National Aeronautics and Space Administration Long Duration Cislunar Habitation Andrea Riley | International Space Station Division | NASA HQ | May 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 Key Issues Review: Enabling Sustained Deep Space Exploration with a Broad Vision Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February.
Advertisements

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Presentation to the NASA Goddard Academy 2. Constellation Overview Ken Davidian Lead, Commercial.
The Vision for Space Exploration – Challenge & Opportunity ISS Panel Report Robert D. Cabana ISS Panel Chair March 30, 2005.
Asteroid Initiative Idea Synthesis Asteroid Crewed Systems Steve Stich – Deputy Director, JSC Engineering Mark McDonald- Concept Analysis Team Lead Join.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.
1 Architecture and Planning Strategies for Addressing Radiation, Space Weather, and Space Climatology Impact on NASA Missions Study Sponsor - NASA Office.
Ad hoc Biomedical Committee Report NIH/NASA MOU Exploration Technology Development Program (ETDP) Milestones 2009 Human Research Program Status For Section.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Future of Space Exploration Orion, Ares and Beyond.... AIAA / NSC / JPL Town Hall Meeting 26 April 2007.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
9/2/2010Innovative and Successful Partnerships SummitPage 1 Johnson Space Center Johnson Space Center Capabilities and Partnerships Ellen Ochoa Deputy.
Strategic Plan Elements: ISRU, Analog Outpost Mike Duke November 10, 2008.
Human Exploration And Development of Space NASA and North Carolina: Building Stronger Partnerships April 24, 2002.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
NASA Environmental Systems Commercial Space Technology Center (ES CSTC) Overview Briefing by William J. Sheehan Sept. 25, 2002.
The Return to Space Exploration Constellation. NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human.
1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.
Summary Description of Previous Studies Study NameDateSummary Description Exploration Office Case Studies NASA's Office of Exploration did four.
5-1 Constellation Space Suit System Government Capabilities and Facilities Crew and Thermal Systems Division.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
ESMD Education Presentation to Space Grant Directors March 2007 Jerry Hartman Exploration Systems Mission Directorate Education Lead.
1 Commercial Crew Program The Next Step in U.S. Space Transportation Brent W. Jett October 11, 2012 Commercial Crew Program - Same Crew…New Ride.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Engagement & Partnerships: Building on the Past, Boldly Collaborating for the Future Goddard.
Space Exploration Vision “This cause of exploration and discovery is not an option we choose; it is a desire written in the human heart.” – President Bush.
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
1 Wrap Up: Human System Risk Management for Human Space Flight Judith L. Robinson, Ph.D. AsMA/Human System Integration for Space Flight May 5, 2009 National.
Challenges & Strategies for Lunar Habitation Systems Larry Toups Advanced Projects Office Constellation Program October 2006.
1 Jennifer Fogarty Space Medicine Constellation Integration Lead April 21, 2009 Operations to Research: Communication of Lessons Learned.
PROGRAM UPDATE March 2012.
NASA’s Fifth Strategic Enterprise Office of Biological and Physical Research (Code U) NASA’s Fifth Strategic Enterprise Office of Biological and Physical.
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
HIAD Mission Infusion: Technology Development & Potential Utilization
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Probabilistic Technology Initiative for NASA Pam Caruso Technical Assistant to the Director, Engineering NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center Presented to.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transitioning Toward the Future of Commercial Human Spaceflight COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM AIAA Spring Dinner.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
0 International Space Station as a Testbed for Long-Duration Human Exploration Robyn Gatens, NASA HQ ISS Division Affording Mars Workshop, Dec 2, 2015.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Evolvable Mars Campaign Presentation to Affordable Mars Workshop Pat Troutman December 2015.
0 Space Exploration and International Cooperation Gilbert R. Kirkham Office of External Relations June 2004.
Near-Term Mars Colonization -A DevelopSpace Project- May 4 th, 2008.
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Evolvable Mars Campaign, SKGs February 24, 2015 Ben Bussey Chief Exploration Scientist HEOMD, NASA HQ NOTE.
SPACE TAXI Marcel Milanes December 14 th, 2010
ILC Dover Proprietary Information “Z” Suits” NASA’s Exploration Extravehicular Activity Space Suit Development Program FISO Telecon Phil Spampinato.
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
Recommendation to Cease NASA Crew Return Vehicle Development April 29, 2004 Amanda KellyBlake HajovskyAnthony Pittman Engineering Technical Communications.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
Phil Dempsey ISS Vehicle Office July 15, 2014 Inspection Considerations from the ISS Program NASA In-Space Inspection Workshop 2014.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Evolvable Mars Campaign in support of a Sustainable Journey to Mars The Evolvable Mars Campaign in support.
Affording Mars II: October, 2014 Turning Vision into Reality Humans to Mars Summit May, 2016 George Washington University Washington,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Environmental Control & Life Support Systems for Mars Exploration 2016 Humans to Mars Summit Robyn Gatens.
SLS Derived Vertical Habitat
The Year in Review 2016 Humans to Mars Report. Mars Science Paving the Way Notable Discoveries – The Past 5 Years Mars was once a habitable environment.
The Global Exploration Roadmap Considerations on Life Support International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) Francois Spiero, CNES Co-chair,
National Goals and Objectives
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
h t t p : / / w w w . u s c . e d u / g o / t t c
Return to The Moon: An International Perspective
Mars Sustainability Workshop Kennedy Space Center February 8, 2018
Key Benchmarks in a LEO Economy Robert L. Curbeam Jr.
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Fuel Cell Market size worth $25.5bn by 2024 Low Power Wide Area Network.
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
“Introduction to UPC-Orion” June 4, 2008
Presentation transcript:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Long Duration Cislunar Habitation Andrea Riley | International Space Station Division | NASA HQ | May 2016

Agenda Brief History Exploration Strategy Long Duration Habitation Capability Goals Habitation Capability Development Efforts 1

A Brief History of Beyond-LEO Spaceflight Architecture Development Leadership and America’s Future in Space National Commission on Space NASA Case Studies America at the Threshold 90-Day Study First Lunar Outpost Mars Design Reference Mission 1.0 Mars Design Reference Mission 3.0 DPT / NEXT Exploration Blueprint Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Challenger Constellation Program Lunar Architecture Team Global Exploration Roadmap Exploration System Architecture Study Bush 41 Speech Bush 43 Speech Columbia Obama Speech Human Journey to Mars – Thoughts on an Executable Program (JPL) Evolvable Mars Campaign Pathways to Exploration 2

3

Ends with testing, research and demos complete* Asteroid Redirect Crewed Mission Marks Move from Phase 1 to Phase 2 Ends with one year crewed Mars-class shakedown cruise Today 2030 Mid-2020s *There are several other considerations for ISS end-of-life Transition from ISS to Cislunar Space: Framework 4 Phase 0: Exploration Systems Testing on ISS Phase 1: Cislunar Flight Testing of Exploration Systems Phase 2: Cislunar Validation of Exploration Capability 4

Phase 1: Cislunar Flight Testing of Exploration Systems  Demonstrate that SLS and launch processing systems can insert both Orion and co-manifested payloads into cis-lunar space  Demonstrate that Orion and mission operations can conduct crewed missions in cis-lunar space at least for 21 days  Demonstrate Mars-extensible systems and mission operations that reduce risk for future deep space missions (with EVA) beyond 21 days Phase 1: Cislunar Flight Testing of Exploration Systems  Demonstrate that SLS and launch processing systems can insert both Orion and co-manifested payloads into cis-lunar space  Demonstrate that Orion and mission operations can conduct crewed missions in cis-lunar space at least for 21 days  Demonstrate Mars-extensible systems and mission operations that reduce risk for future deep space missions (with EVA) beyond 21 days Preliminary Top-Level Phase Objectives Phase 0: Exploration Research and Systems Testing on ISS  Test Mars-capable habitation systems – ECLS, environmental monitoring, crew health equipment, exploration generation EVA suit, fire detection/suppression, radiation monitoring  Complete human health & performance research and risk reduction activities  Demonstrate exploration related technologies and operations Autonomous crew operations Docking, prox ops Phase 0: Exploration Research and Systems Testing on ISS  Test Mars-capable habitation systems – ECLS, environmental monitoring, crew health equipment, exploration generation EVA suit, fire detection/suppression, radiation monitoring  Complete human health & performance research and risk reduction activities  Demonstrate exploration related technologies and operations Autonomous crew operations Docking, prox ops Phase 2: Cislunar Validation of Exploration Capability  Validate Mars class habitation and habitation system functionality and performance  Validate Mars class human health and performance  Validate operational readiness to leave Earth-Moon system via one year+ “shakedown cruise” (no resupply/crew exchanges, limited ground interaction, etc.) Phase 2: Cislunar Validation of Exploration Capability  Validate Mars class habitation and habitation system functionality and performance  Validate Mars class human health and performance  Validate operational readiness to leave Earth-Moon system via one year+ “shakedown cruise” (no resupply/crew exchanges, limited ground interaction, etc.)  Validate cislunar as staging orbits  Use of high power SEP for deep space missions  Asteroid related origins of the solar system science objectives  Demonstrate real-time robotic lunar surface activities  In situ resource utilization demonstrations  Validate cislunar as staging orbits  Use of high power SEP for deep space missions  Asteroid related origins of the solar system science objectives  Demonstrate real-time robotic lunar surface activities  In situ resource utilization demonstrations  Robotic manipulation technology and techniques demonstrations  Remote presence technology development and demonstrations  Earth/space science  Enable development of LEO commercial market  Robotic manipulation technology and techniques demonstrations  Remote presence technology development and demonstrations  Earth/space science  Enable development of LEO commercial market Origins of the universe, lunar rover volatile sample return Other scientific or research objectives? Origins of the universe, lunar rover volatile sample return Other scientific or research objectives? enables 5

4 Crew for days Common pressure vessel 15 year lifetime with long dormancy periods Design for reusability across multiple missions 100 m 3 habitable volume and dry mass < 22 t Autonomous vehicle health monitoring and repair Advanced Exploration ECLSS with >98% H 2 O recovery and 75% O 2 recovery from reduced CO 2 ECLSS System (w/o spares): <5 t mass, <9 m 2 volume, <4 kW power Environmental monitoring with >80% detection rate without sample return 14-kW peak operational power and thermal management required Autonomous mission operations with up to 24 minute one-way time delay Autonomous medical care, behavioral health countermeasures, and other physiological countermeasures to counteract long duration missions without crew abort Exercise equipment under 500 kg Provide g/cm 2 of radiation protection EVA pressure garment and PLSS <200 kg Contingency EVA operations with 1 x 2-person EVA per month Communications to/from Earth and between elements Live and operate in microgravity during trip to/from Mars 4 crew for up to 1,100 days 93 m 3 volume for logistics and spares Logistics Mass: 21 t 4 years dormant before use and between uses Live and operate in microgravity at Phobos 4 crew for up to approx. 500 days 48 m 3 volume for logistics and spares Logistics Mass: 10.7 t EVA system with Phobos mobility and dust mitigation 4-5 years dormant before use 3 years dormant between uses Live and operate on the Mars surface in 1/3 g 4 crew for up to approx. 500 days 48 m 3 volume for logistics and spares Logistics Mass: 10.7 t 4 years dormant before use 3-4 years dormant between uses EVA system with surface mobility, dust mitigation, and atmospheric compatibility 6 6

Specific Habitation System Objectives System IncludesTodayDeep Space Goal Life Support Air revitalization, water recovery, waste collection and processing 42% recovery of O2 from CO2; 90% recovery of H2O; <6 mo MTBF for some components >75% recovery of O2 from CO2; >98% recovery of H2O; >2 yr MTBF Environmental Monitoring atmosphere, water, microbial, particulate, and acoustic monitors Limited, crew-intensive on-board capability; rely on sample return to Earth On-board analysis capability with no sample return; identify and quantify species and organisms in air & water Crew Health exercise equipment, medical treatment and diagnostic equipment, long-duration food storage Large, cumbersome exercise equipment, limited on-orbit medical capability, food system based on frequent resupply Small, effective exercise equipment, on- board medical capabilities, long-duration food system EVA Exploration suitISS EMU’s based on Shuttle heritage technology; not extensible to surface ops Next generation spacesuit with greater mobility, reliability, enhanced life support, operational flexibility Fire Non-toxic portable fire extinguisher, emergency mask, combustion products monitor, fire cleanup device Large CO2 suppressant tanks, 2- cartridge mask, obsolete fire products. No fire cleanup other than depress/repress Unified fire safety approach that works across small and large architecture elements Radiation Protection Low atomic number materials including polyethylene, water, or any hydrogen-containing materials Node 2 CQ’s augmented with polyethylene to reduce the impacts of trapped proton irradiation for ISS crew members Solar particle event storm shelter based on optimized position of on-board materials and CQ’s with minimized upmass to eliminate major impact of solar particle event on total mission dose 7

Ends with Industry Developed Concepts – Decision on contract(s) continuation Ends with Industry Developed Concepts – Decision on contract(s) continuation Ends with: 1) Industry Developed Ground Prototype Module performing integrated tests, 2) identified standards, and 3) identified GFE – Decision point on contract continuation and if so, what contractor specific element(s) focus and NASA provided GFE Ends with: 1) Industry Developed Ground Prototype Module performing integrated tests, 2) identified standards, and 3) identified GFE – Decision point on contract continuation and if so, what contractor specific element(s) focus and NASA provided GFE Ends with Deployment and Operational Status of Deep Space Habitat NextSTEP BAA Habitat Development Approach 8 NextSTEP Phase 1 Obtain Innovative Cislunar Habitation Concepts that leverage Commercialization Plans Deliverables include Concept Description with concept of operations, Phase 2 proposal and SOW NextSTEP Phase 1 Obtain Innovative Cislunar Habitation Concepts that leverage Commercialization Plans Deliverables include Concept Description with concept of operations, Phase 2 proposal and SOW NextSTEP Phase 2 Continue Concept refinement and development of ground prototype module(s) and standards, culminating with an integrated test Contractor: Concept description with concept of operations, Phase 3 proposal and SOW, delivery of ground prototype module(s) NASA: Define reference habitat architecture based on contractor concepts and identified GFE in preparation for Phase 3 NextSTEP Phase 2 Continue Concept refinement and development of ground prototype module(s) and standards, culminating with an integrated test Contractor: Concept description with concept of operations, Phase 3 proposal and SOW, delivery of ground prototype module(s) NASA: Define reference habitat architecture based on contractor concepts and identified GFE in preparation for Phase 3 Phase 3 Development of Deep Space Habitat for Proving Ground Phase 1 Objectives Deliverables include Flight Unit (note may be multiple modules integrated via common interfaces and standards) Phase 3 Development of Deep Space Habitat for Proving Ground Phase 1 Objectives Deliverables include Flight Unit (note may be multiple modules integrated via common interfaces and standards)

NextSTEP BAA Phase 1: Habitation Awards (Habitats) 9 Bigelow Aerospace LLC | Las Vegas, NVLockheed Martin | Denver, CO Orbital ATK | Dulles, VA Boeing |Houston, TX 9

Questions