimeter-tagged muon from the barrel region. Efficiency: plateau at p T ~ 6 GeV. C OMBINED AND C OMBINED + S EGMENT T AGGED E FFICIENCY Above 15 GeV: muon efficiencies and scale factors measured using Z Tag and Probe. Tag: Chain 1 combined muon. Probe: a calorimeter-tagged muon. Efficiency: little variation with p T. C OMBINED + S EGMENT T AGGED E FFICIENCY J/ψ  μμ E VENT D ISPLAY Tag and Probe Select events with a triggered muon and a track the invariant mass of which is consistent with a resonance, J/ψ or Z, decaying to muons. If the triggered muon is well reconstructed, select it as the tag. The track becomes the probe. The Efficiency is the number of reconstructed probes (matched) divided by the total number of probes (matched+unmatched). The event display shows two muons with p T of 28 GeV and 15 GeV consistent with a boosted J/ψ decay. The separation, Δr, for such events is relatively small but to avoid a trigger bias a Δr cut is used to prevent the two muons from appearing in the same trigger Region of Interest (ROI). Pile-up Conditions in 2011 In 2011, p-p collisions have a center of mass energy of 7 TeV. The beam was squeezed in September (β* = 1.5 m to β* = 1.0 m) leading to a higher mean number of interactions per crossing. Blue line: operating conditions before September. Red line: operating conditions after September. Efficiency Dependence on Run Period in 2011 Efficiency is relatively stable versus run period. This indicates minimal dependence on detector operating conditions and pile-up. M EAN N UMBER OF I NTERACTIONS PER C ROSSING Muon isolation is required by many physics analyses. As a result measuring the muon isolation scale factors is necessary to properly model the effect of isolation cuts. Track Isolation: Little pile-up dependence. Calorimetric Isolation: Some pile-up dependence but good agreement between data and MC. T RACK I SOLATION Σp T (ΔR<0.3)/p T <0.15 Scale Factors for Z and J/ψ Compares the p T region 10 GeV – 15 GeV from J/ψ tag and probe to the 15 GeV – 20 GeV region from Z tag and probe. Scale factors from September – October 2011 shown. Agreement within systematic errors. S CALE F ACTOR VS η C OMPARISON BETWEEN J/ Ψ AND Z J/ψ Invariant Mass Peak C ALORIMETER I SOLATION Pile-up corrected ΣE T (ΔR<0.3)/p T <0.14 E FFICIENCY VS η F OR D IFFERENT R UN P ERIODS SM WZ Segment-Tagged Muon Υ(1S) Cross-Section Segment-Tagged Muon SUSY 3l+E T miss Combined Muon